Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

“These Cuts Wipe Out the Foundation.”

State house ways and means chair Rep. Ross Hunter.

1. The state house ways and means committee released its budget yesterday. Andrew filed a report here documenting the $4.4 billion in spending reductions which include cutting: I-728 funding for class size reductions, saving $1.2 billion; higher education funding by $482 million; K-4 classroom reductions by $216 million; and state contributions to pensions for higher education employees by $57 million.

While the house proposal does save the Basic Health Plan (albeit at limited levels, covering 25 percent fewer people), advocates for community health clinics pointed out a basic irony: the $183 million cut to clinic funding threatens “the health care delivery system that forms the backbone of the safety net and serves the majority of patients on these programs,” according to a statement from the Community Health Network of Washington.

“House leadership said they hoped that saving Basic Health and Disability Lifeline would create a bridge to health care reform,” said CHNW spokeswoman Rebecca Kavoussi, “but these rate cuts wipe out the foundation of that bridge.”

We’ve put together a group of local leaders—Phil Bussey from the Greater Seattle Chamber of Commerce, Seattle City Council member Sally Bagshaw, and Geo Quibuyen (aka Geologic from the Blue Scholars), among the many brains—to weigh in on a weekly set of special guest editorials we’ll be publishing every Tuesday.

2. The Service Employees International Union 1199, which represents 22,000 nurses and health care workers who work in hospitals and clinics statewide, are planning to converge on the capitol on Thursday to protest the health care hit—with a focus on mental health care services.

“We’re striking for one day, but the truth is that the governor and legislature have gone on strike against the people of this state every day by not funding health care,” said Mary Dessein, an adult drug court liaison at Catholic Community Services in Everett.

Noting that the legislature is not slashing tax breaks and loopholes—there are an estimated $6.5 billion in tax breaks on the books, including an estimated $100 million for banks and $45 million for agriculture, Jared Miller, a children’s case manager at Behavioral Health Resources, said:

“Our priorities aren’t in the right place when legislators continue to leave money on the table for banks and corporations, while taking away services from families and kids, and sentencing people to end up on the streets, in emergency rooms, and in jails. We need to see shared sacrifice by corporations.”

3. As part of our re-design (still tweaking it, but psyched), we’re debuting a weekly series today: ThinkTank Tuesday.

We’ve put together a group of local leaders—Phil Bussey from the Greater Seattle Chamber of Commerce, Seattle City Council member Sally Bagshaw, and Geo Quibuyen (aka Geologic from the Blue Scholars), among the many brains—to weigh in on a weekly set of special guest editorials we’ll be publishing every Tuesday.

Today’s editorials, which we’ll post later this morning, are from Wisconsin State Sen. Scott Fitzgerald, the Republican majority leader who pushed through the big collective bargaining legislation, and Dian Palmer, a state union employee president with SEIU Wisconsin.

As our budget battle begins in earnest this week—state health care worker unions are angry that their members, who make about $10 an hour caring for seniors and people with disabilities, are taking 10 percent cuts and may lose their own health care coverage—we wonder what lessons there are in Wisconsin for Washington State.

Every few weeks, we’re going to let a lucky reader sit in on the ThinkTank. This week, sharp commenter Michael Maddux is a member of the ThinkTank.


  • ivan

    Look, the cold facts are that we can’t ask or demand that state legislators, or the Governor, flout the laws that they have sworn to uphold. Closing tax loopholes is a violation of I-1053, which the voters, in their infinite stupidity, passed by a wide margin. Even if members of the House and the Senate wanted a constitutional test case, they could never get it past Lieutenant Governor Brad Owen, who continues to pose as a Democrat, as long as he presides over the Senate.

    All we can do at this point is play Eyman’s game and put out our own initiative, that would overturn I-1053.

  • Anonymous

    I hate to be shallow, but what does that woman in the photo have perched on her head? It looks like a deboned lap dog of some kind.

  • Anonymous

    I hate to be shallow, but what does that woman in the photo have perched on her head? It looks like a deboned lap dog of some kind.

  • DBT Cow Sacred!

    Thank god we’re not cutting the DBT social welfare program which is essential to whisk a select group of 22K drivers a day largely in SOV’s thru downtown at a speed of some 45 mph. Without this DBt they’d have to go on surface streets and it might take them another 10-12 mintues in their journey. But because we will preserve this mobility for them, their thoughts while whisking along free of congestion likely will develop innovative strategies toc reate jobs, and that can trickle down to all us and help our state prosper in the long run, also this will more than pay back the billions spent in the long run. So cut class size, health and community clinics but please! do not cut the DBT!

