
By Erica C. Barnett
Last week, Seattle City Councilmember Cathy Moore directed the city’s Human Services Department to award $1 million in funding for survivors of commercial sexual exploitation (CSE) through a direct contract with The More We Love, a group that began as a company offering private encampment sweeps and now holds most of the city of Burien’s homelessness contracts.
Moore’s move, which the city’s Human Services Department immediately agreed to implement, effectively ended a competitive bidding process that had been underway since last year, when providers who work with sexually exploited adults and minors in Seattle began meeting to discuss what a fair and equitable competitive distribution of new local funding could look like. The groups first met with Moore’s office last September, and came away believing that the funds would be distributed to various groups through a fair, competitive bidding process, according to several people involved in those discussions. HSD later created a timeline for this process and distributed it to the potential bidders.
City staff reiterated their commitment to a fair, open process in meetings that included organizations that work with survivors as well as law enforcement, Harborview, and other “system partners” that could potentially refer people to the new services the $2 million was going to fund.
“From the very beginning, when we heard there might be an opportunity for additional funding and resources to support the community of survivors that work against trafficking, we were thrilled—and the next thing out of our mouth was, ‘Providers deserve an open and fair process,'” said Amaranthia Torres, co-executive director for the Coalition Ending Gender Based Violence.
Unless Moore rescinds her directive—or HSD decides not to fulfill her request—the funding decision will be final. The mayor’s office, which oversees HSD and was included in email conversations about Moore’s directive to forego the usual bidding process, directed all of our questions to HSD. After this story posted, HSD responded to PubliCola’s questions with the following statement: “No contract or award has yet been processed for [Moore’s budget action[. HSD is continuing conversations around next steps for implementing these investments.”
“It was shocking that all of the work to engage with the community this whole time is being thwarted,” Torres said. “It seemed obvious to me that the way city funds get allocated shouldn’t feel like its rigged. Everyone should have a fair shake.”
The $1 million, which is supposed to add 10 beds to The More We Love’s shelter for sexually exploited women in Renton, was part of $2 million Moore set aside to help survivors of commercial sexual exploitation in the city budget last year to help providers respond to a new law reinstating Stay Out of Areas of Prostitution (SOAP) zones. Currently, the only overnight space specifically for people escaping the sex trade in Seattle is a six-bed temporary housing facility run by Real Escape from the Sex Trade (REST).
Representatives from existing Black-led groups that work with survivors said that by giving $1 million to a white-led group that has not previously held a contract to work with CSE survivors, the city is ignoring and undermining the expertise of organizations that focus on Black and brown survivors, who make up a disproportionate number of people in the commercial sex trade. In recent years, organizations that help survivors have made concerted efforts to end what several described as a “white savior” mentality, in which white leaders (often women) believe they know what’s best for Black and brown survivors.
The news was “a slap in the face,” a leader from one Seattle organization, who requested anonymity because her group works with the city, said. “It’s more than a funding issue—it’s about power and whose voices get amplified.”
Another longtime organizational leader said she was disappointed, but not surprised, that Moore was directing the funds to The More We Love. “It’s not to say their organization couldn’t have been funded, but you should not be giving this organization all the funding,” she said. “You’re saying, ‘We’re going to fund this white-led group and let them run this pilot without any of you,’ but they need all of our support.”
It’s highly unusual for an individual council member to ask an executive department to spend a large amount of money on a single organization through a direct contract without holding a vote to release the funds. It’s perhaps even more unusual for an executive department to take this kind of direction from a legislator.
And there’s another odd wrinkle in this case: Moore apparently asked HSD to give $500,000 of the $2 million to REST to expand its own receiving center in February, but rescinded that offer after HSD had already informed REST that they were getting the money, according to emails and sources familiar with the offer. REST participated in all the conversations leading up to the planned RFP and supported the process; the organization’s leaders were reportedly surprised to learn that the city had decided to bypass the RFP and award some of the money to them directly.
Earlier this year, the Mayor’s Office on Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault (MODVSA), which is part of HSD, launched a series of meetings to discuss the upcoming request for proposals (RFP) for the funds, which was supposed to come out in May. Under an expedited schedule, the city was set to release the funds to the winning bidders in September.
“We’re going to focus on how to get that $2 million and get all of this work organized and coordinated in a very timely fashion,” HSD Director Tanya Kim told Moore’s housing and human services committee during a public meeting in January. “That $2 million requires us to expedite an RFP to get those services online as soon as possible.”
Elizabeth Dahl, executive director of Aurora Commons, said a competitive RFP “is the only way to ensure a fair and equitable process, with appropriate oversight, to ensure the funds allocated to respond to the SOAP legislation are used effectively. Organizations and leaders in the [gender-based violence] field, including ours, were leaned on for their expertise throughout the SOAP legislation process, and we were ensured there would be a fair process for distributing the funds awarded through an RFP. That is not what is happening.”
“Bypassing the RFP process is a blatant dismissal of the work we did and the expertise of those of us who have been doing this work for years,” the first CSE organization leader who requested anonymity said.
Neither Moore’s office nor HSD responded to questions by press time, but we’ll update this story if we hear back.
