Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

The Gender Gap in Public Transit

A new study from Stanford University concludes that studies of public transit fail to consider the type of trips taken by women—an oversight that leads transit agencies to fail to provide for women’s transit needs.

Specifically, transit agencies tend to completely ignore trips that involve taking care of a child or relative—trips that are predominately taken by women. When researchers asked transit riders whether their trips involved care—as opposed to the usual categories, which include getting to and from work, going to school, and leisure, 25 percent said they were using transit for care purposes, including getting kids to and from school, visiting sick relatives, and shopping for kids.

Additionally, the study found, transit agencies  fail to factor in the fact that women with kids are twice as likely as men to engage in “trip-chaining”—taking the kids to school, picking them up, and doing household errands on their way to and from work.

All this despite the fact that women use transit more than men do, regardless of race.

What are the implications? The Atlantic suggests that if transit agencies take women’s needs into account, they will provide easier boarding and wider aisles (for women with strollers or heavy bags) and more transit service in care-related sites, like parks, daycares, and schools. Additionally, transit agencies could include more women on their boards, the Atlantic suggests. Although Sound Transit, the regional transit agency for the Puget Sound, is led by a woman, Joni Earl, its 16-member board is dominated by men, with just four female members. (It’s all-white, too).

For another transit rider’s perspective on riding while female (and with a stroller), check out Sightline’s Alyse Nelson, who talked about riding transit with a toddler last month.


  • Mark B

    “What are the implications? The Atlantic suggests that if transit agencies take women’s needs into account, they will provide easier boarding and wider aisles (for women with strollers or heavy bags) ”

    Wider aisles would mean wider busses which would mean widening the roads or taking out a bike lane, and you wouldn’t want either of those would you?

  • Perfect Voter

    Spoken just like a person who doesn’t ride the bus. You widen the aisles by redesigning the interior of the bus, dufus. Taking out a few seats here and there would result in wider aisles and easier boarding and alighting.

  • Anonymous

    Nice snark, Mark B. Do you have any authority for that claim? If you look at the Sightline post, they discuss how other transit agencies make it work. Although I can’t cite to any authority to support my assumptions, having been to Copenhagen, I’m pretty sure that they haven’t widened their roads…and they certainly haven’t taken away bike infrastructure.

  • TK

    Transit agencies don’t take much of anything into account anymore do they?  Its all about the peak commute to downtown Seattle around here.  Forget about serving anyone who doesn’t travel to downtown Seattle, let alone women specific needs.

  • Local Yokel

    You need to widen your horizon.  Get creative.  Think out loud if you have to.  There are other completely logical solutions to your problem of needing wider aisles: you remove a car lane, and you make the bus lane and the bike lane wider.  Or, you could eliminate the sidewalk.  There are lots of options.  Or, you could just do as Perfect Voter suggests and use a little common sense.  The choice is up to you.  Choose wisely!

  • Anonymous

    no, they would require getting rid of some seats—which is actually what many transit experts recommend, because buses with fewer seats can accommodate more people. 

  • CC

    This is long overdue. As a former single woman who used to commute on the bus daily from lower Queen Anne to downtown, I never once thought about how challenging it might be for a mom with even just one child to commute on public transit. As a new mom, I don’t EVER bother taking the bus anymore. I drive everywhere that’s too far to walk. That works for me because I can afford a car, but it must be torture for moms who can’t afford a car and have to lug their strollers and kids everywhere.

    Public transit should be an option for ALL people,  including families with young kids. In a world of SUV’s and crossover’s, making public transit more family friendly could have an enormously positive impact on the environment.

  • Jakers

    And make for wider seats so they can accommodate fat people better.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr Baker

    And i thought it was just me thinking that unless you are traveling from your giant cube to work downtown, or to the U, you are lucky to devise an efficient route to go elsewhere for work or any other activity.

    Thank goodness there was a study.

  • really.

