Courts, homelessness, King County, Mayor Wilson, Transportation

This Week on PubliCola: April 18, 2026

Homelessness Authority Undergoes Forensic Audit, County Assessor Won’t Have to Wear Ankle Monitor in Stalking Case, and More News from this Week

Monday, April 13

Seattle Nice: Mayor Wilson’s Shelter Plan, King County Assessor’s Stalking Charges, an Ambitious Library Levy, and More

On the podcast this week, we talked about Mayor Wilson’s plan to build 500 new tiny house village-style shelter units by this summer; stalking charges against King County Assessor John Arthur Wilson; and the latest library levy, which will dwarf the most recent such levy at nearly half a billion dollars.

Tuesday, April 14

King County Assessor Says He Can’t Wear Ankle Monitor In Stalking Case

County assessor Wilson, whose term ends this year, failed to show up to a court hearing where he planned to argue that he couldn’t wear a court-ordered ankle monitor because of a medical condition. His lawyer cited scheduling confusion as the reason for his absence from the virtual hearing.

Burien Puts City Manager on Leave

The Burien City Council, which has a new progressive majority, placed controversial city manager Adolfo Bailon on administrative leave this week. Bailon recently fired Burien’s city attorney, who was reportedly helping the city council figure out the process for ushering Bailon out the door.

Bicycle Weekends Will Be (Almost) Every Weekend This Year

Mayor Wilson announced the dates for Seattle’s annual “Bicycle Weekends” event, in which the city opens up Lake Washington Boulevard in Seward Park to cyclists and pedestrians during summer weekends. Unlike her predecessor, who killed longstanding plans to install stop signs and speed humps on the dangerous lakefront boulevard, Wilson is expanding the safe-street program to include every summer weekend (except Seafair) and three holidays.

PubliCola is supported entirely by readers like you.
CLICK BELOW to become a one-time or monthly contributor.

Support PubliCola

Wednesday, April 15

King County Assessor Won’t Have to Wear Ankle Monitor in Stalking Case

King County Assessor John Arthur Wilson, who was arrested and charged with stalking after he showed up repeatedly at his former fiancée’s house in violation of a no-contact order, will not have to wear an ankle monitor, a Seattle Municipal Court judge ruled, due to a medical condition that Wilson said requires him to soak his legs nightly. The monitor would have alerted Keller if Wilson violated the order by coming within 1,000 feet of her.

Thursday, April 16

Mayor Wilson’s “Shelter Acceleration” Plan Moves Forward, With Some Questions Unanswered

The City Council approved two pieces of legislation to advance Mayor Wilson’s proposed shelter expansion this week and moved a third bill forward, clearing a legal path for the city to build larger tiny house villages on a shorter timeline and providing $5 million to help pay for the first of 1,000 new shelter units Wilson has said her administration will add this year. But the council had questions about how the mayor plans to make her shelter plans sustainable, given ongoing budget deficits.

Friday, April 17

As Seattle Goes It Alone on Shelter, Homelessness Authority Faces Forensic Financial Audit

The King County Regional Homelessness Authority will not oversee any of the new shelter contracts, the Wilson administration confirmed to PubliCola. KCRHA is currently undergoing a forensic audit into its accounting and budgeting practices, a sign of strong concern from both the city and King County, its two primary funders.

City Council, homelessness, Mayor Wilson

As Seattle Goes It Alone on Shelter, Homelessness Authority Faces Forensic Financial Audit

By Erica C. Barnett

One group that was notably missing from a public discussion of Mayor Katie Wilson’s shelter expansion plan was the King County Regional Homelessness Authority, which is supposed to manage every publicly funded homeless shelter contract in the region. Instead, the city is going it alone in Wilson’s top campaign priority—building 1,000 new units of shelter, such as tiny house villages, in 2026, and a total of 4,000 by the end of her term.

Wilson’s team has said they can move faster if the city does the work. But they’re also waiting on the outcome of a major forensic audit that could shed unfavorable light on the KCRHA’s finance and budgeting practices. That audit, which the city is paying an outside consultant more than $600,000 to conduct, has been going on since August and is supposed to wrap up this month. (King County is also helping to pay for the audit.)

