Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Nickelsville to Move May 15; City May Consider Alternatives to Sunny Jim Site

This post has been updated to reflect the fact that the mayor’s office hopes to open a new encampment in October, not four months earlier as we initially reported. City council members call that timeline unrealistic and are looking at alternative sites. The mayor’s spokesman Aaron Pickus now disputes that deputy mayor Darryl Smith is talking to the council about alternatives, as council member Nick Licata told us he was yesterday. Pickus now says the council is simply “working with Licata on the [mayor's preferred alternative]” and that if the council wants another site, they’ll have to work on it themselves.

Nickelsville, the temporary homeless encampment that’s currently housed in an abandoned fire station in Lake City, will move out May 15, when its extended temporary land-use permit to use the site runs out, members of SHARE/WHEEL, the group that runs the encampment, tell PubliCola.

Mayor Mike McGinn had vowed to move shelter residents into a new, semi-permanent encampment at the former Sunny Jim’s peanut butter factory in SODO by May, but city council members pointed out practical concerns like the need for environmental review, the fact that the site is close to the Jungle, where people have been known to prey on the homeless, and the fact that the mayor’s preferred site was not among seven locations recommended by the city. Now council member Nick Licata, a longtime advocate for the homeless, is suggesting that the city review its original recommendations for potential alternatives to the Sunny Jim’s location.

The group had hoped to move its members to a new, city-sanctioned encampment at the Sunny Jim’s site by May; however, opposition from neighbors of the site and the need for lengthy environmental review make that schedule all but impossible.

The city council has told McGinn his proposal for the encampment can’t move forward until the city completes the required environmental review; meanwhile, a group of SODO businesses has said it will almost certainly challenge the encampment in court.

Last month, Nickelsville residents wrote McGinn a letter asking him to let them live on the Sunny Jim site on a temporary basis while environmental mitigation is underway, and operate a separate shelter, including a staffed “wet” shelter where people would be allowed to show up drunk, at the Lake City site.

Meanwhile, Licata says he’ll ask the city to consider some of the potential encampment sites it recommended in a 2010 report (which did not recommend the Sunny Jim site), including a grassy space at the intersection of Dravus and 15th in Interbay where a monorail station was once planned (and which has better access to transit routes and services, Licata notes).

“I want to take a look at the top three recommendations [from the report] and see if any are more acceptable to council members’ concerns about noise” and environmental issues, Licata says.

Licata says he’s also interested in allowing more permanent structures than tents—along the lines of Portland’s Dignity Village, which council member Sally Bagshaw praised on her blog earlier this month.

McGinn spokesman Aaron Pickus says the mayor’s office still hopes to open the SODO encampment this year (a timeline most city council members have called unrealistic, given the long environmental review process and certainty of legal challenges), but adds that deputy mayor Darryl Smith “has been working pretty closely with Licata’s office” on site alternatives. Next week, Smith will meet with Lake City residents to discuss the future of the current Nickelsville site.


  • Barfly

    Rules, rules rules…what’s a hobo to do?

  • http://pstransitoperators.wordpress.com/ Jeff Welch

    I keep telling these guys, it’s MCGINNVILLE.

  • fount

    Maybe it’s that they’re smart enough to know which Mayor has worked with them, and which one closed down the elevators when they came to visit.

  • Chris

    as usual Mcginn’s vows ring hollow.

  • sarah

    The article is wrong in several respects:

    Nickelsville is not operated by Share/Wheel; it’s run by a different 501(c)(3).

    Nicikelsville didn’t propose that it operate a double shelter (wet and self-managed) after May 15 in the fire station; it asked the Mayor to allow Share/Wheel to do so. Wheel has 11 years’ experience in operating a womens’ wet shelter.

    The Mayor did not propose to move Nickelsville onto the Sodo site. He proposed an entirely different situation: a tent encampment with social services on-site, data kept, adults only and no pets, and only 12-15 months residence, none of which requirements fit Nickelsville’s needs.

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    2 billion dollar stadiums weren’t enough to get yuppies to move to SODO.

    Therefore, a homeless encampment.

    Makes sense.

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    2 billion dollar stadiums weren’t enough to get yuppies to move to SODO.

    Therefore, a homeless encampment.

    Makes sense.

