1. The Seattle Public Library is, once again, renting out public space to an organization dedicated to eliminating the rights of trans people—this time, a trans eliminationist group called Women’s Declaration USA, which will hold a panel discussion in the large auditorium of the Central Library downtown at 7 pm on Sunday, November 17.
Like other anti-trans groups, the WDI argues that being trans is an “ideology,” and that their goal is to stop people from believing they are trans, not to eliminate specific trans people. However, their policy prescriptions are dangerous for trans women, in particular, making them potential targets for anti-trans violence and subjecting them to legal discrimination. For example, the group supports banning trans women from using all women-only spaces as well as girl’s and women’s sports; one of the speakers at next week’s event, April Morrow, recently wrote that allowing trans women to be jailed with other women will subject cis women to attacks by “serial killers, pedos, and rapists.”
According to the invitation, WDI’s event will include discussions about “the atrocity of pediatric sex change”; a rehash of the Olympus Spa case, in which a trans woman sued a Tacoma women’s spa for kicking her out; “K-12 indoctrination”; “how women’s prisons in Washington state are no longer safe for women due to the inclusion of men,” and other inflammatory topics. (In fact, trans women in men’s prisons are at high risk for sexual assault, forced prostitution, and other dangers. According to The Marshall Project, just 10 of the approximately 1,000 trans women in federal prison are incarcerated in women’s prisons.)
The panel will include six different anti-trans activists, including Morrow; Amy Sousa, who argues that “the cult of trans ideology is one of body dissociation and external validation seeking”; detrans activist Elle Palmer; and Carol Dansereau, an activist who argues that parents should avoid “affirming” their gender-nonconforming kids’ gender identities and raise them as the sex they were assigned at birth.
Echoing a blog post the library posted last month, library spokeswoman Laura Gentry said, “Unless speech expressed by a group booking a Library meeting room directly incites imminent criminal activity or comprises specific threats of violence, it is protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
“The Seattle Public Library works hard every day to support and amplify the voices of vulnerable or historically excluded groups, including trans and queer communities,” Gentry added.
The directors of Capitol Hill Pride and Lynnwood Pride, Charlotte LeFevre and Philip Lipson, asked the library to cancel the event, arguing that members of WDI are associated with far-right militia groups. In response, library director Tom Fay said the library couldn’t cancel the event, but doesn’t endorse the views of WDI or any other group; he also noted that WDI agreed to hold their event after hours “to mitigate potential disruption and address concerns from staff,” and that the library will have additional security, including Seattle Police Department officers, on hand.
The library hasn’t figured out how much it will cost to have extra security, including police, on hand for the event, but Gentry said the funding for security comes from SPD’s budget, not the library’s. WDI paid $1,150 to rent the auditorium, including a $250 security fee.
PubliCola is supported entirely by readers like you.
CLICK BELOW to become a one-time or monthly contributor.
2. The state Public Disclosure Commission has dismissed a complaint against a Burien resident by Burien City Manager Adolfo Bailon, who accused Rashell Lisowski of violating state law during a Burien City Council public comment in October, when she urged the council to pass legislation raising the city’s minimum wage to $20 an hour instead of sending the proposal to voters.
During the meeting, Burien City Attorney Garmon Newsom II told Lisowski to stop “campaigning for an initiative.” She did not urge a yes vote on the measure, but did say Burien residents supported a higher minimum wage.
In addition to asking the council to pass the higher minimum wage, Lisowski—who owns a small business in Burien and works for Washington Community Action Network—used her two minutes to talk about her personal experience working for low wages in the service industry.
Lisowski said it was her first time speaking at a city council meeting, and she found the way the city attorney and city manager “zoomed in on me” shocking. “I didn’t know why they were treating me like that,” she said. “If I wasn’t someone that had been in public speaking situations or had experience dealing with people treating me like that, I would have felt very intimidated and silenced. … I’m a constituent, and they treated me like I had no stake at all in the community.”
The state’s Open Public Meetings A/ct prohibits elected officials and public employees from using public facilities, or allowing them to be used to promote political campaigns. The PDC dismissed the complaint because Lisowski is not a public official, and noted in their dismissal—issued just one week after Bailon filed his complaint—that it’s up to the presiding officer of the city council to stop people from electioneering, meaning that Burien Mayor Kevin Schilling, rather than any member of the public, could be liable if he let people use public comment to campaign.
In his complaint, Bailon described Lisowski as “the perpetrator” and provided “screenshots of the Washington Community Action Network website that promotes Ms. Lisowski as an organization employee [and] a website screenshot hosted by the Transit Riders Union, sponsor of Initiative Measure 24.001, that promotes involvement from Ms. Lisowski in their campaign effort.” According to Burien budget documents, Bailon made $225,000 as city manager this year.

So both Publicola and The Stranger are both giving air to this event at the library and, for some reason, don’t understand why the Seattle PUBLIC library can’t just deny access to people they don’t like. The library is 100% correct: they can’t just deny a group that wants to reserve space at the PUBLIC library because Erica and The Stranger whine about it. The First Amendment doesn’t just apply to viewpoints and people that you agree with – this isn’t that hard of a concept (well, maybe it is since TWO media publications are all upset about it).
And FYI… if The Stranger and Erica didn’t cover this story, 99.99% of the Seattle population wouldn’t even know anything about this library event or WDI… all you’re doing is giving WDI free publicity. So know we’ll get the “counter protest”, the two sides will yell at each other, nothing will get solved or change, and then everyone will go on about their business. Yawn.
I think the answer is clear— bring back Drag Storytime to the library
I’m glad the library is not stifling WDI’s free speech rights. They have the absolute right to say that men cannot become women, that men should not be showering in women’s restrooms, should not participate in women’s sports and should not be housed in women’s prisons. After all, the vast majority of humans all across the globe agree with WDI.
“… an organization dedicated to eliminating the rights of trans people…”
No, that’s not true.
“We are a dedicated group of volunteer women from across the country focused on protecting women’s sex-based rights.”
https://womensdeclarationusa.com/about/
Furthermore:
“WDI USA categorically rejects violence as a form of activism.”
Why is this the one topic that can’t be discussed ?
It’s unethical for a journalist to ask the government to violate the first amendment
I want to know who Bailon has compromising photos of. He got his (presumably terrible) job evaluation suppressed, leading to the evaluation firm resigning its contract with Burien. He has now filed several spurious complaints against members of the public who say things he doesn’t like at council meetings. He failed to inform the council of a one million dollar grant for housing unhoused people until it was very nearly too late to accept it… and then the council refused to spend it so they lost it anyway? He seems to think Burien is his fiefdom to run as he wishes and the council majority seems to support him in that behavior.