Tag: Office of Inspector General

Report: Police Contract Severely Limits CARE Team’s Ability to Do Their Jobs

Flow chart demonstrating how a CARE dispatch proceeds when a 911 operator directs the team to respond to a call directly.

By Erica C. Barnett

A new report from the city’s Office of Inspector General confirms what Community Assisted Response and Engagement (CARE) Department Chief Amy Barden has been saying for more than a year: The new contract between the city and the Seattle Police Officers Guild (SPOG), which was put on a fast track last year after Katie Wilson beat incumbent mayor Bruce Harrell, drastically limits the ability of the CARE team of civilian first responders to respond to crisis calls, which is the entire the reason they exist.

Although many other US cities now have crisis response teams who have replaced police for calls that don’t require armed officers or where police may make the situation worse), Seattle has increasingly lagged behind. When Harrell announced the new contract, he emphasized the fact that it allowed CARE to respond to calls without police in tow—what’s known as a “primary” response—for the first time since its inception, in 2023.  A Until last year, police had to be present, at least initially, during every 911 response.

But the new contract also included a memorandum of understanding between the city and SPOG that dramatically reduced CARE’s ability to respond to the type of calls that were supposed to be its raison d’être: Welfare checks, “person down” calls, and nuisance calls.

The agreement, which CARE had no role in crafting and did not approve, “prohibits CARE response to calls involving substance abuse, persons in homeless encampments and on private property, and individuals in crisis,” according to the report. “This excludes a significant portion of the population CARE was intended to serve.”

“CARE’s scope of work remains significantly impacted by the terms of the SPOG contract,” the report says. “Even as the SPOG contract adds a new response type, expands call types, and removes the cap on new staffing, it also further limits the CARE Team.”

 

In a statement, Mayor Katie Wilson’s office said the reviewplaces an important spotlight on limitations placed on CARE crisis responders under the SPOG collective bargaining agreement negotiated by the prior administration. Seattle’s residents have been unambiguously clear in their demand for an alternative response to emergency calls, and the CARE crisis responders were curtailed by past City leadership, through no fault of their own.”

Barden said she sees some positive news in the most recent data from the report, which show a 32 percent uptick in CARE responses compared to the previous 12-week average. “I think this is due in part to the team being available early morning, and in part due to stronger relationships with the SPD precinct captains and more clarity about what constitutes a crisis call that is clinical in nature and most appropriate for the CARE team,” Barden said.

Wilson’s office said the mayor is  “optimistic about the positive and productive collaboration Interim [Police] Chief [Andre] Sayles has formed with the CARE department and other community safety partners. That commitment to partnership will be an essential qualification for our next permanent chief.”

The team is planning to start operating out of library branches with a high number of crisis calls, and is launching a partnership with the downtown jail to intercept people leaving jail who need services, which Barden said should use up the rest of the 32-member team’s capacity. “I anticipate that these strategies will create more work than we currently have staff for, so I am not concerned with the existing limitations explained in the OIG report,” Barden said. The  city’s 2026 budget included funding for 48 CARE crisis responders, but Barden said she thought it made sense to spread out or slow down hiring in light of the current economic forecast and $175 million budget deficit, which could force cuts to many city departments.

PubliCola is supported entirely by readers like you.
CLICK BELOW to become a one-time or monthly contributor.

Support PubliCola

Without a change to the underlying SPOG contract, however, CARE remains severely limited in its ability to accomplish its original remit of responding to 911 calls in the place of police. The current contract runs through the end of next year.

“Dual dispatch,” which was previously the only way CARE could be sent out on calls, is limited in new ways under the MOU, the OIG report notes; officers who would previously have been directed to call CARE to provide assistance can now “take immediate action if they believe it is appropriate” without calling the team at all. Another problem, according to the report, is that SPD’s very slow response to low-priority calls that require dual dispatch under the contract means that “community members do not receive help when they need it, even if CARE is available,” undermining confidence in the team.

