Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

This Landmark Decision

1. As we reported in yesterday morning’s Fizz, the city of Seattle was nervous about Sound Transit’s proposed light rail plan through Bellevue because the plan is short about $150 million. A cost-sharing agreement could lock Seattle into picking up some of the bill, which includes a $329 million tunnel that was not part of the original $2.4 billion Eastside route.

Indeed, yesterday’s Fizz reported that a Seattle city council staffer sent an anxious email to Sound Transit’s Planning Director Ric Ilgenfritz late Wednesday asking if the ST board could hold off on approving the route until funding questions were answered.

However, the board went ahead an approved the route yesterday, 11-2. Mayor Mike McGinn and King County Council Member Larry Phillips, two of Seattle’s five members, voted ‘No’.

King County Executive Dow Constantine and King County Council Member Joe McDermott voted ‘Yes.’  (Seattle City Council Member Richard Conlin wasn’t there for the vote.)

The vote formally ends the Eastside feud over the line, which had bitterly divided the Bellevue council for over a year (follow Erica’s coverage here.) Disagreeing with Sound Transit’s preferred, and now-approved route (which jogs west of the Mercer Slough, heading north through the commercial corridor and near a park and ride), several Bellevue council members had wanted the line, dubbed the B-7 route, to head east—crossing the slough, skipping the commercial and residential core in South Bellevue, and running up along the abandoned BNSF rail line just east of 405.

Sound Transit sent out a victorious press release late yesterday after the vote, which included quotes from Bellevue City Council member Claudia Balduci (who’d been a dissident on the Bellevue Council because she’s supported Sound Transit’s preferred version all along) and from Constantine.

“Today’s action reflects the City of Bellevue and Sound Transit’s commitment to establish a partnership for a tunnel through downtown Bellevue,” said Sound Transit Board and Bellevue City Council member Claudia Balducci. “A tunnel not only avoids impacts to traffic in downtown Bellevue but provides the best transit service for riders all over the region.”

“I applaud the spirit of compromise and collaboration that led to this landmark decision that will connect urban centers, improve our mobility, and enhance our economic prosperity for generations to come,” said Sound Transit Board member and King County Executive Dow Constantine. “East Link will make commuting easier for thousands of residents and boost the competitiveness of our region in attracting new employers and jobs. This is the vision that voters in Bellevue had in mind when they approved East Link in 2008.”

Mayor McGinn, however, told the Seattle Times: “By making this commitment we’re starting with what is a $100 million to $200 million hole. That’s if everything works out.”

“I’m troubled by this alignment choice without a better understanding on a funding plan within our available revenues to get there.”—Larry Phillips

And Phillips told the PI.com: “I’m troubled by this alignment choice without a better understanding on a funding plan within our available revenues to get there.”

2. Pioneer Square’s community association, Alliance for Pioneer Square, endorsed the pro-tunnel position on Ref. 1 on Wednesday night.

Their resolution states:

“The Alliance for Pioneer Square believes strongly that we cannot restore the historic connection of our neighborhood to the waterfront without significant diversion of many of the thousands of cars now clogging waterfront and neighborhood streets.

The Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement Project is the State of Washington’s project; it is funded and is already under construction, providing the best opportunity to achieve our goals of reconnecting to the waterfront.

We urge Seattle voters to reject more needless delay and vote Yes on Referendum #1 to keep our economy and our neighborhood on the road to recovery.”

3. Despite the state Public Disclosure Commission’s statement that Democratic US Rep. and gubernatorial candidate Jay Inslee can transfer $1 million from his congressional campaign surplus fund to the governor’s race, Republican Rob McKenna’s campaign sent out a fundraising letter calling the move illegal.

Fizz asked McKenna campaign manager Randy Pepple to explain, and Pepple stood by the letter. “If the PDC looks into this further,” he said, “they will decide that their advice [to Inslee] was incorrect, and he can’t do this.”

Pepple says there’s a big difference between an informal decision from PDC staff and a formal decision from the PDC commissioners, and he believes the commission will have a different opinion when it reviews all the facts of the transfer.

For starters, he says, federal campaign rules allow larger contributions—$10,000 for political committees and $5000 from individuals—than Washington state, $3200 for both. (True.) That means, Pepple says, Inslee has used higher federal fundraising thresholds to fund his state level campaign.


  • ivan

    After all the shit that went down over the Bellevue line, after all the lobbying and backroom chicanery and Council-buying by Freeman, look who voted no. Larry Phillips, who still thinks he should be County Executive even though Dow stomped his sorry ass in the 2009 primary, and Mike McGinn, who is certifiably insane and — it is becoming increasingly clear — unfit to govern.
     

