Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

A Group of Local Small Businesses

1. You might guess from this week’s ThinkTank about city council member Nick Licata’s proposal to mandate paid sick leave that all small business owners, particularly restaurateurs, are dead-set against the idea. (Washington Restaurant Association president Anthony Anton wrote a Cola ThinkTank op/ed opposing Licata’s idea).

However, a group of local small businesses sent a letter this week to council members—who’re being inundated with emails and phone calls on both sides of the issue—supporting the idea of requiring paid leave.

The letter—signed by a group of small business owners including Molly Moon Neitzel of Molly Moon’s Ice Cream—says, “We believe that providing paid sick days is the responsible thing to do.”

The letter—signed by a diverse group of small business owners including Molly Moon Neitzel of Molly Moon’s Ice Cream, Risa Blythe of Girlie Press, and Ana Castro of the Salvadorean Bakery in White Center—says in part:

We believe that providing paid sick days is the responsible thing to do to support employees and help prevent the spread of disease. Ensuring people can earn paid sick days encourages workers to stay home when they’re contagious, and is especially important for workers who handle food, provide health care, or have close contact with the public.

2. The city council’s land-use committee should get its first peek next week at a proposal from Mayor Mike McGinn to expand street food in Seattle. The measure would allow food vendors to set up along some roadways (instead of just on private property, which is all the current system allows), and would allow food carts to offer more kinds of hot food than they currently can.

One change that may no longer be on the menu, though: An initial proposal to allow vendors to enter a lottery for the most desirable street corners.

3. Potential zoning changes around light rail stations in Mount Baker and the Rainier Valley have riled up the usual suspects (the same group that managed to sink a transit oriented development proposal back in 2009 with scary pictures of Mumbai), including Mt. Baker activist Pat Murakami and Columbia City landlord Ray Akers, who’ve resurrected the long-defunct Save Our Valley organization, originally set up to oppose at-grade light rail through South Seattle.

On a recently established Facebook page, group members warn of  “more pawn shops, payday loans, and 20-story-high ’affordable’ housing” if the city allows taller buildings in the neighborhood.

They’ve resurrected the long-defunct Save Our Valley organization, originally set up to oppose at-grade light rail through South Seattle.

In reality, the city is considering a proposal to raise heights to a maximum of 85 to 120 feet, or eight to 12 stories, and to re-work the way traffic moves on the two main drags that run through the area, MLK and Rainier, potentially turning the two streets into one-way parallel arterials.

4. Andrew wrote a story yesterday on the workers’ comp legislation that state Rep. Deb Eddy (D-48, Kirkland) is pushing as a compromise between business (which wants a lump sum settlement option in workers’ comp negotiations instead of just mandated ongoing workers’ comp payments) and labor (which flatly opposes to the concept of lump sum settlements).

However, Fizz now hears that Eddy’s proposal (and the senate’s more conservative version) may both be off the table.

At a meeting yesterday with Democratic and Republican leaders on the issue—Reps. Mike Sells (D-38, Everett) and Cary Condotta (R-12, East Wenatchee) and Sens. Jeanne Kohl-Welles (D-36, Ballard) and Janea Holmquist Newbury (R-13, Grant County)—Gov. Chris Gregoire put forth her own proposal.

The governor’s version only focuses on older workers, 55  and up. And while the current legislation lets older workers take a lump sum settlement only if they’re also eligible for worker’s retraining and puts requirements around the lump sum (it has to be at least one third of the disability award), the governor’s proposal expands the pool of older workers who can take the lump sum settlement and puts no requirements on the payout.

Labor is sure to reject this idea because, as one labor advocate told me, it expands the pool of “exploitation.”

5. There’s a serious Cinco de Mayo festival cued up in South Park today. The all-day festivities, which also happen to feature the groundbreaking for construction on the new South Park Bridge along the Duwamish, will feature: a tour of local restaurants;  mariachi; DJs; a meet-and-greet with local fire fighters for the kids; and a 26-foot-long pinata shaped like the bridge. Gov. Gregoire is dropping by as well.


  • Mindyourownbusiness

    I’m sure business owners wih a small number of employees will be more likely to support this proposal than restaurant owners who have a high number of employees with higher overhead and smaller margins. It’s also nice to see business owners not in Seattle support a cost increase for their competition!

  • Mindyourownbusiness

    I’m sure business owners wih a small number of employees will be more likely to support this proposal than restaurant owners who have a high number of employees with higher overhead and smaller margins. It’s also nice to see business owners not in Seattle support a cost increase for their competition!