Emails between Moore and her staff and Kim, Deputy Mayor Tiffany Washington, and other city officials show that Moore directed HSD to give the funds to The More We Love about a week after visiting their shelter in Renton, where she spoke to women living there and found their stories “compelling.”
“Given the urgency of the need for additional receiving beds in a safe location … and The More We Love’s ability to immediately add an additional 10 beds with wrap-around support and 24/7 access, I am requesting $1 million of the $2 million [allocation] be awarded to The More We Love for the provision of 10 emergency receiving center beds at their facility as soon as a contract can be finalized,” Moore told Kim in a March 12 email.
“HSD will move forward with the below, piloting The More We Love’s emergency receiving center—ensuring there’s a clear nexus to Seattle given the location [in Renton]—at $1 million, and implementing the remaining as proposed by HSD,” Kim responded. Renton is about 20 miles away from Aurora Ave. North, where Seattle’s street sex trade is concentrated.
PubliCola is supported entirely by readers like you.
CLICK BELOW to become a one-time or monthly contributor.
In a subsequent email directing HSD staff to “move forward with implementation,” Kim said it was unclear how much will be left over from the original $2 million, which also has to pay for a new city staffer, consultants, and any costs associated with the work the city has already done on the planned competitive bidding process.
The More We Love recently opened a small shelter at a house in Renton, but otherwise does not have any track record working with CSE survivors; the group’s leader, Kristine Moreland, worked at REST for a couple of years but was never a direct service provider, according to several people familiar with her role there.
Moreland did not respond to a request for an interview.
In an email inviting Moore to visit The More We Love’s Renton shelter, Moreland said a staffer for the group had recently sat down with the group of women and learned about gaps in service they faced, finding the revelations “both eye-opening and heartbreaking because many of the challenges they described seem like they should be simple to fix, yet they persist.”
The language is similar to the pitch Moreland made to city officials in Burien, where she claimed that she, unlike existing groups with more experience working with chronically homeless people, could easily get people into housing and treatment; subsequently, the Burien council ended the city’s contract with the longstanding outreach group REACH and handed that money to The More We Love.
It’s unclear what services The More We Love provides at its Renton facility. According to Moore’s email to HSD Director Kim, Moreland told the city her organization offers “substance use treatment, counseling, job training, advocacy in the criminal legal system as victims as well as defendants, and assistance accessing housing.”
But people that have been working in the field for years or decades are skeptical. Because the groups that assist CSE survivors have varying levels of funding and offer different services, they typically work together to provide wraparound support rather than trying to do everything themselves, several representatives from these organizations said. Moreland’s group has never been part of those conversations.

Moreland’s claims about The More We Love’s results have been hard to verify.
Earlier this year, Moreland presented The More We Love’s “year end report” to the Burien City Council. The five-page document says The More We Love “assisted” 303 people, including “25 survivors helped,” between August and December 2024, with a numberless pie chart providing a very high-level breakdown of the services the group claims to have provided. The More We Love provided the same five-page report to Seattle leaders, including Moore, as part of their pitch for funding.
The group has not published a more detailed breakdown of its services or data showing more detailed measures of effectiveness, such as how many people obtain and remain in permanent housing, how many people are able to stay sober or in recovery after treatment or detox, and how many people return to the sex trade after going through their program.
The More We Love has been criticized in the past for distributing private health information about their clients to police, elected officials and at least one private business owner in Burien, and one provider we spoke to expressed concern about the fact that the organization publishes the photos of sexual exploitation survivors on its Facebook page, potentially revealing information about their location and lives to their former traffickers.
Despite holding a major homelessness contract with Burien and securing a million-dollar promise from Seattle, The More We Love just organized as a nonprofit in mid-2023, and did not have enough revenue to file a full 990 tax form with the IRS that year. “They haven’t been on the scene long enough to have results,” the longtime provider said.
Many of the organizational leaders who spoke to PubliCola said they felt the city had not only wasted their time but violated their trust.
The longtime CSE leader called the outcome “really sad, because at the end of the day, the city is breaking the trust of the community. … The city talked about providing a forum to share critical information about investments, and now they’re going behind our backs.”
“We already know that white people are in power and that Black and brown people have to fight ten times as hard to get the same respect,” the other CSE organization leader who requested anonymity said. “It reinforces a harmful pattern where white-led groups secure resources and Black-led groups that have the solutions to these critical issues are sidelined.”

Some of the comments in this article are so racist. Who cares if the charge is led by whites or blacks. This issue is color blind and if it isn’t for you then you have no business being involved. Why isn’t this being addressed?
ffs, Erica. The More We Love is *run by survivors* and already has a system in place that has been providing consistent, safe emergency services and support to trafficked women. How long have the city and other survivor groups not been able to add emergency beds for survivors? Literally years — even though they all agree, and have publicly said, that the main thing they need is these beds — the immediate survivor services.
And now they’re pissed that an organization that has a proven track record of doing it, and doing it quickly, is being supported? The More We Live literally gets women off the streets. They show up when they get a call at 1am … other groups close at 5pm and say call back later or hand out pamphlets. They got the contract because they’re already doing the work.
