Category: Politics

Burien City Manager Filed Complaint Against Council Member Over Tweets

Burien City Councilmembers Hugo Garcia and Linda Akey

By Erica C. Barnett

Note: This post has been expanded and updated since its publication.

Burien City Manager Adolfo Bailon filed a human-resources complaint against Burien City Councilmember Hugo Garcia earlier this year over a series of tweets Garcia wrote expressing concern about the number of high-level employees who had left the city.

Garcia’s initial tweet quoted a story in the B-Town Blog about then-Burien police chief Ted Boe’s testimony in a lawsuit challenging the city’s near-total ban on unsheltered homelessness, or “camping.” In his testimony, Boe said Bailon had demanded a new police chief after Boe refused to direct King County sheriff’s deputies, who provide Burien’s police service, to enforce the ban.

“đźš©I’m concerned with continual departure of long time city employees since the arrival of our city manager and the interactions detailed in this article on how personnel [are] treated is a RED FLAG,” Garcia began, then listed four high-level employees who had left over the past 12 months.

“There is a good chance that our Chief of Police may too decide to leave sooner than later now too,” Garcia wrote. “Lawsuits, staff turnover, and deteriorating relationships [with] regional partners is bad.”

In his complaint, Bailon said Garcia had “made statements online that infer nefarious reasons for the departure of city personnel.” The city of Burien completely redacted the complaint, citing an exemption for “personal” information that would violate someone’s “privacy.”

UPDATE DECEMBER 16, 2024: After PubliCola appealed the redaction, the city provided an unredacted copy of Bailon’s complaint.

“I have submitted prior complaints against Councilmember Garcia due to prior statements made that were unsubstantiated, including a statement that work performed by the City ‘reeked of white supremacy,'” Bailon wrote.

“This is in addition to a verbal threat made by Councilmember Garcia in Fall of 2022 through telephone when he stated to me ‘if you start performing sweeps then you and I are going to have a problem.”

In 2023, Garcia commented that a proposal by other city council members to site a temporary homeless shelter in a low-income Latino neighborhood in order to keep it out of downtown Burien “reeked of white supremacy,” prompting Bailon to call Garcia’s statements  “baseless and slanderous in nature” in an email forwarding his complaint to Garcia. In the same email, Bailon suggested Garcia could be subject to “personal liability” in a potential lawsuit.

Garcia said Bailon claimed he was unaware of any concerns about high turnover at the city or the likely departure of then-chief Ted Boe. “He was like, ‘This is news to me. I’ve not heard that there’s an issue.'” Less than a month later, Bailon formally asked for Boe’s removal; Boe resigned to become the police chief of Des Moines in June.

After PubliCola posted this story on December 9, Bailon—who did not respond to our questions—ranted about PubliCola in response to a Burien resident’s letter to the editor of the B-Town Blog. After calling the resident a “a well-known and extreme political activist,”  Bailon accused me, by name, of supporting “the creation of a hostile work environment against subordinate public employees” and of failing to report on Garcia’s “slanderous statements” (which are quoted in this piece, although we do not agree they are slanderous.)

Bailon is apparently also still fixated on PubliCola’s reporting about his performance evaluation, which the city has refused to release. As we reported, the firm that performed the evaluation resigned its contract because, they said, the city wasn’t taking their recommendations seriously.

In his letter to the B-Town Blog, Bailon demanded to know why PubliCola hasn’t asked that “Councilmember Garcia release all documents related to any performance evaluations performed of him or his work while employed by King County.” (Garcia has not worked for King County since 2023). Bailon concluded by saying the lesson he learned from the Burien resident’s letter was that “I should exercise my right as a member of the public and submit my own request for public records to King County for all documents related to performance evaluations of Councilmember Garcia and his work.”

City councilmembers receive a “salary” of $750 but are essentially volunteers. Bailon makes more than $200,000 a year.

Garcia said he doesn’t know what, if anything, ever came of Bailon’s complaint against him. (The city of Burien has not responded to questions, but we’ll update if they do.) But he said he’s tired of being just one of two progressive council members, and the only one who is routinely shut out of internal meetings on city policy (sound familiar?)

Bailon told Burien staff and the rest of the city council that he would no longer meet with Garcia last September, despite the fact that Garcia—along with the rest of the council—is one of Bailon’s seven bosses.

