Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Rep. Jinkins to Propose Capital Gains Tax

The liberals (and freshmen for that matter) are swinging for the fences as the legislative session in Olympia begins.

Yesterday, Seattle freshman Sen. David Frockt (D-46, N. Seattle) and freshman Rep. Chris Reykdal (D-22, Olympia, Lacey) proposed doing away with the state’s B&O tax (a weird tax on biz revenues instead of profits) and scaling back the regressive sales tax—and offsetting the revenue loss with a tax on high income earners.

The legislation would impose a 5 percent tax on income from capital gains as reported on people’s federal income tax returns.

Today, freshman Rep. Laurie Jinkins (D-27, Tacoma) tells PubliCola she’s going to propose a capital gains tax next week. She says the legislation would impose a 5 percent tax on income from capital gains as reported on people’s federal income tax returns. She would exempt earnings under $5,000 for an individual and $10,000 for a couple. She also wants to exempt income from the sale of a primary residence.

Jinkins frets that, like the sales tax, capital gains taxes are volatile. She said, for example, that the state would have made $620 million on a capital gains tax in 2008 (before the recession fully clobbered the economy), but just $210 million in 2010. She says it does show a quicker recovery time than sales tax revenues, though.

She says she’s basing the proposal on a white paper by the lefty Washington State Budget & Policy Center. Jinkins says she hasn’t lined up any co-sponsors yet; the bill would require a two-thirds vote as all tax increases do, and Jinkins also acknowledges she hasn’t talked to any Republicans. But she says she’s gotten a positive reaction from budget committee heavies Rep. Ross Hunter (D-48, Medina), the chair, and Rep. Reuven Carlyle (D-36, Queen Anne Ballard)—and from Rep. Frank Chopp (D-43, Wallingford), the speaker of the house.

She says Chopp has divvied up revenue solutions into “short-term” “medium” and “long-term” and that her capital gains tax idea falls into the “medium” category. She’s still working out the mechanics, but says it’s likely the state would have to set aside the money for a while to build up a stable account.

During the overtime special session last May, Jinkins sponsored legislation repealing the infamous first mortgage bank tax loophole and using the money to pay for K-3 class size funding. The bill made it to the house floor, but didn’t get the two-thirds vote that tax increases need. (Repealing a loophole is considered a tax increase. It lost 52-42 in a straight party-line vote, Democrats for, Republicans against. Coincidentally, the vote was also part of the Democrats’ strategy to challenge the two-thirds rule in court.)

Gov. Chris Gregoire has proposed a number of items on the lefty wish list this session—such as closing a few corporate loopholes, including the break for big banks on first mortgages for $18 million and a B&O tax on windfall profits for oil companies—but she explicitly rejected the capital gains tax idea, saying simply that the state didn’t have the infrastructure to make it happen quickly enough.


  • Kevin

    “She says the legislation would impose a 5 percent tax on income from capital gains as reported on people’s federal income tax returns. She would exempt earnings under $5,000 for an individual and $10,000 for a couple. She also wants to exempt income from the sale of a primary residence.”

    Oh hell no.  Hell no.  Dickbag republicans privatize my retirement and then dickbag democrats increase my tax burden on it?

  • Bark More Wag Less

    Crap, better sell some of my AAPL stock asap.

  • Blue Light

    Democrat Proposes New Tax
    In other news; Dog Bites Man

    When you swing for the fence, you frequently strike out.

  • http://profiles.google.com/mmrussell67 Malcolm Russell

    As the democrat Governor correctly points out there is no structure in place in WA for collecting a capital gains tax and thus no way for the state to collect it.  It would require a new level of government bureaucracy and paper pushers and then they would new reporting and access to your financial info.  Bad, bad, really bad idea from newbie Rep. Jenkins

  • Nemo

    This is much better and more doable than the other proposal for the B&O, Sales, and Income Tax shell game.

    Throw in an excise tax on millionaires, and we can make some progress.

  • Blue Light

    and…

    Another “non-profit” pulling the strings on a “representative” of the people.
    We need complete overhaul of section 501 of the tax code.
    The non-profit has become the haven for all manner of activism, charlatan and get-around.