So far, Wilson’s team has not suggested that they’re concerned about KCRHA’s ability to administer homelessness contracts; instead, they’ve said it’s just easier and more logical for the city to do it.

Near the end of a city council committee meeting on Wednesday, for instance, Council President Joy Hollingsworth asked whether the KCRHA would “have a role” in the city’s big shelter expansion plans. Or, Hollingsworth asked, “are we transitioning that a little bit now to what we’re doing at the city, because those outcomes have not been—I’ll just be frank—what the public has anticipated for the money that we have been spending or giving to the King County Regional Homelessness Authority?”

Jon Grant, Wilson’s homelessness advisor, hemmed and hawed. “You know, we have, I think, a very important partnership and relationship with the King County Regional Homelessness Authority. …. And I think that collaboration will continue.” But, Grant said, it just makes more sense for the city itself to oversee the new shelters and administer contracts through the city’s Human Services Department—”in parallel to the work that we are also still doing with KCRHA and the work that they’re doing to operate the existing base of shelters,” of course.

Former mayor Bruce Harrell also worked to bring some of the work KCRHA was overseeing back in direct city control—focusing specifically on outreach and homelessness prevention, two areas the Harrell Administration said KCRHA “did not have the capacity” to oversee, given that they busy trying to implement Partnership for Zero—a plan, later abandoned, to end unsheltered homelessness in downtown Seattle.

PubliCola is supported entirely by readers like you.
CLICK BELOW to become a one-time or monthly contributor.

Support PubliCola

 

The forensic audit is taking a close look at the KCRHA’s finances—including the agency’s ongoing negative budget balance, which I wrote about last year. (KCRHA essentially starts every year with a fund balance of zero and borrows money, with interest to pay contractors throughout the year, paying back the loans when they receive money from funders.)

According to the city’s contract with consultant Clark Nuber, issued last July, the audit will “assess and document King County Regional Homelessness Authority’s (“KCRHA”) use and allocation of contributed funds; analyze the underlying drivers of its recurring negative cash position; assess the adequacy of the accounting infrastructure, information flow, and reporting; evaluate and reconcile cash advance activity to understand and identify issues related to reporting and reimbursement; and provide best practice recommendations to improve systems and processes.”

The audit was supposed to wrap up in December but the city extended the contract until the end of April late last year.

The homelessness agency has been audited before, by the state auditor and the King County Department of Human and Community Services, which raised serious concerns about the KCRHA’s accounting and monitoring practices—finding, for instance, that the agency had spent grant funding on ineligible projects, failed to executive projects on time, and had accounting errors that led to a negative balance at the end of the year.

The audit covers the period between 2021, when KCRHA started operations and July 2025. According to the contract, “If issues or suspected malfeasance are identified, the Consultant will propose additional targeted procedures to further investigate, which may include considerations such as expansion of the time range under scope, performing data analytics, staff and management interviews, and other related procedures.”

It’s unclear whether this audit, like the earlier ones, will find concerning issues with KCRHA’s internal accounting and budget practices, although early reports from people familiar with the process say it’s unlikely to be flattering. What is clear is that the city and county, which provide nearly 80 percent of the KCRHA’s budget, are following the outcome closely.

A spokesperson for Wilson told PubliCola the mayor’s office is “certainly aware of the audit, which was jointly commissioned by the previous administrations at the County and City. The mayor is concerned about KCRHA’s stewardship of public funds and will be asking hard questions about their financial controls & effectiveness.”

A spokesperson for DCHS said the department “supports the audit to gain a more clear and accurate understanding of KCHRA’s cashflow and to confirm that the organization has strong internal controls in place to sustain long-term cash management, including invoicing processes.

And a spokesperson for King County Executive Girmay Zahilay said, “Strong financial stewardship, transparency and accountability, and achieving tangible progress in addressing the homelessness crisis that impacts every part of our region are top priorities for Executive Zahilay. Once the full audit report is received, the County will work with the City and other partners to determine next steps.”

