By Palmira Figueroa and Ben Maritz
It was one of Pedro’s sons who gave him the idea. A friend of his made the trip earlier that year and experienced no issues getting across the border, posting about the entire journey on TikTok. Pedro, an asylum-seeker from Venezuela, had been living in Colombia with his family of six for the past three years, doing odd jobs when he could find them, and decided to set out for a better life in the north.
Salvador, an Angolan from the embattled exclave of Kabinda, had been bouncing around various African countries, unable to return home. He learned from a friend that it was possible to buy a cheap ticket to Brazil, a country which doesn’t require a visa for entry. Once in São Paulo, he joined the stream of migrants from every part of the world heading to the United States for safety and economic opportunity.
A lot has been written about Texas paying for buses to send migrants to New York and Chicago, but the federal government itself is also paying for people to travel away from overwhelmed shelters near the border—a policy that has impacts in unexpected places, like Seattle.
Pedro and Salvador both recently passed through an informal asylum-seeker encampment at the Riverton Park Church in Tukwila, a community-run facility that is now overwhelmed. Every week, 30 to 50 new asylum-seekers arrive, most with young children. The federal government has policies in place that allow people to cross our border, but has provided no resources to help provide them resettle. The church is woefully overcrowded and the vulnerable people staying there are getting desperate.
How we got here
Today, most people who reach the border seeking asylum—about 2.3 million a year—are processed and released, especially those who are traveling with children. They are assigned the next available court date, which the most recent arrivals have told us is currently sometime in 2029. Federal law makes asylum-seekers eligible to work six to eight months after they apply for asylum; in the meantime, they receive no assistance or accommodation.
Three-quarters of the migrants are from places further afield than Mexico, including South America and Africa. Some people cross 20 countries before they arrive in the United States. Because the migrant facilities at the southern border are completely overwhelmed, authorities are encouraging migrants to travel to other places within the United States, ideally where people have access to family or other resources. A lot has been written about Texas paying for buses to send migrants to New York and Chicago, but the federal government itself is also paying for people to travel away from overwhelmed shelters near the border—a policy that has impacts in unexpected places, like Seattle.
The local crisis
Both Salvador and Pedro passed through shelters near the border that had no capacity to accommodate them, and so paid for them to travel to Seattle—Salvador by plane, and Pedro and his family by bus. They arrived at the church just like the dozens that are still arriving each week – disoriented, penniless, and full of hope.
The Riverton Church, under the leadership of Pastor Jan Bolerjack, has long played a leading role in caring for our most disadvantaged neighbors. It was the site of a sanctioned homeless encampment until early 2023, when the Low Income Housing Institute built a tiny house village on the site. Seattle police officers and other law enforcement agents had been referring people to the Riverton Shelter ever since the first migrants started showing up in Seattle about a year ago. The officers knew Pastor Jan would welcome them.
PubliCola is supported entirely by readers like you. CLICK BELOW to become a one-time or monthly contributor.
Today the church is a buzz of languages and chaos, with hundreds of people from around the world overflowing its fellowship hall, sanctuary, parking lot, and green spaces. It’s wet, muddy, and cold, but smiles abound and a spirit of optimism is palpable. Children play, families cook and sing, teens gossip. After a harrowing journey across South and Central America, the American dream is palpably just around the corner.
The people at the church, like those at similar overflowing facilities around the country, are here to seek safety and happiness. They are ready to learn, work and to fully take part in our society. But they still face tremendous short-term obstacles and have essentially no resources available to help them. Most are from countries without families or established communities in the region and so don’t have a natural network to turn to. Unlike refugees, a different category of migrants, they are not eligible for federal assistance.
The asylum-seekers in Tukwila and elsewhere need help filing their immigration cases. They need English language training. They need jobs. But most of all, in the immediate term, they need housing and basic sanitation so they can restart their lives.
What’s Needed
In December, King County allocated $3 million to rent 100 rooms in a hotel in SeaTac through June for some of the most vulnerable asylum-seekers. This is a costly, partial, and temporary solution. During our most recent cold weather emergency, many families living outside the church were moved to hotels by volunteers who used their own funds, but only for a few days.
What is needed is a permanent resettlement center which can welcome the migrants and be a base from which local and state governments can provide assistance. Since there is no end in sight to the flow of migrants, this facility and its funding must be open-ended, not time-bound. It should be located near transit, services and amenities such as schools for the many children in the community.
This group of people is very different from other homeless community members who are living unsheltered. While they certainly carry their share of trauma, they do not generally suffer from the issues that our urban unsheltered community goes through. They are ready, able, and eager to work and grow in their new community. A small amount of targeted assistance will get most asylum seekers into a place where they have work permits, a job, and stable housing.