  • Blue Light

    Rookie only knows page one of the Party Playbook:  Tax

  • Anonymous

    Quit looking for ways to increase taxes, and get back to making the necessary cuts to create a sustainable budget.
    .

  • pragmaticengineer

     Such as…?

  • Magwildwood1

    Non-profits inform legislation all the time. Do you think legislation is born in a vaccuum? It is not lobbying. Duh.

  • Blue Light

    It is actually more insidious than lobbying.

  • Will in Seattle

    So Bill Gates multi Billion dollar mansion is exempt if he sells it?

    HECK NO!

    Just exempt 1 million inflation adjusted from home sales and impose the surtax on all earning above 1 million adjusted no matter what the source – inheritance, capital gains, salary, retirement funds.

    Period.

    (adjusted means automatically adjust by the same inflation adjustment used for the minimum wage)

  • Blue Light

    and, yes, non-profits “inform” legislation ALL THE TIME.

  • Anonymous

    This is the problem with the Frank Chopp-led House Dems.  Always and only looking to steal more money from businesses and citizens while they bend over for the tribes, the trial lawyers and the SEIU and every other public sector union.

    Olympia still has literally thousands of useless employees, often mid management types (not unionized) who cannot manage up nor down.  The foolish “1% for the arts” on every public building should go.  But this might be the beginning of a real political change in Oly. 

    Instead of continuing to vote for dems and then voting for initiatives to undo what the Dems did, why not try voting for Repubs, just once.  Yes, I am sure that is heresy in left leaning King County but look at what has been wrought.  the Dems have literally run the state into the ground by having almost complete control over Oly for so long. Only when the Repubs. had a Senate majority with dino running Ways and Means did we keep a lid on spending.

    The Dems. got complete control in 2004 and have done nothing but spend, spend, spend, with NO reform until the stimulus money ran out, when the economy didn’t recover as quickly as hoped, did the House Dems get remotely serious about dealing with state employee pensions and health care and getting rid of the COLAs for PERS I retirees.

    The social service and health care budgets have grown much faster than revenues, population, inflations, etc. crowding out fudning for K-12 and higer ed.  What do have? Essentially a less educated and more unhealthy poulation.  spend more (and intelligently) on education and less on health care and social services and we could get somewhere in this state.

    At a minimum, at least vote McKenna for gov–unless you want more of the same.

  • Magwildwood1

    How do you think legislation, any legislation, (including something you might agree with), happens? What’s wrong with a non-profit informing legislation?

    I’d much rather a non-profit than corporations using their influence to make a profit for their own benefit (which I’d be willing to bet happens much more often and with a greater impact). Non-profits, regardless if you agree with them or not, usually have the public’s interest at heart. I’d rather they, not mega-corporations or even business influence laws.

  • Blue Light

    How do you think legislation, any legislation, (including something you
    might agree with), happens?

    I’ll tell you how I think it SHOULD happen.  A member of a community believes they have a way of improving that community, RUNS ON IT (clearly communicating their vision with their constituents) and – if elected – works to implement it.

    What’s wrong with a non-profit informing
    legislation?

    The non-profit usually has a (direct or indirect) financial interest in the legislation.  Non-profits support tax increases.  Tax increases fund non-profits (directly or indirectly).  Lather, rinse, repeat.  We can’t all work for non-profits, can we?  Hmmm….

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr Baker

    I remember that answer from the governor’s recient news conference. I think part of the solution to the “mechanics” of that is in Sen. Frokt’s income tax.
    I don’t think they have completely thought through the effort to do it, maybe they have. But, I think I would have to file an income tax form with the state in some way to let them know I’m not a billionaire. That’s your mechanism.

    With the 2012 state sales tax write off being held hostage, again, by congress I would just assume move to a state taxing method that doesn’t get turned off and on depending on the competency of the Speaker of the House of US Representitives.

  • Blue Light

    On the bright side… they’ve got to call themselves Progressive and believe they are smarter and of superior moral character than those who vote for The Other Party.

  • Blue Light

    yes, much better left to the competency of the Washington State Legislature.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr Baker

    Republicans in Congress just raised my taxes through their inaction. I can’t buy my tax break with a lobbyist
    So, yes, it is much better left to the state.