  • typical passivist

    or ivan, we could:(a) find a candidate to oust owen, how about Lisa Brown (b) fight anyway to garner p.r. and public education benefits of fighting rather than giving in passively (c) put out an initiative to simply close tax loopholes and put 100,000 organizers on the street to make this the defining issue of the next cycle (d) sell the liquor stores and give a check to every citizen just to show democrats also can dealw ith waste and inefficiency in government and (e) end the stadium tax to show sometimes we will in fact end a regressive tax and (f) I don’t think a legislator is prevented from brining the constitutional case the way you suggest, they just don’t have the balls to do it, so in effect they’re wimpishly violating their oath of office every day when they “respect” that unconstitutional 2/3 requirement. They need to bring up a tax increase, pass it with simple majority, have owen declre it not passed and then sue. You have to sue, march, educate, message AND organize and anyone saying “all we can do at this point is play Eyman’s game” is really really being passive and accepting defeat.

  • ivan

    Learn some basic civics, please. Owen would simply declare anything like this out of order. Owen is said to be retiring after this term and Lt. Governor will be an open seat. Lisa Brown is almost certainly not interested in being Lt. Governor. Don’t just throw names around without knowing something about them.

    It’s easy to be qall self-righteous and accuse people of being wimps and accuse others of being “passive” when you’re not responsible for doing the public’s business.

  • typical passivist

    ivan, am advocating suing, organizing, marching, messaging, educating and as usual you quibble with details instead of confronting the main issue so people like you are the problem. that 2/3 law is unconstitutional and no one has the fortitude to go sue. And go learn youself, the legislators can sue owen if he declares it out of order ….you like the statewide democrats clearly have no strategy at all about how to deal with the eymanistic wave that sweeps over us and you counsel only taking one action in response while I counsel taking action in every area, and instead of agreeing, you quibble. I am responsible for the public’s business as a citizen and voter and donor and I am taking responsiblity by putting forth a basic critique, it’s called free speech dude, and your side of the argument, to basically do nothing, ain’t a winner. Becuase look what they’re cutting now and look where it’s gotten us today, so thank you very much, passivism works sooo well.

  • http://www.twitter.com/joeszi Joe Szilagyi

    So there is no way anyone has any standing to file a lawsuit to challenge the constitutionality of the Eyman 2/3 Scheme?

  • Anonymous

    Didn’t the citizens of this state approve I-728 funding for class size reductions – by a larger majority than they approved I-1053?

    Where’s the “respect the will of the people” crowd?

    If I-128 can be set aside – time and again – then why can’t the Legislature even discuss closing tax loopholes for corporations?

  • Anonymous

    Closing tax loopholes is NOT a violation of I-1053!

    I-1053 clearly allows new taxes with a 2/3 majority vote, and new fees with a simple majority.

  • Anonymous

    Closing tax loopholes is NOT a violation of I-1053!

    I-1053 clearly allows new taxes with a 2/3 majority vote, and new fees with a simple majority.

  • Anonymous

    No one has standing to file a lawsuit to challenge the constitutionality of I-1053′s 2/3 requirement until several things happen:

    1) the Democrats grow some balls and put forward a tax increase
    2) the tax increase passes with a simple majority, but not a 2/3 majority
    3) the opponents (Republicans, and a few conservative Democrats) say it didn’t pass because of I-1053
    4) the proponents (Democrats) say it did pass under the Constitution
    5) the Lt. Gov. makes a ruling
    5a) The Lt. Gov. rules in favor of the opponents and say it didn’t pass because of I-1053 (likely)
    5b) The Lt. Gov rules in favor of the proponents and says the Constitution trumps I-1053 (unlikely)

    Then, a legislator on the losing side of the Lt. Governors ruling would have standing to sue.

    It sounds like a long list of things, but it would all happen in the course of about one hour on the floor of the Senate.

    The only thing stopping it from happening is Step #1

  • tvguide

    Ya sure you betcha… we’ll send over a longship to raid the gas tax money that the evil Olympia Monastery is hoarding. The fact that it can legally only be used for roadway construction is of no concern to us, after all we are Vikings… our law is the sword. Let’s ravish some women and burn down a few villages while we’re at it. It takes a village to really make a raid feel like it is a success, don’t ya think?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr Baker

    McGinn must have $10 million dollars of general fund city money as seed money for west side light rail before the city has an integrated and comprehensive transportation plan, while we cut back the city budget.

  • ivan

    What the fuck do you know about what I do?

  • Blue Light

    “…why can’t the Legislature even discuss closing tax loopholes for corporations? ”

    And indian tribes.
    And “non-profit” organizations.

    Close ‘em all.

  • sarah

    You can’t overturn an initiative until two years after passage.

  • Tiresome Voter

    There are times when the Lt. Gov. is not presiding over the Senate, when the president pro-tem is presiding, someone who might rule differently from Owens. Someone should look into this….

  • Asdf

    how about addressing the fact that under Gregoire the budge grew over 30% far outstripping inflation and reality?

  • sarah

    They approved it. They didn’t fund it.

    The Legislature did discuss closing tax loopholes; at least 5 bills have been introduced. They’re not going anywhere.

  • Anonymous

    Typically, the President Pro-Tem only serves when the Senate is considering mundane uncontroversial bills and the Lt. Gov. has more important things to do (like discussing upcoming bills in the back room with the Majority Leader).

    Short of the Lt. Gov. being deathly ill, there’s zero chance that he’d be absent and leave the President Pro-Tem to preside over such an important decision.

