Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Another Reason For Two-Car Trains

Regular readers know I’m apt to get cranky about the fact that Sound Transit runs one-car trains on nights and weekends. (The move, which often results in cars overcrowded with luggage, bikes and people, is expected to save about half a million dollars a year—a pindrop in a budget of billions).

After work one day last week, riding a two-car train, I (re) discovered another reason reducing train lengths isn’t worth the money: Two-car trains give riders an easy out when their fellow riders make them feel uncomfortable. I was riding in the back of the train, trying to read a book, when an older fellow sat down next to me, spilling across the seat and almost into my lap. He started talking to me, asking increasingly intrusive questions (“What’s that book about? Did you go to college? How old are you?,” and crowding my space. After the usual bus-space-invasion lines (“If you don’t mind, I’d like to go back to reading my book;” “I’m not interested in having a conversation right now”) didn’t work, I got up, hopped off the car, saying, “This is my stop,” and then boarded the other car.

Passive-aggressive? Maybe. But as much hassle as a daily transit rider has to endure already, it was worth it. And knowing that mild annoyances on transit can quickly escalate to dangerous situations—harassment, violence, or worse—I was glad to have the option of getting away, without having to get off the train altogether.


  • DA

    Get a car or complain about the trains.  Those are your two options.  You’re either for public transit or against it.

  • Get_a_grip

    In an age when the public sector is trying its best to find efficiencies, I just can’t agree with you here. Yes, sitting next to unruly/inappropriate people happens from time to time on public transportation. It’s a risk you take when riding it, that I find is generally outweighed by the positive aspects of public transportation. Purposely making public transportation more inefficient is not the answer here. 

  • Anc

    I thought anti-social behavior on Link was a good thing?

  • David Sucher

    Erica,
    I really urge you to get rid of anonymous commenters.

  • Grover

    “The move, which often results in cars overcrowded with luggage, bikes and people”

    Exactly what is your definition of an “overcrowded” Link car?  Why don’t you count the actual number of passengers on a Link car which you consider “overcrowded” sometime, and take some photos on an “overcrowded” Link car, so we can see what you are talking about. 

    From the ridership figures ST is putting out, those cars are not close to being at “capacity” at any time.

  • Ryan on Summit

    I haven’t seen two car trains in a while. I rode a northbound two-car train today that probably could have been a one car but the southbound trip was more crowded. 

  • Grover

    “But as much hassle as a daily transit rider has to endure already,”

    Just exactly how much hassle does a daily transit rider have to endure?  What hassle are you talking about? 

    You mean that using transit is not a wonderful, hassle-free experience on a daily basis?

  • Anonymous

    With the exception of magic carpets, all forms of transit have some pros and cons.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr Baker

    Erica, why didn’t you just tell Mike McGinn that Dominic Holden gives him enough attention that he doesn’t have to hassle you on the train.
    Just be honest, it’s as good for him as it is for you.

  • Transit maven

    Yes, multi-car trains are a convenience in the situation you cite, Erica, but please tell us how often you’ve had to do that, hop off and onto the other car?  You’re a regular rider, ORCA card and all that; I’m curious how many times you’ve done this?

  • Dude

    Fine points, but what ARE you reading?  Did you go to college?  And really, how old are you?

  • sarah

    They should segregate the trains into younger-rider trains and older-rider trains.  But where’s the cutoff age?  To a 25-year-old, ECB’s probably “older”.

  • Anonymous

    In some East Asian cities, such as Tokyo, some trains are female-only (and young children) to prevent groping and harassment during times of peak crowding.

  • Gomez

    Learn how to yell at somebody, Erica. It works. Not every creep who gets in your space is a hair trigger psycho that you can’t run off.

  • Jakers

    True, someone sitting next to you in an open seat doesn’t seem to show over-crowding.

  • one line = low ridership.

    we built a whole line, well half of one, and there isn’t enough DEMAND to require two car trains?  Wow.  That’s the basic problem — why no ridership to speak of?
    At a certain point one might conclude that doing it the way about 200 other cities do it is the way to do it — that is, have multiple lines that feed each other …..more than one line going downtown and thru downtown…all the transfers result in a system covering the whole city…..boosting utility and ridership thru the system
    IOW   it’s all those riders who’d be going to ballard and west seattle that aren’t on your train because we didn’t build that line to connect to your line, resulting in the perception, quite correct, that ridership doesn’t justify two cars. 
    IOW the entire  ROI calculus is way off what it should be.
    The huge capital costs of a line, stations, trains, but only enough ridership for one car trains?  That’s like spending two billion on a DBT but only getting enough “ridership” to produce 45K vehicle trips per day, tolled ones at that.  Not much mobility ROI. 
    Some systems in other cities have six lines and six car trains.  Some have nine lines.  I believe Vancouver is up to five lines.  virtually no city of the size of seattle and its region can do it with our planned 1.5 lines. 
    There is a relationship between coverage and ridership.  Because tthe one line we have doesn’t go everywhere and has too few stops where it goes and where it will go, ridership will be …..minimal.  Sure, we can say w built it and we have trains, woo hoo, but it won’t really be a useful system for most folks. And saying it’s in progress the other lines will come 3 or 4 or 6 decades later is just like saying “yup, we’ll be rebuilding the first line while we’re adding the other lines” and we’ll be even more “behind” the cities that do it right.