    Um…..we have massive problems with race and gender discrimination, but I don’t think there’s a problem here.  if there are fewer seats that would disproportionately impact parents with a kid or someone helping a senior, assumed here to be women with kid and parent, that is, people who need seats more.   So that cuts both ways.  And how are transit agencies completely ignoring “trip chaining” also known as the “transfer”?  Most allow transfers.  What else are they supposed to do? The notion that bus agencies should plan more routes to places where care or schools happen, is unsupported.  In general bus agencies make a mess of routes for everyone….years just to add a route from QA to cap hill.  Our metro took about 6 years plus massive funding crisis to even just do the obvious:  cut hours from low rider routes to add hours to high rider routes.  If anything, bus routes are too slow and ponderous anyway — stopping every two blocks too much — which helps the parents with kids and the seniors, those assumedly tied to “women” in this piece, who can’t walk more than 2 blocks easily, and works against the healthier singleish adults (“men”?) who’d rather it be fewer stops, more distance between stops, just get me downtown as fast as possible please, it’s okay if I stride walk 10 blocks to a stop.  As far as women on boards, did they apply?  If gender disproportionality is per se evidence of discrmination, I guess SEAL TEAM SIX is guilty of massive gender discrmination — they also got no wymen.

  • Guest

    Boo for accommodating strollers that take up way too much space in transit as it is.  What’s wrong with carrying your kid? 
    http://www.overstock.com/Baby/HugaMonkey-Baby-Sling/5880686/product.html?cid=202290&kid=9553000357392&track=pspla&kw={keyword}&adtype=pla

  • FrequentPoster

    I’ve met plenty of girls on the bus who would pull a train, but never met any girls on the bus who offered to chain a trip.

  • FrequentPoster

     It’s wymyn, you pig.

  • Monster

    redesiging the bus is easier said then done faggit

  • ivan

    It’s “predominantly,” not “predominately.”

  • Monster

    Erica will never have children.

  • Big Jim Slade

    The idea of more transit service in care-related sites is not a gender issue, as much as Erica desperately wants to make it one.

    Anyone with school-age children or kids in daycare learns quickly that public transit is simply not a viable option. It takes way more time, and time is a luxury parents simply don’t get. Paying overage fees to a daycare more than once a week because the bus ran late again makes the decision to save up for a car real easy.  

  • Mark B

    Anyway retard , I ride the bus or carpool to work EVERYDAY. Taking out seats makes less room for riders (is’nt that the point of walk, bike ,ride.) We already have a shit transit system so making it less accessible doesn’t seem very smart.

  • Mark B

    So basically, METRO should just buy a few thousand new busses that will carry less people with the money that they do not have?

    Are you serious?

  • Fred

    “ heavy bags”

    Bag ladies?

  • Mark B

    ” because buses with fewer seats can accommodate more people.”

    There you go, the Seattle less is more thought process.

    I guess it is fine if you want to make people stand for 2 hours.

  • Fred

    Womyn like this?

    “Woman stabbed on Seattle bus; 2nd woman arrested”http://www.seattlepi.com/news/article/Woman-stabbed-on-Seattle-bus-2nd-woman-arrested-2888273.php

    Me thinks getting the psychos off the buses would be a good start to making the buses more usable for everyone.

  • Bark More Wag Less

    Another non-issue dredged up by Seattle’s perpetually aggrieved, college educated, over privileged leftists. Fuck me, we’re supposed to buy a whole new line of buses because women are too stupid to either get a 1. baby sling or 2. a sensibly-sized folding stroller rather than the SUV models most Seattle women prefer?

    What’s next, hard seats are institutionally oppressing hobos with boils?

  • Bark More Wag Less

    Another non-issue dredged up by Seattle’s perpetually aggrieved, college educated, over privileged leftists. Fuck me, we’re supposed to buy a whole new line of buses because women are too stupid to either get a 1. baby sling or 2. a sensibly-sized folding stroller rather than the SUV models most Seattle women prefer?

    What’s next, hard seats are institutionally oppressing hobos with boils?

  • Verd1n

    One quiet evening I asked a bus driver what was the most curious incident he had experienced.  The answer: when a lady came up to him to complain about a couple screwing on the back seat.  His answer to the women, “If it offends you, look out the window.”

    So, maybe taking out seats is not the answer after all.

    As for the Stanford study, tell me they haven’t got something better to do.

