Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Under Questioning from Board Members

Caffeinated news & gossip. Your daily Morning Fizz.

1. While the conservative Democrats in the state senate controlled the budget talks last session, do not expect the same all-cuts approach next year. Fizz hears that the senate Democrats met recently and the vote count says they will not be able to pass that kind of budget next year.

With a devastating revenue forecast ($1 billion down?) queued up for next week, senate liberals are reportedly prepared to fight for more revenue this time.

2. The school board tabled a motion earlier this week to hire two Teach for America recruits. Teach for America sends idealistic young folks to teach in inner city and low-income districts all around the country.

Campaign finance records show that 10 Inslee donors have all gone over the state campaign finance limits when you add in the federal transfers.

The board didn’t go for it because one prerequisite the board had set for hiring TFA teachers (a controversial move to start with because TFA teachers aren’t certified) was disclosing where the funding comes from. TFA charges a $4,000 fee for every teacher they deliver and private donors who support getting TFA teachers in Seattle schools said they would cover the cost.

Under questioning from board members Michael DeBell and Sherry Carr, Superintendent Susan Enfield couldn’t say where the money was coming from, so the board unanimously tabled the idea.

Watch the action here. The motion is introduced at the 116 minutes mark and DeBell gets the runaround from Enfield around the 118 mark.

3. While US Rep. Jay Inslee (D-WA, 1) is allowed to transfer contributions from his federal congressional campaign fund to his 2012 governor’s race fund, the donors cannot exceed state contribution limits. (Initially, Inslee had planned to transfer the federal campaign dollars and then ask the donors for gubernatorial campaign contributions without counting the initial federal contribution toward the state limit.)

However, campaign finance records show that 10 Inslee donors have all gone over the state campaign finance limits—$1600 in the primary and $1600 in the general—when you add in the federal transfers.

For example, a managing partner at Polaris Venture Partners gave $2000 at the federal level and another $2000 at the state level, $800 over the limit.

When you total all 10 apparent violations, Inslee has received $13,000 in excess donations.

The Inslee campaign says the refunds will show up on their next campaign finance reports.

4. Erica will be on KUOW’s week in review with Steve Scher this morning. Tune in 94.9 FM at 10 AM.

I think they’re going to talk about Obama’s big stimulus re-do: $140 billion for school upgrades and roads work.

Fizz is glad Obama finally took the Krugman cue from state Rep. Hans Dunshee (D-44, Everett), who pushed a $500 million school retrofit package over a year-and-a-half ago.

For her part, I think Erica “the C. is for Crank” Barnett doesn’t like Obama’s plan because it’s more of a He-covery plan (construction jobs favor men) than a universal shot of relief. That’s just my guess. Listen in.


  • Godwin

    A HeCovery for a Mancession.

  • Jakers

    #4 – Typical sexist.Disregard the statistics so she can do her part to tear/keep men down and create her new dominate sex.

    “the current recession has had a more adverse effect on men than women”
    http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/economists/sahin/GenderGap.pdf

  • Jakers

    #4 – Typical sexist.Disregard the statistics so she can do her part to tear/keep men down and create her new dominate sex.

    “the current recession has had a more adverse effect on men than women”
    http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/economists/sahin/GenderGap.pdf

  • ivan

    Correction. Please change:

    Under questioning from board members Michael DeBell and Sherry Carr,
    Superintendent Susan Enfield couldn’t say where the money was coming
    from, so the board unanimously tabled the idea.

    to “Enfield WOULDN’T say where the money was coming from.” Here’s a clue, Susie. We’re entitled to know. It’s OUR school system.

  • SPSLeaks SPSLeaks

    For eye-opening public documents showing how the TFA fix was in, go to:

    http://www.scribd.com/SPSLeaks

  • TheLawWon

    In 2009, the overall unemployment rate for women was 8.1 percent: of the 72
    million women in the labor force, approximately 6 million were unemployed. I think those 6 million would have a thing or two to say about the mancession.

  • TheLawWon

    What these reports fail to consider is that 8.1 is a huge number, and while more men are affected, should we put all recovery in this direction? There is more to infrastructure then building roads.

  • TheLawWon

    What these reports fail to consider is that 8.1 is a huge number, and while more men are affected, should we put all recovery in this direction? There is more to infrastructure then building roads.

