1. Washington state’s latest revenue forecast shows tax revenue increasing $3.3 billion through 2023, a major jump from the Washington State Economic Revenue and Forecast Council’s most recent (November) projection. The new projection is an improvement on what had already been an upward trend after a grim forecast last June predicted $8.8 billion in lost revenue through 2023, and brings the state much closer to its pre-pandemic $52.3 billion projection.
Wednesday’s report shows that the state’s revenue recovery is being driven by speedy vaccine distribution, the two federal stimulus packages that passed in December and March, which gave qualifying Washington state residents $600 and $1,400 checks–the $4.25 billion expected to go to the state was not factored into the forecast–, and near-record high taxable activity from real estate transaction and higher than predicted retail sales.
Andy Nicholas, senior fellow at the progressive Washington State Budget and Policy Center, says it’s no surprise sales taxes and real estate excise taxes are keeping the economy afloat. “Our whole tax code is propped up by lower- and middle-income working people in Washington state,” he said. “The gains that we’re seeing are gains from a tax code that disproportionately put responsibility for funding public services that we all benefit [from] on those with low- or moderate incomes and asks very little from those at the top.”
Nicholas says the state is currently stuck in a position where it can only hope to keep funding for public services at the same amount they were before the pandemic—which he says was not enough.
Several bills in the house and senate, like the capital gains tax (SB 5096) and the wealth tax (HB 1406), hope to fix the state’s tax code and get wealthy residents to pay more. Democratic budget proposals for the next biennium, likely coming next week, may indicate what taxes they expect to pass this session.
The Office of Financial Management said in a press release on Wednesday, “The increase in projected revenues would leave the state with a net surplus of nearly $3 billion — including reserves — at the end of current biennium.” The recently passed American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 will infuse an additional $12 billion into the state and may help maintain programs, but ultimately the money is only a one-time infusion and needs to be spent by 2024. Washington state has received roughly $20 billion in federal aid since the start of the pandemic.
“This is moment where we need to be making big and bold investments in communities,” Nicholas said. While the federal aid will help, “[The government} needs to be thinking about how we are going to set ourselves up for long-term adequate level funding and that has to be done with new, equitable sources of revenue.”
If you’re reading this, we know you’re someone who appreciates deeply sourced breaking news, features, and analysis—along with guest columns from local opinion leaders, ongoing coverage of the kind of stories that get short shrift in mainstream media, and informed, incisive opinion writing about issues that matter.
We know there are a lot of publications competing for your dollars and attention, but PubliCola truly is different. We cover Seattle and King County on a budget that is funded entirely by reader contributions—no ads, no paywalls, ever.
Being fully independent means that we cover the stories we consider most interesting and newsworthy, based on our own news judgment and feedback from readers about what matters to them, not what advertisers or corporate funders want us to write about. It also means that we need your support. So if you get something out of this site, consider giving something back by kicking in a few dollars a month, or making a one-time contribution, to help us keep doing this work. If you prefer to Venmo or write a check, our Support page includes information about those options. Thank you for your ongoing readership and support.
2. If Seattle City Attorney Pete Holmes’ prediction is correct, the city’s labor negotiation team won’t sit down to negotiate with the Seattle Police Officers’ Guild (SPOG) until after new mayor takes office in 2022.
In a presentation to the Community Police Commission on Wednesday, Holmes hypothesized that contract negotiations with the city’s largest police union “probably” won’t begin “until sometime next year,” and that the negotiators may not have finalized the “parameters” for bargaining—the ground rules for the process—by the time the next mayor is inaugurated in January. He also suggested the next mayor could begin the search for a permanent police chief at roughly the same time; current Interim Seattle Police Chief Adrian Diaz stepped into the role when former Chief Carmen Best retired on short notice in September 2020, and Mayor Jenny Durkan has declined to begin the search for a permanent during her term.
Contract negotiations with city employee unions can be a lengthy process—the last round of bargaining with SPOG ended in 2018 after more than a year of negotiations. At that time, SPOG members had been working under an expired contract since 2014. The 2018 contract expired at the beginning of this year, so SPOG members will once again work under an expired agreement for the foreseeable future.
Delayed negotiations would also mean that the numerous controversial features of the 2018 SPOG contract will remain in effect for at least the coming year. Before the Seattle City Council approved the contract in November 2018—responding in part to pressure from Durkan to approve raises for union members—police accountability advocates, including the CPC, condemned the agreement for undercutting years’ worth of advocacy and a landmark 2017 ordinance that strengthened police oversight and discipline.
Holmes was preceded at the CPC meeting by Dr. Antonio Oftelie and Monisha Harrell, who lead the team appointed by federal judge James Robart to monitor the progress of reforms Robart mandated as part of the consent decree imposed in 2012. (The consent decree is an agreement between the city and the Department of Justice that enables a federal court to oversee reforms to SPD.) Oftelie and Harrell appeared at the meeting to briefly outline their work plan for the coming year; the CPC will need to vote to support the work plan before it can go before Judge Robart for final approval.
According to Harrell, the monitoring team’s plan “does not address the shortcomings from the  contract negotiations.” She added, “The monitoring team doesn’t have a role in saying what can or cannot be in the contract, though we can give guidance about what the results of a contract might be.”
[Update, 3/18/2021]: In an email on Thursday afternoon, Durkan spokesman Anthony Derrick told PubliCola that Holmes’ prediction “should not be construed as a formal declaration” of the city’s timeline for bargaining. The mayor’s more optimistic timeline, he said, would see bargaining begin before the November election.
Dan Nolte, a spokesperson for the City Attorney’s Office, agreed that Holmes’ prediction was not binding but reflected the length of past bargaining processes. “Considering bargaining has historically been a drawn out process,” he wrote in an email, Holmes thinks it’s likely that bargaining will “occur after the election.”
The actual bargaining timeline will depend on the Labor Relations Policy Committee: the body—comprised of five city council members, as well as the city’s budget and HR directors—which develops the bargaining parameters and priorities for the city.
3. City council member Kshama Sawant busted the “recall” campaign that’s trying to remove her from office for using a stock photo called “”Diversity People Group Team Union Concept” to represent the “diverse mix of working people and seniors” who supposedly support the campaign. The stock image is available through Shutterstock.
“These lies are nothing new from a campaign founded on alternative facts, including allegations that Kshama broke the law (she did not) and that she disclosed the address and led a protest to Mayor Durkan’s house (she did not do that either, but rather attended and spoke at the invitation of families of the victims of police brutality),” Sawant’s campaign said in a press release.
The recall campaign’s hamfisted use of a cheesy stock photo is reminiscent of a similar mini-scandal from the last local election, when a conservative group called Moms for Seattle Photoshopped stock footage of tents into real photos of Seattle parks to suggest that unsheltered people were setting up camp and leaving piles of junk in children’s playgrounds.
The anti-Sawant mailer, which Fizz received, is a four-page pamphlet focusing on the legality of recall campaigns and the fact that the money for Sawant’s defense is coming from across the country. What it doesn’t include is any particular reason to recall Sawant—except the dog-whistling “angry brown woman” image on its cover, which is unlikely to win anyone over except people who consider being a vocal woman of color grounds for removal.