Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

County Executive, Council Announce Plan to Pass $20 Metro Fee, Eliminate Ride-Free Zone

11:20: City council transportation chair Tom Rasmussen says that with the elimination of the downtown Ride-Free Area, the city plans to continue spending the $400,000 it currently invests in the area, perhaps by providing free daytime service on Third Avenue. King County Executive Dow Constantine confirms that eliminating the zone will also mean eliminating the confusing current system in which riders pay as they leave when boarding certain buses, but pay as they enter when boarding others.

11:15: Neither of the two Republican members of the King County Council will say whether the remaining (and absent) two council Republicans, Pete Von Reichbauer and Reagan Dunn, will vote to put the temporary, $20 Metro fee on the ballot—a response I interpret as a “no.” However, both say there is “zero” chance that they will vote against the fee on Monday, August 15.

11:10: Jane Hague, who’s being challenged by two serious opponents for reelection, says she’s willing to stake her election on her support for a two-year, $20 vehicle license fee. “I’m here at the behest of the District 6 voters. If they choose to reelect me, that’s fine. This is a very meaningful issue—real, meaningful reform, real jobs in the economy. Those are huge to me.”

11:07: Bellevue Downtown Association president Leslie Lloyd: “Giving up on 40/40/20″—the system that provided most new service to suburban areas, and the least to Seattle and Shoreline—”was a bitter pill for us to swallow. [But]  fewer routes and riders would mean more cars on 520, I-5, and I-405 and more cars idling on the streets of our downtowns. … We can’t afford those consequences if we’re going to remain competitive as a region.”

11:05: King County Council member Larry Phillips, on the deal to pass a $20, two-year fee to preserve Metro bus service: “There is some controversy with regard to raising the congestion reduction charge by $20 in this economy. The tremendous hurt it would do to our economy not having it would be unacceptable. … To my mind, $20 is affordable, and transit cuts are not.”

10:50: Both Republicans at this morning’s Metro press conference announcing that the King County Council will pass a $20 fee to preserve Metro service for two years, Jane Hague and Kathy Lambert, have spoken. Jane Hague: “I believe that it is a great deal for the Eastside. It is a great deal for King County. It cuts waste; it is real, meaningful reform. … I know it’s not without controversy, but I think as the system, the proposed package, plays out, you will all see that it is well worth the hard work.” Kathy Lambert: “We were ready for the ballot, and then things changed.”

The $20 fee requires a supermajority vote of six members of the King County Council. Details of the agreement are below.

10:45: County Executive Dow Constantine has announced a five-part plan to save Metro service.

Part 1: Provide bus tickets, worth up to $20, to everyone who pays the $20, two-year vehicle license fee; those who don’t want the tickets can donate them to social and human-services agencies that provide low-cost bus tickets to low-income and homeless people;

Part 2: Phase out the downtown Ride-Free Area, which costs more than $2 million a year, starting in October 2012;

Part 3: Increase the pool of funds that pay for low-cost bus tickets and either further discount bus tickets or provide more bus tickets to social service agencies;

Part 4: Accelerate the “right-sizing,” in Constantine’s words, of bus service—increasing vanpool and dial-a-ride service in areas where demand for full bus service is lower, and increasing bus service in areas where demand is high;

Part 5: Increase bus service in areas where drivers are hit hardest by tolls, including the SR-520 corridor and on the new deep-bore tunnel.

10:36 am: County executive Constantine announces that the county council has a “supermajority, and then some” to pass the temporary $20 fee to save Metro service for two years.

10:33 am: King County Council members Jane Hague and Kathy Lambert, Republicans who had been holdouts on the $20 fee, just arrived with Constantine. “I am pleased to announce that we have reached an agreement to save Metro Transit,” Constantine just said.