  • Trevor

    RE #1: everything depends upon whether Senate Dem leadership can enforce party discipline– something they have proven not very good at. Will they allow a disloyal “roadkill” caucus to play the two parties against each other while still claiming to be Democrats? Or will they bring roadkill to heel?

    Also note: a partial cuts budget is not much to celebrate. Why not shoot for a no-cuts budget when you control the house, senate and gov’s office? After all, it would still be a net loss when you put it in relation to the whole biennium budget.

  • Trevor

    RE #1: everything depends upon whether Senate Dem leadership can enforce party discipline– something they have proven not very good at. Will they allow a disloyal “roadkill” caucus to play the two parties against each other while still claiming to be Democrats? Or will they bring roadkill to heel?

    Also note: a partial cuts budget is not much to celebrate. Why not shoot for a no-cuts budget when you control the house, senate and gov’s office? After all, it would still be a net loss when you put it in relation to the whole biennium budget.

  • Trevor

    RE #1: everything depends upon whether Senate Dem leadership can enforce party discipline– something they have proven not very good at. Will they allow a disloyal “roadkill” caucus to play the two parties against each other while still claiming to be Democrats? Or will they bring roadkill to heel?

    Also note: a partial cuts budget is not much to celebrate. Why not shoot for a no-cuts budget when you control the house, senate and gov’s office? After all, it would still be a net loss when you put it in relation to the whole biennium budget.

  • Melissa Westbrook

    I’ve covered a lot of the TFA story.  It’s very, very troubling and shows that we STILL have a district that has problems with transparency and accountability.  That only ONE Board member spoke up for transparency on where the money was coming from to pay the $4k per TFA teacher per year (meanwhile in Federal Way, they only pay $3k per year per teacher) is troubling.  That director was Michael DeBell who eloquently pointed out that the district cannot have the appearance of being for sale by wealthy people who want to see certain things happen (like ed reform items like TFA). 

    Yes, these “idealistic” young folks generally are smart and mean well.  But if you look at the TFA website, there is a plethora of benefits to doing this work that come afterwards.   Like deferred admission to graduate school programs,waived application fees, internships with top ten financial companies, etc.  Plus you are now in the secret handshake club – you know, the one where you go to Harvard or Yale or join a sorority or frat and now you’re part of the “club.” 

    It’s a great deal except for the notion of putting recent college grads with 5 whole weeks of training in front of the most high need kids.  That and having a revolving door of teachers at high needs schools.  Not how you build a solid teaching corps that knows the kids and the community. 

    Dr. Enfield lied (and there’s videotape to prove it) at the last Board meeting where she promised to reveal the donor of the money when there were hires (and there now are).  She now says she has to wait until ALL the hires are made and anyway she doesn’t even know.

    Really?  Who knows?  The Alliance for Education?  The Gates Foundation?  If the Superintendent doesn’t know who is paying for these hires, who does?

    Dr. Enfield really is a breath of fresh air in this district, has gotten rid of some top leadership and replaced them with new people and is trying to reach out on a far bigger scale than our former superintendent.  But she undermines that good work with cronyism and secrecy around TFA. 

  • Melissa Westbrook

    I’ve covered a lot of the TFA story.  It’s very, very troubling and shows that we STILL have a district that has problems with transparency and accountability.  That only ONE Board member spoke up for transparency on where the money was coming from to pay the $4k per TFA teacher per year (meanwhile in Federal Way, they only pay $3k per year per teacher) is troubling.  That director was Michael DeBell who eloquently pointed out that the district cannot have the appearance of being for sale by wealthy people who want to see certain things happen (like ed reform items like TFA). 

    Yes, these “idealistic” young folks generally are smart and mean well.  But if you look at the TFA website, there is a plethora of benefits to doing this work that come afterwards.   Like deferred admission to graduate school programs,waived application fees, internships with top ten financial companies, etc.  Plus you are now in the secret handshake club – you know, the one where you go to Harvard or Yale or join a sorority or frat and now you’re part of the “club.” 

    It’s a great deal except for the notion of putting recent college grads with 5 whole weeks of training in front of the most high need kids.  That and having a revolving door of teachers at high needs schools.  Not how you build a solid teaching corps that knows the kids and the community. 

    Dr. Enfield lied (and there’s videotape to prove it) at the last Board meeting where she promised to reveal the donor of the money when there were hires (and there now are).  She now says she has to wait until ALL the hires are made and anyway she doesn’t even know.

