Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Gregoire Recommends $2 Billion in Cuts, Revenues on Table for Legislative Session

Gov. Chris Gregoire sets the stage for special session with an all-cuts budget.

Gov. Chris Gregoire held a press conference this morning setting the stage for the upcoming November 28 special session, when the legislature will be tasked with dealing with a $1.4 billion shortfall in the current $32 billion biennial budget.

Two footnotes on those numbers: 1) The state needs to find more than $1.4 billion in savings—the governor says $2 billion—because only saving $1.4 billion won’t leave any reserves in the budget. And 2) The state doesn’t actually have $32 billion to consider—64 percent of the budget is off-limits because of state and federal rules and mandates.

That leaves $8.7 billion in discretionary spending in four areas: Education (the biggest piece), social services, health care, and corrections. Despite her mantra that “everything’s on the table,” though, Gregoire has noted that she couldn’t release felons—”Protecting the public has to be one of our top priorities”—so other areas would have to take bigger cuts. With that major asterisk on the $8.7 billion, Gregoire released a “road map” this morning of $4 billion in possible cuts, of which she identified $2 billion she would support. Gregoire spokeswoman Karina Shagren said the $2 billion proposal was intended to “start the conversation.”

Asked repeatedly about revenue, Gregoire said: “I have not thought about revenue.

Asked repeatedly about revenue, Gregoire said: “I have not thought about revenue. I’ve spent my due diligence on an all cuts budget. Now, I will turn my attention [to other ideas]. I do not have any [revenue] ideas today. The question now is, these are what the cuts look like, now we have to ask ourselves do we want to look at alternatives of revenue, what might they be, and do we want to go there?”

She added, however, “first we must cut to get to the $2 billion.”

The press did not ask about the left’s go-to option—cutting from the $6 billion in tax loopholes, such as the $172.6 million loophole for big banks. However, when asked about the issue previously while saying “everything’s on the table,” she called the option “premature” and said the state first “has to come up with the $2 billion in cuts,” cautioning, “Someone has to show me the $2 billion—or $2 million, for that matter, [in tax loopholes] that I can pass in the legislature and in the court of public opinion.” Gregoire noted that every loophole has its constituency and cutting loopholes comes with the potential of “cutting jobs.” She said the legislature has to “make the word ‘jobs’ the driving force of the 2012 session.”

Here are some of the cuts Gregoire indicated will be in her final proposal to the legislature to kick off the special session:

Eliminate the Basic Health Plan, ending subsidized health care to 35,000 low-income individuals.

Cut off medical services to 21,000 people enrolled in the state’s Disability Lifeline and ADATSA (Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Treatment Support Act) programs.

Trim 15 percent from the support the state provides to colleges and universities.

Cut the length of supervision for all offenders, based on severity of offense. Sex offenders will be supervised for 24 months, and all other offenders, for 12 months.

And saying, “I can’t stand my education budget … a recession is not the time to cut education,” here are some of Gregoire’s suggested cuts to K-12 education nonetheless: reducing state levy equalization money to poorer school districts ($150 million); increase class sizes in grades 4-12 ($137 million); reduce teacher bonuses for 5,800 teachers ($8.4 million); and reduce high school staffing ($5 million).

Mary Lindquist, head of the state teachers’ union, the Washington Education Association, said of Gregoire’s opening gambit:

Enough is enough. We’ve already slashed more than $2 billion in funding from Washington’s public schools in the last few years. It’s clear we also need new revenue. Washington’s students need a quality education more than big businesses need tax breaks.

Anticipating Gregoire’s all-cuts approach, Our Economic Future,  a coalition of health care, social service, and union groups—referring to themselves as “the 99 percent”— condemned the governor’s “road map” this morning.

And the lefty state budget watchdogs at the Washington State Budget & Policy  Center issued this statement immediately after Gregoire’s press conference:

The plan rolled out by the Governor this morning is absolutely the wrong direction for Washington state. We cannot create jobs and get our economy back on track through deep cuts to education, health care, and social services. This one-sided, lopsided approach will do significant damage to the very things that make our state a good place to live, work, and do business.

Policymakers must take a balanced approach. We need to raise revenue now to address our immediate needs and make structural changes so that our revenue system is adequate and sustainable in the long-term. This includes eliminating ineffective tax breaks and temporarily increasing and permanently modernizing the state sales tax. In the long-term, we can enact a new tax on capital gains and strengthen our rainy day fund.

Budgets always require hard decisions, but a budget that cuts children, families, and older adults without any tax reform is not just a hard decision – it’s a bad decision.

Our state must make the public investments needed to create jobs and protect our communities. This cannot be done without additional revenue.

State Sen. Joseph Zarelli (R-18, Ridgefield), the ranking Republican on the senate ways and means committee, and the GOP’s go-to senator on the budget, issued this statement: “I agree with the governor when she says government cannot do it all. It will be up to the Legislature to decide what government should and should not be doing, and at what cost to taxpayers. We managed to accomplish that earlier this year, in a bipartisan manner, and that is my goal again.”