“I have no support from the rest of the council or the mayor to get [Bailon] to act right,” Garcia said. “They’ve basically all shut me out.” He said he’s waiting until after the February election, when voters will decide whether to raise Burien’s minimum wage to about $20 an hour, before deciding whether to run again. But he said he’s come to believe he may be able to “do more good outside of the council, like I’ve been doing organizing and [working to pass] the minimum wage ordinance,” than on it.

The council has significant work ahead of it, including a planned levy to help address a growing budget gap and an ongoing debate over whether to slash the city’s human services budget in order to refill the city manager’s discretionary reserve fund.

Listen: PubliCola on KUOW (a Three-fer!)

By Erica C. Barnett

I was in the KUOW studios three times over the past week or so, including two appearances on Seattle Now (“Casual Friday” edition) with Patricia Murphy and one on Friday’s Week In Review, hosted by Bill Radke.

This week’s Casual Friday was something of a special occasion, because the other guest was Sandeep Kaushik, my co-host (along with David Hyde) on “Seattle Nice.” Sandeep, Trish and I had a great time talking about national news, including the Republican National Convention, MAGA’s influence in Washington, and (inevitably) the Trump assassination attempt, before returning to local news (AKA the stuff people in Seattle can actually do something about.)

In the past week, a Stranger writer was suspended for making a dumb joke on social media, an iconic monument to peace was cut off—literally—at the ankles, and ballots landed in mailboxes across the city, complete with “I Voted” stickers and an opportunity to choose between recently appointed Seattle Councilmember Tanya Woo and her highly motivated progressive challenger, Alexis Mercedes Rinck.

If you ever wanted a clean, cuss-free version of Seattle Nice, that’s pretty much what you’re in for here, including at least one moment where each of us struggles to think of a radio-friendly synonym for “bullshit.”

On “Week in Review,” Seattle Channel host Brian Callanan, Washington Policy Center senior researcher Paul Guppy, Radke and I debated whether ballot initiatives that repeal taxes—like a proposal to allow workers to opt out of a tax that funds long-term care insurance—should be required to include fiscal notes estimating how much such measures will cost the state.

I didn’t know much about this debate before this week, and I was surprised to learn that Republicans and libertarians oppose this kind of cost transparency—after all, isn’t it (in their view) a good thing whenever we reduce government spending?

PubliCola is supported entirely by readers like you.
CLICK BELOW to become a one-time or monthly contributor.

Support PubliCola

Continuing in that macroeconomic vein, we also talked about why some union leaders seem to be courting Trump (it was protectionism all along!) and an effort from the restaurant lobby to wiggle out of their obligation to start paying full minimum wage in Seattle, something they agreed to phase over 10 years when the $15 minimum passed a decade ago.

Also on the docket: A new fine for street racers, SPD interim chief Sue Rahr’s decision to fire infamous cop Daniel Auderer, and Sound Transit is finally getting rid of those inscrutable station pictographs.

Finally, if you missed last week’s Casual Friday, Jodi-Ann Burey and I were on talking about lake swimming, the Biden waiting game, and Seattle’s hot weather—all still topical!

Sound Transit Leaders Call Trains Dirty, Dangerous; San Francisco’s Experience with Sanctioned Camps; New Poll Tests Harrell Priorities

This graph is a metaphor: With no “Y” axis, an incomplete color key, and no definition of the three “issues” that are listed, it’s impossible to know whether these wavy lines represent an alarming increase in incidents or a modest pandemic-era increase.

1. Sound Transit board and staff members, including outgoing CEO Peter Rogoff, used an update on “current operating challenges” as an opportunity to portray the central light-rail system as a dirty and dangerous way to get around, especially during non-“conventional” hours, when fewer riders are on board. Only board member (and King County Councilmember) Claudia Balducci, of Bellevue, pushed back on her colleagues’ “unduly bleak” description of the system, saying, “it doesn’t match my own personal experience as a regular rider of our service.”

Almost since the beginning of the pandemic, Rogoff has argued relentlessly for increasing security and fare enforcement on trains, both to increase revenues and to punish people who fail to pay fare or behave in ways that make other riders feel unwelcome or unsafe. On Thursday, Sound Transit’s executive director of operations, Suraj Shetty, said the agency has had trouble retaining  private security and “fare ambassadors,” vest-clad staffers who check to see if riders have paid but do not issue tickets.

When the agency’s main private security provider, Securitas, failed to provide as many guards as they agreed to, Sound Transit contracted with two additional firms, both non-union—a fact that prompted a number of public commenters to accuse the agency of being anti-union. Sound Transit is also facing a shortage of drivers, cleaning staff, and maintenance crews.