    Really?  Who knows?  The Alliance for Education?  The Gates Foundation?  If the Superintendent doesn’t know who is paying for these hires, who does?

    Dr. Enfield really is a breath of fresh air in this district, has gotten rid of some top leadership and replaced them with new people and is trying to reach out on a far bigger scale than our former superintendent.  But she undermines that good work with cronyism and secrecy around TFA. 

  • Melissa Westbrook

    I’ve covered a lot of the TFA story.  It’s very, very troubling and shows that we STILL have a district that has problems with transparency and accountability.  That only ONE Board member spoke up for transparency on where the money was coming from to pay the $4k per TFA teacher per year (meanwhile in Federal Way, they only pay $3k per year per teacher) is troubling.  That director was Michael DeBell who eloquently pointed out that the district cannot have the appearance of being for sale by wealthy people who want to see certain things happen (like ed reform items like TFA). 

    Yes, these “idealistic” young folks generally are smart and mean well.  But if you look at the TFA website, there is a plethora of benefits to doing this work that come afterwards.   Like deferred admission to graduate school programs,waived application fees, internships with top ten financial companies, etc.  Plus you are now in the secret handshake club – you know, the one where you go to Harvard or Yale or join a sorority or frat and now you’re part of the “club.” 

    It’s a great deal except for the notion of putting recent college grads with 5 whole weeks of training in front of the most high need kids.  That and having a revolving door of teachers at high needs schools.  Not how you build a solid teaching corps that knows the kids and the community. 

    Dr. Enfield lied (and there’s videotape to prove it) at the last Board meeting where she promised to reveal the donor of the money when there were hires (and there now are).  She now says she has to wait until ALL the hires are made and anyway she doesn’t even know.

    Really?  Who knows?  The Alliance for Education?  The Gates Foundation?  If the Superintendent doesn’t know who is paying for these hires, who does?

    Dr. Enfield really is a breath of fresh air in this district, has gotten rid of some top leadership and replaced them with new people and is trying to reach out on a far bigger scale than our former superintendent.  But she undermines that good work with cronyism and secrecy around TFA. 

  • Kathy

    Steve Sundquist wanted to move forward with TFA.  Does Sundquist care about transparency?  What about Sundquist’s oversight duties?  I’m not seeing transparency or oversight from this incumbent.  Let’s remember this at the voting booth.

    Special thanks to M. DeBell.  I”ve been concerned by the manner in which dollars undermine our democract.

  • Here We Go Again

    Looked at the Seattle Wikileaks site. The very first document shows Interim Superintendent Enfield and TFA Business Development Executive Janis Ortega talking LAST OCTOBER how to “handle” the Board’s request for donor transparency.

    The Board and the Public are being played here.  Wasn’t Maria Goodloe-Johnson fired less than 6 months ago for witholding information from the Board? Either Enfield learned nothing or she does not care about her obligation to the Board and by extension the Public. Either way, her chances of moving from Interim to Permanent superintendent just tanked.

  • Here We Go Again

    Looked at the Seattle Wikileaks site. The very first document shows Interim Superintendent Enfield and TFA Business Development Executive Janis Ortega talking LAST OCTOBER how to “handle” the Board’s request for donor transparency.

    The Board and the Public are being played here.  Wasn’t Maria Goodloe-Johnson fired less than 6 months ago for witholding information from the Board? Either Enfield learned nothing or she does not care about her obligation to the Board and by extension the Public. Either way, her chances of moving from Interim to Permanent superintendent just tanked.

  • Here We Go Again

    Looked at the Seattle Wikileaks site. The very first document shows Interim Superintendent Enfield and TFA Business Development Executive Janis Ortega talking LAST OCTOBER how to “handle” the Board’s request for donor transparency.

    The Board and the Public are being played here.  Wasn’t Maria Goodloe-Johnson fired less than 6 months ago for witholding information from the Board? Either Enfield learned nothing or she does not care about her obligation to the Board and by extension the Public. Either way, her chances of moving from Interim to Permanent superintendent just tanked.

  • http://www.twitter.com/joeszi Joe Szilagyi

    Is the school system somehow exempt from public records laws? 

  • Here We Go Again

     KUOW ran a story today about this. http://kuow.org/program.php?id=24501

    Bezos Foundation, Gates Foundation. Raikes Foundation. And Seattle
    Foundation. All worked to get TFA here. Are these the same big $$$
    people who ‘bought’ themselves a school board four years ago with
    outsize donations? What about this time around? Anyone willing to
    analyze pdc reports? Specifically interested in connections for Steve
    Sundquist, Harium Martin-Morris and Peter Maier. Because not one of them
    spoke up at the Board meeting to demand transparency. If there is a tie
    between campaign donors and TFA donors, the public has the right to
    understand that link.

