Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Chip, Chip, Chip…

So Obama announced this morning a “compromise” to placate a group of Catholic religious bullies who don’t want any religiously-affiliated institution to have to pay for contraception.

In the “compromise,” which has been praised by everyone from Cecile Richards to Patty Murray, insurance companies themselves will have to provide contraception to women who want it. giving the bishops a win (in that religious institutions won’t have to pay to prevent their employees from getting pregnant), while making Obama look pro-woman (99 percent of US women use birth control in their lifetimes).

It’s far from clear exactly how this will work. Insurance companies aren’t going to just start handing out free pill packs; the money for that extra cost has to come out of the premiums employees pay for their insurance coverage. Presumably, employees at non-religious institutions would have to subsidize birth control for those who work at religious institutions, forcing non-religious businesses, as a Washington Post blogger put it, to “foot … the bill for people who aren’t on their payrolls.

However the administration works its way through that morass, the result will likely be higher insurance premiums for everyone. Thanks, bishops!

And, of course, women will be responsible for the extra burden of making sure that their insurance company provides and maintains direct coverage of birth control under their special new, separate-but-equal contraceptive plans. (To quote Melissa McEwan, this is like “celebrating the passage of a mandatory waiting period for abortion as a win because abortion is still available.”)

Additionally, insurance companies are required to let employers know when an employee seeks birth control coverage, which could be a major problem for women who work at a religious institution that believes that taking contraceptives is immoral.

And here’s the larger issue: The bishops aren’t going to back down. Even if they ultimately accept this “victory,” (they won’t) they’re going to keep pushing for more… and more… and more. If women’s right to health care is something Obama considers negotiable (he does), then what else will he “compromise” away under pressure from a few old, celibate white men? For once, just once, it would be nice to hear our President say, “This is basic health care, and if you’re opposed to providing basic health care, you’re welcome to forgo all government funding and tax exemptions.”


  • Native

    You mean the first amendment applies to something other than “journalism”

  • Anonymous

    blame the bishops!  how convenient.  why do insurance cos. *have* to cover contraception?  why do i have to pay so some dumb ass chick can screw whoever she wants?  the reason premiums keep going up is because so many lefties want insurance to cover every darn thing under the sun.  pay for it youself.

  • http://twitter.com/chemchampion Richard Champion

    I think people should take a deep breath. Cost-benefit for the insurance companies – covering charge for relatively inexpensive birth control pills vs. covering more births. It has to be cheaper to just take the hit on “the pill.” This may actually be a win-win.

  • Guest

    I dunno.  This persuades me that Obama actually kind of punked the right wing on this one: 
    http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2012/02/10/obama_riled_up_republicans_on_contraception_and_then_delivers_a_knock_out_punch_.html

  • Anonymous

    Oh, I dunno, because you yourself may benefit from not getting some “dumb ass chick” pregnant in the future? Or because paying for pregnancy, maternal care, child care, public school, etc. for an unplanned child is a lot more expensive than the pill? 

  • Jamesa

    I’m not a “religious rightie”, but if I was (male or female), I can see where this little political stunt would make me a bit upset. Many have not heard of the tyranny of the majority. It is brought up in regards to marriage rights, etc., but the concept seems to fade into the background when it is applied to someone less beloved of time and fashion. Nevermind the Catholics, there are many other communities in America that are not keen to receive edicts from the throne in D.C.
    The handwringers are flipping out. They appear to imagine pregnant women begging and dying on the sidewalks of our cities. Personally, I think the whole stunt is just for the sake of political motivation of the base. To the rest of us, this is just another dollop of the putrid cesspool scum fed to us as ”important news and event”. It is neither, and Washington might be better off doing the necessary work to get our country back on track as a nation of innovation, manufacture, and  freedom. The tyranny of the majority is not in the Bill of Rights, it is found elsewhere; the duty of the powerful is to protect the rights of the weakest among us – even if we do not like them.
    I am still waiting for the knock on my door ……
    Jsa

  • repete

    Time to stop pretending religious organizations deserve
    special tax treatment.

  • Anonymous

    Obscenely, willfully obtuse.

  • Jakers

     Lefties screw society up by making by promoting promiscuity and then want society to pay to help reduce the negative effects of their policies.

  • Jakers

     Religious groups cost-benefits analysis takes into account their concepts of the cost and benefits to the souls (agree or not is a separate issue) of their followers, not just the financial costs.

  • repete

    For every dumb as chick, there is a dumb ass dude; and if we
    can keep them from begetting a dumb ass kid, we should.

    For every dumb as chick, there is a dumb ass dude; and if we
    can keep them from begetting a dumb ass kid, we should.

  • IdahoQuiz

    I don’t know if this was a political stunt or not, but Jamesa touches upon an important principle at stake here, freedom of conscience.  I don’t agree with the Catholic Church’s stand on contraception, nor am I in any way, shape, or form religious, but I respect their right not to participate in a practice that they find morally objectionable.  It’s outrageous that so many progressives like ECB are content to run roughshod over other’s deeply-held moral principals.  It’s also quite clear from the article above that Erica has no regard for anyone who doesn’t see the world exactly the way she does.  No room for any compromise or accommodation at all.  Scary.

  • Monster

    Bottom heavy and pig faced Erica “the C is for Cunt” barnett is so unpleasnt she is unrapeable!