Cathy Moore, for her part, has put more work into understanding this issue than any past councilperson that I can remember.
I sincerely don’t understand what pedestal Erica is trying to stand on here.
I will not be putting the non-profit industrial complex on a pedestal. It’s a terrible way to run government and is a reflection of how blue cities have hallowed out their own ability to effect change through have state capacity. Many cities are struggling to get results with their $$$ for this reason.
I respect Moore making this her own problem and political risk rather than simply allocating dollars to a category and calling that a victory lap. What was the criticism of Moore months ago? That she outlawed sex work and wasn’t going to follow up with services … Now, she’s taken the lead in identifying services. This sort of follow-through is missing from most other legislators.
We’ll never improve services if we treat them as far off things managed by the expert class, who only need more money year over year. The level of rigor ECB is demanding from this group is unlike how she writes about ideologically aligned non-profits. If you follow these conversations in any detail you’ll hear there are plenty of arguments for “different services should be in one facility”, yet in this piece that model is framed with extreme suspicion by existing incumbents who have a direct financial interest in seeing a different outcome.
What a racket for all involved.
I’m relieved that REST didn’t receive the funding. Their reputation for causing harm to survivors is well-documented, and they exemplify the troubling “white savior” mentality. I’ve heard countless accounts from survivors detailing their negative experiences with REST, far outnumbering any positive feedback. Whoever authored this article clearly lacks a deep understanding of the varied impacts that different nonprofits have; each organization approaches their mission in unique ways.
REST stands out as the most problematic of all. It’s no surprise that Cathy Moore sees through their façade. Survivors who have sought help from REST consistently report that the organization does more harm than good. I commend Cathy Moore for prioritizing the voices of survivors over the interests of money hungry organizations. This new initiative deserves a chance; perhaps it will succeed where REST has failed—helping rather than hurting those it aims to serve.
I want to know the relationship between CMoore and KMoreland. CM advocated vigorously for KM’s group to get all of Burien’s sweeps contracts on nothing more than a wink and a promise. KM’s “results” in no way justified this confidence in her ability to provide meaningful services with lasting outcomes. So why does CM keep stanning her?
Cathy Moore is in Seattle. She has nothing to do with Burien! Wrong person/ jurisdiction
Glad to see the money is not just going to the usual providers who are well versed in RFPs and have dominated the available resources till now. Its going to an organization run by trafficking survivors.
I wish more people did their homework like you sir…🙂… TMWL is run by more than just Kristine (who btw is a survivor of trafficking). The director of services was trafficked for over 20 years of her life beginning at just 12 years old. She is undeniably the most understanding, informed and dedicated individual that I’ve ever had the pleasure of meeting. Personally I am excited to see what TMWL does with these funds. The huge difference they’ve already made in so many people’s lives without much funding is already evident and speaks for itself so this is really a game changer. Also, please stop fueling the change of narrative that’s trying to rear its ugly head…. This is NOT a race thing and has nothing to do with skin color. Survivors come from every and all backgrounds, ethnicities and nationality’s so how is any one’s “skin color” make their trauma or their experience worse than another’s? White women have been beaten and murdered while being trafficked, black women have been beaten and murdered while being trafficked, Hispanic women also etc.etc. All survivors should be standing together on this and not trying to create a ridiculous divide because of something that’s not even remotely a part of this. A survivor is a survivor and should not be graded on how bad they actually had it by just the color of their skin!!! That’s absolutely ridiculous and something that should disappear from this narrative. Thank you Joe for bringing up the fact that I originally was responding to… appreciate you for throwing that little known fact out there!!! 👍
How does an individual Council member get to arbitrarily allocate City funds, after the City conducted a public process? How is this legal and why is it final?
She didn’t and it’s not final. HSD made the tentative decision after Moore requested it, apparently via email and available through a public records request. Though you may not like elected officials using their own discernment, that’s not the legal definition of arbitrary.
As someone who worked in direct support and now, leadership in domestic violence, this disgusts and disappoints, but doesn’t surprise me. I wish it did.
Why on earth would this disgust you? That makes no sense at all to me because if the funding is going to any organization (regardless of which one) isnt that a win? The funding will be put towards exactly what it is intended to be put towards… survivors of CSE and any and all tools to give them the hand up that they need and not just a hand out. So I don’t really see why anyone can be upset about this??? What’s really crazy to me is only one commenter besides myself took the initiative to fact check this article’s information for themselves. Mind boggling… the funding is going to hands down the best possible organization that it possibly could have because I know for a fact that it will be used for exactly what’s it’s intended for… SURVIVORS OF CSE NO MATTER THEIR COLOR, BELIEFS, OR CURRENT SITUATION…. TMWL HAS BEEN STEPPING UP IN A MAJOR WAY AND WILL UNDOUBTEDLY HELP SO MANY MORE PEOPLE GET THEIR LIVES BACK ON TRACK AND ASSIST THEM IN ANY AND EVERY WAY POSSIBLE BECAUSE THATS WHAT THEYRE ABOUT AND IT SHOWS IN THE THINGS THEYVE ALREADY BEEN ABLE TO ACCOMPLISH SO FAR… FACTS!!!!!