  • Here We Go Again

    The SaveSeattleSchools blog is also calling out SPS and TFA:

    http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=28765366&postID=6400726803012896730

    “…What we got was an unimformed, rushed, secretive, divisive, “back door”
    approach. I don’t know to what extent TfA and its supporters were
    purposefully deceitful and secretive, or just unbelievably clueless, or
    whether they are just utterly dismissive of any opinions other than
    their own — but the result is the same. This COULD have been a really
    interesting discussion. Instead, it is a political mess…”

  • SPS Parent/Observer

    On Tuesday, I put in a PDR to the district for the names of the donors and the amounts of the contributions.  I have not

    I received aknowledgment yesterday. The public records officer at SPS anticapates a response on or before October 16, 2011. 

    Why the six weeks to find the answer, I do not know.

  • SPS Parent/Observer

    I have worked up the 2007 campaign finance data, downloaded on June 2, 2011 from the Washington Public Disclosure Commisssion website. I will arrange for the spreadsheet file containing raw data and analysis to SPS LEAKS.  It was necessary to rectify multiple spellings of donors’ names before the data could be properly analyzed. If you use share the following, please attribute the analysis of the WA PDC data to Seattle Shadow School Board (S3B). Commentary can be used without attribution (do not attribute to S3.). Summary of data; followed by (anonymous) commentary.
    Total contributions to the 2007 campaigns of the four incumbents: $505,496Statutory Maximum Individual/PAC Contribution to Mayoral, City Council, and directors of certain  special purpose district Campaigns: $700There were twenty-one individual donors, each of whose total contributions to the four campaigns exceeded $2800. These 21 donors account for 2% of the 1059 unique donors to these four campaigns.  Combined contributions of the 21 donors was $307,510Combined contributions of these 21 donors is 60.8% of the five hundred and five thousand dollars contributed to the four campaigns. Twelve of these donors were husband and wife pairs. The most generous couple was Nicholas Hanauer and his wife Leslie, whom together contributed $40,000 to the four campaigns.  Nick Hanuaer is a co-founder of LEV.  Most of LEV’s funding comes from two foundations:  The Nicholas J. and Leslie Hanauer Foundation, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.  The husband-and-wife donor pairs include the CEO of Costco and the CEO of Microsoft (Steve Balmer).  (See [Summary] Table of attached xls file for a breakdown of the contributions of these 21 donors.) Commentary (do not attribute commentary to S3B; use any part of this that you like, without attribution.) Steve Balmer’s children do not attend Seattle Public Schools. Steve Balmer does not live in Seattle School District.  Microsoft benefitting from the implementation of the Excellence for All Strategic Plan, in which student data wherehousing, and on-line testing play a major role?  Is Bill Gates and/or his Foundation benefitting through the effect on the Microsoft stock that he owns?  Do these donors believe that they have more insight than the residents of Seattle and parents of SPS students as to what is good for our schools and our children? Do these incumbents’ voting records show that they understand that their extraordinarily generous donors have expectations?  Do the priorities of LEV provide an indication of the priorities of these donors?  LEV is a champion for Ed Reform, including high stakes testing; charter schools; merit pay for “human capital,” formerly known as “teachers”; and federal models of restructing. These are controversial reforms that have not produced good results for genuine academic achievement and for genuine closure of the achievement gap.    Maria Goodloe Johnson is a darling of the Ed Reform organization known as the Broad Foundation.   The incumbent superintendent has shown that she will aggressively promote the Ed Reform agend in SPS, and has close ties to the Gates Foundation.   The incumbents, if they are re-elected, will continue to rubber stamp all Ed Reform proposals that the interim superintendent will bring to the Board.   These incumbents will hold the course. Electing geninue grassroots candidates are the only hope for change in SPS.  Ousting incumbents will not guarantee a positive change in direction, but would greatly improove the odds of positive change.