City Council, homelessness, Mayor Wilson

Mayor Wilson’s “Shelter Acceleration” Plan Moves Forward, With Some Questions Unanswered

By Erica C. Barnett

The Seattle City Council approved two pieces of legislation to advance Mayor Katie Wilson’s proposed shelter expansion this week and moved a third bill forward, clearing a legal path for the city to build larger tiny house villages on a shorter timeline and providing $5 million to help pay for the first of 1,000 new shelter units Wilson has said her administration will add this year. (Earlier this month, Wilson announced the first new shelter that will open as part of her “shelter acceleration” plan—a 75-unit Pallet shelter on 15th Ave. W in Interbay).

But council members raised questions about the timeline and long-term funding for the new shelters, which are supposed to serve people with various needs, ranging from people priced out of market-rate housing to those with profound substance use disorder and other behavioral health needs. The legislation allocated existing funds for the shelters, but they’ll need ongoing funding through the city budget, which is facing a deficit of more than $140 million.

“I will say that in these few months of a new mayor, we have yet to understand exactly what the plan is for the rest of the year, and in most circumstances, the council would not pass a budget bill without an exact plan nailed down,” Councilmember and budget committee chair Dan Strauss said. ” [A] higher level of care means that there’s a higher financial cost, and I think that we have to just really reckon with that, because without spending those additional dollars, we’re not going to see the outcomes that we are setting out to achieve today.”

The first bill adopted Tuesday gives the city’s Department of Finance and Administrative Services the authority to sign leases and make property improvements on behalf of nonprofit agencies that operate tiny house villages or other types of “transitional encampments,” a change aimed at reducing the time it takes to open new shelters. The legislation also allows the city to negotiate leases at “market rate,” rather than capping the price for land.

The second bill allocates $8.2 million to new shelters by using up the balance of two city funds—a revolving loan fund for affordable housing that was “underutilized,” according to a council staff analysis, and a human services fund that’s restricted to projects in downtown Seattle.

Councilmember Eddie Lin’s land use committee took up the third and final bill for the first time on Wednesday. It would increase the maximum size of tiny house villages from 100 occupants to 15o and allow one “pilot” village with up to 250 residents—a reduction from Wilson’s original proposal, which would have allowed one such village in every council district.

PubliCola is supported entirely by readers like you.
CLICK BELOW to become a one-time or monthly contributor.

Support PubliCola

 

The council attached several amendments to the funding and leasing legislation before passing the two bills on Tuesday, including:

  • A requirement that each new shelter sign a “good neighbor agreement” committing to “address community concerns” as they arise, along with a written plan “to keep the area surrounding the shelter safe, clean, and free of unsanctioned encampments” (Rob Saka);
  • A list of reporting requirements, including monthly reports on “public safety indicators” around each new shelter (Debora Juarez) and a detailed report, due in September, showing how the mayor’s office plans to add 4,000 shelter units by the end of 2029 (Bob Kettle);
  • A new work group that will set the “acuity level” for future shelters (low, medium, or high—terms that are not currently defined or used in limiting clientele at Seattle’s existing shelters) and lay out the exact service types each level of shelter will provide (Strauss); and
  • A requirement that at least one of the new shelters established this year be an abstinence-only “recovery” shelter (Maritza Rivera).

Staffers with Wilson’s office repeatedly emphasized that they plan to work closely with both the Seattle Police Department and the city’s encampment-removing Unified Care Team to enforce public safety requirements around new tiny house villages, including the provision that makes shelter operators responsible for whether people pitch tents anywhere in the vicinity of the new shelters.

“The Seattle Police Department already enjoys a strong collaborative relationship with the Human Services Department via the Unified Care Team, which visits many of the existing encampments on a regular basis, and through the Find it Fix It app and criteria for resolving encampments that become dangerous or obstructions to public access to public spaces,” Wilson’s public safety advisor Alison Holcomb told the council on Wednesday.

