Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Kohl-Welles, McGinn Crafting Legislation to Force Escort Ad ID Checks

Sen. Jeanne Kohl-Welles (D-36, Ballard), Mayor Mike McGinn, and Council Member Tim Burgess are crafting legislation which could require websites running escort ads in Washington to check IDs in-person.

The legislation comes as McGinn and Washington Attorney General Rob McKenna have been waging wars against Backpage.com for its role in the sex trafficking of young men and women.

The legislation would require anyone who places an escort ad in Washington—in print or online—”to do more than just checking a box that they’re adult,” Kohl-Welles says, referencing the sort of honor system used by sites like Backpage.com, to protect children from being prostituted online.

Police have said that requiring in-person ID checks for anyone posting an escort ad would likely greatly impact pimps’ abilities to prostitute children on the internet.

Another piece of Kohl-Welles’ legislation would be to redefine parts of the state’s laws regarding profiting off the prostitution of a juvenile to include websites. Kohl-Welles declined to go into great detail about just how the law would work.

In the months since McGinn, McKenna, and other politicians began threatening to crack down on Backpage.com, the company—which has seen a 50 percent increase in revenue from escort ads—has vowed to fight any government regulation of the site, which McGinn has called an “accelerant” of juvenile prostitution, a first amendment violation.

“It’s a challenging issue because of first amendment rights, Kohl-Welles says. “We’re trying to craft legislation that would be able to stand. I’m very civil liberties-oriented, but I think there’s a difference between having something that could restrict editorial [content] versus advertising.”

Kohl-Welles says she’ll meet with McGinn and other local politicos next week to talk more about the legislation.

“I think we have to address this,” Kohl-Welles says. “it’s going to have its challenges.”


  • Blue Light

    Worked their way that far down the “to-do” list, have they?

  • Anonymous

    Please raise your hand if you think Jeanne Kohl-Welles is smart enough to create a legally defensible definition of an “escort ad” tailored at already-illegal prostitution.

  • Mikos

    This is certainly a team that knows how too turn ideas into reality.

  • repete

    How much tax money does it take to craft emotionally
    appealing but ultimately meaningless legislation?   I
    would really like to know.

  • Guest

    It isn’t meaningless to McGinn if it rids him of a hostile newspaper. This is payback done in such a way to appeal to our region’s nanny mentality.

  • Nemo

    Notice how good a job Kohl-Welles did on keeping her MJ legislation from becoming so watered down it was worse than the status quo  /sarcasm

    Expect no less from a proposed bill that tries and end-run around the Constitution, For The Children. Ironically, it does nothing substantive For The Children. When are we going to use that wasted enforcement money on shelters for teens? Hmmm?

  • Anonymous

    The target is the newspaper, not the scum placing the ads.

  • Mikos

    The hostile newspaper he needs to get rid of is not the Weekly. That rag is self-destructing.

  • This123

    If you close this, there will still be others like http://www.classivox.com

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=622103568 Joseph Burlett

    While the village voice is making millions on this crime, they are not alone. This has been an issue for over 10 years with internet marketing of the exploitation of children.In fact, in 1996 the US Government introduced a law that would have protected children from these types of crimes. Bt the time it passed through both the house of representatives and congress, the law no longer provided protection to the children. Instead it provided civil and criminal immunity to the online companies that engage in this crime. Since 1996 companies are not held liable for their involvement in crimes like prostitution or sexual exploitation of women and children.Asking or demanding backpage.com remove sex ads from their site will do little or nothing in regards to ending this crime. The village voice or another of the hundreds of companies out there will just begin posting these ads under other names and URLs.The only way to end this crime and expose these criminals is to demand that congress amend the law that granted protection to these companies in the first place.http://goo.gl/6WpaI

  • Willy_wonka787

    Here is a new and radical-for-Seattle-people idea: Leran to mind your own goddamned business.

    Stop
    indulging your silly and selectively hypocritical outrage at the idea that
    women trying to feed, shelter, clothe and care for themselves and their
    families are surviving in this cruel economy thanks to the donations of horny
    men.

