Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Pro-Tunnel Campaign Gears Up

A group calling itself Let’s Move Forward has officially registered with the Seattle Ethics and Elections Commission, and commission director Wayne Barnett confirms that it’s the pro-tunnel campaign, who want voters to say “yes” on the tunnel referendum and uphold the city’s agreements with the state on the tunnel.

Although the campaign has not reported any contributions or expenditures (they just registered a half-hour ago), the campaign will reportedly be managed by Sheila Stickel, who previously worked for city council president Richard Conlin (a big tunnel supporter and frequent adversary of Mayor Mike McGinn), the 2006 school levy, and the campaign to build the Mariners’ stadium.

Likely supporters of the pro-tunnel campaign include  groups like the Downtown Seattle Association, Vulcan, the Pike Place Market, the Manufacturing Industrial Council, and the Maritime Shipping Association which are members of the Tunnel + Transit Coalition, a group that’s been opposing McGinn’s effort to stop the tunnel.

The anti-tunnel referendum campaign has until Tuesday to collect 16,500 valid signatures to get the measure on the ballot. Because it’s a referendum, a “no” vote means turning down the agreements adopted by the council, and a “yes” vote means upholding the agreements.

Neither Stickel nor campaign treasurer Phil Lloyd immediately returned a call.


  • Stacy

    Let the lies begin! Or , let the fear-mongering propaganda continue.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr Baker

    Vote Yes on the anti-Tunnel ballot measure.

  • Godwin

    I wonder what the McGinn, Publicola. and Stranger camp will do when their issue finally goes down into the dusbin of history, along with Monorail, Cogswell for Council, and the rest.? What will their cause célèbre be then?

  • Anonymous

    Right, because they can only start with the pro-tunnel side starts talking. (please note tone of sarcasm)

  • Anonymous

    Ha! Tunnel+Transit? I love misleading names.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Looks like what Joni Balter would call a real grass roots effort.

  • Anonymous

    Because highway projects never fail in Seattle….

    If you are going to talk about the monorail, please talk about forward thrust too. We eventually wised up and got rapid transit. By we I mean, the children of the generation that voted down fully govenrment-funded rapid transit contruction though. Oh, but this time we had to pay.

  • Guest

    If they’re planning some kind of clumsy, tone-deaf PR campaign in the spirit of the truly terribly awfully inept and ridiculous Tunnel + Transit group…then really, this new group could do the tunnel project its biggest favor by just shutting the f up.

  • beezer

    As misleading as Surface/Transit when we all know that McGinn and company have no chance of getting Olympia to fund transit if they turn down the tunnel.

  • Anonymous

    http://publicola.com/2011/03/24/freeway-removals-and-tunnel-mishaps/

    Street and I-5 reconfiguration is still cheaper than street reconfiguration and tunnel construction. Digging always costs more than paving. For example, tunnel boring machines are built for individual use and are unique to each project and most equipment for street projects are not. There’s some cost saving right there.

  • Stacy

    Are you implying that if we “accept” the tunnel then Olympia will somehow give us transit funding? The same transit funding the Gov already vetoed? The same transit funding the Sen. Haugen is holding hostage so she can try to ram through more freeways all over our state? Please explain.

  • fgruben

    Will there be reason for Publicola to exist after the tunnel gets built? It seems that the majority of “newsworthy” items here are about the tunnel.

  • fgruben

    Will there be reason for Publicola to exist after the tunnel gets built? It seems that the majority of “newsworthy” items here are about the tunnel.

  • Isaac Patterson Freely III

    What is that image depicting, anybody know?

  • Isaac Patterson Freely III

    What is that image depicting, anybody know?

  • Anonymous

    I wish half this much energy was going into a campaign for Ballard and West Seattle Light rail. Why can’t we vote on that in November instead of this silly referendum?

  • Anonymous

    I wish half this much energy was going into a campaign for Ballard and West Seattle Light rail. Why can’t we vote on that in November instead of this silly referendum?

