Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Metro to Cut Route that Replaced Waterfront Streetcar

King County Metro has proposed reducing service on the free downtown Seattle waterfront shuttle—the Route 99, which replaced the George Benson Waterfront Streetcar—to peak hours only, citing low ridership on the route.

Metro discontinued the streetcar service in 2005, when the city demolished a maintenance barn and streetcar station at Broad Street to make way for the Olympic Sculpture Park.

In exchange for getting rid of the streetcar, and as mitigation for years of construction of the deep-bore tunnel on the waterfront, the agency created a new bus route, the 99, to serve tourists and others wanting to travel north and south on the downtown waterfront. Under the new proposal, announced to neighborhood residents and businesses via flyer last month, the 99 would run only between 6 am and 9 am and between 3 pm and 6 pm on weekdays, and would not run on the weekends at all.

The flyer says the changes were needed to ensure that the bus system stays “productive—delivering the most value we can for the tax and fare dollars that support transit.” The 99 is among the lowest 25 percent of Metro routes in terms of ridership.

However, the low ridership is a bit of a Catch-22. Before Metro eliminated the streetcar, ridership on the corridor was dramatically higher than it is today—about 404,000 trips a year in 2003, compared to about 252,000 in 2010 (and 204,000 in 2009). The reason, probably, is twofold: First, Metro cut service on the route from every 15 minutes to every 30, making the faux-”streetcar” less reliable and convenient. Second, and perhaps more importantly: People like riding streetcars—and buses painted like streetcars don’t fool anyone.

The King County Council will vote on the proposed service reduction in January. Neither Metro representatives nor King County Executive Dow Constantine’s staff immediately returned calls for comment.


  • Grover

    The waterfront streetcar was just a tourist ride.  It was not transportation.

    The waterfront streetcar was like “Ride the Ducks.”  You would not replace “Ride the Ducks” with buses, because people ride the Ducks because WW2 amphibious assault vehciles are fairly rare, and they seem like fun, just like the antique waterfront streetcars were fairlly rare, and seemed like fun.

    Neither Ride the Ducks nor the waterfront streetcar provided any needed transportation to many people.

    Metro should eliminate every bus route that has low ridership.  This is a good thing.

  • Anonymous

    Well, basically yes. The waterfront streetcar was a way to generate money. It’s like many older trolley lines in other cities. The streetcars on Market St and the Embarcadero in SF are slow and inefficient but they still draw tourists (they are always packed). People overwhelmingly flock to the streetcars in SF. It’s a tourist attraction similar to the monorail here or even the Space Needle or Kerry Park.That being said, they also do serve as a way of getting to other parts of the city (the Castro/ Fisherman’s Wharf). This is similar to the waterfront streetcar. It served as a connection between Pioneer Square and Belltown/between Chinatown and Myrtle Edwards Park. These are not only places tourists go to spend money or just to loiter, but are also places that Seattleites may want to go. Not to mention that this line would connect to the First Hill Streetcar, Link, tunnel buses, and King Street Station.

  • http://profiles.google.com/jlog74 Jace Loggins

    Unfortunately the numbers for the “real” trolley prove you wrong. Having been exposed to your comments over the last few years, however, I’ve realized that you’re the personification of “begging the question”. Therefore there is no point in trying to discuss it with you: your mind is made up and your circular logic designed to help you arrive at a conclusion made even prior to getting any empirical evidence to back up (or more accurately, to disprove) such conclusion.

    But man, you are entertaining troll bait though! Thanks for the laughs!

  • KevinR28

    I used to use the trolley (paid for it) and then teh waterfront bus 3-4 times a week to get to and from International District, stadiums, Pioneer Square from teh waterfront.  Now the bus runs half as often, only southbound, is effectively worthless.  Bring the trolley or the regular bus back!

  • Katherine

    While it’s true that the route is underperforming at the moment (though the service hours have been cut, so its 30-minute headways are too infrequent for a lot of users) the context for this route is critical to the discussion. In addition to Erica’s sleuthing, the 99 route is now literally the only transit between Alaskan Way and 3rd Ave, not counting AM peak ST and CT buses running down 2nd.

    I hope the County Council will see beyond this year’s numbers and understand the need to keep people moving in this interim period as the Waterfront/ID/P Square head into major construction for serveral years. If we cut off a way for folks to get around today, will we be harming future interest/sense of accessibility for the future waterfront park?

  • Verd1n

    Waterfront Park?  A joke in the offing.  At a huge cost, too.

  • 99 Rider

    I ride the 99 everyday during the week to and from work from the Sounder train station. It is my lifeline between work and the Sounder train. This is how me and many other people I ride with get to the train station on time. Without it, I usually miss the train I need (and pay fees for late daycare) and it becomes a hassle to get to the station.

    During the sports seasons the bus is usually packed with fans and during the summer it is busting with tourists throughout the day. I speak with many people on a daily basis that use the 99 for multiple reasons throughout the day.