    Stop
    concerning yourself with whether grown, adult, of-legal-age-to-consent men and
    women are voluntarily exchanging sex for money.

    Stop
    sputtering in rage at the fact that women are being saved from having to cram
    themselves and their family members into sleazy, frightening and dangerously
    unsafe shelters, thanks to the financial contributions of their customers.

    Learn
    to get a grip and accept the fact that there are women who are grateful to have
    a roof over their head, clothes on their back, food in their stomachs, coffee
    and cigarettes and the occasional medical care when they need it — and that
    all of this is made possible by the $40-to-$60 contributions they receive in
    exchange for 10-20 minutes’ work in performing oral sex.

    If
    you truly want to crack down on underage prostitution and the sexual abuse of
    minors (and we all should want that, and most of us generally do — including
    most men who pay for sexual services)…

    … then, here is your solution.

    Stop
    wasting time, energy and taxpayers’ money on chasing, arresting, prosecuting
    and criminalizing grown, of-legal-age-to-consent sexual providers and sexual
    customers.

    Instead, adopt the safe, sensible, enlightened and low-key approaches adopted
    in other, more-enlightened countries around the world:

    *
    Decriminalize the purchase of sexual services by people over the age of 18.

    *
    Decriminalize the sale of sexual services by people over the age of 18.

    *
    Set aside a particular area of town (almost certainly one zoned primarily for
    commercial or industrial use, not a residential area) to be a dedicated
    full-time red-light district.

    *
    Require women wishing to work “The Zone” to purchase an individual
    license good for 3 months at a time.

    *
    In return for issuing the license, require women to supply proof of legal age
    along with fingerprints and DNA samples. The fingerprints and DNA can be
    cross-checked against databases containing fingerprints and DNA samples from
    convicted criminals (to verify age) and families of missing children (to
    determine if women applying for the licenses have ever been reported as missing
    or kidnapped).

    * Focus on arresting and prosecuting pimps, abusive /
    violent customers and sexual predators to the fullest extent of the law.       

    *
    Use the funds collected from issuance of licenses to fund programs to perform
    regular health checks of working girls and/or assist underage sex workers to
    exit the sex trade and receive training in life skills, non-sexual employment
    and becoming independent and self-sufficient.

    Of course, all of this would save time, save money and make sense… meaning, of course, that in Holier-and-Purer-Than-Thou Seattle, it absolutely positively cannot be done.

    *
    Use the funds collected from issuance of licenses to fund programs to perform
    regular health checks of working girls and/or assist underage sex workers to
    exit the sex trade and receive training in life skills, non-sexual employment
    and becoming independent and self-sufficient.

    Of course, all of this would save time, save money and make sense… meaning, of course, that in Holier-and-Purer-Than-Thou Seattle, it absolutely positively cannot be done.

  • Anonymous

    Your solution is too sensible to be implemented. But blaming “Holier-and-Purer-Than-Thou Seattle” is way off base; where in the U.S. does the same puritanical ethical code not hold sway? Well, maybe a few counties in Nevada, but even there legal prostitution is under pressure and shrinking.

  • Anonymous

    Tony Ortega, Village Voice editor, in an effort to protect prostitution ad revenue, belittles anti-child trafficking activists and tries to manipulate statistics on child sex trafficking to create an illusion that this is a minor problem.  See here: http://villagevoicepimp.com/tony-ortega-2/

  • Willy_wonka787

    So-called “child sex trafficking” is indeed a minor problem. It virtually does not exist. The lies of the hysterical “child sex traffickers are everywhere, Backpage must be shut down” LIARS have been exposed and debunked.

    NEW RESEARCH DEMOLISHES THE STEREOTYPE OF THE UNDERAGED SEX WORKER — AND SPARKS AN OUTBREAK OF DENIAL AMONG CHILD-SEX-TRAFFICKING ALARMISTS NATIONWIDE.

    http://www.riverfronttimes.com/2011-11-03/news/commercial-sexual-exploitation-of-children-john-jay-college-ric-curtis-meredith-dank-underage-prostitution-sex-trafficking-minors/