The UCT’s criteria for encampment sweeps were established under the previous two mayors and codified by the Harrell administration in a matrix that focuses on where a tent is located rather than the individual circumstances of the people being swept.

During her campaign, Wilson opposed indiscriminate encampment sweeps, but has since told PubliCola that she doesn’t plan to make “earth-shattering changes” to the way the Unified Care Team operates. The 116-member team, which has exclusive access to hundreds of shelter beds, managed to get someone into a shelter bed for at least one night just 903 times in 2024.

Jon Grant, Wilson’s chief advisor on homelessness, said the mayor’s office hasn’t identified a site for the initial 250-person tiny house village because it would be premature to announce a location before the council adopts legislation allowing it.

Grant said the first 500 tiny homes will be aimed at “high-acuity,” chronically homeless people who need more intensive case management and wraparound services. (The cost of these services has been a bit of a question mark, as the mayor’s office has only announced an average cost, $28,000, for the first 1,000 shelter units she has said the city will open this year.) However, he said, there is “nuance” in that designation

“Within that range, folks can be chronically homeless for lots of different reasons,” including a disability that prevents them from having a full-time job who just needs “somebody to help them get their their ID and get connected to a rental subsidy program to move them into housing,” Grant said.

 

 

Courts, King County

King County Assessor Won’t Have to Wear Ankle Monitor in Stalking Case
Seattle Municipal Courthouse in downtown Seattle.

By Erica C. Barnett

King County Assessor John Arthur Wilson, who was arrested and charged with stalking last year after he showed up repeatedly at his former fiancée Lee Keller’s house in violation of a no-contact order, will not have to wear an ankle monitor, a Seattle Municipal Court judge ruled Wednesday. The monitor would have alerted Keller if Wilson violated the order by coming within 1,000 feet of her.

Wilson—who failed to show up at his scheduled hearing yesterday, citing confusion about the date— told Seattle Municipal Court Judge Andrew Simon that he has a medical condition, called lymphedema, that requires him to soak both his legs every day; the ankle monitors the city uses are not supposed to be submerged in water. Addressing the court this morning, Keller said that in the four years she was involved with Wilson, she had never seen him soak both his legs because of this condition.

Wilson’s attorney, John Polito, suggested he was being targeted because he is a public figure. “If his name was John Smith, I’m not sure he would be here in this position,” Polito said. (Wilson has refused to resign from his elected position).

Simon said he saw no other choice than to reverse the previous order that Wilson wear an ankle monitor. He asked Keller if she has a smartphone, so that she’ll have “a way of recording any phone calls in the moment.” He also advised her to take screen shots if Wilson attempts to contact her by email, text message, or over social media, “and of course, then you can report that to the city.” If Wilson violates the order, Simon said, he’ll be arrested again.

“He will not be violating this order, and if he does, he will incur this Court’s wrath… its legal wrath,” Polito said. Wilson agreed emphatically, saying. “Let me assure you, I will have absolutely no contact with Miss Keller for as long as I live. We are done.”

In a statement, Keller said, “My only goal is to be protected from further contact with John Wilson.  I expect he will obey the court’s very clear order and refrain from contacting me.”

From a 2025 conversation between John Arthur Wilson (messages in white) and Lee Keller. Source: Case file

According to Keller, Wilson contacted her repeatedly after he was arrested for stalking her last year. She provided two screen shots of messages Wilson sent through a shared scheduling app on March 27, shortly before she obtained a new protection order against him last week. The messages referred to an event Keller was attending that night; while she was there, she said, he posted a Facebook reel that showed him at a bar two blocks away.

Keller first obtained a protective order against Wilson in 2024. At that time, she accused him of creating fake social media personas to contact her after she blocked him; taking photos of her without her knowledge and texting them to her; tracking her whereabouts, and showing up at her home uninvited. That August, Keller said, Wilson contacted the employer of a man she had dated to falsely accuse him of sexually assaulting her in an attempt to get him fired.