Board member (and Pierce County Executive) Bruce Dammeier, a former Republican state senator, said he considered the system “unsanitary and unsafe,” adding, “I wouldn’t ride it,” and suggested stricter fare enforcement as a solution to problems like drug use and unclean conditions on trains. “We don’t want to stop running the trains at certain hours, but that is one of the solutions” to problems that become worse late at night, he continued. “Or maybe we put security guards on every train.”

Nancy Backus, the mayor of Auburn, chimed in, suggesting that the problems on trains are made worse by “some of the laws surrounding drug use, what police officers can and cannot do with low level property crimes and other issues.”

Responding to those comments, Balducci said that in her own “anecdotal experience” riding the system over the last two years, “this narrative that our system is falling apart just does not ring true to me. And we have to ask the staff and leadership of the staff to help us paint a truly accurate picture of what’s going on that we need to address.”

2. As PubliCola reported exclusively earlier this week, Seattle City Councilmember Andrew Lewis and Mayor Bruce Harrell’s office have been discussing a plan to relocate as many as 600 people living unsheltered in downtown Seattle into up to 10 sanctioned encampment sites. Lewis described the proposal as a humane way to transition people from unsheltered homelessness to housing as more permanent housing units become available this year.

The plan is also explicitly an attempt to make downtown more appealing to companies that want to bring workers back to the office this year—including the companies that funded a separate plan to “dramatically reduce unsheltered homelessness” downtown by navigating people to shelter and services elsewhere.

Seattle would hardly be the first West Coast city to create fenced tent encampments as a response to increased homelessness. San Francisco began opening sanctioned encampments in 2021 in response to an increase in unsanctioned encampments during the pandemic.

Jennifer Friedenbach, executive director of San Francisco’s Coalition on Homelessness, said unsheltered people in San Francisco said they preferred encampments to congregate shelter because, among other reasons, they offer more privacy and don’t have strict curfews or other rules common in mass shelters.

The drawbacks, Friedenbach said, are that the encampments are cold, tend to be expensive—around $70,000 per tent, per year—and are, obviously, not housing permanent housing. “Rental assistance with support services runs less than half” the cost of sheltering a person in a sanctioned encampment, she said. “So instead of sheltering you can just have housing for the people at half the cost.”

And, Friedenbach noted, San Francisco’s encampments are “used as a placement option in sweeps.” The Coalition did a report last year on San Francisco’s geographically focused efforts to eradicate (or “resolve”) encampments in specific neighborhoods, which found that most people who are displaced from one location end up unsheltered elsewhere, often after losing their possessions to sweeps. As in Seattle, there are typically only a handful of shelter beds available citywide for thousands of unsheltered people across the city.

3. A poll in the field this week was already taking Seattle voters’ temperature about new Mayor Bruce Harrell, interspersing favorability questions about the mayor with questions about his political priorities. For example, the poll asked recipients to rank priorities such as “expedit[ing] removal of homeless encampments from sidewalks and parks, with those of need of assistance being redirected into housing and services, with a minimum of 2,000 units brought into use this year”—a description of the Compassion Seattle initiative, which Harrell integrated into his campaign platform.

Continue reading “Sound Transit Leaders Call Trains Dirty, Dangerous; San Francisco’s Experience with Sanctioned Camps; New Poll Tests Harrell Priorities”

Police Chief Fires Two Officers Who Trespassed on Capitol Grounds During January 6 Attack

Image by blinkofaneye on Flickr; Creative Commons license.

By Paul Kiefer

Interim Seattle Police Chief Adrian Diaz announced in a blog post on Friday that he has fired officers Alexander Everett and Caitlin Rochelle for violating department policy and federal law by trespassing on the grounds of the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2020 while insurrectionists stormed the legislative chambers inside.

Using video evidence provided by the FBI, investigators from Seattle’s Office of Police Accountability (OPA) were able to place Everett and Rochelle at the steps of the Capitol as rioters clashed with police nearby. Though Everett and Rochelle told investigators they didn’t know they were trespassing in a restricted area, neither the OPA nor Diaz were convinced; in his letter on Friday, Diaz wrote that “it is beyond absurd to suggest that they did not know they were in an area where they should not be, amidst what was already a violent, criminal riot.”

