On Seattle Nice this week, Sandeep, David, and I discussed the mayor’s track record at six months in, starting with her approach to encampment sweeps, which have continued at a steady clip through the new mayor’s tenure.
Some Wilson never promised to “stop the sweeps”—before she ran for mayor, we had her on the podcast to talk about a piece she wrote for the Stranger titled “Where the Left Went Wrong on Homelessness”—but she did say she would moderate the aggressive sweeps of the Harrell administration. Wilson also set an aspirational goal for new shelters (specifically, tiny house village units): 500 by the World Cup, 1,000 by the end of this year.
So far, the Wilson administration has fallen far short of that goal, and sweeps have continued apace. (Wilson has also embraced Purpose Dignity Action’s approach to encampment resolution, which involves longer-term outreach and shelter or housing options that are actually tailored to people’s needs, but that sort of solution is limited by funding and political will).
In an interview published in two parts on PubliCola last week, Wilson said it was important to keep “high-priority” areas like parks and sidewalks clear. Discussing her comments on the podcast, I said sounded an awful lot like the way her predecessor Bruce Harrell justified accelerating sweeps, saying it was important to keep parks and sidewalks open for their intended use.
Sandeep argued that Wilson is “charting a new path for the left” by reversing the “stop the sweeps” attitude that led the city to stop removing encampments during the pandemic. As I repeatedly interjected, the business-backed mayor at the time, Jenny Durkan, actually stopped sweeping encampments in response to guidance from the CDC during Trump’s first term, and the sweeps were quickly resumed once the immediate emergency was over. At no time was “the left” in control of the city’s sweeps team during those years.
Wilson has also faced headwinds that Harrell didn’t, including conflicts with the council—some self-inflicted, others a matter of ideological differences.
As we discussed, one of the items Wilson ticked off in her list of achievements—securing funding in the Families, Education, Preschool and Promise (FEPP) levy plan for universal school meals—was undermined the very day of our interview, when Council President Joy Hollingsworth and Councilmember proposed using the school-meal money to pay for vouchers for weekend and holiday lunches for low-income kids. The debate over whether children’s access to food at school should be means-tested or universal is still ongoing.
The upcoming budget will also be a test of both mayor-council relations and Wilson’s ability to get her priorities through the legislative process. We discussed the challenges the mayor will face while navigating likely spending cuts (Harrell, who was running for reelection when he drafted his final head-in-the-sand budget, knowingly left Wilson with a starting deficit of $140 million, which has risen to around $175 million), including council members who oppose any slowdown in SPD hiring.
During our interview, Wilson said she’s retaining Police Chief Shon Barnes. But I heard an unspoken “for now.” Sandeep, citing unnamed sources “in her orbit,” says I’m wrong. Who’s right? I’m sure we’ll talk about that more on a future episode!


Well, the first 6 months haven’t been a total disaster for Mayor Wilson. Regardless of her policies, I believe housing starts will define the rest of her 1st term. Over the last couple of decades, robust construction numbers has given the City budget a lot of money to work with and provided solid job growth numbers. If housing starts climb again, the budget deficit shrinks, employment numbers get better and the general economic outlook for the City gets brighter.
The flip side is permits for new construction stall out this Winter and budget gap and unemployment get worse. Most of this isn’t really in the mayor’s control, but rolling out new taxes may not be q good idea. It’s really not the most opportune time to be Seattle Mayor, there are a lot of economic headwinds right now the last few mayors didn’t have to face.
Housing starts…. Aren’t you just adorable? We are never again going to see housing construction as we have for the past 20 years. Housing starts are DEAD. Nobody is going to build an apartment building in Seattle when you must also finance affordable housing units, can’t evict anybody for non-payment of rent, can’t raise rents sufficiently to deal with property taxes and other constantly inflating expenses.
Housing starts…. Check back in 2058.
I am optimistic that Seattle’s Social Housing Developer will take this on. There are a lot of places it could get started building exactly the kind of housing that is needed…mixed market rate and subsidized, all in the same footprint, no “poor door” or income segregated facilities
I doubt social housing will do much of anything over the next couple years. Tiffani McCoy has zero construction experience and building apartments isn’t easy or cheap. There’s a whole lot of difference between being a real leader and an activist. Until “House Our Neighbors” hires people with real world development and construction experience, the organization will just bump along and buy a building every now and then…. and buying buildings doesn’t help the housing crisis one bit because it doesn’t add any new housing to the equation. So far we have maybe 15 units of “social housing” and 15,000 applications? It’s a bad joke and the tax payers certainly deserve better.
So far “House Our Neighbors” are making sure social housing never works in Seattle. An organization can’t receive hundreds and millions of dollars and fail to produce results long term.
Jump Start is going to the general fund Bruce spent. $309 million his last year. So housing is being hamstrung on purpose. Bruce is a NIMBY champion and erased several town centers. Katie made them reappear and a law to make the NIMBY stop with meritless complaints.