Mayor Wilson Says She’ll Accelerate Comprehensive Plan and “Go Bigger” on Density

Why is “no rezone proposed” always the biggest area?

By Erica C. Barnett

Mayor Katie Wilson wants to accelerate the remaining phases of Seattle’s comprehensive plan update by one year, add more density within a “reasonable walk” of transit stops, and revisit the neighborhood centers—nodes of density inside traditional single-family areas that already have major transit stops or commercial areas—to restore the nine centers her predecessor Bruce Harrell removed from the plan and potentially add more.

On Thursday, Wilson announced that the city’s Office of Community Planning and Development (OPCD) is starting an environmental review process that will wrap up next year, with final land use and zoning legislation around June 2o27.

Wilson previewed the announcement at a Housing Development Consortium fundraising event earlier this week. “As a renter, I think this is very exciting,” she said. “You don’t have to live right along a busy, noisy, dirty street.”

In an interview Thursday morning, Wilson said her plan would compress Phases 3 and 4 of the update (adding neighborhood centers and increasing density near transit and in regional centers, respectively) into a single phase, reducing the timeline by a year while slightly delaying neighborhood centers so that everything can get done at once. On Thursday, Wilson announced that she’ll launch an environmental review process hoping to wrap up environmental review and have final legislation ready to go by June 2027.

“Basically, we inherited this comp plan process, and … we were looking at ways we can really accelerate and go bigger,” Wilson said.

Currently, the city council’s comprehensive plan committee is considering upzones in the neighborhood centers and urban centers—denser areas within neighborhoods that were previously known as “urban villages”—and within a half-block of certain frequent transit routes. Land use and comp plan committee chair Eddie Lin did not immediately respond to an interview request on Thursday.

PubliCola is supported entirely by readers like you.
CLICK BELOW to become a one-time or monthly contributor.

Support PubliCola

Wilson’s plan is to go beyond those limits in a revamped Phase 3, adding back and potentially expanding nine neighborhood centers that the council placed on a “docketing amendment” last year, while also considering new ones the city hasn’t studies yet. The city’s original plan contemplated nearly 50 neighborhood centers, a number that was eventually scaled back to 30 after the council heard complaints from homeowners in areas like Magnolia, Maple Leaf, and Laurelhurst.

“I’m open to new neighborhood centers,” Wilson said. “I certainly want to go back and consider the ones the previous administration cut out, and if there are additional ones that weren’t considered but made sense, I’m happy to consider that too. We’re going to do an efficient but hopefully effective stakeholder process to decide what we want the scope to be, but in general, my bias is to go big.”

Wilson also called the city’s current plan to allow new housing within just a half-block of rail and frequent transit stops “pretty darn stingy.” As a renter in Capitol Hill, she said, she lives within a ten-minute walk of light rail and much closer to several frequent bus routes, so her “instinct” is to change the requirement to allow more housing within “a reasonable walk”—somewhere between a couple of blocks and half a mile. “How long do you walk to get to a bus stop? That’s more than half a block,” she said.

Legislation passed last year, House Bill 1491, imposes new density requirements near transit and restricts parking mandates, which force developers to build parking even in dense areas where fewer people own cars. With a compressed timeline to finish the comp plan, the city should be able to “comply or exceed compliance with state law” before the 2029 deadline, Wilson said.

7 thoughts on “Mayor Wilson Says She’ll Accelerate Comprehensive Plan and “Go Bigger” on Density”

  1. Over the last month as I have checked the rental listings on Zillow there have been between 12,000 and 13,000 vacancies. There is simply no way this is a crisis of scarcity. The remaining small landlords are facing one of the slowest markets in years and are being forced to lower rents while utilities, real estate insurance and taxes continue rising, up In some cases 20-30% In just one year. This is a recipe for even more landlords leaving the market.

    How is the obsession with placing mega apartment blocks around light rail working out? There are massive apartment buildings throughout Roosevelt, Othello and Columbia City next to light rail, to name just three — with 40+ vacancies. Some of these buildings were built five years ago and they are still vacant. It would be a good idea for the city to look at what it has done so far and see how it is working before new “planning” erases more existing affordable housing, and substitutes corporate profit and more towers of faceless beige monotony for sense of place.

    We overbuilt downtown and have the highest downtown vacancy rate of any city in the United States. Do we want to do the same thing with residential housing? If you look at our residential rental rates between Bellevue Redmond and Seattle you will also see where the jobs are going and the people are going and where demand is highest: It is not Seattle. Bellevue‘s rents are running $900 more on average than Seattle’s, a mark of high demand, jobs moving east and high desirability.

    1. Vacancies are best measured as a percentage of regional population, and that number is still pretty low compared to what’s considered healthy.

  2. HB 1110 upzoned entire cities, allowing for 4-6 plexes on residential lots. I’ve yet to see mass production of new housing. Meanwhile, upzoned lots sit empty (across the street from City Hall). It’s not zoning holding housing production down. It’s housing costs and lack of financing.

    1. The Seattle rezone implementing HB 1110 only took effect last year. It’ll take a while for new projects to move through the pipeline.

      Within Seattle those changes went beyond merely allowing four-plexes as the state required. Now if you have a typical 5,000 square foot Neighborhood Residential zoned lot it’s legal to build a four-story, 10,000 square foot apartment building divided into as many as ten homes, with optional retail space at the ground level. The maximum building size and unit count scales with lot size.

      This is already a pretty significant change in the allowed building envelope. I support our mayor’s effort to go even bigger, but if you told me a decade ago that the lowest zoning category would today allow four-story apartment buildings with ground-floor retail I’m not sure I would have believed you.

  3. I like her energy and vibe she brings to our fair city and I lost count of how many projects she wants done.
    However, Mayor Wilson needs to finish ONE project before promising more. Show me (us) that she can cut through all the bullshit and get it done.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.