  • Guest

    Republicans in Congress just raised my taxes through their inaction. I can’t buy my tax break with a lobbyist
    So, yes, it is much better left to the state.

  • ivan

    Republicans suck. Their policies suck, their politics suck, and their politicians suck.  Most of all,  their trolls on these comment threads suck. Does that answer your question?

  • Bark More Wag Less

    Are you just figuring out that WA state is not some looney left paradise and instead leans moderate to conservative? Which is why income tax measures always fail and I1053 roared to victory?

    You need to get out from under the shadow of the Fremont Troll and see more of this wonderful state, east and west. Meet the hard working people who don’t want your nanny state but instead want sensible government.

  • Blue Light

    It certainly clears up your position and the depth of thought by which you arrived there.

  • http://www.twitter.com/joeszi Joe Szilagyi


    We need complete overhaul of section 501 of the tax code.

    The non-profit has become the haven for all manner of activism, charlatan and get-around.”
    I’ll trade you that in exchange for no more corporate personhood and Federal caps on executive compensation pegged to 10x the average annual income of the non-executive staff at any public corporation. 

  • http://www.twitter.com/joeszi Joe Szilagyi

    Nonsense; this is simple to do. Just peg the state taxes to a certain percentage of your Federal tax numbers. Easy as pie.

  • http://profiles.google.com/mmrussell67 Malcolm Russell

    So Joe, is that based on the honest system then, remember the federal government is separate from state government. So in your ‘Simple” plan I just break out my check book and write a check to the State of WA for some percentage of what I “claim” that I put on my Federal Tax forms.  Also do you just write a big check one time each year for your income taxes or does your employer or bank withhold for you…  there is no mechanism for WA state to relablly and fairly assess a capital gains tax, even the governor that wants for taxes will tell you a capital gains tax in WA is not feasible.  It only simple if you ignore reality Joe.

  • Bark More Wag Less

    Apparently, the baby is not drowned yet, one more shove under water.

  • The American Way

    typical thread: right wing commenters spread nonsense and utopian thinking, while the left basically gives up by not responding or trying the “you suck” philly school of political argument.

    Fact:  America had its highest era of economic growth when we had higher income taxes on wealthy than we do today; this era went from depression to war to decades of prosperity.  republicans then supported income tax.  This period of rising middle class fortunes ended when Reagan got in and cut the taxes.

    Fact: this put us way into deficit, weakening America.

    Fact: all around the world the nations with highe rincomes taxes do on the whole better than us and recently nations like norway or denmark or germany even have better social mobility than us.  Want a comparator closer to home?  Canada with higher taxes and more social programs is not par with us in per capita income, while 30 years ago it was about 30% below us.

    [inevitable right wing dog whislte response coming in 4...3...2..1....."but we are more diverse" meaning those damn lazy black people drag us down"]

    that’s right you see when you oppress your poorest folks for centuries then never build the social democratic programs like proper national health care and paying for college like they have in europe, the you stupidly shit all over your own economy by oppressing 20% at the  bottom instead of treating them like family and helping them out.  That’s what the higher taxes are for — to educate give health care to and enable everyone including the bottom 40% to learn more earn more and produce more. 

    The right wing in America can’t deal with these facts so usually they just try to mock them.  But the problem is, their utopia of low gummint low tax leading to prosperity for all….is that…it’s never been illustrated in the real world, but their minds don’t care, they just believe out of faith and their own psychological pay off in feling smugger than thou.  They casually dismiss all economic facts like the fat that nations with income tax on the whole do quite well and many better than the USA, they dismiss the fac that the midle class income here’s ben falling for thirty years oh guess what! since the tax cut theory took hold of ou politics.  or they start calling a proposal for 4% more points on the top rate communism.  they wallow in their ignorance, and the more you logically and factually prove your points the more they get off on dissmissing it all.  there’s absolutely no reason why a cap gains tax wouldn’t make sense andhlp out and be a good thing and the places that have income tax and capital gains tax ARE the places that have the most rich people.  Because taxing leads to spending leads to roads bridges education and health which leads to more people being productive leading to a bigger economy for all.  Bigger taxes, create greater personal freedom. 