A large number of the calls CARE responds to—388 in the first three months of 2026—originate with police who respond to calls and then, after determining they’re appropriate for social workers, refer them to CARE. These calls, known as “SPD request” in the report, are the most common way the CARE team gets dispatched, followed by dual dispatch, primary dispatch (meaning 911 directed the CARE team to go to a call), and on-views, in which the CARE team witnesses an incident or situation where they can help and self-dispatch by responding in real time.

All of the restrictions in the SPOG contract apply to every kind of CARE response. For example, if CARE first responders saw someone in distress while walking through downtown Seattle, approached, and saw signs the person was using drugs, they would have to walk away and call SPD to the scene. Under the SPOG contract, SPD sergeants can override any 911 operator who decides to dispatch the CARE team to a call. The OIG report doesn’t indicate how often that happens.

 

 

Witnesses In Diaz Investigation Say Former Chief “Obsessed” Over Affair Rumors, Asked Employees to Use WhatsApp to Evade Disclosure

SPD employees described several incidents that made them uncomfortable, including a 2am call to a park in North Bend and a request for makeup wipes in Diaz’ official city vehicles. 

By Erica C. Barnett

Newly released records from the investigation into alleged misconduct by former police chief Adrian Diaz include previously unreported interviews with two staffers who were close to Diaz.

Mayor Bruce Harrell fired Diaz in December, six months after removing him as chief, after concluding he violated SPD policies by having an “improper… intimate relationship” with his chief of staff, Jamie Tompkins, failed to disclose the relationship, and lied about it to investigators. Diaz created a position, chief of staff, for Tompkins, who resigned amid allegations of dishonesty in November.

PubliCola obtained the investigation records, which include interviews with a member of Diaz’ security detail, Tay Gray-McVey, and his executive assistant, Tricia Fuentes, through a public disclosure request.

Investigators found that Diaz had violated SPD’s policies on dishonesty, professionalism, avoiding or disclosing conflicts of interest, and improper personal relationships, and that Tompkins had not only lied to investigators but falsified evidence by disguising her handwriting in an effort to prove that she didn’t write a love note to Diaz on an Star Wars-themed birthday card.

Diaz, who is married to a woman, went on a local right-wing talk show last June to announce that he was gay, using this claim as a defense against the affair allegations as well as several harassment and hostile-workplace lawsuits by women in the department.

In his interview, which took place in January, Gray-McVey described several incidents that helped confirm his belief that Diaz and Tompkins were having an affair.

In one incident, Gray-McVey described driving out to a park in North Bend, where Tompkins lived, at around 2:00 in the morning to provide a jump to Diaz’ city-issued Chevy Tahoe, which had a dead battery. As he worked to get Diaz’ truck up and running, he said he noticed Tompkins was sitting in the passenger seat. Gray-McVey said he never spoke with Diaz about Tompkins’ presence, but told the two people present at the interview, “I’m sure we, all three of us, can figure out what two adults are doing in a park after hours in a car.”

Shortly after the encounter, Gray-McVey said, Tompkins gave him a bottle of Crown Royal with a note saying “‘Thanks for saving the day,’ or something to that effect.”

Gray-McVey also mentioned two incidents that involved Tompkins’ heavy makeup. According to Gray-McVey, before Tompkins was hired but while Diaz was spending significant time with her, the police chief began requiring all his cars—the one he drove and the ones driven by his security detail—to be with makeup removal wipes. “I think they [were] used to remove the makeup that might be on him,” Gray-McVey said.

PubliCola is supported entirely by readers like you.
CLICK BELOW to become a one-time or monthly contributor.

Support PubliCola

 

During a convention in San Diego, Gray-McVey continued, Tompkins escorted Diaz back to his hotel after a night of drinking with other police chiefs from around the country. The next morning, when he walked by Diaz’ room, he noticed a stack of towels on a cart outside the room, including some that were visibly smeared with makeup. They could have been someone else’s towels, Gray-McVey conceded.