  • IPfreely

    Once the tunnel is completed the battery street tunnel will be decommissioned. Why not just stick ‘em all in there? It’ll be like Thunderdome, kinda’ fun! You could peek down through the grates to see what they’re up to. The southbound lanes could be reserved for single mothers with adolescent male children–a demographic that is currently shut out of shelters, so this could be a real benefit to the region.

  • Anonymous

    Shorter Licata: “Any sight not proposed by McGinn will be OK.” City Council continues to act like a bunch of junior high kids.

  • Roger

    Why not use the former carpool space owned by SDOT under I-5 at 6th & Cherry? They’ve already barricaded the entrances so cars can’t park there and a few tents have popped up since. As a special bonus, it’s just one block away from City Hall and even closer to SPD!!!!

  • Aaron Pickus

    Erica,

    As we discussed yesterday evening, the pilot project is funded for operations to begin in October of this year. The encampment at Fire Station 39 has a temporary use permit that is until about mid-May. It looks like you switched those two dates on these two separate projects in your last paragraph. Can you please correct that?

    Also, it is true that Deputy Mayor Smith and Councilmember Licata are working closely on the pilot project in SODO. We have identified the old Sunny Jim site as the location for the project. If Council would like to explore alternative sites, that is up to them. Our office is not working on finding alternative sites. I think you quoted me out of context regarding this issue in your final paragraph. Could you please clarify your post on this point?

    Thank you,

    aaron

  • Barfly

    Nonsense, McGinnville is totally a SHARE/Wheel circus. The fact is that Scott Morrow and SHARE/WHEEL use the very few that are legitmately homeless as pawns in their stunt known as “Nickelsville” all the more disgusting.

    Scott Morrow moves these people over from Tent City 3 & 4 to beef up his numbers at Nickelsville, because he wants a “shanty town” where he can call the shots and permanently squat. He wants to intimidate and make threats to city and county officials by taking public land for his illegal encampment. He did the exact same thing with Tent City 3 and Tent City 4. Both camps came about the same way.

    Don’t take my word for it. Research the history of both Tent City 3 & Tent City 4. Read and Google the names of Scott Morrow and Leo Rhodes. Read the stories on the links provided. Google Safe Harbors/SHARE/WHEEL and read about that recent history with Scott Morrow and his threats to the City of Seattle in which he risked federal/city funding and instead made threats to open “multiple tent cities” in parks of his choosing. Then decide for yourselves.

    The success of any organization serving the homeless is measured by the people that transition out of that program into housing, jobs, etc. By that measure (and because they refuse to keep data) SHARE/WHEEL and Scott Morrow are total failures.
    This isn’t about helping the homeless, because if it was Scott Morrow would be appalled that Leo Rhodes was still homeless and living in a tent after 20 yrs.

  • Barfly

    Nonsense, McGinnville is totally a SHARE/Wheel circus. The fact is that Scott Morrow and SHARE/WHEEL use the very few that are legitmately homeless as pawns in their stunt known as “Nickelsville” all the more disgusting.

    Scott Morrow moves these people over from Tent City 3 & 4 to beef up his numbers at Nickelsville, because he wants a “shanty town” where he can call the shots and permanently squat. He wants to intimidate and make threats to city and county officials by taking public land for his illegal encampment. He did the exact same thing with Tent City 3 and Tent City 4. Both camps came about the same way.

    Don’t take my word for it. Research the history of both Tent City 3 & Tent City 4. Read and Google the names of Scott Morrow and Leo Rhodes. Read the stories on the links provided. Google Safe Harbors/SHARE/WHEEL and read about that recent history with Scott Morrow and his threats to the City of Seattle in which he risked federal/city funding and instead made threats to open “multiple tent cities” in parks of his choosing. Then decide for yourselves.

    The success of any organization serving the homeless is measured by the people that transition out of that program into housing, jobs, etc. By that measure (and because they refuse to keep data) SHARE/WHEEL and Scott Morrow are total failures.
    This isn’t about helping the homeless, because if it was Scott Morrow would be appalled that Leo Rhodes was still homeless and living in a tent after 20 yrs.

  • sarah

    Barfly, you repeat these charges every time Share/Wheel is mentioned in an article. I don’t think anyone really cares who helps people who are homeless, as long as they have somewhere to be that is dry and safe. If you’re so dissatisfied with Share/Wheel and Nickelsville, please start your own program, and then find the housing and jobs to which those homeless people in your program can transition. You may not find that as easy as you appear to think, but at least you’d be doing something, not just complaining.