  • Mindyourownbusiness

    I’m sure business owners wih a small number of employees will be more likely to support this proposal than restaurant owners who have a high number of employees with higher overhead and smaller margins. It’s also nice to see business owners not in Seattle support a cost increase for their competition!

  • Mindyourownbusiness

    I’m sure business owners wih a small number of employees will be more likely to support this proposal than restaurant owners who have a high number of employees with higher overhead and smaller margins. It’s also nice to see business owners not in Seattle support a cost increase for their competition!

  • Dora E.

    Cinco.

    Is it too much to ask to at least be familiar with the first five numbers in the second most popular language in the EEUU? We have so many Spanish speakers we’re like the second most populous spanish speaking nation in the americas. If you were in Valencia and saw an alt hip website talking about a “Fourt of July” celebration in America, wouldn’t you think they’re sort of ig—oh wait, wouldn’t you be prompted to reflect on the impact of globalization on access to foreign language education, even among Spanish writers and reporters?

  • Dora E.

    Cinco.

    Is it too much to ask to at least be familiar with the first five numbers in the second most popular language in the EEUU? We have so many Spanish speakers we’re like the second most populous spanish speaking nation in the americas. If you were in Valencia and saw an alt hip website talking about a “Fourt of July” celebration in America, wouldn’t you think they’re sort of ig—oh wait, wouldn’t you be prompted to reflect on the impact of globalization on access to foreign language education, even among Spanish writers and reporters?

  • Dora E.

    Cinco.

    Is it too much to ask to at least be familiar with the first five numbers in the second most popular language in the EEUU? We have so many Spanish speakers we’re like the second most populous spanish speaking nation in the americas. If you were in Valencia and saw an alt hip website talking about a “Fourt of July” celebration in America, wouldn’t you think they’re sort of ig—oh wait, wouldn’t you be prompted to reflect on the impact of globalization on access to foreign language education, even among Spanish writers and reporters?

  • Dora E.

    Cinco.

    Is it too much to ask to at least be familiar with the first five numbers in the second most popular language in the EEUU? We have so many Spanish speakers we’re like the second most populous spanish speaking nation in the americas. If you were in Valencia and saw an alt hip website talking about a “Fourt of July” celebration in America, wouldn’t you think they’re sort of ig—oh wait, wouldn’t you be prompted to reflect on the impact of globalization on access to foreign language education, even among Spanish writers and reporters?

  • ivan

    Did they sing the transit oriented development proposal a capella, or did they have a backup band?

  • ivan

    Did they sing the transit oriented development proposal a capella, or did they have a backup band?

  • Josh Feit

    Thanks. But my word, no need for the lecture. It was a typo. (You’ll notice—see Ivan’s comment below re: “sing” vs. “sink”— we make spelling gaffes on lots of English words too). Fixed.

  • McMullet

    It’s called a typo Dora E., relax.
    The sky is not falling.

  • Anonymous

    I support density around the stations (also park and rides), but not so much making mlk and rainier one way. despite the article abstract, these roads are NOT parallel. they are closer to being perpendicular. true, for a few blocks they are close enough to each other to cross from one to the next, but they quickly go off in their own directions, both northward and southward (or northeast and southwest, north and south)…anywho…if they truly were parallel that would be a great idea.

  • http://www.twitter.com/joeszi Joe Szilagyi

    Didn’t you get the memo that mistyping is now a hanging offense?

  • Anonymous

    Hey, your link to the Save Our Valley facebook page actually directs to Ray Akers (yikes!).

    Thanks for picking up on the return of the “great” SE NIMBY campaign.

  • Peter

    Sure, it is easy to see that sick leave may be the “right thing to do”. But that does not mean that creating a law to mandate it is the right thing to do. This business of preventing the spread of disease is poorly founded. We all know people spread pathogens before they are aware of infection; so poo poo on the amateur epidemiologists. I don’t recall reading any studies showing Seattle to be microbially challenged; so perhaps we are not broken in the first place. I am far more sickened by the confluence of personality disorders in city hall than any E. coli or noro virus from the taco stand.

  • Diogenes

    They had a mariachi band: sinko de mumbai.

  • Monster

    Monster agrees

  • ivan

    Cheap labor conservative pricks will always find an excuse to oppose something that’s for the greater good, or anything that might benefit those “below” them on the socioeconomic scale, or anybody at all who isn’t them.

  • ivan

    Cheap labor conservative pricks will always find an excuse to oppose something that’s for the greater good, or anything that might benefit those “below” them on the socioeconomic scale, or anybody at all who isn’t them.

  • Grover

    So, are these food vendors going to be blocking sidewalks downtown?

    Or, are they going to be in parking spots right on the streets? If so, are they going to pay the going parking rate?

