With a Year of Zoning Changes Ahead, Mayor Wilson Can Still Put an Urbanist Stamp on the “One Seattle Plan”

By Erica C. Barnett

The city’s Office of Planning and Community Development rolled out legislation this week that will implement “Phase 2” of the city’s 10-year update to its comprehensive plan, the document that guides density and zoning in Seattle. Former mayor Bruce Harrell officially dubbed the proposal the “One Seattle Plan,” in keeping with his campaign and mayoral catch phrase.

The legislation complements the comp plan updates City Council adopted last year by increasing the density of housing allowed in 30 new Neighborhood Centers—areas within about 800 feet of existing commercial “nodes” or major transit stops—and expanding Urban Centers, where significantly more apartments are allowed.

The new plan will simplify the requirements for developers to build apartments in midrise areas. OPCD staff said apartments rarely get built in the existing midrise zone, because the four-story height restriction is too low to justify building and because Midrise has the most complex requirements of any zone in the city.

“Today, every single project that is built in a midrise zone has to come in and get a departure [from the standards because these are so complicated,” OPCD strategic advisor Brennon Staley said during a briefing on the legislation last week.

The legislation was finalized under former mayor Bruce Harrell, so it doesn’t bear Mayor Katie Wilson’s stamp. Wilson ran an explicitly urbanist campaign, with a commitment to allowing more housing in more places—something she’ll have a chance to demonstrate in later phases of the comprehensive plan.

Under Harrell, the city delayed the comprehensive plan update repeatedly, which is one reason it’s now broken up into four separate phases; the first phase, which got Seattle into compliance with a state law passed in 2023 requiring more density in former single-family areas, passed in December.

The zoning update also increases the amount of housing that’s allowed along “corridors”—areas directly adjacent to streets with frequent transit routes. As Doug Trumm at The Urbanist reported last week, OPCD reduced the size of some corridors in response to incumbent residents’ complaints about allowing too many apartments near single-family houses.

PubliCola is supported entirely by readers like you.
CLICK BELOW to become a one-time or monthly contributor.

Support PubliCola

“Today in the city, there are really very, very different viewpoints about housing,” Staley said. “There are people who own their home for a very long time. It’s been a great investment. … There are other people who think they will need to leave Seattle because they can’t afford a place to live.” The final legislation, he said, is an attempt to “recognize that both those types of opinions are valid.”

Efforts to accommodate homeowner complaints about apartments—that is, renters—have long been a centerpiece of Seattle politics. The result has been decades of anti-growth policies. Some, like exclusive single-family zoning, have only been eroded by outside intervention—it’s unlikely that Seattle would have allowed up to six units on every residential lot if the state legislature hadn’t passed House Bill 1110, which forced the city’s hand. Others, like the longstanding practice of segregating apartment buildings from single-family areas by concentrating them on busy, polluted arterials, remain in effect and are baked into the comp plan update.

Within those constraints, the remaining phases of the comp plan leave plenty of room for the new mayor (and progressive urbanists on the council, like Alexis Mercedes Rinck, Dionne Foster, and Eddie Lin) to allow more housing in other parts of the city.

After Phase 2—the “centers and corridors” legislation—the city will rezone the existing regional and urban centers, which include downtown, Northgate, and Capitol Hill. That will happen later this year and early next year, as will consideration of of nine more neighborhood centers, which require additional review because Harrell removed them from his plan.In  Phase 4, in 2027, the city will upzone areas around frequent transit stops—another density gift from the state legislature, which forced cities to add more housing near transit through House Bill 1491 last year.

Editor’s note: The original version of this story incorrectly described the city’s midrise zones as allowing six-story apartment buildings. That describes one of the city’s lowrise zones; midrise zones allow taller buildings. The story also misstated when the city will consider adding new neighborhood centers to the plan; that will be later this year, not in the first quarter of this year. 

7 thoughts on “With a Year of Zoning Changes Ahead, Mayor Wilson Can Still Put an Urbanist Stamp on the “One Seattle Plan””

  1. “The final legislation, he said, is an attempt to “recognize that both those types of opinions are valid.””

    FFS. Preference for zoning that enforces segregation is not a valid opinion.

    It’s real and gross, but not something that should be recognized as “valid.”

  2. “Today in the city, there are really very, very different viewpoints about housing,” Staley said. “There are people who own their home for a very long time. It’s been a great investment. … There are other people who think they will need to leave Seattle because they can’t afford a place to live.”

    Yeah, about that…the homes are not the investment. It’s the land. They have held on a piece of land in a city that has seen tremendous economic growth…no one gives a damn about what’s on it. Vacant land has paid off pretty well, the houses are just extra. Check out this parcel, quadrupled in value while the building was valued at $0.

    https://blue.kingcounty.com/Assessor/eRealProperty/Dashboard.aspx?ParcelNbr=2826049053

    The housing will still be needed, as hiring and economic growth are not expected to slow down. The 10 year old homelessness and housing affordability crises will not abate (a crisis that lasts 10 years is not a crisis but the new status quo). But there is a lot of vacant or disused land all over Seattle that can be developed. Lots of surface parking lots as well.

    1. In Sunday’s _Seattle Times_, Danny Westneat’s column was specifically about hiring and economic growth possibly slowing down. He puts quotation marks around this from unnamed “economists” from the Puget Sound Regional Council (which is a reputable organisation): “Region loses 12,900 jobs in 2025”, and “this is the first time the region has experienced an annual decrease of jobs since 2009”.

      Since I’m about to get a degree, I’m not happy with this news, and anyway, of course one data point is never a reliable trend. But you’re wrong to assume that hiring and economic growth will never slow down here. At least last year, it did.

    1. I predict housing will become less expensive in the next few years. Rents are levelling out and the job market too. Plus the silver tsunami is occurring. It would be stupid to mandate Upzoned allowing builders to decide what to build where if the housing is no longer needed. The king and pierce and snohomish county area has built more affordable housing than anywhere in the usa. We also have lots of empty apartments in every neighborhood. Lots of availability. The “crisis” will naturally abate.

      1. We’ll have to see just how much housing gets built over the next 5 years. Is Katie Wilson a friend of the construction industry? We’ll find out soon enough. So what difference does zoning make? I can personally tell you that the construction industry ran at over 100% for much of last 30 years with 2008-09 being only a slight bump in the road….and zoning did not play a role in how much housing got built. It’s not about zoning… it’s about finance, labor and demand.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.