
The “xenophobic” messages include “Fuck Tanya Woo—get her out” and “Tanya Woo Hates Black People”
By Erica C. Barnett
Last week, the Northwest Asian Weekly newspaper ran an article denouncing what the author described as “anti-Asian hatred and xenophobia” targeting Seattle City Councilmember Tanya Woo. According to the story, historic buildings and parking pay stations had been tagged with graffiti that “included hate speech, references to race, and evoked themes of exclusion.”
The image accompanying the story shows a parking pay station on which someone has crudely scrawled “fuck Tanya Woo get her out”—a phrase that, while disrespectful, isn’t hate speech. (Posters bearing similar messages about various council members have been seen on Capitol Hill for many years, generally targeting whoever happens to be the most conservative members of the council members.)
A quick afternon walk around the area identified in the NW Asian Weekly article—which, according to the Stranger, was submitted by Woo herself—turned up just one other clear example of anti-Woo graffiti: A message scrawled in two-inch-high letters in the alley behind the Louisa Hotel apartments, owned by Woo and her family: “Fuck Tanya Woo/Tanya Woo Hates Black People!” The Stranger apparently took a similar walk and turned up another example that, while hard to read, seems to call Woo racist.
During the city council’s weekly briefing on Monday, Woo said she had been reluctant to say anything about the “hateful attacks,” but was persuaded to speak up because “the graffiti was done on historical buildings and landmarks”—a reference, apparently, to her family’s own property. She also said the CID community “doesn’t understand politics” and would be more likely to think of “exclusion laws and xenophobia” when they saw the graffiti than booting Woo out of office.
By Tuesday, the parking pay stations had been painted over with lumpy gray paint, but the graffiti on the bricks remained. “With the landmark structure,” Woo said, “we can’t take that off. It’s still there. That’s going to require even more thought and permitting and implementation to get that repainted.” Woo did not mention that the landmark structure was her family’s property.
PubliCola is supported entirely by readers like you.
CLICK BELOW to become a one-time or monthly contributor.
Woo said she was threatened by two men in the CID some time after the graffiti went up, including one who said he was going to kill her and another who “came at me with a large stick that he’s swinging around like a bat. He pointed it right at me, and just kind of repeated what the graffiti said,” Woo recalled.
During their comments, other councilmembers referred to the graffiti as “misogynistic [and] xenophobic” (Rob Saka), a “racist attack” (Sara Nelson), “destruction [of] historic buildings” (Joy Hollingsworth), and “hate speech” (Maritza Rivera, Cathy Moore) that was designed to “try to intimidate [Woo] out of office” (Nelson again.)
A spokesperson for the Seattle Police Department said Woo herself reported the graffiti to the FBI. “Our Bias Crimes detective is aware of this incident,” they said, but “SPD has not yet received a police report.”
A spokesman for the FBI’s Seattle branch, Steve Bernd, said that while he couldn’t comment on a specific case, investigators looking into hate crime allegations generally consider three factors: “Use of force or the threat of force or conspiracy to use or threaten force or willfully cause bodily injury; [t]argeting the victim because of actual or perceived gender, sexual orientation, race, color, religion, national origin, disability, or familial status; and [a]dditional motive to injure, intimidate, or interfere with some specific federally protected activity or right,” like the right to vote.
“No matter how offensive to some, we are keenly aware that expressing views is not a crime by itself and that the protections afforded under the Constitution cannot be compromised,” Bernd said. “Non-threatening hate conduct is protected by the First Amendment and the FBI does not investigation that conduct.”
Woo responded to PubliCola’s questions, which included a request for any additional examples of graffiti that might include more explicitly anti-Asian, xenophobic, misogynistic, or hateful messages, by referring to her remarks during the council briefing.
“My hope is that people will direct their comments to me, as their city council representative, instead of defacing property and local businesses,” Woo said. “It’s unacceptable that workers and small business owners should have to deal with these types of property crimes.”
During the 2020 protests against police violence, then-mayor Jenny Durkan argued for closing down the Capitol Hill Organized Protest (CHOP) zone because of “homophobic slurs” left-wing protesters had supposedly graffitied in the area, harming the queer community in a “historic sanctuary” for LGBTQ+ people, Capitol Hill. As we reported, the so-called “slurs” turned out to be tags from self-described “fags against cops,” “dykes for anarchy,” and “dykes for BLM,” protesting Durkan’s administration and policies.

This blog has become a series of petty “gotchas” about the SCC. We get it. You don’t like moderates. But there are so many interesting things to tackle in this city and some silly version of “Mean Girls Go To City Hall” just isn’t one of them. Your blog, your rules, though.
With exception of the “why few people…” line (totally unnecessary), Jay is correct.
Why cover The Stranger’s xenophobic article? Are you and they so blind to anti-Asian hate that people here have suffered from since the late 1800s? Don’t you understand how “GET OUT” graffitied onto anything in Chinatown/International District (CID) could be taken by people who have suffered so much discrimination? Did you forget about the mobs that forcibly expelled most of Seattle’s Chinese residents back in 1886? Following the Tacoma Riot of 1885? Or the United State’s first immigration bill, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1888? Or the internment of hundreds of thousands of our Japanese American neighbors during World War II? More recently, do you recall how local Asians were blamed for COVID-19, with people refusing to shop or dine in the CID? And then windows throughout the CID were smashed. A few months later, the CID was again attacked, windows smashed again and other property damage as George Floyd protesters stormed through the neighborhood. Again and again and again. Can’t you even begin to imagine the cumulative effects of a century and a half of discrimination and how anyone of any Asian descent could find harm in the anti-Tanya graffiti?
The Stranger’s pattern of Anti-Asian racism is long. Maybe some of that crap stuck to you. But perhaps you ought to spend some time in the Wing Luke Museum.
By the way, for the unknowing, Wing Luke, who served as an assistant Attorney General for the State of Washington, was elected to the Seattle City Council in in 1962. He was the first Asian American to hold elected office in the state. His election to Seattle City Council broke the color barrier.
Asian Americans have had a seat on the Seattle City Council most years since then. That’s why Tanya Woo’s appointment was so important. The Council majority saw the gaping hole in representation, noted how close Tanya had come to winning in District 2, and believed this was the right choice. And ever since, Leftist bloggers have had a shit fit about it. Yet for people of Asian descent, far and away the largest minority group in Seattle, Tanya Woo is the ONLY person on the City Council who understands them; the ONLY person on the City Council who understands the levels of discrimination they face; the ONLY person on the City Council who understands the ongoing threat to the CID from bad government decisions (Sound Transit station location debates, King County’s decision to place a gigantic homeless industrial complex next to the CID, the City’s blind eye to the open drug dealing and crime in Little Saigon, and so on).
Do better, Erica. Get out in that neighborhood; it’s just a short bicycle ride away. Talk to the people who live and work there.
You are right. In an effort to smear a moderate, Erica has dived headfirst into “Asians are a model minority who suffer no racism” stereotypes, which are harmful and incredible racist. You only hear this from white liberals , and it is so misguided and deserves to be called out. I would love to see Erica run for city council, on the other hand.
I see also that you screen comments and don’t let them show up live – also a bad look.
Erica, why in the world would you victim blame? Tanya says she was threatened with violence. You doubt her? This whole article is in poor taste and why few people read you blog
It’s not victim blaming, it’s reporting, and I find it useful in getting to know our council and their attitudes.