Although Keller and Wilson briefly reconciled, she got another protection order against him the following year, after he refused to stop contacting her despite her pleas to leave her alone, according to Keller’s account. In one message, Wilson responded to Keller’s all-caps demand that he leave her alone by saying “never,” then continuing to text her. In an effort to get that protection order overturned, Wilson attempted to paint Keller as vengeful and unstable. He was arrested outside her house three weeks later.

Even before Wilson’s arrest, the entire King County Council demanded he resign his elected position as county assessor. His term ends in December. Wilson’s next court date, for a pre-trial hearing, is scheduled for May 5.

Courts, Mayor Wilson, Parks

King County Assessor Says He Can’t Wear Ankle Monitor In Stalking Case Due to Medical Condition, Burien Puts City Manager on Leave, and More

1. King County Assessor John Arthur Wilson failed to appear at his court hearing in Seattle Municipal Court on Tuesday, where he was scheduled to explain why “medical issues” prevent him from wearing an ankle monitor while he awaits trial on charges of stalking his ex-fiancée, Lee Keller. Wilson’s attorney said his client was confused about the date. The court will hold another hearing tomorrow so that Wilson can attend.

According to a court filing, Wilson told a staffer for the company that provides GPS monitors, Sentinel, that he can’t wear a monitor because he “must regularly soak both legs in water to help reduce swelling” from a medical condition. “Sentinel policy states that the GPS device must not be submerged in water,” the “failure to enroll” filing says. Wilson also said he has to wear compression socks and “reported the device felt tight and indicated that additional space would be necessary to allow him to properly remove and put on his compression socks. Due to these factors Sentinel did not enroll Mr. Wilson on the GPS with exclusion zones obligation.”

Wilson was arrested earlier this year after showing up repeatedly outside Keller’s home in violation of an existing no-contact order. In court filings last year, Keller detailed Wilson’s history of stalking and harassing her over a period of several years. Seattle Municipal Court magistrate Noah Weil issued a five-year no-contact order against Wilson last week  and ordered him to wear a GPS monitor that would alert Keller if Wilson comes within 1,000 feet of her. During that hearing, Wilson said he would have “no problem” complying; the ankle monitor was meant as an assurance that he would not violate this protection order as he has with previous orders to stay away from Keller.

2. The Burien City Council decided, in a closed-door executive session, to place city manager Adolfo Bailon on administrative leave last night, voting 4-3 to remove him and direct the city’s contract interim city attorney, Ann Marie Soto, to find an interim replacement.

The reason the city has a contract city attorney is that Bailon summarily fired former City Attorney Garmon Newsom III earlier this month, PubliCola has learned. (Newsom would have been the person providing legal advice to the council as they discussed whether and how to remove Bailon). This could be among the reasons the council’s four progressive members voted to place Bailon on leave after a lengthy executive session with Soto Tuesday night.

Officially, the council has not given a reason for removing Bailon from his position, and PubliCola was unable to get any councilmember to comment on the record about what led them to consider removing him in the first place. (Executive sessions are closed to the public and considered attorney-client privileged.) Administrative leave is paid and is not considered punitive in itself.

However, it’s not hard to imagine any number of possible reasons beyond Bailon’s decision to fire the city attorney. Back in 2023, the city council (then dominated by more conservative members) stood by Bailon as he shot down efforts to stand up a homeless shelter on land owned by the city, threatened legal action against a church that hosted an encampment, turned away $1 million in shelter funding from King County, and more.

Bailon also berated council members who disagreed with his political views on homelessness, filed a complaint against Councilmember Hugo Garcia over  tweets, demanded the removal of the King County sheriff’s deputy who served as Burien’s police chief, and apparently spent much of his time calling 911 on unsheltered people in the park outside his office, among many other actions that arguably stretched the limits of his authority as a city employee.

PubliCola is supported entirely by readers like you.
CLICK BELOW to become a one-time or monthly contributor.

Support PubliCola

 

Under Burien’s city manager-council form of governance, every city employee technically works for the city manager, and he works for the seven-member city council. Three years ago, an outside firm resigned over what they described as the council’s refusal to take critical evaluation of Bailon’s performance seriously. With a council less sympathetic to Bailon’s actions and political opinions, he could be on his way out after four years in the role, for which he is paid around $240,000.

3. Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson announced the dates for Seattle’s annual “Bicycle Weekends” event, in which the city opens up Lake Washington Boulevard in Seward Park to cyclists and pedestrians during summer weekends. And unlike her predecessor, who killed longstanding plans to install stop signs and speed humps on the dangerous lakefront boulevard, Wilson is expanding the safe-street program to include nearly every summer weekend, except during Seafair, and three holidays.

That means that cyclists and pedestrians, including wheelchair users, will have access to the roadway more summer Sundays than any year in the past. Under Harrell, who lives nearby, the car-free celebration happened only on alternate weekends, for a total of 20 days. Wilson is expanding that to 15 summer weekends and a total of 33 days, including three holidays. Details (including where drivers can park outside the car-free zone) on the city’s website.

homelessness, Mayor Wilson, podcasts

Seattle Nice: Mayor Wilson’s Shelter Plan, King County Assessor’s Stalking Charges, an Ambitious Library Levy, and More

By Erica C. Barnett

If you aren’t listening to Seattle Nice, the weekly podcast I co-host along with political consultant (and my former Stranger colleague) Sandeep Kaushik and longtime reporter and producer David Hyde, now’s a great time to tune in—in the last couple months, we’ve talked to City Councilmember Eddie Lin about plans to increase density across the city, debated Mayor Katie Wilson’s apparent plan to move forward with the police surveillance cameras she once opposed, and talked to Downtown Seattle Association director Jon Scholes about the DSA’s unusually sunny forecast for the future of downtown.

This week, we talked about the mayor’s plan to build 500 new tiny house village-style shelter units by this summer, stalking charges against the King County Assessor (who has refused to step down despite a unanimous King County Council vote demanding his resignation), and the latest library levy, which Sandeep said was just another example of Seattle’s willingness to pay any amount of taxes for any purpose.

Sandeep said he was impressed by the mayor’s announcement last week that the city will open 75 new shelter beds in Interbay and expand tiny house villages in two other locations. The biggest unheralded news, he thought, was the announcement that T-Mobile, Starbucks, and Microsoft are all helping to fund the mayor’s initial shelter push, kicking in around $3 million so far.

As someone who’s genuinely excited by Wilson’s ambitious agenda but skeptical about her ability to upend the Seattle Process, I argued it’s too early to declare victory—noting, for instance, that the last time the city participated in a privately backed venture to address homelessness, the “Partnership for Zero” effort to eliminate visible homelessness downtown, they got burned—that initiative, spearheaded by the King County Regional Homelessness Authority, fell apart when it proved harder to house people directly from the street than the homelessness agency anticipated, and funders pulled out, forcing the partnership to shut down in 2023.

PubliCola is supported entirely by readers like you.
CLICK BELOW to become a one-time or monthly contributor.

Support PubliCola

People who’ve been around Seattle’s homelessness system for a while say they’re hopeful about the mayor’s plan, but I’ve also heard concerns that it’s too focused on a single shelter type—tiny house villages—and too optimistic about the timeline for siting nearly 1,000 more tiny house units around the city in the next nine months. Another concern is cost—Wilson’s team has said the average tiny house unit will cost $28,000, all in, but that estimate seems low, given the higher cost of existing villages with the kind of wraparound services and 24/7 security Wilson has suggested will be available at each site.

All that said, you know who didn’t really even bother trying to add shelter in Seattle? Wilson’s predecessor Bruce Harrell, who promised to add 2,000 “shelter or housing” units by the end of his term but ended up using dubious math (taking credit for shelters that were underway by the time he took office, for instance) to claim he had actually added 3,000. (In reality, by the end of Harrell’s term, there were around the same number of shelter beds in Seattle as when he took office). In other words, even if Wilson gets no further than the initial 100 or so additional tiny houses she announced last week, she’ll have increased shelter more than Harrell did in his entire four years in office.