Editorializing for a second here (it’s hard not to), but doesn’t Gregoire’s earlier dismissal of closing loopholes (because they have constituencies and could eliminate jobs sound weird given that the cuts to education—class sizes, reducing high school staff—are also tied to constituencies and jobs?

Watch Gregoire’s press conference here.


  • Clyde

    Re: your editorial comment: YES. Why wasn’t that asked at the press conference?

  • http://yrihf.com John Bailo

    Why not pass HB2100, a tax on intangible assets?

  • headlesshorseman

    Ouch. Why didn’t we pass 1098 again?

  • http://www.charlesredell.com/ Charles

    Here’s a great loophole to close: $450 million loophole on trade-in cars.
    http://daily.sightline.org/2011/10/27/washingtons-450-million-tax-giveaway-for-cars/

    Gregoire is a sham and I can’t wait for her to go. She won’t even seriously consider closing any loopholes. She can go to hell.

  • Perfect Voter

    Cut, cut, cut, cut and cut. OK, we’ve seen the Republican plan being put on the table. Where is the Democratic plan?

  • Jamesmi

    Remember the State employees certifying their retirement in order to receive their pension payments ? (Most notably the UW administrators ). Remember them going back to work (at UW) in short order ?
    Cancel all State employee pension adjustments/payments if the employee is found to be working. In the cases noted at UW and any related cases, sue the individuals for fraud and recover any funds paid in excess of the initial payment amounts, or any payments made to the post retirement working employee. Impose a fraud penalty of 33% on any future funds paid by the State.
    Definitions:
    leaving of job or career: the act of leaving a job or career at or near the usual age for doing so, or the state of having left a job or careertime after having stopped working: the time that follows the end of somebody’s working life >>>>> I prefer this one as most direct and trueDo I need to define fraud ?
    All savings revert to the general fund for survival services to the unemployed, disabled, and non-working poor.

    Its just a small start !

  • Anonymous

    Obviously the areas our governor choose to cut, contain the least voter population. Have they every taken a poll to see which services the citizens would like to and can do w/o for a year or two. W/ a budget that size I would think the pacman approach could work and would quickly add up to the $2B.

  • Trevor

    Wait we need $600 million in reserves why? Isn’t that something the 2012 legislative session can deal with a month later if it wants to?

  • Monster

    becuase in two years time it would of been expanded into the middle class.

  • Blue Light

    I wonder if she’s cutting her travel budget… 

  • BigDonLives

    Bend over and take it like a bitch?

  • Lew

    Sounds like a great start. They should cut cut another 2 billion for good measure.

  • sarah

    Which is the case in 43 other states, which are in no worse case than our state. 

  • sarah

    Gregoire isn’t the one to pass a budget.  The Legislature is.  Yell at them; you elected them.

  • sarah

    Of course, they do it just about every year.  a few days later, to be exact. 

  • http://www.charlesredell.com/ Charles

    True. But she’s the one that proposed this travesty and she’s the effective head of the Ds in state government so I reserve my right to be angry at her. That said, I’ll be letting my reps/senators know my feelings as well. I promise.

  • Trevor

    It’s a 42% increase in the cuts that may not even be necessary!

  • jimu

    I agree with Josh on the loopholes. The problem is that Gregoire isn’t running for reelection, so she doesn’t have to try to do the right thing.

    There is further to cut/close loopholes before we start taxing citizens.

  • Jake Neusner

    “Gregoire noted that every loophole has its constituency”That’s pretty frank and clear.  Business loopholes have constituencies that are relevant to Olympia.  Poor people and students do not.  Partly this is because of how the system is set up.  If I donate $10,000 to your campaign and you provide my business with $100,000 off our taxes, I get my $10,000 back and then some.  If I donate $10,000 to your campaign and you take $100 off of the tuition for 1,000 students, I’m high and dry.  So why would I donate to protect poor people and students?  And I don’t.
    The solution is that Olympia can be influenced by means other than money.  But it requires organization.  Legislators can see money that appears as campaign donations.  They can also see letters and crowds at the Statehouse.  What they can’t see is the tears of the parents of the college students who give up and the handicapped who can no longer make it.  We cry those alone.  As long as poor people and students don’t organize, they will be beat out by businesses buying loopholes.

  • FrequentPoster

    Hmm. So it’s taxed once when I sell it to the dealer as a trade-in, and taxed again when the dealer sells it to someone else? Why would I go to the dealer, then? I’d just sell my car privately, where it’s only taxed once. Or are you also suggesting double-taxing private sales?

    Do you people ever actually think about anything before puking out your opinion? Sheesh. All you will do with this is drive a lot of sales away from dealers and into the private market, which will depress employment.

  • FrequentPoster

    You can lie on your back if you’d like.

  • http://www.charlesredell.com/ Charles

    Do you ever think? You’re not taxed on the trade in, you’re taxed on the purchase of the new car. You should be taxed on the price you pay for that car, not for the price you pay for the car minus the value of the trade in. IF the car costs $20k and your trade is valued at $5k and you PAY $15k, then ok, pay taxes on $15k. But as I understand it, thanks to this loophole, you pay taxes on $10k. 

  • Big Jim Slade

    Give it up sarah. Income tax is not happening. The numbers aren’t even remotely there.