Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

There’s a Silver Lining for Seattle in Metro Cuts

Here’s the bad news for Metro transit riders: If the county fails to approve a $20 vehicle license fee to pay for bus service (a fee that requires either a two-thirds vote of the King County Council—unlikely—or a majority vote by King County residents ), Metro is going to have to cut around 600,000 hours of bus service across the county. Even with the extra money, Metro estimates it will have to eliminate around 350,000 hours of service.

Here’s the silver lining for Metro riders in Seattle: Because the county is using a new set of rules for slashing service (and, theoretically, for adding service, although that doesn’t seem likely in the foreseeable future), Seattle and other cities won’t have to bear the brunt of the cuts.

The previous system allocated service cuts based on which areas received the most service. Under that system, Seattle took about 62 percent of any cuts because that’s where most of the service is, but received only about 17 percent of any new service.

The new system bases cuts on how productive a route is (basically, ridership throughout the day), on how well they serve low-income communities and communities of color, and on how well they serve all areas of the county.

What does that look like? Under the 600,000-hour cuts scenario, it would mean, first, totally eliminating more than three dozen “low-performing” routes that don’t serve many riders (169,000 hours); reducing route frequency or eliminating night service entirely on routes that provide more service than necessary, like the 236 between Woodinville and Kirkland, or the 251 between Redmond and Woodinville (51,000 hours); restructuring routes all over the county to make them more efficient (256,000 hours); and reducing some additional routes that are performing well but not as well as others (124,000 hours). Those last two categories, particularly the final category (“Priority 4″), would impact some Seattle routes.

That’s the worst-case scenario. Although Metro hasn’t released the better-case scenario (350,000 hours cut), the numbers the agency has put out so far indicate that Seattle, and suburban cities like Renton and Bellevue, would probably fare far better than far-flung suburbs like Totem Lake, Kent, and Sammamish, where many routes would be cut entirely. Other cities, like Woodinville and Redmond, could see bus service reduced to every two hours (although they’re also served by Sound Transit).

The worst-case scenario service cuts are available here; Metro will release a snapshot of what 350,000 hours of cuts would look like only if the county council or voters pass the $20 fee.


  • http://www.twitter.com/joeszi Joe Szilagyi

    Thanks for posting the full PDF.

  • http://twitter.com/mloar Matthew Loar

    Hey, they’re finally going to kill the 268. I’ve always wondered why Metro was running a peak-only express that is so duplicative of the 545.

  • http://twitter.com/mloar Matthew Loar

    On the other hand, it also lists cuts to the 81, 82, 84, and 99. So it sounds like Seattle would lose most of its owl service and that the county would have finally completely killed any remnant of the Waterfront Streetcar.

  • beezer

    Even under this scenario, Seattle still has to take deep cuts. Seattle currently has 62% of Metro service in the county. Under the new strategic plan, they would still have to take about 55% of the cuts. That plan has not been passed yet and won’t likely be until late July. Currently, under current policies, Seattle has to take a proportional cut of 62%. Deep cuts to Seattle are unavoidable because that is where 2/3 of the service is.

  • http://www.facebook.com/trollwithaxe Shane Phillips

    If the fee goes to voters, I hope they look at which areas were least supportive and cut there first. Enjoy your congestion.

  • Connie

    Do you expect me to vote for it when they are saying they will cut my route in any case? There’s a larger question in play– to what extent should transit focus on helping folks without cars versus getting cars off the streets/easing rush hour/relieving emissions/etc. If it’s about getting folks without cars more service, then stop taxing the whole county. If it’s about getting my SOV off the freeway/easing congestion outside the Seattle city limits, then don’t cut my route. You may not believe it, but giving city dwellers a bus up Rainier every 10 minutes instead of every 45 does not change congestion/car idling/etc, on I-5, I-90, 520, or 99.

    Now, let’s hear it from the ‘move to Seattle’ folks. Never mind why the roads are where they are— let’s just call them all “subsidized parkways for people who want to avoid diversity” instead of recognizing what built them and what they provide to the economy.

  • Eddiew

    ECB: as your readers have noticed by reading the route list, there is no silver lining; without new revenue, the cuts will be severe and will fall largelly in the West subarea (e.g., Seattle, Shoreline, and Lake Forest Park), as that is where most of the service lies; even if the new reduction and allocation policies are adopted, the end game is uncertain and probably grim. show me the money; or show me the silver.

  • Grover

    These cuts should have been made a long time ago. What is the reasoning for ever operating routes which get almost no ridership? That is just a stupid waste of tax dollars under any conditions.

    “on how well they serve low-income communities and communities of color,” Why is serving “communities of color” a criteria? What does that have to do with anything?

  • Fatass

    It annoys you, and is therefore excellent.

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    What does 600,000 hours of service look like?

    Oh, about 12 feet of DBT…

  • Anonymous

    Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. This issue recently cost BART $70m for trying to bypass a low-income area of on the way to the Oakland airport:

    http://transbayblog.com/2010/01/21/fta-holds-back-on-bart-oac-funding/

  • Anonymous

    Well, the question in play right now is actually “how to keep Metro from running out of money”. But the Regional Transit Task Force recommended the following policies:

    1) Emphasize productivity due to its linkage to economic
    development, land use, financial sustainability, and environmental
    sustainability
    2) Ensure social equity (note: see Title VI of Civil Rights Act)
    3) Provide geographic value throughout the county

    http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/11/05/rttf-final-recommendations/

    About congestion, keep in mind this is Metro not SoundTransit. ST’s mandate is increased mobility for PSRC-designated regional growth centers like Redmond, downtown Seattle, etc.