  • Seattle Shrugster

    Perhaps, but how does one quantify the cost to a soul?  And if that is not quantifiable, can it be measured another way?

  • Herpae Derpae Catholicae

    “No room for any compromise or accommodation at all.  Scary.”

    Because the right and the Catholics aren’t at all like this, either.

  • Anonymous

    Lots of people have “deeply held moral principles.” That doesn’t mean they should be able to run roughshod over women’s basic health care. Where does it stop? Should churches that believe in faith healing be able to opt out of the health care law entirely? Should Jehovah’s Witnesses be allowed to deny coverage for blood transfusions? Should any religious institution that frowns on premarital sex and adultery be allowed to refuse to pay for STD testing? Should religions that oppose homosexuality be allowed to refuse HIV testing and treatment? Ultimately, this argument isn’t about “religious freedom.” If it was, we’d be asking all those questions. It’s about women’s autonomy over their own bodies, and our ability to PLAN our families, instead of being forced to choose between abstinence and pregnancy.

  • Monster

    chubby is upset cuz no one wants to get her pregnate

  • Anonymous

    It’s about women’s autonomy over their own bodies, and our ability to PLAN our families, instead of being forced to choose between abstinence and pregnancy.

    Marvelous.  So if the State doesn’t compel employers to provide a specific type of benefit (antithetical to and undermining of their core teachings), the result is women are “forced to choose between abstinence and pregnancy.”

    Somehow the lack of employer-provided food, clothing, and housing hasn’t created legions of malnourished, naked, and homeless office workers.   

    Your logical fallacy is larger than the Grand Canyon, even putting aside the uncontested ability of any adult to purchase the contraception of their choice.

    But that’s why this is C for Crank, rather than News.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_7J3DMRSL6VTVVMZOXLRRL55VZE Jim D

    That is sheer bigotry!  Most Catholics aren’t like that at all.  A few are, but most aren’t.

    As for the conservatives, just because so many of them are rigid and close-minded doesn’t mean we have to sink to their level.  Besides, not all conservatives are like that either.  I’ve known many of them in my time.  Have you?

  • Jakers

    I don’t know how each one does it, nor do I necessarily agree with their stance, but I don’t think that it is a right to for every person born in the US and working to be able to have birth control paid for by their employer or insurance company.

  • mark

    It’s all a sham.  For an insurance company to have to provide free contraception and contact the women directly, the premium charged to the religious organization will have to be slightly higher than it would have been if they were just offering the contraception itself.  Nobody wins.

  • take a pill

    ahem, so catholic bullies includes senator john kerry, bob casey of pennsylvania and joe biden i guess, also mike barnicle and chriss mathews in the media.  bullies.  oh wait, now obama himself is a bully. 

  • No Name

     Don’t stable married couples have an interest in planning their families? 

  • Jimb

    Fer sure, sheeple. Its “family planning” on the house.
    Have a worry-free shackup tonight;
    its women’s health, doncha know.

  • Anonymous

    but then there would be no more catholics!

    why is the catholic church against contraception in the first place? It’s a shallow effort to perpetuate itself. 

  • Anonymous

    righties screw up society by increasing the number or unwanted children.

  • Jamesa

    I have to wonder where this will end ?
    “running roughshod over womens’ basic health care” has nothing to do with individuals minding their own business and embracing their deeply held beliefs.
    Will you (those media folks who own and write the ink and have a firm hand on the podium), ever find a “progressive” policy that goes too far, in the name of public health, fairness, or any other coded doctrine you have fashionable embraced ?
    I find it hard to imagine being a Muslim in Erica’s America. Will you be standing aside and allowing mandatory pork consumption in public schools if that is the new miracle food fad ? Will you outlaw noon prayer at public schools, and at the same time not allow devout Muslim students to leave the grounds ? What will you dictate in regard to hand useage ? After all, in some cultures each hand has a place in the routine of life. If the soiled (left) hand is used to shake or touch another person in greeting it is an insult. Conversely, I have had gay friends who prefer a left hand shake for thier own reasons. Which group will you force to submit Erica ?
    When will you be sending in the Storm Troopers to Amish country ? Will you be hunting down the Mennonites too ? Is there anyone free from your religous zeal ?

    Erica’s America ……. the iron fist from above to rule the simple masses below. Hmmmmm, which country and political group does this intolerance remind me of ? Hmmmm, they had the majority supporting them too ! Sooooo, no room for different cultures and beliefs in this ! corner of America !
    Too bad for us.

    Insha Allah

    Jmsa

  • stronger argument

    i think the left has missed the message on this one.  just declaring something women’s health care isn’t a winning response to the first amendment religious liberty frameinstead, frame the catholic bishops as the religious tyrants, insisting that the tens of thousands of noncatholic employees they have in their clutches follow catholic thought on birth control — they are messing with the religious liberty of their own employees in those hospitals and universities.  hey if they want to prescribe doctrine for their priests and nuns fine that’s it, we don’t want priests suing bishops in federal court over employment practices but they can’t tell their non church employees they’re part of the catholic church enterprise. 

    whether it’s about women’s bodies, or wage laws, or the right to work free of racial discrimination or ANY worker rights.  they’re taking religious freedom from their workers.  that’s the trump argument.

  • Jakers

     Hey, at least they are for post-natal abortion to get rid of the bad apples. Lefties want to spend billions so they can get out of jail and continue costing society.