  • Verd1n

    One quiet evening I asked a bus driver what was the most curious incident he had experienced.  The answer: when a lady came up to him to complain about a couple screwing on the back seat.  His answer to the women, “If it offends you, look out the window.”

    So, maybe taking out seats is not the answer after all.

    As for the Stanford study, tell me they haven’t got something better to do.

  • Anonymous

    Were you serious when you referred to a previous commentor as ”retard?” Because I’ve seen a lot of past comments by you, but I’ve never seen your comments be so juvenile and disrespectful.

    I’m not suggesting that Metro has to buy “a few thousand new buses” (PS: they don’t even own “a few thousand” right now). I’m saying that there are other steps that can be taken short of your option, which would also involve buying new buses. I don’t think that anyone who wants change is expecting this issue to be solved overnight, but as Metro buys new buses, it’s something that they can consider.

    Also, getting rid of seats doesn’t mean that Metro carries fewer passengers–it means they carry more. I’m not suggesting that we should do away with seating. I’m just saying that your premise (along with your grammar and spelling) is wrong. (sorry…I’m not usually so petty in my responses, but your tone calls for it)

  • Anonymous

    Were you serious when you referred to a previous commentor as ”retard?” Because I’ve seen a lot of past comments by you, but I’ve never seen your comments be so juvenile and disrespectful.

    I’m not suggesting that Metro has to buy “a few thousand new buses” (PS: they don’t even own “a few thousand” right now). I’m saying that there are other steps that can be taken short of your option, which would also involve buying new buses. I don’t think that anyone who wants change is expecting this issue to be solved overnight, but as Metro buys new buses, it’s something that they can consider.

    Also, getting rid of seats doesn’t mean that Metro carries fewer passengers–it means they carry more. I’m not suggesting that we should do away with seating. I’m just saying that your premise (along with your grammar and spelling) is wrong. (sorry…I’m not usually so petty in my responses, but your tone calls for it)

  • Anonymous

    The Atlantic isn’t a Seattle publication and Stanford University is not based in Seattle.

  • Bark More Wag Less

    Publicola is a Seattle based publication, according to Erica’s criminal record, she’s from Seattle, and the whiners on this blog calling for ‘something to be done, ohhhh the injustice’ are from Seattle. 

    Did you miss this line in ECB’s article:

    “Although Sound Transit, the regional transit agency for the Puget Sound, is led by a woman, Joni Earl, its 16-member board is dominated by men, with just four female members. (It’s all-white, too).”SO yes, this is about the usual Seattle leftists with too much time on their hands.

  • Bark More Wag Less

    “As for the Stanford study, tell me they haven’t got something better to do.”

    Manufacturing oppression is the left’s only business these days.

    “His answer to the women, “If it offends you, look out the window.”
    Same policy they have at the library.

    No thanks, I’ll drive.

  • Mark B

    Yeah, I shouldn’t have called him a retard, just didn’t like being called dufus. Sorry for the misplacement of the apostrophe.

    Funny how my tone “calls for it” but the orignal insult does not bother you.

  • Anonymous

    I was responding to the phrase “another non-issue dredged up….” Maybe you meant that ECB “dredged up” the article, but the issue was identified by Stanford and then reported on by The Atlantic.

  • Bark More Wag Less

    “ I shouldn’t have called him a retard, just didn’t like being called duffs.”

    That’s retarded.

  • Bark More Wag Less

    “Public transit should be an option for ALL people”

    Judging by the stabbings and shootings in the past 6 months alone on Metro, I think you have ‘mission accomplished’.

  • Bark More Wag Less

    “Maybe you meant that ECB “dredged up” the article”

    Well, duh…

  • Anonymous

    Well say what you mean then, because ECB didn’t dredge up the issue.

  • Lew

    I believe it is Wombyn

  • Bark More Wag Less

    “ECB didn’t dredge up the issue.”

    Yes she did when she posted her opinions on the subject here for us to read. ‘Dredge’ doesn’t mean original source. 

  • FrequentPoster

    As a new mom, I don’t EVER bother taking the bus anymore. I drive
    everywhere that’s too far to walk. That works for me because I can
    afford a car, but it must be torture for moms who can’t afford a car and
    have to lug their strollers and kids everywhere

    If you can’t afford a car, you sure as hell can’t afford a kid.

