Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Breaking: House Dems Filing Court Challenge to Two-Thirds Rule

Twelve Democratic state reps, along with the Washington Education Association, the League of Education Voters, and former Washington State chief justice Robert Utter, are filing a case in King County Superior Court  this morning challenging I-1053, the Tim Eyman voter-approved rule that requires a two-thirds vote of the legislature to raise taxes.

State Rep. Jamie Pedersen (D-43, Capitol Hill), a K&L Gates attorney, one of the twelve legislators who signed on to the lawsuit, says they believe the two-thirds rule is unconstitutional because the state constitution already spells out the specific instances when two-thirds votes are required, such as amending the constitution or issuing bonds.

Pedersen points out that the state supreme court overturned a term limits measure in 1998 because “it added qualifications” that the state constitution does not include. “This is the same principle,” Pedersen says.

Pedersen—along with freshman Democratic Reps. David Frockt (D-46, Seattle) and Laurie Jinkins (D-27, Tacoma), who are also in the group of plaintiffs—forced a vote on closing tax loopholes to fund K-4 class sizes on the last day of session this year (the Eyman rule requires a two-thirds vote to close loopholes because doing so is seen as the equivalent of raising taxes.) That measure failed, but as we reported at the time, the vote was part of a tactical move to establish standing to file the case.

Pedersen tells PubliCola the legislation itself isn’t at issue in the case, but it “illustrates” the problem; that’s why educators are co-plaintiffs.

The other legislators who signed on are: Reps. Reuven Carlyle, Deb Eddy, Sam Hunt, Jim Moeller, Timm Ormsby, Eric Pettigrew, Chris Reykdal, Cindy Ryu, and Mike Sells.

Four of this year’s outspoken freshman class—Reykdal and Ryu along with Frockt and Jinkins—are on board.

You can read the complaint here.

Washington State Republican Party chair Kirby Wilbur issued a reaction to complaint:

Washington State Democrats, once again, have shown how far removed they are from the will of the people. When a resounding 64% of Washingtonians voted to reinstate the two-thirds requirement in November 2010, after Democrats suspended it in February 2010, you would think they would get the message.

The people of Washington have said over and over they do not want Olympia to solve their spending problems by taking more of their money, yet the Democrats and their special interest allies continue to demand more of their paycheck.

Wilbur ended his press release by asking what Democratic gubernatorial candidate US Rep. Jay Inslee thinks of his fellow Democrats anti-1053 effort.

I have a message out to Rep. Inslee.

McKenna has said he supports the two-thirds rule because the voters have repeatedly approved the concept. I-1053 was a follow-up to I-960, the two-thirds rule that the legislature overturned in 2010. I have a call in to get McKenna’s position on the concept itself.


  • yay pedersen

    well finally props for their courage.  we’ve only had about a few thousand votes under the unconstitutional minority rule rule which the democrats participated in, violating their oath of office to uphold the constitution.

    this fight is about majority fule versus minority rule.  they need to start calling hte 2/3 rule the one third minority rule provision.  then they need to explain that in a bicameral legislature, senators representing just oh what would it be….18% of the population?  could muster the one third and are the true tyrants.   Blackstone said the right to majority rule rules in parliament is a fundamental right, one that secures all the other rights.    IOW majority rule protects our liberty, freedom, rights and the American dream etc.  by ensuring we the people can thru legislatures make the normal kind sof rules needed to give us a fair shake, prevent predatory conduct by those in the private secgtor, and so on. 

  • sarah

    Great!  I hope there’s time for the case to be decided before the next session.  The court system has been squeezed by the recession.  

  • Anonymous

    Good news. Please post the complaint (or a link) when you get it.

  • Josh Feit

    Good call. Done. 

  • Anonymous

    This is great – happy to see Paul Lawrence and his new firm Pacifica landing interesting civic cases. He and a bunch of extremely high-profile K&L Gates powerhouses jumped ship to form their own shop now, and they’ve captured some high-profile stuff already.

    (That said, they were supposed to help Let’s Move Forward kill Referendum 1, and they couldn’t quite get that done, could they?)

  • Anonymous

    Thanks. I see that Robert Utter is also a plaintiff. He’s one of the best supreme court judges we’ve ever had in this state, and was part of the 6 – 3 majority in the 1978 Seattle School District v State decision holding that the state does in fact have a paramount duty to fund schools.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr Baker

    Good to see my Rep on the correct side of this issue.

    Let’s just follow the constitution and amend it if and as needed.

  • Jakers

    And if we’re going to amend it, let it be done through the amendment process.

  • fgruben

    Good to see the Democrats don’t believe in Democracy. No surprise there.

  • Anonymous

    Allowing a simple majority in a single election to require a supermajority for all future votes is undemocratic. It means that if the majority vote changes (which could happen with a shift of only a few percent of voters), they could not raise taxes even if they had a higher majority than the original initiative mandating the supermajority. To pass minimal democratic muster, the supermajority requirement should have to be passed by at least the supermajority that is being required.

  • Jakers

    Democracy must follow its own democratically created rules.

  • Jakers

    Like changing the constitution on a whim? Move to Venezuela and see if you like what democracy on a whim looks like.

  • http://www.derekmyoung.com Derek Young

    Thank you, was just looking for that.

  • http://profiles.google.com/jeffw66seattle Jeff Welch

    Actually the Dems *do* believe in Democracy – thats why they oppose this supermajority.  By requiring a 2/3 vote rather than a simple majority (what was required to pass the original initiative), the will of the majority is bypassed and held hostage by the minority.

    It’s the Republicans who hate Democracy, and hate America.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr Baker

    Yes, that would be following the constitution.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr Baker

    Yes, that would be following the constitution.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr Baker

    My democratically elected representative is doing exactly what I elected him to do.

    Why do Republicans hate the Constitution so much?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr Baker

    My democratically elected representative is doing exactly what I elected him to do.

    Why do Republicans hate the Constitution so much?

  • Jakers

    Not only elected him to do, but also pay your precious tax dollars for him to do. Why do Republicans love wasting tax dollars?

  • Monster

    its gonna be hilarious when this fails, hopfully some of you will kill your selves after.

  • Juno

    Excellent news on possibly shutting down this conservative economic rope-a-dope via initiative process.

  • northernlight

    Thanks, Please spell Cindy Ryu’ s name correctly. “CinDy.”