Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

New Safeco Field Tax Loophole To Cost City Up To $300,000 a Year

Update: Ed Murray and Scott White respond here

While the public cheered last session’s omnibus stadium bill for phasing out the stadium taxes and replacing them with more popular arts and workforce funding taxes, four words quietly added to the bill at the last minute will hit Seattle taxpayers with a new $300,000 bill annually, PubliCola has learned.

In the final days of this year’s special legislative session, state Sens. Scott White and Ed Murray quietly added an amendment to legislation that would have extended the hotel/motel taxes to pay off debt on the Kingdome and Qwest Field. (The bill that was ultimately adopted dedicates the taxes to pay for arts and housing, but not until 2021).

The amendment, which includes the addition of the four words “or a baseball stadium,” effectively gives the public authority that runs Safeco the right to charge a 10 percent commercial parking tax at Safeco’s parking lot—and prohibits the city from continuing to levy its own 12.5 parking tax once Safeco does so.

The cost to the city, according to city finance director Beth Goldberg? Between $200,000 and $300,000 a year. “It’s real money,” Goldberg says tells PubliCola. The budget office did not factor the loss into its 2012 budget, announced Monday, simply because they didn’t know about it.

City council president Richard Conlin characterized the situation more bluntly. “They’re stealing $200,000 from us,” he said.

In a letter to Finance and Administrative Services Department director Fred Podesta dated September 23, Washington State Major League League Baseball Stadium Public Facilities District board chair Dave Sperling wrote, “Under the legislation, no city within  the baseball stadium is located may ‘impose a tax of the same or similar kind on vehicle parking charges at the facility.’ Because this change will affect revenues collected by the City, the PFD wanted to make sure you were aware of it.”

Most of the people I talked to at the city were not, in fact, aware of it. Conlin’s mention of the PDA’s new tax yesterday was the first inkling that budget director Goldberg and city council members had that the city is poised to lose millions of dollars in parking revenues due to the legislation, which has no expiration date.

Mayor Mike McGinn’s spokesman Aaron Pickus tells PubliCola he had not heard about the tax.

The PFD is essentially a quasi-public entity with the authority to charge taxes “to pay off bonds and for repair, reequipping, and capital improvement.” What’s more, again under authority from the legislature, they can do so without a public election. (They can also let contracts, up to a certain size, without a competitive bidding process.)

Why would two Seattle legislators work so hard to add an amendment into otherwise unrelated legislation granting a massive tax break to the stadium authority? Moreover, why didn’t anyone from the city sound the alarm?

The second question—why no alarm bells?—is easier to answer than the first. White and Murray’s amendment was added in the final days of the special session, when there’s almost no time to vet bills closely. Nor is there much incentive to read the fine print of a bill like ESSB 5834, which the city had already vetted, sans parking-tax amendment, more than a dozen times.

“It was a late amendment at the very end of the session,” city lobbyist Craig Engelking says. “We’re concerned about the lost revenue in light of the city budget,” which already faces an $18 million shortfall.

The answer to the second question is less clear. Although the stadium PFD was reportedly lobbying legislators to include the tax exemption, PubliCola was unable to confirm this directly; White has not yet returned a call, and Murray is out of the country. Murray, of course, is considering a run for mayor, making his gift to Safeco particularly surprising.

Mariners spokeswoman Rebecca Hale says there’s precedent for the special Safeco tax: Centurylink Field, formerly Qwest Field, is already authorized to charge a similar tax. Although Qwest (which is run by the Washington State Public Stadium Authority, another quasi-public entity) currently only charges a parking tax of 1.2 percent, a spokeswoman for the authority says the tax will go up to 10 percent starting in 2021, once the bonds on the stadium are retired (something a 2008 presentation to the council confirms).

Conlin says he’s asking City Attorney Pete Holmes whether the city has any recourse to prevent Safeco from taking away its parking-tax authority. Holmes’ spokeswoman Kimberly Mills says she has not yet gotten a request from Conlin to look into the taxing issue. Katherine Schubert-Knapp, Podesta’s spokeswoman, says, “This is a change in state law and the Department of Finance and Administrative Services (FAS) will implement it. … We will not levy the commercial parking tax on parking at this facility.”


  • Guest

    “Because this change will effect revenues”

    Illiterate fool, that should be “affect”.

  • Josh Feit

    Hey, pretty great scoop, Erica.

  • jimu

    Agreed. This is unbelievable. When you get a hold of the respective Senators, please bust some chops and don’t let them off easy.

  • http://www.facebook.com/alexjon Alex-jon Earl

    Well, I guess this means Ed isn’t running for mayor.

    He’ll definitely need some landmark legislation next year to keep his job.

  • Jeff

    I’m so smart!

  • http://www.twitter.com/joeszi Joe Szilagyi

    I think we should ban such municipal bonuses unless the teams are actually winning, and getting more people out to spend more money which in turn gets the city more taxes. A Mariners team winning 100+ games, or the Seahawks winning 12-13 and all making the playoffs? Sure. These teams? Yeah, not so much.

    More bonuses for the Sounders and Storm!

  • Big Jim Slade

    Then perhaps the Storm could actually provide the City with some ROI considering they pay below market value rent for Key Arena, if they pay anything at all. Why no outcry over this, Publicola?  

  • Bill B in the Central District

    nice effin’ job, Ed!