  • Verd1n

    Unions are non-profit.  Look how great they are at politicking, even in this soviet.

  • Noneya

    Saying repubs suck is to complimentary Ivan ,  I say most of em just slobber then spit  …

  • ivan

    Soon enough you will learn that these are trolls and it is pointless to present them with facts. I rarely if ever respond to them because what passes for their minds is already hard-wired, and their votes are already counted.

    So just because I might choose not to respond to them on a comment thread of a blog, or might once in a while deign to remind them that they suck, hardly means that “the left basically gives up.” That’s bullshit. Neither I, nor you, nor anyone else are obliged or required to engage them.

    If you choose to engage them, fine, but the fact that others might choose not to does not mean dick diddly shit. Let them delude themselves that they are getting any edge.

  • DA

    Also, I think this could run afoul of the “uniform and equal” rule for taxes.  Two different investors could face widely different tax bills, even on gains derived from sales of the same stock.  If I sell AAPL and you sell AAPL and I pay nothing and you pay something, the Supreme Court will say NO, just in my limited knowledge of the issue…

  • oblige this

    ivan — when you don’t respond, you give up.  You give up the chance to arm your fellow lefties or liberals with th talking points so they go talk to the vast majority of bamboozld middle americans.  it’s not bullshit, it’s true.  it’s also stupid and lazy and it’s typical of liberals, they’d rather sit at home feeling smug and superior than actually getting out there and doing the things that actually create politicial change, and btw, no it’s not just running a bunch of meetings about bylaws, it’s heart it getting the talking points and message down.  you have to hit their hard wired miinds and make them pay, and it’s being a total pussy to sit back in smugness and leave the field of the war of ideas.  it’sthe same problem the democrats have had for about fifty years.  and what’s this legalistic avoidance shit about how you or I are not obliged to do this or that?  obliged?  what the fuck?  “I am not obliged to participate in turning our nation around.”  Riiight, I noticed.  So continue to just pop up and give a hearty fuck you here or screw you there, it’s all so very sunny in philadelphia and btw wow this whole democratic  party refusal to debate, refusal to have a message it sure is working like gangbusters isn’t it?  thewhite working class used to be called Reagan Democrats, now they’r caled the Republican party base.  But hey it’s working in allowing you to feel smug, who cares if our nation actually continues the middle class decline?  Right now the R’s have a budget message for the state: refomr before cuts.  The D’s have no message!  They have no plan, no list of taxes to raise or loopholes to cut, we got a guy running for gov who says he will giveus a plan soon, any day now, and you back him up in remaining ilent for a few more months.  Hello!  We are losing the argument.  Perhaps not engaging in it has somefuckingthing to do with that, mmmh?

  • Anonymous

    The only real solution to the State’s overall financial issues is to look at both sides of the ledger: expenses and revenues.  Like any business operations, you control and cut expenses, and see to raise revenues.  You can’t balance the books by just looking at one half of an equation.  The math doesn’t work. 

    That’s a fundamental flaw in the “cut, cut, cut” mentality of the conservative view point.  This from the very same people who want to have government operate more like a business, but when it tries to, they complain that it’s overreaching or operating outside its mandate.  They want to have their proverbial cake and eat it, too.  Doesn’t work. 

  • ivan

    You have no fucking idea what I do or don’t do. Publicola is hardly the real world.

  • Blue Light

    And Dems swallow,
    Anything.

  • Anonymous

    The state needs to learn to live within its means.  If it simply raises taxes every time it overspends, it will soon find itself in the same position as bankrupt California.  The government can only do so much.  It can’t be expected to solve every problem, real or imagined.  It should be able to perform certain core governmental functions, and perform them very well.   Any service currently being performed by the state that is also provided by the private sector should be privatized.  And the public sector unions should be able to collectively bargain over working conditions, but not wages and benefits.  Pension benefits should be based on actual contributions, like an annuity.  The whole notion of public employees organizing to improve their economic standing at the expense of the taxpayers is inherently undemocratic.  It is merely another form of unsustainable redistributive economics.

  • Big Jim Slade

    Oh please jackass, you are the Troll with a capital T here.