1. Bike and bus advocates showed up in force for a “town hall” meeting featuring District 4 city council member Alex Pedersen in Eastlake last night, but many said afterward that the moderators who chose the questions from a stack of cards submitted by the public—a representative from the Eastlake Community Council and a Pedersen staffer—rejected or ignored their questions.
I was live-tweeting the forum, and noticed early on that most of the questions seemed to be from people opposed to a planned protected bike lane on Eastlake, rather than the dozens of bike lane supporters in the audience. For example, early questions centered on how businesses were supposed to deal with the loss of hundreds of parking spaces directly on Eastlake Avenue; why cyclists couldn’t just ride on a parallel greenway somewhere near, but not on, Eastlake’s business district; and what can still be done to prevent King County Metro from replacing the milk-run Route 70 with a RapidRide bus route that will be faster and more frequent but won’t have as many stops.
During the meeting, I noticed that a pile of questions had been set aside, and that the moderator seemed to be favoring questions from people who opposed bike lanes and RapidRide over questions from the bike lane supporters who packed the room. So I asked via Twitter: If you were at the forum and asked a question that didn’t get answered, what was it?
Pedersen was fairly circumspect in his responses, suggesting repeatedly that people contact his office and promising he would get back to them by email. He did, however, say he supported changing the Eastlake bike lane plan—which has been debated, studied, and affirmed repeatedly over a period of several years—so that cyclists would have to shift back and forth between the arterial and short stretches of “greenway” on unnamed parallel streets. “I think [the Seattle Department of Transportation] should look harder at a combination of protected bike lanes on some part of it and greenways on some of it,” Pedersen said.
Invoking the specter of 35th Ave. NE, where a long-planned bike lane was scuttled after neighborhood activists complained that the loss of on-street parking would destroy local businesses, Pedersen added: “There was a lack of transparency” about the proposed bike lane, which he opposed. “People were just trying to figure out what was going on with it.”
“I think [the Seattle Department of Transportation] should look harder at a combination of protected bike lanes on some part of [Eastlake] and greenways on some of it.” — City council member Alex Pedersen
During the meeting, I noticed that a pile of questions had been set aside, and that the moderator seemed to be favoring questions from people who opposed bike lanes and RapidRide over questions from the bike lane supporters who packed the room. So I asked via Twitter: If you were at the forum and asked a question that didn’t get answered, what was it? Here are some of their (slightly edited) answers:
• Given that every study shows bike lanes make streets safer for everyone and are good for business (and that cyclists spend more than drivers), what data are you paying attention to? How will you incorporate the data that already exists about protected bike lanes around the world?
• Have you seen any analysis of the percentage of people who are NOT in Eastlake that commute to Eastlake for any of the businesses that are afraid of losing 320 parking spots? Do people drive to 14 Carrots from other parts of the city?
• Have you seen any research about the actual impact of bike lanes on businesses?
• What options are you prioritizing to help my whole family get around without using a car?
• Many people bus and bike through Eastlake, but don’t stop because traffic is so dangerous. What can be done to make Eastlake more welcoming to visitors and encourage fewer single occupancy vehicles, supporting the goal of Vision Zero?
• When will the city consider a residential parking zone in Eastlake (which prevents people from commuting in by car and parking all day in neighborhoods)?
• Why is the RapidRide and bike lane project important for Eastlake and the surrounding area?
Jessica Westgren from Welcoming Wallingford, a group that supports housing density and alternatives to driving, asked Pedersen verbally why he wouldn’t return calls and emails from her organization. Pedersen responded that she should send him an email, ideally including specific information such as “I’m having this issue on my block.”
2. Mayor Jenny Durkan announced that the city will be distributing 700 doses of naloxone (Narcan), a drug that can reverse opioid overdoses, in response to a surge in overdoses from fentanyl in counterfeit oxycodone pills—and, in particular, an increase in the number of teenagers who have died of fentanyl overdoses. Fentanyl is especially deadly, and overdoses happen quickly; an overdosing person can die long before first responders arrive, which is why having Narcan on hand (and knowing how to use it) is so critical.
Durkan said that kits will be distributed in schools, bars, and nightclubs—”any place where it is likely that someone might overdose.” The city is also planning 25 Narcan training workshops.