  • gohuskies

    Chris Grygiel got Ed Murray on the phone: 

    “Murray said he was stunned by those comments, as the City had supported the bill, in all its versions. He said the language in question was not hidden, nor a surprise.“This is the language that was in the House bill, that the (House) Speaker supported. This has been language in all the proposals. This has been in the bills the City of Seattle supported,” he said.“I’m surprised by Richard Conlin’s comments,” continued Murray,  who is often mentioned as a serious potential candidate for Seattle mayor in 2013. “We thought the City was on board with this. I’m kind of stunned. I don’t what else to say. What kind of game is this?”Murray continued: “I am happy to go back and try to open this up if that’s what the City wants. If we go back and open it up, I worry about the underlying arts issue…What worries me about Richard Conlin’s comments. If the City Council of Setatle wants to work with their legislative delegation, they ought to pick up the phone and talk to us instead of shooting at us through the blogs.””http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/2011/09/29/ed-murray-to-city-council-pick-up-the-phone/

  • Jakers

    There’s an interesting concept, tie subsidies to attendance.

  • http://www.twitter.com/joeszi Joe Szilagyi

    Want a $1,000,000 tax break? Make the MLB playoffs, almost mathematically guaranteeing increased attendance, earnings for everyone around/related to the team (such as local businesses), increased salary for workers to support this whole thing, and for all the other little reasons. The $1,000,000 would only be earned upon making the playoffs, etc.

    It’s not really that far removed from that crazy notion that floats around that companies in general should only get tax breaks if they agree contractually to tie up a given percentage of that tax break in hiring new employees. I want a $10,000,000 property tax break over 10 years? Sure thing–if I’m willing to commit 20% of that total compensation to hiring more employees for the ten years at the median total compensation rate of my company. If that’s $50,000/person, that’s an additional 4 employees I agree to carry per year for 10 years in exchange for $8,000,000 in free profits. Fail to hold up my end, make sure the contract says I owe the city $15,000,000 total from penalties. Everyone sort of wins.

  • Josh Feit

    Saw that. Erica talked to Sen. Murray and Sen. White. Stay tuned. 

  • Cary N.

    Didn’t Murray try to take away $3 million in city revenues paid by the UW earlier this year?

  • No-Safeco-bailout

    Now, their name is the two senators from Safeco. They are not inline with their voter. It is sad that we keep on electing people who are against our interest. Never vote again for Safeco senators.

  • fount

    “I am happy to go back and try to open this up if that’s what the City wants.”

    .

    We heard the same from him on cost overruns. How about he doesn’t screw over the city in the first place, then we won’t have to open anything back up.

  • Diogenes

    If you read the text of the amendment, there’s another way to phrase this story: the senators offered an amendment which allows the PDA to impose a surcharge on the parking fee at any lot it owns or leases, provided (Section 3 (3)) that the surcharge “must be used exclusively to fund repair, reequipping, and capital improvement of the baseball stadium”.  The provision thereby dedicates a revenue stream from the parking lot to fund the maintenance and improvement of the stadium; in doing so, the provision exempts the parking lot customers from any additional tax levied by the city.  While I don’t hold any particular brief for baseball fans and their right to drive to the stadium, I do recognize that a double imposition would jack the prices up and the consequent reduction of demand would jeopardize the finances of the stadium maintenance fund. 
    The cries of outraged virtue emitted by city functionaries seem a tad excessive; $200k isn’t chump change, but it’s not the hold-up even of this new century.  Sometimes I get the impression that ECB is so enthusiastic at being fed a story that she neglects to get her sources to clarify their motives.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr Baker

    That’s RCW 36.30.010 for those of you not paying attention, or asleep at the switch in city government.

    Hey, let’s have a story 18 months later on Seattle’s 2% hotel tax give away to the State Convention Center PFD.

    You might want to read bills and find out what is in them.

    What you are not going to have is Safeco Field coming back in 7 years asking for money for minor capital improvements, and the city saying no, and ending up with the Oklahoma Mariners.

    As a bonus, the RCW 36.38.010 also applies to Seahawks Stadium, and any new arena the is created by a PFD that imposes the admissions tax and a parking tax.

    Btw, there is only “stolen” revenue if somebody goes to a game and pays for parking. The tax only exists because the facility exists. It is a “Public” facilitates district. Wtf did you think Public means?

  • ivan

    Who’s going to run against him? You?

  • Ari Fineman

    Interesting that both White and Murray work in … gasp … the old Safeco Tower… coincidence ?

  • fount

    I bet they do want a stadium maintenance fund.

    But I for one think taxpayers have given enough to the stadium. To divert public money away to a private authority — especially a stadium the people voted against, especially at this budget time — is not really responsible policy.

  • http://yrihf.com John Bailo

    I thought that Publicola hated parking and cars and parking lots that use up space.

    Now all of sudden you want us to drive in and pay parking taxes?

    No dice.

    I take LINK light rail in when I go down town.  

    Only $2.50 either way and free parking at Tukwila.

  • Jefferson

    name calling will always get me on your side FOOL.

  • Anonymous

    This story is a construct and more fabricated positions by City Council.  They conspire with legislators in Olympia to fleece the public, then claim to the public that they didn’t know what was going on – it is those bad legislators in Olympia that cooked this all up.  Same baloney they ran about the cost overruns for the tunnel project – the City Council and Mayor at the time agreed to the overrun position in order to get the tunnel.  Now they turn around and claim otherwise – they’re hamstrung, and media indulges these stories b/c it gives them something to report – what a crock on both ends.