  • BigDonLives

    I disagree, Mayor McGinn clearly realizes that our future resides in pedicabs, like other 3rd world cities

  • Jakers

    #1 – McGinn only wants others to subsidize transit in his city.

  • Yusuf Cabdi

    it is actually us (Seattle) who subsidizes other city in king County.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3CLQQP4RJOCVCFSMCW4KZ4ACWU DH

    Great news on the Bellevue route and line! It’s weird to see McGinn coming out against alternate forms of transportation than cars, I bet if it was a bike lane he would have been all for it. King County and Sound Transit have to keep moving ahead with light rail, it’s needed for this region’s future.

  • Rich

    McGinn’s position is entirely consistent with his position on the DBT. Answer the hard questions on funding before going forward. “We’ll just steal the money from Seattle” is not an acceptable answer.

  • ivan

    No, he’s an enemy of any progress that doesn’t conform to his own narrow agenda. Why some of you people don’t recognize a fundamentalist when you see one is a mystery to me.

    Fuck financing. It’s only money. Money is “fungible.” Time and space are not.

  • MVH

    Toss in the Roads & Transit campaign and McGinn supports light rail–about half the time.

  • MVH

    Toss in the Roads & Transit campaign and McGinn supports light rail–about half the time.

  • Anonymous

    stop the presses…McGinn said NO to something.

  • Anonymous

    stop the presses…McGinn said NO to something.

  • Jakers

    Yes, that is correct. But don’t forget that those outlying areas in King County subsidize your urban lifestyle by accepting your outsourced manufacturing pollution, allowing for mines to provide raw materials to build your bike lanes and transit centers, damming their rivers to provide you electricity, having farms for your super trendy urban farmers markets, etc. etc. etc.

  • Anonymous

    and opportunity is even rarer…  

    dbt…light rail through bellevue…520…mohai…mcginn — no no no no…opportunities to do something only come around once.  remember how seattle could have had the best transit in the nation but boffed on that one?  same thing, McGinn has no guts…sometimes you have to take chances and figure the money will eventually be there.  didnt they say light rail couldnt make it to the airport?  but in the end, they found the money.  same thing.  sometimes you have to lead, not just block every freaking thing that comes along because it doesnt conform to your narrow, ideological agenda.

  • Bill B in the Central District

    and with the uber-density development cabal that bleat here and on other blogs, we’ll be living in 500 sq ft condos.

    wait — everyone except the cabal will be in condos.  they’ll stay in their single family homes.

  • Bill B in the Central District

    and with the uber-density development cabal that bleat here and on other blogs, we’ll be living in 500 sq ft condos.

    wait — everyone except the cabal will be in condos.  they’ll stay in their single family homes.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr Baker

    Bellevue has to share the cost and accept the cost overruns on the tunnel “they” want.

    Shouldn’t they vote on that?

    Happy Friday!

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr Baker

    Bellevue has to share the cost and accept the cost overruns on the tunnel “they” want.

    Shouldn’t they vote on that?

    Happy Friday!

  • Monster

    please most of all the people who make money in seattle dont even live in seattle.

  • Monster

    and that is why people dont like the latte liberals and progressives. 

  • Bill B in the Central District

    i don’t drink latte, but i do consider myself a progressive.  and my winger friends call me a “lib”. 

    and i also support urban density.  but density defined through neighborhood planning, not by those outsiders connected to the development industry (the ones that want to build condo towers or level neighborhoods).

    so, sadly, your simplistic lefty/righty view of the world won’t apply here…

  • Meh

    He must just have a thing against tunnels ;)

  • Anonymous

    That’s not a ‘subsidy’ that’s an economy. We pay them for those things. 

  • Meli

    Right, right, because it’s people from outlying areas who want the dams removed and support strict environmental regulations.

  • Anonymous

    It’s sad that it takes us longer to plan this stupid thing than to actually build it. Its a few miles of train tracks for frak sake. We should be able to do this in two or three years not a significant chunk of people’s lives. 

  • Meli

    He seems to have come out against unfunded mandates.

  • Meli

    “Fuck financing. It’s only money.” Of course tell Ivan he has to pay a toll or for parking, and he’ll go apeshit.

  • Jakers

    You pay them to damage the environment for you?

  • Jakers

    Environmental friendly or not, it all benefits the urban city center.

  • Jakers

    Uh, no. S/T/5 is 100% unfunded!

  • ivan

    No, I don’t go apeshit.I just avoid those areas and spend my money elsewhere.

  • Anonymous

    Nope. They can produce things how they want. We just pay for the products produced. It’s not like we somehow demand they do these things. 

  • Jakers

    You provide tax incentives, access to state and federal lands, provide water to them, etc. for those activities, those are pretty big subsidies.

