Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

The Rest of the Transportation Bills

Gov. Chris Gregoire’s $3.6 billion, ten-year transportation funding package was the big news in transportation circles today, but advocates have their eyes on a number of other bills that are on the docket for this year’s 60-day legislative session. This is by no means a comprehensive list of this year’s transportation bills; nor are any of these bills (with the exception of a few that are already scheduled for hearings) guaranteed to get a hearing in committee.

Senate Bill 5188, sponsored in part by senate transportation chair Mary Margaret Haugen (D-10), would impose a number of new regulations on cities that use automated red-light traffic cameras—requiring a city-funded analysis before and every year after the cameras are put in place, requiring warning signs that cameras are coming at least 30 days before they are installed; and requiring that the yellow interval before a light turns red last a minimum of three seconds to give drivers more time to get through an intersection on yellow. (A similar house bill, 1590, would also limit the amount of fines for red-light violations to $50).

House Bill 1217, which would give cities the authority to set speed limits as low as 20 mph on nonarterial highways.

House Bill 1098, another red-light bill, would require all red-light camera proposals to be approved by a public vote, and would require limits on the number of red-light cameras that could be installed in a jurisdiction; it would also stipulate that cities could not provide information about traffic violations caught on red-light cameras to drivers’ insurance companies.

House Bill 1700 would gives cities the flexibility to fund bicycle and pedestrian projects using gas taxes if those projects improve motor vehicle safety.

House Bill 1527 would allow motorcycle drivers to drive through a red light if their motorcycles are too light to trigger an automatic signal change (this one has the support of Seattle Democratic Rep. Reuven Carlyle, D-36, a motorcycle driver).

House Bill 1857  would require drivers whose cars have been impounded to provide proof of insurance to get their cars out of hock (and impose stiff fines for drivers who can’t provide proof of insurance) .

House Bill 1018 would require drivers to stay between three and five feet away from cyclists, depending on the driver’s speed when passing them (and would clarify cyclists’ responsibility to keep as far away from drivers as they feel is safe).

Senate Bill 5250 would require the state department of transportation to consider using a “design-build” process for all projects over $10 million. Design-build projects are designed and built by the same contractor, who assumes some of the risk WSDOT would have taken on under the more traditional “design-bid-build” process, in which the state is responsible for project design.


  • jimu

    1098 sounds great!

    And in addition to 1527, let’s legalize lane splitting for motorcyclists and repeal the helmet law, as well.

  • Perfect Voter

    Yeah, right, lane-splitting for bareheaded motorcyclists! What a concept!

    One of those once came up between me and the truck next to me — his handlebars were a whole, maybe 8 inches away from my left mirror. After cruising there for a few hundred yards, he finally pulled away.

    What if the panic he induced in me caused me to drift left? He’s one damned lucky cyclist — if he’s still alive and cycling.

  • Anonymous

    SB1700 wants to steal gas tax revenue for non-highway purposes.  Gas taxes are protected by the 18th amendment, so some brilliant legislator wants to violate the Constitution.  Wonderful.

  • Anonymous

    How about a bill to allow the state to build ferries out of state where the costs are 1/2 to 2/3 less?

  • Anonymous

    Legislators are reacting to voter dislike for red-light cameras in an attempt to satisfy them so they don’t get rid of them completely.  HB1098  is a good start but needs to go farther.

  • Anonymous

    Oh yeah! How about another bill to eliminate the sales tax for transportation projects?

  • Anonymous

    Lane splitting is working well in congested California, and would work just a well here on our congested highways.

  • Oemissions

    we have catered to the auto corps for  far too long
    they put out the product, then we have to pay with taxes billions /trillions of dollars for their uses and abuses ,as well as  horrendous loss of lives,injuries, NOISE and stink

  • Blue Light

    And all we’ve got in return is the highest standard of living – access to goods and services, emergency response, etc. – of any generation in the history of our species.  The outrage!

  • Oemissions

    @731d5d807934ba1639a34c6e8b533504:disqus Service vehicles are not targeted here. They are useful.
    Daily personal automobile use is NOT: degrades our habitats, our air, and our morale,very very selfish behaviuor.  One can have a very high standard of living without driving

    Our streets are filthy,our houses are dusty. The pollution of air is ridiculous.
    Where do u think all that exhaust goes? And why do we have to suffer from all the NOISE?

  • Oemissions

    yep! a high standard of living, access to all the junk food you can eat,polluted lakes, drinking water in plastic bottles,housing problems,lineups at foodbanks,etc,etc and what about healthcare for all?

  • FrequentPoster

    House Bill 1217, which would give cities the authority to set speed limits as low as 20 mph on nonarterial highways

    As if we needed yet another example of the selfish cyclistas wanting special privileges (exemption from the time-honored practice of tying speed limit changes to traffic engineering studies), which they’ll then use to convince their allies (like the Seattle Shitty Council and Mr. 23%, a/k/a Mayor McDope) to use to further harass motorists.

  • FrequentPoster

    House Bill 1018 would
    require drivers to stay between three and five feet away from cyclists,
    depending on the driver’s speed when passing them (and would clarify
    cyclists’ responsibility to keep as far away from drivers as they feel
    is safe).

    Another motorist harassment measure from the cyclistas. If they pass this, then there should at least be an equivalent measure requiring every bicycle to give pedestrians that same clearance. But you can bet the cyclistas will oppose that, because they wah-wah-want every special privilege, while refusing any responsibilities whatsoever.

  • FrequentPoster

    Typical liberal puritan Seattle Smugster, wanting to tell everyone else how to live. Just wait until your favorite Mayor McDope, oh he of the 23% approval rating and cyclista worship, stands for re-election. He’ll be flattened just as thoroughly as a cyclista in front of a semitruck.

  • FrequentPoster

    The selfish cyclistas hate motorists until it comes time to pick our pockets!

  • FrequentPoster

    I agree! I’m voting for Eyman’s proposition on that issue.

  • Oemissions

    OUCH!!!

    Hey, I live in CANADA and wouldn’t want to live in your vicinity

  • FrequentPoster

    Ya got me. Our Smugsters are bad, but in the global smugness contest, it’s hard to beat the Canadians. Hey, take a bus out to Alberta and tell us about your Goodness.

  • Oemissions

    tune in to the Northern Gateway Hearings webcast to hear some wisdom…

    read the proceedings goals and purposes of the EcoCity Summit and finally, FrequentPoster, what is your purpose here, to represent belligerents?

  • JN

    Gas taxes don’t even produce enough to maintain the current freeway/highway system. Seems pretty dumb to stretch that limited amount of money even further.

  • Bark More Wag Less

    Plus the occasional blow job while driving….the American Dream

  • Bark More Wag Less

    Degrades “our morale”

    You obviously never got several blow jobs while doing 70mph down I94.

  • Bark More Wag Less

    “why do we have to suffer from all the NOISE?”

    The bells, the bells!

  • Bark More Wag Less

    You must be a fun date.

  • Kitsapleo

    House Bill 1018 was fought by cyclists in Washington State- this bill would endanger, not protect , cyclists using the roads.
    The group that sponsored it, asked the bill to be removed after the public outcry it caused.

  • FrequentPoster

    FrequentPoster, what is your purpose here, to represent belligerents?

    Yeah, like the 61% of Seattle voters who defeated the Smugster proposal to raise taxes on motorists. Now tell me, what the fuck are you doing here, Canuck?

  • Mark B

    Single file will get you 3 feet, 3 abreast may get you 6 feet, under.