  • FrequentPoster

    Good God, just when I think ericabarnett can’t possibly get any dumber, she proves me wrong.

  • Bark More Wag Less

    “ buses with fewer seats can accommodate more people.”

    But what about the elderly, people carrying infants, the handicapped, people with jimmy legs….are they supposed to stand now because some Seattle stupid urbanist b*tch uses an oversized stroller they can’t maneuver onto a bus? 

    Your race to find a newly oppressed group has lead you to defend idiots yet again.

    No thanks, I’ll drive.

  • Bark More Wag Less

    ..or a condom apparently.

  • Bark More Wag Less

    “ let alone women specific needs.”

    Hell, what about the needs of midgets, people with jimmy legs and Indians who like to sit crossed-legged on the floor? All ignored too. 

    Apparently sitting in a seat and not making a nuisance of yourself is only for straight white males…yet again.

  • jhk

    My memory only goes back to the mid 70′s, but in Finland buses have always had back doors with a low floor and double-wide to permit men or women with a stroller to enter. In that section of the bus, they take out a row or two of seats to provide a safe place to park up to maybe 3 strollers, and when there are no babes on board, it creates a more spacious zone for standing passengers. There are straps affixed to rails so you can secure the strollers. Also, one adult boards free when with a baby stroller so the parent doesn’t have to fight through the crowd to pay their fare. Simple. Effective.

  • Davey Jones

    So move to Finland.

  • Busdrivermike

    I do not know how more women on the ST board would  impact policy, but I can tell  you that I know it is a hassle for a person to fold their strollers on the bus in particular parents of low income with no other option than taking the bus. It has been my experience that services do not cluster around low income housing so lower income people have to  travel on public transit to shop.

    Simply put, we live in a society that does not function as well as many other countries in relation to  these kind of issues, mainly in this case, the fact that Metro can be sued by parents when their child is injured on the bus by a sudden stop even though the parent is not making any kind of reasonable attempt to keep the child  safe while the child  is on the bus.

    Presently, the best solution for everyone is for transit riding parents is to buy a stroller with a snap-in capsule that holds the infant. All the parent does is snap out the capsule, and push a button that folds the  stroller while  leaving an amount of storage intact for baby needs. It is quick and satisfies the folding stroller rule. Those strollers are quick to fold. I bet in Copenhagen there are not  too many hills like the QA counterbalance or Columbia street from 3rd to the viaduct. A sudden stop with a baby on a big  stroller like those pictured from Copenhagen would move that stroller into  someone else, and if that someone else is elderly it could cause an injury. 

     As I driver, I can tell you that whatever the rule is, drivers have to enforce it or face the consequences if their kindness and generosity gets overcome by circumstances which force them to write an accident report. People lose jobs over these kinds of rules and their decision not to enforce them. 

  • Fred

    Best we create a city agency to give snapping strollers to our disadvantaged communities.

  • Dogpatch, Seattle

    Spoken like a true yahoo — “We-all ’round heayah jes’ don’t cotton to y’awll fum somewheres else.  Y’all must be some kinda flatlander, so why dontcher jes’ take them fancy paints iders and git on outa heayeah.”

     

  • CBO

    The cruelty and stupidity of your comments (both BMWL and FP) never ceases to amaze me.  

  • Seattle Shrugster

    This is the funniest thing I have read yet in the comments on this site.  Frequent Poseur belittling someone else’s intelligence.  Thank heaven we have him here as our beacon of hope for the salvation of intellectual integrity in Seattle.

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Melindagates

    “The Gender Gap in Public Transit”
    Typical pro-government “poop-in-the-pipes” propaganda.

    Sound Transit is entirely run by females,  the state has two of two federal senator postion held by females. the unqualified tax craxy govenor is also female.   They take roles of power are utterly unqaulified for.

    Now this “poop” that trains don’t go where the females want to go? 
    Sound transit goes where politics sends it.  And all politics in this state are dominated by females.

    How about this one.. google this “kirkaldn mayor (a femal of course) is now also th emiliary govenor of kirkland”  go check citizens… hehe, these females have a lot of bad stuff in store for us all.