10:20 am: The press (yes, all of them) is at the county-owned Chinook Building in Pioneer Square, waiting for King County Executive Dow Constantine to make his big announcement about the future of Metro transit. Hanging out in the hallway with county staffers: King County Council member Larry Phillips, King County Council member Bob Ferguson, Greater Seattle Chamber of Commerce spokesman George Allen, state Sen. Scott White (D-46), King County Labor Council leader Dave Freiboth, Bellevue City Council member John Chelminiak, Seattle City Council member Tom Rasmussen, State Rep. Joe Fitzgibbon, King County Council member Larry Gossett, Metro union president Paul Bachtel, Rep. Transportation Choices Coalition field director Andrew Austin, and UW transportation director Josh Kavanagh.

As we reported this morning, the rumor is that county council members have agreed to get rid of the downtown ride-free area in exchange for passing a temporary $20 vehicle license fee to preserve Metro service for two years. More to come.

 


  • Rachael Buchanan

    That is huge!!!!  Awesome!

  • Anonymous

    I’m terribly sad about the loss of the free ride zone, but am so glad this isn’t going to a vote of the people. Representative democracy needs to be allowed to function. This is great.

  • Anonymous

    I’m terribly sad about the loss of the free ride zone, but am so glad this isn’t going to a vote of the people. Representative democracy needs to be allowed to function. This is great.

  • Anonymous

    I’m terribly sad about the loss of the free ride zone, but am so glad this isn’t going to a vote of the people. Representative democracy needs to be allowed to function. This is great.

  • Blue Light

    Apparently the whole system is a “free ride zone” for those so inclined.  If they end the existing “free ride zone” what will they do with those who insist on riding free?  And if the answer is “northing” then why shouldn’t everyone, then, refuse to pay fare?

  • SeattleDem

    Fair trade: this will serve a much greater good to give up the free ride area in exchange for maintaining service within the region.

  • Halla

    “Part 5: Increase bus service in areas where drivers are hit hardest by tolls, including the SR-520 corridor and on the new deep-bore tunnel”

    This makes a lot of sense!

  • Theresa

    Ironic that folks on this site love representative democracy when gives them the things that they want, but are the first to whine about “respecting the will of the people” when you disagree with your elected leaders on issues like the DBT. Hypocrisy much?

  • Halla

    Because most people are law abiding citizens who realize paying their way is the right thing to do.

  • Jakers

    This press conference reminds me of another backroom deal worked out behind closed doors between politicians from differing government entities.

    Are we okay with these kinds of backroom deals or not? I’m confused!

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2008619540_apwaalaskanwayviaduct2ndldwritethru.html

  • Anonymous

    Congrats, King County.  You did the right thing.

  • Anonymous

    I respect their decision on viaduct replacement, Theresa. Not all “folks on this site” believe the same. You may wish to slow down a bit as you read.

  • Anonymous

    I respect their decision on viaduct replacement, Theresa. Not all “folks on this site” believe the same. You may wish to slow down a bit as you read.

  • Blue Light

    Is “law abiding citizens who realize paying their way is the right thing to do” a fancy term for “suckers”?

  • BigDonLives

    Only when we agree with the outcomes

  • Jakers

    Or click on his pic to view a history of comments.

  • $4 DBT

    Yes.  The tunnel is for the rich, and they shouldn’t find their way clogged by poor people who barely scrape together the toll…those poorer folks should get on the bus. 

  • J. Heller

    you sound like Yossarian.

  • backroom media alert?

    what are you talking about?  the deal is all over the media and you are commenting on it.  comment away.  write to your county councilmember or better yet run for office and stop the victimish whining. 

  • Blue Light

    Yossarian:  From now on I’m thinking only of me.
    Major Danby:  But, Yossarian, suppose everyone felt that way.
    Yossarian:  Then, I’d certainly be a damned fool to feel any other way, wouldn’t I?

    Let’s all join the Free Riders Union!

  • Cyclingmarge

    personnally I’m glad they’re getting rid of the ride free zone. As a bus commuter of over 30 years, I think the ride free zone adds to the criminal element to downtown Seattle.

  • Jakers

    So was the DBT a backroom deal, or was it all over the media too prior to being formalized? Or did you not bother to click on the link to understand the contrast I was making in my comment? I’m fine with representative democracy working this way (especially when you have a very competent representative like Dow in charge that can actually get a deal like this done) and in no way do I feel this or the DBT were “backroom” deals (as many have accused the latter of being).