  • http://jabailo.tumblr.com John Bailo

    Day after day after day, unrepentant urbists on Publicola pine about The City and all its great density.

    But when one of its denizens park their less than super-cute derrieres next to yours and start to pull your nose away from a book, suddenly it’s ewww, get off of me. Your love of density suddenly crumbles to demanding that the public treasury fund a whole extra subway car to the tune of half a mil, just so you don’t have to be around the people who live in your precious city.

    In the future, do what normal people do.   Drive a car and turn up the radio, if you can’t love all the folk in your urb.

  • Smellyfeet

    Now now, this is Seattle.  We don’t actually CONFRONT here, we just seethe and fume and then go blog about it.

  • Joe Biden

    Who are you to say what normal people do?

  • Godwin

    Go over to crosscut and look at the tepid exchanges by readily identifiable authors. It is quite the yawn. And yawns do not translate into web hits, and ad revenue.

  • Anonymous

    My reply is “This is my quiet time where I don’t have to talk to anybody and can just read my book”

  • Fremontcut

    thats railroadin’

  • Jerro

    All it takes is one.

  • Gomez

    All it takes is fear of one to psychologically cripple us all. The odds of facing one are not that high.

  • Anonymous

    Not the whole train – a car at the end, and only during peak times.

  • Anonymous

    Not the whole train – a car at the end, and only during peak times.

  • Anonymous

    Not the whole train – a car at the end, and only during peak times.

  • Anonymous

    Not the whole train – a car at the end, and only during peak times.

  • Anonymous

    So basically, you think we should have built a line that we’d have to replace in 20 or 30 years because the platforms weren’t long enough to grow? That’s what Portland did, and now they’re starting to have serious, unfixable crowding. In a decade you’ll thank us.

  • Anonymous

    So basically, you think we should have built a line that we’d have to replace in 20 or 30 years because the platforms weren’t long enough to grow? That’s what Portland did, and now they’re starting to have serious, unfixable crowding. In a decade you’ll thank us.

  • Anonymous

    So basically, you think we should have built a line that we’d have to replace in 20 or 30 years because the platforms weren’t long enough to grow? That’s what Portland did, and now they’re starting to have serious, unfixable crowding. In a decade you’ll thank us.

  • Anonymous

    So basically, you think we should have built a line that we’d have to replace in 20 or 30 years because the platforms weren’t long enough to grow? That’s what Portland did, and now they’re starting to have serious, unfixable crowding. In a decade you’ll thank us.

  • Mama

    If you don’t mind my saying so, it wouldn’t have hurt you to have found out what the Gentleman wanted.

  • Anc

    Fear is the Mind Killer!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IZCFJOQRI6R7JGWZNCQ2BKFBJM Anandakos

    Wow, the trolls are out tonight!  What a bunch of rude jerks you all are.  Go to hell.  Do not pass Salvation.  

  • MarciaFS

    Only in Seattle would anyone regard what Erica did as “passive aggressive.”  A New Yorker would recognize that she acted in a streetwise fashion.  **Any** other response would have invited further unwanted conversation.

  • http://jabailo.tumblr.com John Bailo

    So the goal of urbism and density is then to transform a relatively nice place to live into one in which laptops are stolen in daylight, women are pawed on subway trains and conversations are shunned and avoided while glum commuters bury their noses in books to avoid the crazies?

    Gee, it’s really worth spending billions then for that sort of transformation!

  • http://jabailo.tumblr.com John Bailo

    So the goal of urbism and density is then to transform a relatively nice place to live into one in which laptops are stolen in daylight, women are pawed on subway trains and conversations are shunned and avoided while glum commuters bury their noses in books to avoid the crazies?

    Gee, it’s really worth spending billions then for that sort of transformation!

  • MarciaFS

    There’s a difference between conversation and harassment.  This person’s behavior was way over that line — he refused to take a polite but clear hint that Erica was not interested in conversing at this particular place and time.  She would have been totally within her rights to loudly tell him to shut up — but she remained polite while avoiding an unnecessary confrontation..

    “Urbism [sic] and density” have nothing to do with it.  There were plenty of jerks in the “old” Seattle as well.  Probably more of them, as a percentage of the population.

  • Marion

    I KNOW what the gentleman wanted…