  • Peter

    I am amused defining “greater good” to be such a simple task for you. And did you just call me a “Cheap labor conservative prick”? I am no more that, than are you an ignorant, narrow minded, knee jerk, socialist, stereo typing, pinko commi.

  • ivan

    Cheap labor conservative pricks want everybody else to have less, so that they might have more. Does the shoe fit?

  • Alpha

    A 26 foot long piñata? I hope there are no injuries from all the whacking needed to bring that thing down!

  • Peter

    I already said it doesn’t heuristic one.

  • Patrick

    Same here. I worry that opposition to the road changes is going to be conflated with opposition to the zoning changes and we’ll end up with the same half hearted upzones like North Beacon Hill. God forbid the Lowes gets replaced with a 120′ structure instead of a 65′ one with the same footprint – the extra shadow might increase someone’s seasonal affective disorder.

  • Guest

    SE Seattle has more low income housing that any other region of the city. As a result, it is difficult to bring in retailers who analyze metrics like median household incomes. It is difficult to claim NIMBY on Mt Baker residents when there is already an abundance of low income housing. It creates a ghetto like environment that doesn’t serve low income residents either. SE Seattle has done more than its fair share, why not put new low income housing in places like Magnolia, Laurelhurst, Madison Park. Why not explore that angle?

    Also, why not explore the underbelly of the low income housing ecosystem. The truth of the matter is that there are a bunch of well off white people running non-profit low income housing corporations, paying themselves handsomely, to cluster all low income housing in a single region of the city. Seems fairly corrupt. Isn’t that what the city did with restrictions earlier in the century where they forced all African Americans to live in the Central District. The same thing is happening today but cloaked in the cry of affordable low income housing. Dig deeper and you’ll find more.

    This is not about the light rail. It is not NIMBY. It is doing it right in our backyard.

  • Patrick

    What does that have to do with upzoning? If low income housing is your issue then come fight for the zoning increase to be available as straight market rate with no strings attached. All too often the density opposition just results in low rise development that only pencil out with subsidies or “incentive zoning” where the height is granted back when low income housing is added. I’m not saying 120′ towers will make the area into downtown Bellevue but it’s a lot more likely to lure market rate housing and decent retail.

  • cantwaitfortheelections

    They will take up two parking spots at once and not pay. They will block sidewalks. They will make create street noise until any how they want.

    They will also create more trash, and in Belltown, more fights, just as they ones there now do.

    In our efforts to be like Portland let’s examine what works there – keep the trucks on private property and 100′ away from any other restaurant just like Portland.

  • Anonymous

    Alex, you are hanging out with some not-so-nice people, and are adopting their speech.

    Pat, Ray, Fred, (and Alex?) have elected themselves the official representatives and expect the city to answer to them only, when there are lots of other people in the valley with opinions that don’t fit your model.

    It would be dfferent if the people of the valley had any input, but they don’t. That’s part of the plan, and just the way the SOV folks like it. You are right, though. NIMBY is too nice a word in this case.

  • Shaggy

    I think you get incentive height zoning regardless of the height. In addition, you can get 100% tax abatement for 12 years if you dedicate 20% to low income. This rezoning seems like a developers dream. Lots of units, no taxes, high occupancy via various low income programs and a quick flip for a stupendous profit.

    At the same time, the combination of a lower retail demographic and high rents (based on new construction) will result in more chains and those that take advantage of the poor – such as rent to own.

    Not sure how this helps anyone other than the developer.

  • Patrick

    Well currently you have to go all the way to Orcas to get to the Rent-A-Center, so this will be more convenient. And MLK & Rainier already has check cashing and pawn shops; hopefully extra competition will drive their predatory prices down. The poor aren’t going to get more taken advantage of then they already are.

    In all seriousness, more people equals more customers which equals more and better retail. Not all of those new units are going to be low income. I don’t care if the developer makes a bank as long as I get more choices in my neighborhood.

  • Papi

    Lies.

  • Papi

    Lies.

  • Fred

    I don’t speak a lick of Spanish, what’s the big deal?

  • Fred

    Do you enjoy your 3 all cotton t-shorts for $5.99 at Target?

  • Shaggy

    “More people equals more customers which equals more and better retail.” Depends on your definition of more and better. Bottom line, the dollars that an individual has to spend determines the type of retailer and the goods they carry. The Safeway at Othello v the Safeway in West Seattle is a good example of the investment a company will make based on local demographics.

    We don’t know if all of these units are going to be low income, we do know that 20%+ will be. As for more choices there’s no guarantee the retail space will be filled or how it will be filled. Might be more of the same or perhaps even fewer choices.