  • SPS Parent/Observer

    I have worked up the 2007 campaign finance data, downloaded on June 2, 2011 from the Washington Public Disclosure Commisssion website. I will arrange for the spreadsheet file containing raw data and analysis to SPS LEAKS.  It was necessary to rectify multiple spellings of donors’ names before the data could be properly analyzed. If you use share the following, please attribute the analysis of the WA PDC data to Seattle Shadow School Board (S3B). Commentary can be used without attribution (do not attribute to S3.). Summary of data; followed by (anonymous) commentary.
    Total contributions to the 2007 campaigns of the four incumbents: $505,496Statutory Maximum Individual/PAC Contribution to Mayoral, City Council, and directors of certain  special purpose district Campaigns: $700There were twenty-one individual donors, each of whose total contributions to the four campaigns exceeded $2800. These 21 donors account for 2% of the 1059 unique donors to these four campaigns.  Combined contributions of the 21 donors was $307,510Combined contributions of these 21 donors is 60.8% of the five hundred and five thousand dollars contributed to the four campaigns. Twelve of these donors were husband and wife pairs. The most generous couple was Nicholas Hanauer and his wife Leslie, whom together contributed $40,000 to the four campaigns.  Nick Hanuaer is a co-founder of LEV.  Most of LEV’s funding comes from two foundations:  The Nicholas J. and Leslie Hanauer Foundation, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.  The husband-and-wife donor pairs include the CEO of Costco and the CEO of Microsoft (Steve Balmer).  (See [Summary] Table of attached xls file for a breakdown of the contributions of these 21 donors.) Commentary (do not attribute commentary to S3B; use any part of this that you like, without attribution.) Steve Balmer’s children do not attend Seattle Public Schools. Steve Balmer does not live in Seattle School District.  Microsoft benefitting from the implementation of the Excellence for All Strategic Plan, in which student data wherehousing, and on-line testing play a major role?  Is Bill Gates and/or his Foundation benefitting through the effect on the Microsoft stock that he owns?  Do these donors believe that they have more insight than the residents of Seattle and parents of SPS students as to what is good for our schools and our children? Do these incumbents’ voting records show that they understand that their extraordinarily generous donors have expectations?  Do the priorities of LEV provide an indication of the priorities of these donors?  LEV is a champion for Ed Reform, including high stakes testing; charter schools; merit pay for “human capital,” formerly known as “teachers”; and federal models of restructing. These are controversial reforms that have not produced good results for genuine academic achievement and for genuine closure of the achievement gap.    Maria Goodloe Johnson is a darling of the Ed Reform organization known as the Broad Foundation.   The incumbent superintendent has shown that she will aggressively promote the Ed Reform agend in SPS, and has close ties to the Gates Foundation.   The incumbents, if they are re-elected, will continue to rubber stamp all Ed Reform proposals that the interim superintendent will bring to the Board.   These incumbents will hold the course. Electing geninue grassroots candidates are the only hope for change in SPS.  Ousting incumbents will not guarantee a positive change in direction, but would greatly improove the odds of positive change.

  • SPS Parent/Observer

    Legislative Reform is needed. We need to have school directors added to the list of local offices that has campaign contribution limits.  I have initiated contact with a legislator who is interested to sponsor such legislation. He told though that such legislation is difficult to get out of committee, due to powerful lobbying interests and legislator apathy.  He said it will take committed stewardship from activists to have a chance to get such legislation passed.

  • SPS Parent/Observer

    Legislative Reform is needed. We need to have school directors added to the list of local offices that has campaign contribution limits.  I have initiated contact with a legislator who is interested to sponsor such legislation. He told though that such legislation is difficult to get out of committee, due to powerful lobbying interests and legislator apathy.  He said it will take committed stewardship from activists to have a chance to get such legislation passed.

  • SPS Parent/Observer

    Sorry about the lack of proper formatting on preceding comment.

  • SPS Parent/Observer

    Sorry about the lack of proper formatting on preceding comment.

  • SPS Parent/Observer

    Sorry about the lack of proper formatting on preceding comment.

  • Uncle Jesse

    Enfield has apparently decided that her relationship to TFA and to their marquee name donors is more important than her obligation to the public. It is an unfortunate choice for our district and for her viability as the superintendent of SPS.

    DeBell and Carr and Smith-Blum questioned Enfield’s obfuscation. Patu has previously rejected TFA for Seattle.

    Sundquist, Maier and Martin-Morris were all dead silent about the right of the public to examine private money flowing into the district.

    It is an unfortunate choice for our district and for their viability as board members.