But Everett and Rochelle—a married couple—were only two of the six Seattle Police Department officers who traveled to Washington, DC to attend former President Donald Trump’s “Stop the Steal” rally that preceded the attack on the Capitol. OPA investigators were able to place three of the officers elsewhere in the city during the attack. Though the fourth officer told investigators that he was not present for the attack, neither the OPA nor the FBI could corroborate his claim; investigators didn’t rule out the possibility that he trespassed on federal property.

Though Diaz chose not to discipline the other four officers who attended the rally, some members of the city council and Seattle’s Community Police Commission argued being present for the rally constituted grounds for firing all six. “I don’t understand how we can derive any other decision other than they were there to spur what those people did to storm the Capitol,” CPC Executive Director Brandy Grant said during a commission meeting in January. Continue reading “Police Chief Fires Two Officers Who Trespassed on Capitol Grounds During January 6 Attack”

Rachel Smith: The Chamber’s Recovery Agenda (And Why We Aren’t Endorsing Candidates This Year)

Seattle Metro Chamber President & CEO Rachel Smith. Photo by Alabastro Photography

By Rachel Smith

Global pandemic. Racial reckoning. Economic recession. Capital insurrection. Massive joblessness. Vaccine shortage. Unprecedented times.

This is the backdrop of the moment when I optimistically started in my new role as President and CEO of the Seattle Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce. And yes, I say optimism; optimism that comes from our region’s demonstrated ability to rebound and reimagine itself, as well as optimism about how the Chamber can play a central role in the work ahead. Today, we’re starting to see more signs of hope – and I’m even more excited to help lead one of our region’s civic voices as we begin to slowly emerge from these incredibly challenging times.

In 2021, the Chamber will not make candidate endorsements, nor will we engage in candidate spending through the Chamber PAC. Instead, we will focus on elevating – and pushing for – serious civic dialogue on the most pressing issues in our region.

First and foremost on my to-do list is driving a robust and inclusive regional economic recovery, and that starts with helping struggling small businesses secure federal PPP loans – including pro bono CPA services and connection to lenders; handing out PPE, helping business with Public Health guidance, standing up partnerships to distribute vaccines, and advocating for continued state and federal relief for employers.

Equity and inclusion are also core pillars of that recovery agenda, and we need to focus our economic tools and resources to create a change in outcomes. The Chamber will work to build wealth in historically excluded communities by investing in the retention and expansion of BIPOC-owned businesses, as well as providing all of our members with resources and guidance on becoming more anti-racist institutions.

Emerging from this pandemic in a position of strength also requires partnership with public officials and leaders throughout our region. I believe strongly that we accomplish the biggest things and make the most transformative change for the most people when we work in coalition – government, business, labor, and community. This moment does not call for small-ball victories; it calls for working together in common purpose to ensure that employers survive, people stay employed, the region is prosperous, and everyone has access to that prosperity.

That is the way I intend to lead at the Chamber—working in partnership to accomplish big things. And as with any new leader, you’ll see some changes. One of the first is a new approach to local and regional elections this year. In 2021, the Chamber will not make candidate endorsements, nor will we engage in candidate spending through the Chamber PAC. Instead, we will focus on elevating – and pushing for – serious civic dialogue on the most pressing issues in our region.

These issues include:

  • Specific economic recovery actions to ensure that large employers are able to bring employees back to safe and welcoming business districts, including downtown Seattle, and that small businesses can keep their doors open and attract the volume of customers they need.
  • Working toward racial justice to address longstanding and ongoing inequities
  • Utilizing strategies to address affordability issues so that people of all income levels can afford to live in our region.
  • Making real and sustained progress on homelessness, to bring people inside and provide access to services they need.
  • Implementing police reform and building trust in communities of color, in tandem with a robust plan to keep people and businesses safe.
  • Maintaining our aging infrastructure and a long-range vision for the future of transit and mobility.
  • Delivering on local government basics: light and power, garbage and recycling, potholes and sidewalks, parks and neighborhoods, employees and administration.

Why this switch from endorsements? We believe everyone who gains the trust of the voters and is elected to office has the responsibility to lay out their approach and commit to specific actions to solve our greatest challenges.

Especially in a time of economic crisis, helping all employers and their employees recover and thrive isn’t just a “business” issue.

