This story originally appeared in Seattle magazine’s March 2019 print edition as part of the magazine’s waterfront feature.
Seattle’s new downtown waterfront—a combination of projects so monumental in their collective scope that it’s hard to think of them as a single program—is finally coming into view. Squint just a little as you look up from Alaskan Way toward Pike Place Market’s glass-walled MarketFront development—opened in June 2017—and you can almost see what will be the grand, terraced Overlook Walk swooping gracefully toward a waterfront that will finally be reconnected to downtown after the demolition of the hulking Alaskan Way Viaduct.
Along the central waterfront, just below the new walkway, will be an audacious expansion of the Seattle Aquarium, complete with a 350,000-gallon shark tank that will be visible to people walking through the plaza below. To the south: a reconstructed Washington State Ferries terminal and an actual beach, where people can walk right up to the water. And all along the 26-block length of the project will be a protected bike lane, a landscaped pedestrian promenade and public spaces hosting year-round events, from ice skating in winter to the return of public concerts (which ended in 2005) at a reconstructed Pier 62.
“For the first time, we will really connect Pioneer Square, the historic piers, Pike Place Market and the aquarium—they will all be basically part of one parks system,” says Marshall Foster, director of the city’s Office of the Waterfront. “That is something that doesn’t exist today, and it will thread those neighborhoods together,” making the waterfront a single, unified downtown district, rather than a series of disconnected destinations.
Check out a timeline of waterfront milestones here.
Other elements of the project are less visible, but no less ambitious. A new, seismically stable seawall, finished in 2017 and expected to last at least 75 years, includes salmon-friendly “habitat benches” and translucent sidewalk segments cantilevered over the water, which, planners say, have already shown some success at nudging the threatened fish to use the waterfront as a migratory corridor. A full-service restroom, supplemented by two Portland Loo public toilets with security features that discourage drug use and loitering, will be staffed 24 hours a day. A new green stormwater system will manage runoff from the entire length of the downtown waterfront. And of course, the Alaskan Way Viaduct replacement project will permanently bury State Route 99 underground, fundamentally changing the look, and sound, of the waterfront.
Cary Moon, a onetime mayoral candidate, a longtime waterfront resident and cofounder of the People’s Waterfront Coalition, was an early skeptic of the city’s plans to tear down the Viaduct and divert its traffic through a tunnel. Although Moon still thinks the city should have spent its money on transit, rather than the $3.3 billion tunnel project, she says she’s “100 percent psyched” about what’s happening on the waterfront. “I’m really proud of the city,” Moon says. “This plan is really big and ambitious and bold, and the city has stuck with it.”
Foster notes that once the Viaduct comes down, people who come downtown will no longer have to cross a physical and psychological barrier to walk down to the water. “It’s going to change the mental map of the city,” he says. For businesses on the waterfront that have endured years of closures and disruption from construction and traffic detours, this will be the calm after the storm—a welcome boost in accessibility that could improve their long-term viability.The project to rebuild the waterfront arguably began almost two decades ago, back in 2001, when the Nisqually Earthquake forced the city, region and state to come up with a plan to replace the damaged, seismically vulnerable Viaduct. Years of debate over how (and whether) to replace it ended in 2008, when then Governor Christine Gregoire, Mayor Greg Nickels and King County Executive Ron Sims decided to bury the road in a deep-bore tunnel, opening up acres of new waterfront land for parks, a new roadway and private redevelopment.
Years of additional debate ensued. In 2010, after an international competition, the city chose New York City–based James Corner Field Operations to design the waterfront park. When local architects and others criticized Corner’s initial proposal as too grandiose, Corner scaled back, and then back again—eliminating hot tubs, gondolas and floating swimming pools—to a plan with a more modest, but still grand walkway; flexible spaces for outdoor activities, such as a winter ice skating rink and a mini soccer field; and a wide waterfront pathway flanked by hundreds of trees.
“We have really learned a lot, and we’ve gone through a healthy set of iterations and steps to hone in on the right scale to make a really gracious connection and be as efficient and cost effective as it can be,” Foster says. Significantly, the park’s plan includes ongoing maintenance, which will cost more than $6 million a year (about $4.8 million from the city; and $1 million‒$2 million from the nonprofit Friends of Waterfront Seattle, created in 2012 to help fund and operate the park).
Homelessness is an issue that has come up again and again in discussions, particularly as waterfront property owners debated a special taxing district, known as a local improvement district, that will raise their taxes to reflect the increase in their property values gained from proximity to the park. Former Seattle mayor and waterfront resident Charles Royer, who supports more aggressive enforcement of the city’s anti-camping laws on the waterfront, says people worried that “the waterfront could open and the first tents could go up the next day.”
