By Erica C. Barnett
New Councilmember Cathy Moore demonstrated an alarming intolerance for Seattle’s long tradition of noisy protest by demanding that police arrest a group of demonstrators for being too loud and making her “feel threatened” at a council meeting Tuesday afternoon.
The demonstrators showed up to demand that the council cut police department spending to pay for housing for immigrants and refugees living in Tukwila, where the need for shelter and housing has been (literally) overwhelming.
Council president Sara Nelson started the meeting on a sour note by suggesting that the demonstrators were “exploiting vulnerable people for their own political ends”—suggesting, in so many words, that they were only pretending to care about homeless refugees because it helped them advance an unrelated anti-police, anti-sweeps agenda. (Those who were allowed to speak noted that in their view, these issues are all related). Compounding the insult, Nelson limited public comment to 20 minutes, telling the group they ought to be taking their grievances to King County and the state, which play a more direct role in responding to the refugee crisis.
Council rules limit public comment to topics on the agenda and issues within the purview of a council committee, so Nelson was technically within her right to cut off comments. In recent years, however, the council has generally not enforced this rule, tacitly acknowledging that it’s better to let people say what they have to say than shut down speech.
PubliCola is supported entirely by readers like you.
CLICK BELOW to become a one-time or monthly contributor.
Nelson’s unforced error set the tone for the rest of the afternoon. After pulling the council into recess twice, she had security clear the room; when six people refused to leave, police arrested them for trespassing and booked them into the downtown jail. Legal? Almost certainly. Ill-advised? 100 percent. Seattle has a history of protest and civil disobedience that stretches back decades; if an elected official’s first reaction when people shout and disrupt a meeting is to kick them out and call the police, that says a lot about what they think of that culture and history.
“It is not appropriate” for protesters to be disruptive, Moore, a former King County Superior Court judge, continued. “We need to make sure that this does not happen going forward. We are shutting down the operations of a democracy because of a mob action. It is not to be tolerated.”
Which brings us back to Moore.
With the chamber emptied, the council reconvened to discuss a resolution honoring the state’s first Black senator, George Fleming. From outside the locked council chambers, demonstrators continued to yell, and several banged on the glass chamber walls, prompting Moore to interrupt the proceedings to say she felt “physically threatened” by the protesters outside.
Invoking the image of a “mob” storming the room and physically attacking the council, Moore said, “Our physical safety is being threatened by the actions of the demonstrators outside, banging on the windows, which could easily get broken and we will have a mob scene. I’m asking for police presence to arrest those individuals.”
When Nelson, belatedly trying to deescalate the situation, pointed out that arresting people for protesting would require “several steps”—”I appreciate that it’s very loud”—Moore interrupted, insisting, “It’s more than loud. It is a physical threat to the safety of each of us on this council and it is a threat to the operation of the civic institution.”
“It is not appropriate” for protesters to be disruptive, Moore, a former King County Superior Court judge, continued. “We need to make sure that this does not happen going forward. We are shutting down the operations of a democracy because of a mob action. It is not to be tolerated.”
This is a misunderstanding of how the city council operates. Unlike a court hearing, a council meeting is a place for comment and dissent, up to and including protests that may interfere with scheduled business. The best approach is generally to let people speak their mind, and to listen to what they’re saying—not to declare disruptions “intolerable” or refer to demonstrators as a violent “mob.” If council members aren’t willing to tolerate noisy dissent, they probably should have looked more closely at the job description before applying.