  • Grover

    Maybe because the city does not have billions of dollars lying around to pay for light rail.

  • Guest

    I know the swoopy building upper left depicts the Gates Foundation, so that’s probably a preliminary design for where Broad Street will overpass Aurora/99.

  • james in the CD

    Both Ballard and West Seattle will be getting BRT.

  • james in the CD

    Both Ballard and West Seattle will be getting BRT.

  • Grover

    Looks like the north entrance to the deep bored tunnel. 2-way Mercer Street is running left-to-right in the drawing, with Aurora Ave N. top to bottom overpassing Mercer. Bill Gates Foundation building in upper right-hand corner. At top of drawing, inside lanes of Aurora go to and from surface streets at Denny. Outside lanes of Aurora go into or out of deep bored tunnel.

  • Guest

    Thank you! I was close, but totally no cigar…

  • Coalition Against Polar Bears

    yes, and trabvel time from West Seattle to downtown will increase after we build the DBT.

    Yay autos!

  • voter

    It’s the south portal and the Mercer underpass, or what the Mercer West project hopes Mercer to look like if funding is available to widen it. The Gates Foundation building in the image is the third building that’s not yet under construction.

  • Grover

    Or the surface option. Only new viaduct would not increase travel times.

  • Anonymous

    I’m talking about real transit.

  • Nemo

    Yup, astroturf on top, nothing but worms below it.

  • Anonymous

    How about putting it before the voters and asking. With a half million people the 2 billion or so estimated cost would not be that much per year per person if we bonded it.

  • Grover

    You are talking about real EXPENSIVE transit. Central Link cost about 70 times as much per mile to build as RapidRide A, and is averaging only about 3 times as many boardings per wekday as RapidRide A. So, Link light rail cost about 23 times as much per boarding as RapidRide bus service cost. Light rail is just stupidly expensive. Link light rail also costs about twice as much per boarding to operate as RapidRide A buses.

  • Maryanne

    Do you people ever talk about anything else?

  • Stacy

    You are obviously new here.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr Baker

    In no case is the state paying for Seattle’s ongoing mass transit wishes.

    Saying that the state will not with the Transit portion for Tunnel while pretending that will pay for Transit portion of the Surface idea is absurd.

  • Stacy

    And in no case is the state paying for cost overruns (they’ve made this very, very clear). And in no case will the tunnel work as a transportation solution without improved transit service.

  • Selma

    You can’t expect a news website to tell you what you’re looking at, do you?

  • Perfect Voter

    Better for them to spend thei money taking the proposed ballot measure to court. It’s settled law now that administrative matters like those passed by City Council are not subject to initiative and referendum, no matter how many valid signatures are collected.

    However high the passion, on either or both sides, these things do not belong on the public ballot. If sufficient signatures are validated, failure to challenge in court could set an unfortunate precedent.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr Baker

    True of all option.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr Baker

    True of all option.

  • Grover

    A new 6-lane viaduct or rebuilt current viaduct needs no transit improvements — it would be the same as the current viaduct.

  • Wells

    Astroturf costs less, the savings to spend on luxury cars and tolls. The bored tunnel will have a dress code: older model cars, right-lane only.

  • sarah

    The state doesn’t care a whit if Seattle puts a bazillion permutations of tunnel questions on the ballot, since Seattle will pay for that. The state will simply continue its preparation work for the tunnel and either build it if there’s no earthquake first, or use the money somewhere else in the state is there’s a quake.

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    This week the Census data releases pulled the rug out from under urbanism.

    Downtowns are being fled.

    Cities are shrinking.

    All of these infrastructure projects need to be revisited from first premises and most likely canceled.

    My editorial in Sound Politics:

    Escape from New York…Seattle Urbists Are Wrong!

    http://soundpolitics.com/public/2011/03/escape_from_new_yorkseattle_ur.html