Especially in a time of economic crisis, helping all employers and their employees recover and thrive isn’t just a “business” issue. Every candidate elected should have a plan to keep and grow jobs – not just candidates looking for the Chamber’s endorsement. Every candidate needs to share their plan for how they will address homelessness – plans measured not just in taxes raised and dollars spent, but in outcomes achieved and how many fewer people are spending their nights outside. Every candidate needs to talk about how they plan to deliver on the things we count on local government to provide – like dependable city services, community safety, and reliable transportation options.

And the Chamber can play a role in informing and educating the business community and the public about the issues, the candidates, and their plans. Continue reading “Rachel Smith: The Chamber’s Recovery Agenda (And Why We Aren’t Endorsing Candidates This Year)”

Evening Fizz: Another Call for Durkan’s Resignation, More Questions About Homelessness Reorganization

Two city commissions have called on Mayor Jenny Durkan to resign, and at least one more is considering it.

1. On Wednesday, the Seattle LGBTQ Commission—one of five volunteer city commissions that deal with the rights of marginalized groups—voted narrowly to demand Mayor Jenny Durkan’s resignation, joining the Human Rights Commission, which made a similar demand earlier this month.

In a letter outlining the reasons for their decision, the commission said the mayor had failed to take meaningful action on police violence and accountability; had continued to remove encampments without providing unsheltered people with adequate places to go; and had “repeatedly undermined the budget proposals supported by Black communities,” by, among other things, using JumpStart payroll tax revenues that were already allocated to COVID relief and housing for vulnerable communities to pay for a new $100 million “equitable investment” fund to be spent based on recommendations from a mayor-appointed task force.

The letter notes that deputy mayor Shefali Ranganathan was dispatched to speak to the commission to make the case for Durkan, as she did earlier this week at the Women’s Commission when it considered a similar move. According to the letter, Ranganathan told the commission that the mayor does not have direct authority over police actions (such as the use of tear gas against protesters) and that she supports a regional payroll tax, just not the local payroll tax the council already passed. (She made similar arguments at the Women’s Commission meeting Monday night).

“Mayor Durkan’s role is to serve as the executive for Seattle and not as a lobbyist in Olympia,” the letter says. “Ultimately, Mayor Durkan’s opposition to the Jumpstart legislation disempowered the process taken to get there, which included months of work from Black communities, Indigenous communities, other communities of color, labor, and many more to find a way to fund affordable housing.”

The mayor appoints nine members of the Human Rights, LGBTQ, and Women’s Commissions. All three commissions have numerous vacancies and expired seats, but there is currently no major imbalance between council-appointed and mayor-appointed board members on any of the three commissions.

Durkan is up for reelection next year.

2. As we’ve reported, the city council, mayor, and homeless advocates have been working toward a tentative agreement on a new approach to unsheltered homelessness—one that could include dismantling the Navigation Team and creating a new process where unsheltered people move quickly through hotel-based shelters and into new permanent supportive housing or market-rate units through rapid rehousing, a kind of short-term rental subsidy.

The mayor’s budget allocates nearly $16 million to lease 300 hotel rooms for 10 months, which works out to about $5,300 per room, per month, and about $9 million for rapid rehousing dollars to serve up to 230 households (which works out to an average per-household cost of about $3,300 a month).

Support PubliCola

PubliCola is supported entirely by generous contributions from readers like you. If you enjoy breaking news, commentary, and deep dives on issues that matter to you, please support this work by donating a few bucks a month to keep this reader-supported site going—and expanding!

If you don’t wish to become a monthly contributor, you can always make a one-time donation via PayPal, Venmo (Erica-Barnett-7) or by mailing your contribution to P.O. Box 14328, Seattle, WA 98104. We’re truly grateful for your support.

“I’m guardedly optimistic,”  Alison Eisinger, the head of the Seattle/King County Coalition on Homelessness, told PubliCola. “I have some hope that there are folks [at the city] who recognize that requiring people to move, without addressing the state of homelessness, was never effective before COVID and is completely deficient now.” 

One element of the plan that has gotten little attention so far is that it would be extremely short-term. Funding for the hotel would run out after about 10 months—right around the 2021 election, if the city started leasing the hotel rooms at the beginning of next year. The extra funding for rapid rehousing would also come from temporary COVID relief dollars that expire next year. The upshot is that if the city wanted to rent the 300 hotel rooms and continue the rapid rehousing expansion after the one-time runs out, they would have to find a new source of funding for both. Continue reading “Evening Fizz: Another Call for Durkan’s Resignation, More Questions About Homelessness Reorganization”