This story originally appeared in the August issue of Seattle magazine.
On a day in late spring, David Lucas, 26, is standing in front of Seattle Municipal Court Judge Damon Shadid, waiting to find out if he gets to go home.
Lucas (not his real name) has been locked up in the King County Jail in downtown Seattle for nearly a month. Today, he’s facing a charge of trespassing at a grocery store—the same store where he’s been arrested many times, usually for stealing food. He’s been homeless off and (mostly) on for about a dozen years, and has a chronic mental illness that’s been exacerbated by his habit of smoking meth. Unless he can convince Shadid that he’ll stay out of trouble, he could be going back to jail for a while.
Lucas is part of Seattle’s visibly homeless population, the cohort featured in a KOMO-TV special called “Seattle Is Dying,” which aired in the spring. Although this group makes up a small percentage of the city’s overall homeless population, its members commit an outsize percentage of the kind of low-level drug and property crimes—such as shoplifting, trespassing and public urination—that KOMO highlighted in its special, which amplified the conversation about this subset of the homeless population.
Cases like Lucas’ pose a fundamental question: Is the arrest of people with severe addiction and mental illness who break laws a solution to chronic homelessness? Or is patience and compassion a more effective approach?
Under ordinary circumstances, a judge might look at Lucas’ file—which includes dozens of arrests since 2011—and send him straight back to his cell. But Lucas is no ordinary defendant, and this is no ordinary court session. Like many other clients who sit at the defendants’ table in this courtroom every Wednesday morning, Lucas is supported by a new program that provides case management, legal aid and mental health services to people who, like him, have complex mental health challenges and whose competency to defend themselves in court has been called into question. His advocates this morning include Daniel Garcia, his case manager; Heather Aman, the prosecutorial liaison with the Seattle City Attorney’s Office; and Judge Shadid, who talks at length about the progress Lucas has made.
After a few minutes of deliberation, Shadid decides to release Lucas on the condition that he stay away from the neighborhood where he keeps getting arrested. And when Lucas leaves jail tomorrow, he’ll leave with Garcia, who has been assigned to help him stay on track. He’ll go to sleep tonight not on the street, but in transitional housing, a kind of way station between homelessness and permanent housing. Later in the week, he’ll have an appointment with the occupational therapist who is helping him with the life skills he’ll need to stay out of this courtroom. And his mental health care will be supervised by a team from the Downtown Emergency Service Center (DESC), including a mental health professional who will monitor his progress and adjust his meds if needed.
All of these services are available to Lucas thanks to a $3 million, 18-month expansion of the existing Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) program, a collaboration between law enforcement agencies, the Public Defender Association and Reach, the street-based case management program for which Garcia works. The expansion, which zeroes in on offenders with mental illness, traumatic brain injuries, addiction and other debilitating cognitive conditions, was funded by a 2018 settlement in a landmark case known simply as Trueblood. The settlement created a pool of money for programs to help defendants at risk of being “warehoused” in jails while they await hearings on their competency to stand trial.
When a new client joins the program, any pending charges against that person are put on hold, giving the client time to work with case managers, health care providers and housing specialists. The goal of the program is to reduce criminal activity, but also to give people facing extra challenges the tools to deal with the root causes of their behavior outside the traditional street-to-jail pipeline.
“Historically, the prosecutor says, ‘You’re bad, you should be sentenced to this [amount of time], and the judge agrees, ‘You’re bad, I’m sentencing you to this,’” Aman says. “We’re trying to create a system where we say, ‘I’m interested in hearing about what you’re working on so we don’t have to see you back here.’”
The new funding has allowed LEAD to partner with DESC—an agency serving homeless adults with mental health and substance abuse issues, and disabilities—and Community House, a transitional-housing provider with three properties in North Seattle. Together, they offer wraparound services and transitional housing to clients with complex challenges and extensive criminal histories. (The program expansion also allows LEAD to take on clients charged with offenses that are ordinarily outside the program’s purview, including property destruction, trespassing and interfering with a law enforcement officer.) The new team, which currently serves about 50 clients, includes a nurse, a mental health professional who can prescribe medication, two case managers and an occupational therapist.
“Sometimes people just aren’t ready, especially when they are struggling with mental health. … If a person’s not there yet, it’s kind of a lost resource.” – Daniel Garcia, LEAD case manager
Over a period of months, Trueblood case managers build trust with potential clients and get them enrolled in the program, then offer services slowly, based on what a client can tolerate. Often, potential clients have been living on the streets with untreated mental illness for years; they’re reluctant to sign up for services offered by strangers because they’ve been burned by the system so many times. And although many Trueblood clients have substance use disorders, advocates say mandatory, abstinence-based treatment often does more harm than good.
“They’ve been traumatized by systems,” Garcia says of his clients. “They’ve been unjustly discriminated against, with this whole mind-set that [addiction is] a choice. And sometimes people just aren’t ready, especially when they are struggling with mental health. And what [some] don’t recognize is that if a person’s not there yet, it’s kind of a lost resource.”
Hector Herrera, the LEAD supervisor for Reach, agrees that “shoehorning people” into treatment before they’re ready can backfire, sometimes disastrously. “It’s really important to make sure that we define what success is, and that we define it as the achievement of the goals that the clients set out for themselves,” rather than goals someone else sets for them, like completing treatment.
By spending time with clients and letting them define their own goals—whether it’s showing up for appointments, using clean needles or just bathing every few days—the program aims for gradual improvement, not overnight transformation.
“A lot of what we deal with is really just navigating daily life,” says Brittany Meek, the clinical programs entry services manager for the DESC’s Community Outreach and Advocacy Team (COAT). “I have a home and running water, and I still can’t remember to take my vitamins every day. So why do we have these unrealistic expectations of folks who don’t know where they’re going to sleep at night or where their next meal is going to come from?” By using a gradual approach, the Trueblood team works to build trust in the hope that its clients accept help for their immediate needs and slowly begin to participate in some of the program’s ongoing services, with the goal of improving their health and ultimately stopping the behavior that keeps getting them arrested.