  • Blue Light

    They are still going to let the criminals ride free.

  • Peter Leahy

    BlueLight, get over you obsession with people who refuse to pay. It’s a non-issue. Anyone who rides Metro regularly knows there is no major problem with fare dodgers. And your assertion that people who obey laws are “suckers” is a grave insult to the vast majority of people in our city/county/state/country/world who are law abiding. Just because you’re a criminal (you’re the only one here advocating that people refuse to pay) doesn’t mean everone else is.

  • MVH

    I’m glad we all agree.

  • ivan

    He’s an ignorant, bigoted right-wing troll. Quit responding to him altogether. Ignore his sorry ass.

  • ivan

    He’s an ignorant, bigoted right-wing troll. Quit responding to him altogether. Ignore his sorry ass.

  • Monster

    i’m glad they changed it so i can support the fee.

  • Monster

    i’m glad they changed it so i can support the fee.

  • LWC

    “If free riding is criminialized, only criminals will ride free”, right?

  • Meh

    What part of representative democracy do you not understand is my question, Jakers. Democratically elected representatives put heads together to come up with solutions that will satisfy everyone enough to pass/be supported/get funding or whatever.

    The same scenario takes place day in and day out on every piece of law that gets passed… everywhere in this state.

  • Monster

    hey out of touch and faggy’ old ivan weiss, go back to daily kos no one likes you and you say nothing new,

  • Monster

    I agree, this will clean up the bus’s a bit and maybe even make more people want to ride them.

  • Blue Light

    The bus blogger says it is $3 Million per year.

  • okay i guess

    it’s another way of saying “most people”.

  • Bob Feemster

    Too bad Dow wasn’t the one negotiating the debt ceiling increase.

  • Jakers

    I get this, but anti-tunnel folks seem to not get it. Constantly referring to low polling numbers for the DBT, they some how think that we should stop the tunnel and let people vote on it but when it works in favor of something that they want, “the same scenario takes place day in and day out” is okay for them.

  • Jakers

    I get this, but anti-tunnel folks seem to not get it. Constantly referring to low polling numbers for the DBT, they some how think that we should stop the tunnel and let people vote on it but when it works in favor of something that they want, “the same scenario takes place day in and day out” is okay for them.

  • http://profiles.google.com/jeffw66seattle Jeff Welch

    The County’s own study says it’s $3 million a year.  Unfortunately, fare enforcement would probably cost even more.

  • http://profiles.google.com/jeffw66seattle Jeff Welch

    The County’s own study says it’s $3 million a year.  Unfortunately, fare enforcement would probably cost even more.

  • Blue Light

    Do you consider $3 Million/year a “non-issue”, Peter?

  • Dorothy

    So this is what political leadership and the art of reasonable compromise looks like . . .

  • Best for Seattle

    hardly a back room deal. over 1,500 people commented in public hearings about the proposal

  • Monster

    just like on the federal level

  • Monster

    just like on the federal level

  • WestSide

    That is pretty generalized and inflammatory reply.

    My Household Income is almost about $175,000 for a family of 3 and we all take the bus.  We also drive sometimes especially since the Columbia entrance to West Seattle Junction bus commute went from 12 minutes to 25 -45 minutes recently with the 1/2 mile one lane closure on the Viaduct. 

    I’ll take the bus if I can leave work and pick up my kid from daycare in West Seattle in a reasonable amount of time.  I’ll drive, pay for parking AND pay a toll if it’s 30 minutes faster in each direction.  My hourly wage is close to $50 so $8/10 dollars to pay a toll to not have an hour stuck in traffic is fine by me. 

    I prefer to take the bus though and save that 40-50 bucks a week to put into my kids college fund and my retirement (since there will be no help from the federal govt. by the time college and retirement happen).  

    The point here is tolled corridors should get a priority so people have great access to transit.  The choice not to pay the toll should be as easy as possible by ensuring frequent and reliable transit service to the people who use the corridor.