  • Anonymous

    You mean “reality” like population growth – growth so big we picked up another Congressional District since the previous governor?

    Reality is that government spending is far less per capita than it has been in a long time, and that the cost of the things government does spend on – education, medication, and incarceration – outpace the general rate of inflation by a long shot.

  • Asdf

    Reality is that we can’t afford to pay for all the social justice campaigns that get W. Washington liberals all worked up.

  • Asdf

    Gotta pay off his “consultant” friends you know.

  • Anonymous

    Not wanting to pay for something isn’t the same thing as “can’t afford to pay for” it.

    Besides, if we can afford to lock up non-violent drug offenders, we can afford to pay for drug treatment.

    If we can afford to give tax breaks for Botox and Viagra, we can afford to pay for Basic Health.

    If we can afford to agricultural subsidies for Christmas Tree farms, we can afford school lunch programs.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr Baker

    It could and should be done with a simple amendment to any revenue bill, request a roll call vote, pass the underlying bill.
    It could take less than an hour on the Senate Floor.

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    WA state demands premium government service, but is not willing to fund it through property taxes.

    In property taxes as a percentage of home value, Washington ranks a mere 23rd.

    http://taxes.about.com/gi/o.htm?zi=1/XJ&zTi=1&sdn=taxes&cdn=money&tm=13&f=00&su=p284.9.336.ip_p504.1.336.ip_&tt=2&bt=1&bts=1&st=32&zu=http%3A//www.taxfoundation.org/taxdata/show/1913.html

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    WA state demands premium government service, but is not willing to fund it through property taxes.

    In property taxes as a percentage of home value, Washington ranks a mere 23rd.

    http://taxes.about.com/gi/o.htm?zi=1/XJ&zTi=1&sdn=taxes&cdn=money&tm=13&f=00&su=p284.9.336.ip_p504.1.336.ip_&tt=2&bt=1&bts=1&st=32&zu=http%3A//www.taxfoundation.org/taxdata/show/1913.html

  • v. passivist aggressive now

    I know that when someone suggests organizing, marching, suing, messaging and educating the public what you do is quibble about a minor point about who’s running for brad owens’ seat, picking at gnats, instead of joining in the obviously good and proper call for the progressives to actually take action and fight. Not helpful. Rather dumb in fact. You also do it in a rude manner which as a party leader is a continual embarassment on these blog sites. Your officious passivity is part of the problem as the entire democratic party simply accepts the notion you put forward of “all we can do at this point is play Eyman’s game” which is horrible strategy, horrible tactics, and horrible messaging.

  • v. passivist aggressive now

    I know that when someone suggests organizing, marching, suing, messaging and educating the public what you do is quibble about a minor point about who’s running for brad owens’ seat, picking at gnats, instead of joining in the obviously good and proper call for the progressives to actually take action and fight. Not helpful. Rather dumb in fact. You also do it in a rude manner which as a party leader is a continual embarassment on these blog sites. Your officious passivity is part of the problem as the entire democratic party simply accepts the notion you put forward of “all we can do at this point is play Eyman’s game” which is horrible strategy, horrible tactics, and horrible messaging.

  • against the terrible one

    and the thing that helps step no. 1 from happening is when people who are former party l.d. chairs go around saying things “at this point all we can do is play into Eyman’s game” spreading an utterly defeatist passivity that tells legislators “hey we in your home districts, it’s okay with us if you don’t have the balls to do anything about Eymanism. We will back you up and if people criticize it, we’ll jump all over them on blog sites, too! Keep up the good work being lapdogs for Tim Eyman and the 2/3 minority rule thing, you’re doing a heckuva job!”

  • Rovian tactics

    hey nice try at humor. Your real point is discussing the 18th amendment is off the table. Well fuck that. We’re cutting health teachers and cops and our stupid 18th amendment sez that’s okay cuz the gas tax money has Special Rights. And you know the reality — you only win the debate if the debate doesn’t happen and you compare “discussing priorities including the 18th amendment” to Vikings raping and burning. Wow, very persuasive. Discussing priorities = rape. got it. The DBT cos is sacred, anyone who discusses it gets tagged as a mugger. Signed, Willie Horton.

  • right thinking

    Hey everyone, if we look around the world at the low tax havens like somalia it’s pretty clear that small limited government is the way to go! Why should we emulate failures like holland, denmark or switzerland? They are gulags of economic wastelands and declining standards of living. Nope, let’s be like somalia or mississippi!

  • right thinking

    Hey everyone, if we look around the world at the low tax havens like somalia it’s pretty clear that small limited government is the way to go! Why should we emulate failures like holland, denmark or switzerland? They are gulags of economic wastelands and declining standards of living. Nope, let’s be like somalia or mississippi!

  • right thinking

    Hey everyone, if we look around the world at the low tax havens like somalia it’s pretty clear that small limited government is the way to go! Why should we emulate failures like holland, denmark or switzerland? They are gulags of economic wastelands and declining standards of living. Nope, let’s be like somalia or mississippi!