Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Seattle Times: No Conflict of Interest in Bellevue Council Member’s Business Dealings

The Seattle Times‘ Keith Ervin reports that an independent investigator has found that Bellevue City Council member Kevin Wallace’s business dealings do not constitute a conflict of interest with his efforts to re-route a proposed light rail line through South Bellevue. Wallace, a developer who negotiated a deal with GNP Railway to run freight along the same abandoned BNSF rail corridor where Wallace had proposed running a Sound Transit light rail line.

The Times reports:

[Investigator Jeffrey] Coopersmith concluded that Wallace had not attempted to profit from City Council decisions either through increased values of his family’s downtown properties or through a partnership with GNP Railway.

Last year, Wallace and his father, Bob Wallace, were quietly negotiating a deal with GNP at the same time that Councilmember Wallace was prodding the City Council to authorize a $670,000 study of a light-rail route along the old rail corridor between Mercer Slough and I-405.

The Wallaces and GNP executives signed a December 2010 memorandum of understanding in which Wallace Properties Development was to help sell $30 million of railway stock, invest $500,000 in the venture, and manage property acquisition and development of passenger stations.

The deal was subject to Kevin Wallace receiving legal advice that it wouldn’t conflict with his council duties. Before he obtained a legal opinion, the Wallaces backed out of the partnership.

GNP’s top executives split early this year, and creditors filed an involuntary bankruptcy petition against the company. Last month, a U.S. Bankruptcy Court judge found GNP was insolvent, and the U.S. Surface Transportation Board rejected its request for rights to run freight trains between Woodinville and Redmond on track whose owners opposed freight operations.

Coopersmith noted that Wallace first promoted his “Vision Line” light-rail route in 2009, long before he began discussing a deal with GNP Railway.

Although the Wallaces and GNP owners hoped eventually to run trains on the Bellevue portion of the abandoned rail corridor — and even talked about carrying Highway 520 construction debris on trains — they had no expectation they would use that line in the near future, and it was “highly unlikely” GNP would receive any money from Sound Transit, Coopersmith said.

Last month, Coopersmith absolved two other Bellevue council members, Claudia Balducci and Grant Degginger, of any conflict of interest; Wallace supporters on the council argued that Balducci’s service on the Sound Transit board, and Degginger’s past legal work for the agency, could constitute conflicts for the council members, both of whom opposed Wallace’s preferred rail route through South Bellevue.


  • Boss Tweed

    I applaud this ruling . 

  • Joni

    He’s still a DB.

  • Shaggy

    A truly amazing outcome.  The system here is corrupt to the core.

  • Bruce Nourish

    He’s still a slimy little toad, bought and paid for.

    Fortunately, the council now seems to have wrapped their minds around the fact that the B7 plan (in any of its variations) isn’t going to happen, and is going to address the concerns of Surrey Downs residents in a cooperative and constructive fashion as they should have been doing all along.

  • jimu

    The fact that it “technically” was decided that there was no conflict of interest, does not mean that Kevin Wallace acted in a responsible way. A simple disclosure of his property holdings was all that was necessary.

    A City Council Member should be proactive in declaring ANYTHING that may be construed as a conflict of interest. This is what a responsible upstanding LEADER would do. Unfortunately, upstanding people don’t seem to find their way into office very often.

  • Anonymous

    what a croc.  im sure under it all, there is a conflict of interest with the investigator.  perhaps freeman funds him, too.

  • sarah

    Here’s a little indication of what Coopersmith does, from his firm’s website:

    “Recently, Mr. Coopersmith represented the former CFO of Countrywide Financial Corporation in SEC litigation, where a few days before trial the SEC agreed not to pursue fraud claims alleged in its complaint. Mr. Coopersmith has also obtained the government’s agreement not to pursue charges in several other high-profile matters.

    Truly an ethical giant. 

  • Soccer4us

    If you look up Jeffrey Coopersmith you’ll find that he funds causes like the DNC, Patty Murray, Al Franken and the like.  Not exactly the same causes as Kemper.  Perhaps if you used your brain, instead of your hate-filled heart, you might realize that Wallace was cleared because he didn’t break the law.

  • Soccer4us

    If you look up Jeffrey Coopersmith you’ll find that he funds causes like the DNC, Patty Murray, Al Franken and the like.  Not exactly the same causes as Kemper.  Perhaps if you used your brain, instead of your hate-filled heart, you might realize that Wallace was cleared because he didn’t break the law.

  • Anonymous

    hate-filled-heart!  nice!  you crack me up. btw, is that a country western song?

    there are puh-lenty of strange bedfellows in politics today…what, with anti-tunnelers railing against tolling thereby throwing their allegiance with people like Eyman…so who Coopersmith represented before has nothing to do with who will pay him to represent them later.

  • gohuskies

    Can you name a single anti-tunnel person who has said that their opposition to the tunnel has caused them to support 1125? I know Josh and Erica keep on mentioning the possibility but I have yet to see a single example of it.

  • Anonymous

    thats not the point.  one is carrying water for the other.  by raising voter ire over proposed tolls on 99, they are inherently furthering Eyman’s anti-tolling initiative, whether they support Eyman or not.  It’s a cynical campaign tactic.

  • Monster

    and your a cunt.

  • Joni

    You’re.

  • Joe Biden

    You can always type “you are” if contractions are to confusing for you.

  • The $y$tem

    no you got it wrong.  if your intent is good, you don’t have to disclose, that’s what this lawyer ruled.

    oh and if you buy real estate for long term gain due to rail going in, there’s no conflict because it’s not a near term gain, that’s what the lawuer ruled.  so to sum up:

    you must decline to participate in any decision that gives a reasonable appearance of not being impartial UNLESS YOU SAY YOUR INTENT IS GOOD OR UNLESS YOUR FINANCIAL GAIN IS NOT WITHIN 1 TO 3 YEARS BUT COMES AFTER 3 YEARS OR MORE.

  • jimu

    Look at how technical your explanation is. I didn’t say he HAD to disclose. An upstanding responsible leader WILL disclose.

    There’s a difference between being right on a technicality and doing the right thing.

  • http://www.twitter.com/JN_Seattle/ JohnNiles

    Bruce, 
    You might enjoy watching the video recording of minds wrapping (and warping?) during the latest Bellevue Council meeting as Sound Transit struggles to make the Council majority happy. Latest Monday night meeting available at http://ow.ly/5O1aQ.  First part of meeting is the report clearing Councilman Wallace.
    John