  • Simmian

    chump change wghen you are talking about billion dollar Metro operating costs

  • Peter

    If that number is correct (which I’ve been unable to verify) that’s approximately one half of one percent of Metro’s operating revenue. That’s much much less than having Metro Transit police on every bus to enforce fares. And don’t tell me the bus drivers should do it, others have explained above why that won’t work.

  • Smarter

    Yo notice he did not blog about it on the Seattle Transit Blog or send out daily press releases to the Seattle Times calling the Councilmembers out.  He worked on getting a compromise.  Mayor McGinn -  Please pay attention here!!!!

  • Peter

    I did verify the $3M figure with Metro. I also verified that assumes all fare evaders would otherwise pay full adult fare and ignores the fact that most dodgers are youth and/or low income who would actually qualify for reduced fares. So the $3M number overstates how much is lost to fare evasion.

  • Blue Light

    OK.  It isn’t that big of a deal.  Let’s write it off as social justice.
    If the Free Riders Union takes off, though…

  • Trevor

    One thing the county should consider: changing out the fare boxes with ones that produce time-coded transfers like the ones they have in Vancouver BC. If the choice is between cheating the transfer system and keeping routes, the poor benefit more from the latter.

  • http://eldan.co.uk/ eldan

    This would actually make it much easier for drivers to enforce payment, because the pay as you leave journeys have a disproportionate amount of the fare evasion.

  • Big Jim Slade

    “Anyone who rides Metro regularly knows there is no major problem with fare dodgers.”

    I ride 5 days a week and every trip there’s at least 3-4 people who don’t pay. Add it up.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WZCRCELF2YUAWT5MZHSTMRQICE peter

    At least the buses will be freer of bad body odor.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WZCRCELF2YUAWT5MZHSTMRQICE peter

    At least the buses will be freer of bad body odor.

  • Grover

    Those people didn’t know a thing about eliminating the ride-free zone, giving free bus tickets to people who pay the car tab fee, and the other details which constitute the “back room deal”, now did they?

  • JoAnne

    It sounds like you don’t really understand what representative democracy is.  If they had put the car tab tax on the ballot, and the people of King County voted for it, and then they implemented the tax, THAT would have been representative Democracy.  What was actually done here was circumvention of representative democracy. 

  • http://profiles.google.com/jeffw66seattle Jeff Welch

    Drivers do not “enforce payment”.  Our job is to drive the bus.

  • http://profiles.google.com/jeffw66seattle Jeff Welch
  • http://profiles.google.com/jeffw66seattle Jeff Welch

    Better yet – eliminate paper transfers altogether, as Sound Transit has.

  • Jakers

    How many have commented on the DBT and during the process prior to making the decision. Neither this nor the DBT were backroom deals, but anti-tunnel people always say that it was a backroom deal….but only because they didn’t like the decision their representatives made.

  • Jakers

    The non-collected fare is kind of like stealing mp3s…if I have to pay for it, I might not use it and since there is excess supply, it’s really not hurting anyone.

  • Bob Feemster

    Representative democracy means we elect people to handle the day to day minutiae of running the government, so that we don’t have to spend hours of each day doing that ourselves, dumbass. Did you flunk 9th grade history? What you are apparently advocating is direct democracy like they had in ancient Athens, where everyone has to vote on every last fucking library fine. Do you want to spend your time doing that? If you don’t like the job they’re doing then you elect someone else next time.

  • http://eldan.co.uk/ eldan

    Good point.  It still looks to me, as a passenger, like most fare evasion happens on the pay as you leave journeys, because it’s that much easier for a fare evader to be brazen then.

  • http://profiles.google.com/jeffw66seattle Jeff Welch

    It does.  Hence the fact that nearly all bus drivers support elimination of the RFA.

    It is worthy of note however that a heck of a lot of fare evasion is by middle-class yuppie types who wave a $50 dollar bill, claim that they don’t have change and ask if they can ride anyway.

  • Bark more, Wag less

    See, the voice of a regular working stiff!

  • http://jabailo.tumblr.com John Bailo

    We see the pattern over and over.

    Theft of a working public service, claims of progress, and a citizenry left with a 50 year bill.