We are calling on our local, county, and state government to step in and do what the federal government has failed to do: Care for the asylum-seekers and help them become a part of our community while they wait for their asylum cases to be adjudicated. Concerned citizens should write to their elected officials (a list of state local officials can be found on the new VoteWA Voter Portal) and let them know that helping this worthy group of new Americans should be a priority.
What is needed is a permanent resettlement center which can welcome the migrants and be a base from which local and state governments can provide assistance. Since there is no end in sight to the flow of migrants, this facility and its funding must be open-ended, not time-bound. It should be located near transit, services and amenities such as schools for the many children in the community.
Today, Salvador is living in the county-funded hotel and working as a translator and community organizer among the asylum seekers; he’s also enrolled at Seattle Central College, working toward his GED. Pedro and his sons are working in construction and building toward a life of independence in their new country.
Meanwhile, in December 2023, the most recent month for which data is available, 302,034 people were processed at the southern border, an annualized rate of 3.6 million and an increase of roughly 50 percent increase over the record-breaking rate of the most recent fiscal year.
Washington has long taken pride at being a Sanctuary State and rejecting xenophobic, anti-immigrant sentiment. Now is the time to invest in welcoming and embracing our new neighbors and letting them join our community with dignity.
Palmira Figueroa is an immigrant, a community organizer and long-time immigrant rights advocate. Ben Maritz is an affordable housing developer based in Seattle.
Palmira:
I am a nonwhite immigrant myself and I am in full support of your message, except: please let’s not pit populations against each other with facts you only think you have. The fact is, a huge portion of our own homeless population actively have jobs. You have probably interacted multiple times with homeless people serving you at their jobs this month already and not ever thought about it. So please think about it.
Thanks for your comment, which is truthful and fair, you did made me think about this and I appreciate it.
From the article above…
“This group of people is very different from other homeless community members who are living unsheltered. While they certainly carry their share of trauma, they do not generally suffer from the issues that our urban unsheltered community goes through. They are ready, able, and eager to work and grow in their new community. A small amount of targeted assistance will get most asylum seekers into a place where they have work permits, a job, and stable housing.”
First of all, this isn’t true. People coming to the USA from other countries and applying for asylum have lots and lots trauma. Otherwise, why did they have to make the difficult trip? And if they didn’t have trauma before their journey here, they certainly found it along the way.
Second of all, are either of you two, Palmira Figueroa or Ben Maritz, willing to go down to a homeless shelter and explain to those poor people, born in this country, that they need to wait for permanent housing longer because some immigrants have just shown up and need that housing? And that those immigrants are not like them, that you believe they’re actually more worthy? Seems to me, there’s some real racist and classist undertones to this article.
Immigrants are only going to make the housing shortage in Seattle much worse. What part of this do you fail to understand? It’s 6th grade math after all!
Cool – so you and everyone else who buys that this is the biggest threat facing America are voting for Hitler to keep German/US blood pure. Got it.
No, just no….First off,
Washingtonians have a very long recent history of accepting refugees and immigrants into our midst. Accepting, supporting and integrating new residents with these backgrounds has been and will be successful using a clear legal process to insure that the proper vetting and support is given to insure their success here.
There is no reason to think we need to change this but we have to be realistic about what the current administration’s radical reversal of long-standing immigration policies has and will result in: Chaos, Exploitation, Human Trafficking are just a few consequences that come to mind…to throw our doors open to all comers with no regard to how they will be able to survive and integrate into our society, economy or politic can only be a recipe for a catastrophe resulting in exactly the xenophobia the authors above suggest should be avoided. The imagery of an invasion that is readily available for anyone who cares to look only serves to feed this.
Secondly, it is crystal clear that the many persons at Riverton specifically, and in this current mass migration generally, are economic migrants, not refugees and not eligible for asylum despite the very thin claims made here and by advocates generally. Thus, is it beyond the pale for for these people to be making demands for support from us when they have chosen to make this move knowing that no such offer is on actually on the table. Again, the invasion analogy becomes very real and one would rightfully expect any sane person to recoil from those beating down their doors making such demands.
Finally, I would STRONGLY encourage the authors of this piece to lift their noses out of the public funding pig trough they inhabit, get the dollar signs out of their eyes and start thinking clearly about ALL the effects their proposal would have on our local communities already starved for resources if we were to go further down the path they outline.
It should go without saying to this audience that this situation allowed to continue will result in an electoral outcome this Fall that few of you are going to like….
Thanks for letting me share.