Since Seattle public libraries are among the places people use opioids—and are, because staff are always present, safer consumption sites than alleys or parks—I asked if the libraries would also start stocking Narcan, and if library workers would be trained to use it. (The library system has been slow to adopt harm reduction policies, and only added sharps containers in restrooms after I published several stories on the issue last year.) Durkan said “we’d like them in the libraries,” but her staff added later that this would be an issue for the library union to negotiate.
Library spokeswoman Andra Addison later confirmed that the library does not have current plans to stock Narcan or train library workers to use it. “The Library currently uses 911 for all medical emergencies. Use of Narcan in our libraries would involve union representatives, and those discussions are just under way,” Addison says. Asked to clarify what the issue would be for the library union, Addison said, “working conditions and the impact on working conditions.”
3. City council member Lisa Herbold has released a copy of the letter I mentioned on Wednesday, urging Durkan to confirm that she will release all the funding the council provided for the Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion program in its adopted budget no later than March 1, and to affirm that LEAD—which offers alternatives to arrest for people suspected of committing low-level crimes—is a crime prevention program, not a homelessness program. Durkan has hired a consultant to look at LEAD’s performance and to determine performance metrics for the program; currently, LEAD is classified as a homelessness intervention and required to meet housing goals, even though more than a quarter of its clients are not homeless.
Herbold’s letter, which was also signed by Andrew Lewis, Alex Pedersen, and Tammy Morales (the other members of her Public Safety Committee) raises a few additional points about LEAD that are worth mentioning. First, the letter notes that requiring LEAD to move a certain percentage of clients into housing assumes that there is housing available and that they are eligible, but because LEAD clients tend to score low on the metrics used to prioritize people for housing (for example, they’re young, haven’t been homeless for a long time, or are not disabled), they rarely qualify for the housing that is available. “LEAD program managers have appealed to the City to assist in creating a channel for housing this population, but no changes have yet been made in addressing the barriers this group faces in accessing housing.”
Second, Herbold notes that LEAD has already released performance data on a number of existing measures—including the time it takes to outreach and enroll clients, the number of clients newly entering treatment for addiction or mental-health disorders, and housing outcomes.
The letter requested answers to four questions about LEAD funding by today. I have reached out to Herbold and the mayor’s office and will update this post when I hear back.
I attended the town hall by bike. the ECC were the hosts and ran the program. there were about three dozen in support of the cycle track who had their picture taken. the room was not packed. I heard several questions about pedestrian and bicycle safety. A transit network design issue is whether Route 70 should become RR and serve the Brooklyn Link station and the UW campus, or whether the RR should extend to the Roosevelt Link station and force longer walks between RR and Link. Councilmember Pedersen provided a clear answer. Here is a question not asked: should paid parking be used in Eastlake?
Please do not join the Library in scapegoating the library workers’ union here. Of Course the Library would need to negotiate the details of adding a major new job responsibility – say, saving human lives – to their workers’ jobs – not just with regards to yea/nay, but how it is to be established and carried out, by whom, securing commitments and responsibilities for training all people involved, liability for the employee, etc. There are a lot of messy details. The Library has yet to make a proposal to the Union, and when they do this will be negotiated. I’d imagine the same would be the case for the schools.
I am curious about other statements here, suggesting the mayor is going to simply sprinkle the city and the schools with NARCAN kits, and job done. I’m not disagreeing with the general notion that this needs to happen, but let’s be clear: it is the people on the front lines – thousands of teachers, custodians, librarians, parks workers, security officers, etc – who will be on the hook for making this actually work. Please be careful not to scapegoat workers if they want to be sure in their dealings with the City that any such initiative is carried out in an effective, safe and responsible way. Working out the details may not be all that thrilling, but it is absolutely necessary.
Thanks.
Thanks for covering the Eastlake Community Council-fronted “town hall” meeting.
It shoud be noted that the Eastlake Community Council is essentially a private dues-paying group that elect themselves to promote a NIMBY agenda that most residents of Eastlake do not agree with.
Their webpage http://www.eastlakeseattle.org/ doesn’t include a list who their Board consists of, indicate how many members they have, or have any other comparable transparency.
The board is listed on the Washington Secretary of State website: Joyce Lane, Stephen Dunphy, Detra Segar, Ben Wildman, Margaret Sanders, Allison Peryea, Judy Smith, and Isaiah Berg.