“Jail doesn’t fix things. It’s temporary. It removes them from causing impacts on the community, but eventually they get out and will resume where they left off unless we can figure out actual solutions.” — Heather Aman, prosecutorial liaison, Seattle City Attorney’s Office
“We don’t force our agenda on anybody,” Meek says. “If they’re like, ‘Leave me alone, don’t mess with me,’ we’ll leave them alone, but we’ll also circle back, because they might just be having a bad day, and we don’t want them to slip through the cracks.”
Some might wonder why the county would expand a program that encourages leniency and patience at a time when many neighborhoods are crowded with unsanctioned encampments and property crime is on the rise. Meek says she frequently hears from residents frustrated by seeing people sleeping in doorways, using drugs in public or leaving piles of trash in city parks. “There needs to be an understanding that things can’t be fixed overnight. We’re trying to take pressure off the jail systems and hospitals and reallocate resources to be more effective. At the end of the day, we’re trying to save tax dollars, too.”
Aman, the city’s prosecutorial liaison, says her reason for supporting the program is simple: Locking people up doesn’t get at the root cause of what’s leading them to commit crimes in the first place—things like mental illness, addiction and chronic homelessness. “Jail doesn’t fix things. It’s temporary. It removes them from causing impacts on the community, but eventually they get out and will resume where they left off unless we can figure out actual solutions,” Aman says.
Slowly, the program is yielding results. Although an official analysis will have to wait until the end of this year, when the pilot program finishes, caseworkers and those on the prosecutorial side of the LEAD-Trueblood equation say that program participants are using the extra services, including mental health care and occupational therapy, to make the kind of gradual improvements that will result in fewer arrests.
Ultimately, program supporters say they’ll know it’s successful if it reduces the amount of time clients spend in jail and improves those clients’ ability to handle the day-to-day aspects of life that most of us take for granted—such as paying bus fare or showing up for appointments—and that, in turn, will have the benefit of reducing their impact on neighborhoods.
“It’s really meeting folks where they’re at and trying to get them to a point where they can live independently,” says Carolanne Sanders, the LEAD program specialist at King County’s Behavioral Health and Recovery Division. “It’s more than just psychiatric medications and getting people a place to live. It’s an intensive care network aimed at helping a population with a long history of not being able to meet their [own] needs and getting them on a better path.”
As is true for virtually every social services program in Seattle, housing remains a persistent bottleneck for LEAD Trueblood clients. Community House, which provides transitional housing with renewable three-month leases, can house and provide services for as many as 16 Trueblood clients at a time, but the need is obviously much greater. And the program has no permanent housing component, which is a significant problem, given that a majority of Trueblood class members are homeless or unstably housed, according to the state Department of Social and Health Services.
Another outstanding issue is that LEAD can’t enroll people accused of most violent crimes, meaning that the people who may cause the greatest consternation for neighborhoods are outside the program’s reach. “We can advocate for folks, but when it comes down to it, it is law enforcement assisted diversion,” Herrera says. “As much as I would want to serve some of these folks—because, yes, they have these charges, but they’re also very vulnerable—we have to accept that.”
4 thoughts on “A New Criminal-Justice Approach That Acknowledges “Addiction Isn’t a Choice””
You think “Seattle is Dying” proponents just want is to send people to jail? LEAD is exactly the type of program that “Seattle is Dying” proponents are screaming for – action! We are on the same side. The tragedy is the mysteriously tragic lackluster support from leadership (Mayors, City Councils, City Attorney) of the past 10 years for programs like LEAD, but why? If “leadership” of the past 10 years has been in favor of programs like LEAD, then why has LEAD and other programs like it been continuously woefully underfunded and understaffed? It is as if leadership of the past 10 years has only wanted to enable addiction, mental illness, and homelessness rather than take actions that would help it. 2 City sports stadiums plus the Seattle Convention Center have been built for way less money than the billions spent on homelessness, so where is their supportive housing which “leadership” themselves proclaim is such a high priority? We should have giant apartment complexes by now with the money that has been spent. What has really been going on here in this city for the past 10 years?
You think “Seattle is Dying” proponents just want is to send people to jail? LEAD is exactly the type of program that “Seattle is Dying” proponents are screaming for – action to help the people that need it most! We are on the same side. Who’s fault is it that there continues to be zero synergy between jail and drug/mental treatment? The tragedy is the mysteriously tragic lackluster support from leadership (Mayors, City Councils, City Attorney) of the past 10 years for programs like LEAD, but why? If “leadership” of the past 10 years has been in favor of programs like LEAD, then why has LEAD and other programs like it been woefully underfunded and understaffed? 2 major sports stadiums plus the Seattle Convention Center have been built for way less money than the billions spent on homelessness, so where is the supportive housing which “leadership” themselves proclaim is such a high priority? We should have giant apartment complexes by now with the money that has been spent. What has really been going on here in this city for 10 years now?
Important questions not addressed: What is the rate of LEAD clients returning to jail on new charges? Info presented to the city council showed that the effect on overall number of crimes committed by the individual enrolled in LEAD did not go down. How much money is being spent per LEAD client? How many are actually following through on receiving services consistently? Why is LEAD expanding to include diverting – i.e., not prosecuting – crimes with victims? Why has LEAD not produced relevant stats for 5 years? Why is LEAD using old stats that relate to a specific cohort of prostitutes and applying the results to other crimes, making it not an apples to apples comparison? Before we pour even more millions in to LEAD, we need answers.
Comments are closed.