  • Kim Il-sung

    Generally I find white people who speak Spanish in Seattle to be pretty god damn uptight….most of them are Sandalistas who don’t understand why we don’t want to learn a language just so we can talk to the gardener.

  • Anonymous

    You do realize the Salvadorean bakery is in Seattle – not White Center – right?

  • Alex

    I don’t really have a problem with up-zoning. I have an issue with additional low income housing in an areas that already has a ton of low income housing. But we don’t know for sure what those 125′ buildings will be, and the way the plan is written is could be low income housing. A few weeks back the planner said it could be up to 50%+ low income, now he is saying it will be a fraction of a fraction. The city approved a 51 unit building that is low income on Rainer, so it isn’t unreasonable to be suspicious about it given the recent history and the last 30 years of history along Rainer.

  • Alex

    I make up my own mind and use my own language. I personally find it to be highly unethical that the city has resorted to an informal redlining type process where all this low income housing in clustered in one region of the city. Maybe its just me, but is that the sort of policy we look back from from the 40s, 50s, 60s, with disdain and disgust. I mean are we really cool with the city cramming all the poor brown people in one area. I’d like to see some of that low income housing spread around a bit, Magnolia has a tone of land, West Seattle, Laurelhurst, Ballard, Greenlake, etc.

    I’m fortunate enough to be able to send my kids to private school if I had to, but many of the folks in these low income housing developments don’t have that choice. And frankly, their kids need access to higher quality public schools more than my kids do. Ballard High, Roosevelt, etc., are all better academic schools than Franklin. Don’t the south Seattle kids deserve a chance. So what word is better than NIMBY. Me thinks someone is judging someone else without much knowledge of that person’s positions.

    I personally think everyone should have a lot more input than has happened to date. I’d rather have the city hear from a broad group of people instead of a select few. it’s a democracy and I’ll live with the results even if I disagree (or I can move if I really don’t like the end result). I’d argue that many people in Mt Baker and surrounding areas have had little impact on the plane.

    If I didn’t care about an open and healthy debate I wouldn’t be posting on this blog with my name, Mr Barleywine.

  • Anonymous

    Re: posting with my name.
    It says “Guest” here, but “Alex” on the RSS feed. I saw your real name thanks to the magic of Disqus, and saw that you had posted on the SOV Facebook page, and read about your company, and about buying a house in Mt. Baker in 2009. Didn’t know if you lived there before or were new to the neighborhood.

    I get the feeling you’re new, because I hadn’t seen you name before. But you seem to have jumped in with both feet. You use the word “redlining”, which is one of their keywords, leaving only “overlay” and “eminant domain” yet to appear.

    They suck you in fast, don’t they? And if you play your cards right you will be offered a board position.

    A few years ago I spent an embarassing number of hours looking for the source. Ray was the obvious choice, but Pat was in the running, too. She headed the Mount Baker Community Club and since I didn’t get the feeling that it came from that club or that Ray was associated with them I kept looking.
    (Tin foil hats on now, please)
    Source was definitely the South Seattle Crime Prevention Council, which at that time was headed by Mariana; but she wasn’t the source. Note: Pat is now in charge there.
    To my surprise, I traced it to Fred.

    I wanted to know not only the source, but the reason.
    Now I never got to the first cause, but there is something deep and personal between Fred and Greg Nickels; something that I half-joked might have started on the playground. Maybe not that early, but it goes way back.

    You don’t have to take my word for it. Google is for everybody.
    But everything about SOV is based on Fred trying to get back at Greg. And now they have one more recruit to continue that fight, without knowing what they are really fighting for. Or against.

    So, not NIMBY. Not Lesser Seattle.

  • Monster

    Don’t worry I’m sure he gets all his shirts from either Goodwill or from fair trade speciality stores that only use organic and sustainably grown cotton.

  • Papi

    Most affordable housing projects are outside the Rainier Valley. You should get your facts straight and question whoever is misinforming you.

  • Papi

    If there are 125′ buildings, we know for sure there will be a mix of higher income housing. Ask any developer and they will tell you how hard it would be to make a profit at that height if it were “low” income housing.

  • Papi

    Look around the city at new multifamily housing projects with first-floor retail. Which businesses do you find objectionable?

  • Papi

    Look around the city at new multifamily housing projects with first-floor retail. Which businesses do you find objectionable?

  • Papi

    Yes, god forbid we should put a tall building in a valley.

  • Papi

    Yes, god forbid we should put a tall building in a valley.

  • MVH

    No it isn’t. Roxbury is the city/county line and the bakery is on the White Center side.