    If service is reduced it will also eliminate a lot of customers for some of the restaurants along the waterfront because some folks will go to whatever is closest instead of hopping on the 99 and seeing what is further down the lane.

  • Anonymous

    Did we forget about the tunnel?

    Much much more expensive than a waterfront development that will draw people from around the world.

  • Verd1n

    “     draw people from around the world?”   What have you been drinking?

    Apart from Sydney Harbor and its Circular Quay, can you name a single harbopr in the world that “draws people”.

    What horseshit!  

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr Baker

    The market has spoken.

    If this is to support tourists then the city can take back part of its hotel tax from the hoteliers going toward the convention center. If something really is supporting the tourism industry then let the multinational corporation pay for it directly.

  • PSq resident

    Once again – another promise that Metro, the City made and then backed out of when it comes to Pioneer Square!  Shame!

    isn’t it a self proclaimed result if you cut service frequency which reduces ridership and then claim no one is riding it so you can cut the route?  we need bus service on First 

  • Grover

    Just another twit with nothing to say.  Thanks for your contribution.

  • toot toot

    When running, the waterfront trolley was the most expensive per passenger “light rail” in the country. Now, that’s probably LINK or the SLUT.  I doubt that anybody ever decided to come to Seattle because of the historic Melbourne vehicles.  I also doubt that the WFT (hey that’s almost as much fun as the SLUT) added any tourist spending, certainly not extra nights in hotels.

  • Natehc

    FYI about link: Its operating cost is now lower than the operating costs for ST express buses, and the operating cost for Sounder. I agree with you about the streetcar, though.

  • seattle parks are great

    well
    i go to alki watergront lincoln park waterfront mag blvd views bluff over water and magnuson waterfront even swimming there and the little sailboats there, too, also seward park waterfront, even went to some waterfront park in kirkland once also night skinny dipping in luther burbank park oin MI once frequently go to bellingham boulevard park also BI fay b. park and that one overlooking the straight to b town also all the SJ islands and fidalgo waterfronts also decpetion pass waterfront not to mention columbia river waterfront parks and baker lake, crater lake, oregon coast wwaterfront.  i went to tokeland it was  a bit dreqary.  also whidbey island and all waterfront parks in victoria plus stanely park of couse plus lake pearygin and wenatchee and kachelus waterfront parks.  so in general waterfront parks are a big draw.  though here, given so many others, i didn’t even mention that myrtle edwards golden gardens ship canala or gas works, um, you, see we already GOT the best freaking waterfront parks right here in seattle in fact i’d we are WORLD CLASS IN WATER VIEWS here already so the marginal utility of adding another waterefront park downtown?  well it helps the folks downtown, more power to them, god forbid they should have to go one mile north to myrtle edwards, it will help them.  but draw from other parts of seattle?  you crazy?  there’s no freaking transit that works and the parking charges would kill you.  most seattleites will go to this waterfront park about as often as they go to the silly emp museum or the pike market.  which would be for me never as for emp and 4x a year as to pike market.  so, it’s a plus but hardly city transforming.  it’d be like the 7th or 8th stunning waterfront park we got right here in this city.  btw harbors draw people in baltimore, riverwalk in NO, embarcadero in SF, venice beach in LA downtown portlan maine the south park and battery park and promeande in nyc and brooklyn, bellingham like i said, the charleston waterside walk certainly draws people, DC is a bbit cut off from the water but peopel flock to the great falls potomac riverside park and hike, in nyc they also flock to the palisades acrost the river….water is a draw.  what i am saying is we already are no. 1 in the world in waterfront parks to the marginal drawing power of this new one is not ……stunning.  it’s like a 9% increase in our general level of parkyness or waterfrontyness. 

  • we want fast transit

    400K a year is like 1100 a day.  not so many. 

  • Richard Stans

    Metro didn’t eliminate the streetcar, the city of Seattle and the Seattle Art Museum did.  SAM refused to incorporate the cost of a barn into the park.  The city allowed them to do it and didn’t fund the $7-10 million for a new facility.  Metro then tried to build a new barn in Pioneer Square with developer Greg Smith, but he backed out when he couldn’t make it pencil.  Metro has since stored and maintained the cars. Metro does not have the money to buy land and build a new barn.  And it is hard to say they should cut bus service elsewhere for a tourist service.  That is the real history of the streetcar.

  • Concerned business owner

    As a business owner near the Waterfront, we are challenged by the economy and now the beginning of the seawall project, the tunnel and the removal of the Viaduct.  If we are to survive, we need the support of the goverment entities to insure that customers, including tourists and commuters, can reach our businesses.  Having almost non-existent bus service from the waterfront to third avenue almost insures low ridership,   Compare the loss of revenue, including the loss of jobs, when businesses close versus the cost of running busses either along the Waterfront or First Avenue.  Metro, Seattle and the State all have to consider the impace of their decisions on the big picture.  Why make it so difficult for people to come to this neighborhood?