  • Uncle Jesse

    Enfield has apparently decided that her relationship to TFA and to their marquee name donors is more important than her obligation to the public. It is an unfortunate choice for our district and for her viability as the superintendent of SPS.

    DeBell and Carr and Smith-Blum questioned Enfield’s obfuscation. Patu has previously rejected TFA for Seattle.

    Sundquist, Maier and Martin-Morris were all dead silent about the right of the public to examine private money flowing into the district.

    It is an unfortunate choice for our district and for their viability as board members.

  • SPS Parent/Observer

    KUOW’s story mentioned Raikes Foundation.  Jeffrey Raikes is a former executive of Microsoft, and become the CEO of the Gates Foundation in 2008.  He and his wife together contributed $30,000 collectively to the 2007 campaigns of the four incumbents.

    Gates F. is the primary funder of LEV (League of Eduction Voters, based in Seattle, very actively pushing Education Reform privatization agenda, and getting only a small portion of its funding from indivudial voter contributions).  LEV was co-founded by Nicholas Hanauer.  Nicholas and his wife were the most generous donors to the 2007 campaigns of the incumbents.  They together contributed $40,000 collectively to the four campaigns.

    Data Source: WA Public Disclosure Commission.

  • SPS Parent/Observer

    KUOW’s story mentioned Raikes Foundation.  Jeffrey Raikes is a former executive of Microsoft, and become the CEO of the Gates Foundation in 2008.  He and his wife together contributed $30,000 collectively to the 2007 campaigns of the four incumbents.

    Gates F. is the primary funder of LEV (League of Eduction Voters, based in Seattle, very actively pushing Education Reform privatization agenda, and getting only a small portion of its funding from indivudial voter contributions).  LEV was co-founded by Nicholas Hanauer.  Nicholas and his wife were the most generous donors to the 2007 campaigns of the incumbents.  They together contributed $40,000 collectively to the four campaigns.

    Data Source: WA Public Disclosure Commission.

  • SPS Parent/Observer

    KUOW’s story mentioned Raikes Foundation.  Jeffrey Raikes is a former executive of Microsoft, and become the CEO of the Gates Foundation in 2008.  He and his wife together contributed $30,000 collectively to the 2007 campaigns of the four incumbents.

    Gates F. is the primary funder of LEV (League of Eduction Voters, based in Seattle, very actively pushing Education Reform privatization agenda, and getting only a small portion of its funding from indivudial voter contributions).  LEV was co-founded by Nicholas Hanauer.  Nicholas and his wife were the most generous donors to the 2007 campaigns of the incumbents.  They together contributed $40,000 collectively to the four campaigns.

    Data Source: WA Public Disclosure Commission.

  • SPS Parent/Observer

    Uncle Jesse,

    Given the finding ties between incumbents’ 2007 campaigns and TFA (most notably, via Jeff Raikos) it is surprising that Sherry Carr would would on this occasion distinguish herself from the other incumbents, by taking a position that works against her benefactors’ interests.  Carr, however, may feel that Kate Martin is mounting a very serious electoral challenge.  This may explain Carr’s seeming new-found independence with respect to her benefactors’ goals.

  • Anonymous

    Erica, could you please ask KUOW why they always seem to have two men and one woman on the week in review? I don’t think I’ve ever heard two women and one man, or three women. But I’m sure I’ve heard three men. Hmm…

  • burb

    Uncle Jesse, not only does she diss her obligation to her public, she dissed her employer – the School Board!  Even couched in nice words, “talk to the (gloved) hand” is still insulting and disingenuous.

  • sarah

    Unfortunately the Dems have never understood that you must ask for/expect more than what you want, so you’ll get at least some of what you want.  The Republicans, because they’re primarily profit-masters, negotiate downwards.  Lately, downwards of what the Dems ask for is nothing.

  • Jakers

    Why, because only men are able to do construction jobs?

  • TheLawWon

    I think construction and the trades are rewarding careers for women, but not occupations that women are large participants in (Department of labor still has more than 50% of women still working in 5 low paid fields–see Erica’s piece earlier this year on the Women in America report from the Obama Administration). I recently spoke with a “women in the trades” specialist who brought up that the majority of stimulus road construction projects occur during times that women, who still carry most of the child rearing burden, cannot work. In a world where men still hesitate to take a large role in watching their children (not all, but many), women with children lack childcare options on weekends and evenings. This is a practical barrier to women enjoying career options in this field–you need a whole family to agree to the delegation of home responsibilities.