Homeless Authority Funds Pallet Shelter, JustCARE, and Just One of Three Proposed Tiny House Villages

By Erica C. Barnett

The King County Regional Homelessness Authority will fund 50 new tiny house and Pallet shelter units and partially extend the JustCARE hotel-based shelter program, using federal and city of Seattle funds. The awards, announced last week, will go to three projects: A new 25-unit tiny house village operated by Chief Seattle Club and the Low-Income Housing Institute; a 25-unit expansion of Catholic Community Services’ existing Pallet shelter village on Elliott Ave. W, and partial funding for Public Defender Association-led JustCARE hotel-based shelter program, which will receive ongoing operating funds for its 90-room Equity JustCARE program.

The authority rejected three applications, including two for new LIHI tiny house villages—one at a Seattle City Light-owned property in South Lake Union (where Therapeutic Health Services had committed to provide on-site behavioral health care), and one just north of Rainier Beach, where the Refugee Women’s Alliance (ReWA) planned to provide case management

Last year, advocates for tiny house villages pushed the mayor’s office to move quickly to use $2.4 million in existing city dollars to fund three new villages before the authority—whose director, Marc Dones, has been critical of the tiny-house model—took control of the regional homelessness system. When that didn’t happen, the money moved over to the authority, which issued an open request for proposals for the money, along with funds from the federal government totaling another $2.4 million.

“We wanted to be kind of the opposite of NIMBY. We said, ‘We’ll give you the money if you put the [village] next to us.'”—John Pehrson, Mirabella Civic Engagement Project

In a meeting of the KCRHA’s governing board last week, KCRHA chief programming officer Peter Lynn said the authority picked the three projects “in rank order,” adding that three proposals “did not receive funding based on running out of funds, as happens.” The RFP itself, which was extended and amended to allow Pallet (a for-profit company) to apply for funds, includes the criteria the authority used to evaluate the applications.

The three programs the KCRHA will fund, however, did not use up all the funding that was available; according to KCRHA spokeswoman Anne Martens, the Public Defender Association “did not request development funding, so there is a total of $919,812 of unallocated funding ($696,515 of [Department of Commerce capital] funds, and $223,297 of HSD services & operations funds). The raters did not want to partially fund an organization and suggested allocating additional funds during contract negotiations.”

PDA co-director Lisa Daugaard said her organization expects to work with the KCRHA to come up with a site or sites to replace the downtown Seattle hotel where Equity JustCARE has been providing shelter and services to clients with high-acuity behavioral health needs since last year. “We don’t have a site, and understand RHA will be matching the team to a site that is appropriate for participants with complex behavioral health needs,” Daugaard said.

The PDA is still working with the city to come up with a plan for another 150 JustCARE clients currently living in five different hotels; without additional funding, the PDA will have to find other placements for those clients or discharge them back onto the street at the end of June.

Among the proposals the KCRHA’s raters rejected was a tiny house village in South Lake Union that had support, and funding, from the residents of the Mirabella apartments, a retirement community near the proposed village site. John Pehrson, a leader of the Mirabella Civic Engagement Project, said “it was very disappointing to us” that the KCRHA rejected the proposal, for which Mirabella residents and the Mirabella Seattle Foundation raised about $143,000.

“We wanted to be kind of the opposite of NIMBY,” Pehrson said. “We said, ‘We’ll give you the money if you put the [village] next to us.'” The donations, he added, will go back to the donors. “We raised it on the basis that we would put [the tiny house village] in the South Lake Union area and be able to have an ongoing volunteer relationship, and now that we can’t do that, we will have to return the money,” Pehrson said.

Sharon Lee, the director of LIHI, said LIHI plans to appeal the decision.

“My big question,” Lee said, “is how is the mayor going to promise 2,000 units of tiny houses, shelter beds, or permanent supportive in his first year in office if not much is getting funded?” As PubliCola has reported, the city has lost hundreds of shelter beds added during the COVID pandemic, for a net increase of just over 300 beds citywide last year. Seattle, which provides more than 70 percent of the regional authority’s funding, is facing a budget shortfall that will require significant midyear cuts this summer and could force tough choices when the council and mayor hammer out next year’s budget in November.

4 thoughts on “Homeless Authority Funds Pallet Shelter, JustCARE, and Just One of Three Proposed Tiny House Villages”

  1. Any thoughts on why the Mirabella-supported village was denied? Interesting to learn about the effort.

    1. As said in the article, “whose director, Marc Dones, has been critical of the tiny-house model” might be key. He has said a number of times that he doesn’t think it is appropriate to increate the number of tiny house villages because people tend to stay in them for long periods of time (which is understandable because they’re better than other types of shelters and housing is scarce).

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.