Friends of Waterfront Seattle director Heidi Hughes says she’s well aware of the concerns. Hughes says her organization’s plan to operate and program the park (in partnership with the city) strikes a balance between enforcement and deterrence, using programming and outreach to supplement security. Hughes says Friends will provide its own “ambassadors”—similar to the Downtown Seattle Association’s Downtown Ambassadors—who will walk through the park, talking to visitors and providing outreach to homeless residents.
Perhaps more important to the safety and security of the park, Hughes says, will be making sure every space is occupied and used year-round, a strategy that has already proved successful in Westlake and Occidental parks downtown. “Rather than thinking about the central waterfront as a fallow space where events pop up, there will be all sizes of programming of various scopes and scales,” including yoga and tai chi classes, and festivals and concerts that draw thousands of people. Last summer, Hughes says, the Friends group implemented a small-scale version of this approach and saw arrests and citations drop significantly.Ultimately, the success of the waterfront will depend on whether people show up—not just for events and concerts, but to live, dine, shop and walk along the new waterfront beach and promenade. Ivar’s CEO Bob Donegan, whose own flagship restaurant at Pier 54 had to shut down for nearly a year during seawall construction, says he’s bullish about the waterfront’s future.
“One of the things I’ve looked at in the past, to see if a public project is successful, is whether the private sector is investing alongside it,” Donegan says. “If you look from Alaskan Way up to First Avenue, from the stadiums to Pike Place Market, there has been more than $1 billion in private investments over the last four years.” These investments include the newly developed, 16-story Cyrene Apartments, currently appraised at $98 million; Beacon Capital Partners’ $13 million purchase, and subsequent $186 million sale, of the Maritime Building at Alaskan Way and Marion Street; and developer Martin Selig’s 2018 purchase of a small office building and parking lot on Western Avenue and Columbia Street for a record $44 million. Even with the tunnel under construction, Donegan says, “people are coming back.”
By 2023, if all goes according to plan, those buildings will look out on a revamped waterfront full of people and things to do—one that’s equally accessible to waterfront property owners and anyone who happens to wander down on their lunch break to take a look at the view.
4 thoughts on “A New Seattle Waterfront Is Coming”
I am grateful to have had the Seattle experience to living many years in this neighborhood (i.e. Pike Place Hill Climb).
will say that even at that time w/the viaduct, dirt, traffic noise, litter, etc – it was a truly magical place to be – secretly tucked in-between the Market and the waterfront… Zig Zag, Spy Girl, etc.
when James Corner released initial sketches of the ‘concrete aircraft carrier’ tethered to the Market – a lot of us that had lived in the neighborhood honestly freaked out and were worried it might kill the charm of the neighborhood.
however, I am very pleased with how the designs have evolved – to soften up the lines and make things flow more w/aquarium integration, etc.
part of the delight of living in that neighborhood – is that you get to play volunteer tour guide – helping lost guests of all walks of life find their way between the waterfront and the Market… 🙂
most common questions:
1) where are the public restrooms?
2) where is the elevator?
I THINK (hope?) that they are addressing #1 in these designs?
For #2 – the latest designs do seem to have a (glass-encrusted) elevator – but issue is that elevators are low-capacity; also, my beloved ‘hood has seagulls (and kinda gross, but reality is lots of poop) and cleaning it off of a glass-encrusted elevator will drive up maintenance costs (cleaning), or grossness. Probably both. If you know the old elevator by the Western Avenue pedestrian skybridge, it rarely worked, and was always sketchy when it did. That maritime environment is just so harsh on outdoor mechanics/electronics. :S
I think that something like a funicular would be more interesting than an elevator; could be higher capacity (for bikes, wheelchairs) – easier to clean the windows – and honestly just more unique and fun…
Oh – and FWIW – the parks are going to be really sweet addition to the City – but *my* preference was to put a really awesome train station that overlooked Elliot Bay – and connected high speed, high capacity trains between Ballard and West Seattle. Parks are great – and I love our Park spaces – but open transit corridors should be optimized for capacity re: mixed-modal transit w/priority given to high frequency trains in dense areas… (see: JAPAN)
The Moon paragraph is odd. The SR-99 deep bore was a state project with cooperation from the city, county, and port; it was not a Seattle project; it is not city funded. The political and fiscal power was in Olympia, not Seattle. Note that the transit projects have not been funded. the January 2009 executive agreement included a one percent MVET for Metro; a local option has still not been provided. the deep bore has opened. the mechanized T-Rex are devouring the AWV beast.
I may have to buy the issue for this article. Great reporting!
Lost in this send up of the grand plans for the Waterfront is that the City has merged the AWV corridor project with the Waterfront Park project and has delayed moving ahead with it and making the priority project – the corridor construction project subject to the Waterfront. One look at the timelines – really – the original project for the AWV corridor it was to coincide with the original timeline for the tunnel. So how is it the financing for it is not even complete four years later.
Comments are closed.