Gray-McVey said his experience working for Diaz while Tompkins was in the picture, which he said began well before Diaz hired her, was stressful and contributed to a “rough patch” in his life.

Fuentes, who also worked directly for Diaz as a senior executive assistant, also described the stress of being viewed as disloyal by Diaz, telling investigators her previously positive relationship with her boss began to change after she questioned his request to notarize Tompkins’ hiring documents personally, a request that fell outside the normal hiring process and was something she didn’t ordinarily do.

Later, she said, after Diaz became “obsessed” with finding out who was spreading rumors about him and Tompkins, he asked her and another staffer to start using WhatsApp, an encrypted messaging app, instead of text messages to communicate with Diaz and other SPD staff. City employees’ texts are subject to public disclosure, both on their city-issued phones and on personal cell phones if they pertain to city business, and employees are not supposed to use encrypted apps to get around public disclosure laws.

Fuentes, who previously worked on public disclosure requests, recalled to investigators that during a closed-door meeting, Diaz said, “‘The media is making a lot of requests for text messages, so… if you guys could download WhatsApp, that’s how I want to communicate from now on.'” Fuentes said she told Diaz using WhatsApp to evade record requests would violate public disclosure law, and that she would continue using text messages instead. Diaz said “‘that’s fine’ … But from then on, again, I felt a shift in our relationship and the openness.”

For instance, Fuentes recalled, Diaz changed the way he dealt with public disclosure requests for text messages. Previously, she told investigators, “I’d usually stand in front of [Diaz or a deputy or assistant chief] and I’d say, ‘Okay, give me your phone,’ and I’d … do the search, and show them.'” Over time, though, that changed, and Diaz “just handled it himself. … He’d have me still type up the form with, ‘Oh, there was nothing responsive,’ and then he’d sign it.”

On one occasion, Fuentes said, Diaz found out about a records request seeking information about his schedule and told her “I need to find out who this guy is. … “He said, ‘Well, I’m being followed and I believe that that requester knows Jamie’s ex-husband.’ It was just—I couldn’t follow. It was like this long conspiracy theory.”

Fuentes corroborated previous SPD accounts that Diaz became convinced that someone was planting listening devices in his office, and said he “became obsessive on the rumors” about him and Tompkins—sometimes spending “a lot of his workday” in his office with Tompkins discussing who might be spreading rumors about them. “That’s not the normal behavior of a chief of police, especially when we’re in a time when we were having you know such short staffing and crime and all that,” she told investigators.

Around that same time, she said, the way Diaz talked in her presence became more “crude”—she said he talked about how Tompkins was “constantly being sent dick pics,’ [and] I was like, Why is he telling me this?” Diaz also commented frequently on Tompkins “looks… and her makeup and her hair,” and “about her not leaving her house unless she’s got her hair and makeup done. .. I just remember thinking that was kind of a weird—a weird, out-of-nowhere thing.”

On another occasion, he said “something incredibly crass”—after egging Fuentes on to agree that one of her coworkers looked good in his new suit, Fuentes said Diaz told them the coworker “was over with me at the mayor’s office today and the mayor whispered, ‘I’d fuck him in that suit.'” Asked about this account, a spokesman for the mayor’s office said “this absolutely didn’t happen,” and noted that Diaz was fired for dishonesty.

Records reveal that Diaz, who was prohibited from talking about the investigation into his alleged misconduct, was formally admonished last October for sharing information about the case in violation of a direct order from then-interim police chief Sue Rahr. An investigative supervisor with the OIG warned him that failing to follow orders or violating investigative protocols could result in additional misconduct charges.

Diaz, through his attorney, declined to respond to questions. “This matter involves ongoing litigation, and the individuals you reference below are fact witnesses in the case. For those reasons, we will not be answering questions or providing comment at this time,” attorney Joseph P. Corr said. “That being said, Chief Diaz continues to deny any wrongdoing in connection with his former employment with the City of Seattle and/or his relationship with Ms. Tompkins.”