  • Anonymous

    that would be sweet, but remember, this isnt kansas…there are hills and lakes and mountains and oceans to cross out here…okay, well, hills and lakes.

  • Poop

    Until you decide to live on an island and pay a toll to get off of it.

  • Anonymous

    Yeah, here in Queen Anne none of us make any money in Seattle. Same goes for Fremont, Ballard, Belltown, Wallingford, the U-District, Capitol Hill, West Seattle, Magnolia, Green Lake, Madrona, Madison Park, South Lake Union, Phinney, Montlake, Sand Point, etc. etc. etc.. Nothing but cheap, vacant houses, and even cheaper empty lots. Oh, wait…

    [PS apologies to everyone for accidentally hitting like before hitting reply. Yikes.]

  • Anonymous

    I’m no huge McGinn guy, but his position is actually completely consistent on this. He doesn’t believe in committing to expensive projects before identifying funding, and he does believe in doing light-rail on the cheap—-light-rail lite. He’d rather have an ultimately less-efficient system built cheaper and faster. I disagree with him, but he is consistent and it’s not, as you say, a “weird” vote for him.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3CLQQP4RJOCVCFSMCW4KZ4ACWU DH

    Yup, Seattleites are horrible about pulling the trigger when the game in is their sights. It’s held back a good mass transit system here for 40 years.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3CLQQP4RJOCVCFSMCW4KZ4ACWU DH

    My family has a cabin out off Highway 16. I happily pay the toll for the second narrows bridge, man has it made the commute time insanely shorter in that stretch of 16 from I-5 to the bridge. It used to take an hour a peak traffic times, it now takes 10 minutes. That’s worth the $3 every damn time. 

  • Anonymous

    how is tunneling through bellevue light rail on the cheap?  

    as for the finances holding mcginn back, i think mcginn just doesnt want to move on any big projects…its too messy to actually proceed with something, much easier to sit back, do nothing, and complain about it.

  • Anonymous

    You’re right, Scott. Tunneling through Bellevue is *not* light-rail on the cheap. And McGinn voted against it, which was my point.

    I don’t think the idea that McGinn is unwilling to move on big projects holds much water, either. He would be all for cheap rail connecting West Seattle and Ballard to downtown built as quickly as possible if he could find the political consensus or a way to fund it without turning to ST, and he desperately wanted to spend a good deal more money to get light-rail on the new 520 bridge (or at least to ensure it’s light-rail ready). That’s just two off the top of my head.

  • Anonymous

    youre right.  totally misread you.  thought you said he was against light rail on the cheap…  my mistake.

  • Anonymous

    No worries.

  • ivan

    Moron. What do you call ferry fares?

  • ot-nay oron-may

    ferry fares ?  the capital cost per car carried by a ferry is huge.  way bigger than the capital cost per rider on a bus.  ferries are the mopst subsidzied transportation we got except maybe paratransit.  the typical ferry ride carrying a car is waaaaaay more subsidized than a b us ride.  maybe sounder is as subsidized, their capital was more than a billion dollars to just allow a few thousand a day.  but compared to busses?  ferries win the most subsidized context, not matter who calls you a moron.

  • oslo DF NYC Rome

    yes, no city with hills, lakes, water has ever built rail except Seattle.  We’re unique.

  • Poop

    Some call them fares, some call them tolls. It’s part of the state highway system that you have to pay to use.

  • ivan

    You’re showing your ignorance. Washington State Ferries have a higher ratio of “farebox recovery” than any other mode of public transportation in the state, and that farebox recovery rate increases at a higher rate than the rate for any other mode of public transportation in the state.

    So while I might stipulate to your statements about the subsidy rate to the ferries, it is also true that ferry riders pay a higher percentage of ferry costs through their fares than any other public transit passengers do, and that percentage increases at a higher rate than the percentages for buses, trains, you name it. Moreover, the ferries have had their subsidies from the state slashed ever since Eyman got Initiative 695 passed.   

    So if you’re accusing me and other ferry passengers of being some kind of “free riders” in fact we are less so than any other transit riders are, and due to yearly ferry fare increases, we are less so every year. So you really don’t know what the fuck you are talking about.

  • Anonymous

    But it can be fully funded. Especially when it becomes the only viable option left.

  • Anonymous

    What were the timelines for those systems?  Here’s a link to the SFO BART system…  http://www.flickr.com/photos/walkingsf/5411415766/

  • Juno

    Actually, you might want to look at BANKS and Absent Owners (often corporations) of land and real estate to lay blame.

  • Johns

    What Meli said. It’s not about the route, it’s about the fact that the $$ aren’t there to pay for it. Just like the DBT.

  • Johns

    What Meli said. It’s not about the route, it’s about the fact that the $$ aren’t there to pay for it. Just like the DBT.