Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Afternoon Jolt: King County Metro

Today’s winner: King County Metro.

The senate transportation committee just passed Sen. Scott White’s (D-46) emergency transit funding bill. While the bill was scaled back from the original version, the good news is that bill would allow King County to impose the temporary vehicle-license fee with or without a public vote (an amendment to require a public vote, by Sen. Tim Sheldon, D-35, failed). A vote, as we’ve noted, would push the implementation of any fee voters pass back too far to fix transit agencies’ short-term funding crises. King County is facing a $200 million shortfall over the next two years, cutting 200,000 hours of service.)

The bad news: The maximum fee was cut by a third, to $20.

Transportation committee chair Sen. Mary Margaret Haugen (D-10) said she was impressed by the work King County had done to cut costs and improve and monitor the efficiency of its transit system. “I had some grave concerns over this bill to start with,” Haugen said. “I can support this for King County because I think they’ve done something that we’ve asked all the transit [systems] to do, which is to really do a review” of their operations.

As King County County transportation chair Larry Phillips told the committee in testimony last week, the county has “worked very hard to wrench every service dollar out of the agency that we can to put [buses] out on the street”—negotiating concessions from the transit union, implementing workplace efficiencies, and doing an audit of the agency that identified potential money-saving measures.

If the bill passes the legislature and gets the governor’s signature (Gregoire vetoed similar legislation two years ago) have to decide whether to implement the fee or put it to a countywide vote, and any extension of the fee beyond two years would require a vote of the people.

Today’s Loser: Pierce and Snohomish Transit

The legislation as adopted today only applies to King County, leaving Pierce and Snohomish Counties without access to emergency funding. Haugen said she didn’t feel comfortable extending the fee authority to those counties because they hadn’t done the same due diligence as King County to identify potential cost savings.

There’s hope for the beleagured counties. The house version, sponsored by Rep. Marko Liias (D-31, Edmonds) passed out of committee earlier this month. Community Transit in Snohomish has already cut weekend service and Pierce County is looking at a 35 percent cut in service.


  • notme

    Opps, kinda blows the meme that the Legislature is always mean to Seattle doesn’t it? Most of us know that theory is total crap but it is always nice to see it demolished so well.

  • Jogilvie

    Except that Metro is run by King County and not the City of Seattle.

  • Scott White yay.

    bravo Scott White!

    And MMH — next time just butt out completely, ok? it’s not your county, not your taxes, not your busses.

  • Michaelp

    Perhaps now Community Transit and Everett Transit, along with their respective ATU locals, will seriously consider finally merging, for the sake of the county and city.

  • Jakers

    Hopefully not while Reardon is still pretending to be king of Snohomish County.

  • Jakers

    Hopefully not while Reardon is still pretending to be king of Snohomish County.

  • guest

    I am an ATU member and as far as I know the ATU is not against merger. When it was talked about before i think it was ET that did not want it. Too much power and money to give up for the leadership of CT and ET.

  • Dick Burkhart

    Haugen shouldn’t be judging the county transit systems. That should be the job of the voters.

    That being said, the real issue may be the much stronger political support for transit in King County, especially Seattle. At the Senate hearing, only one rep from Snohomish showed up and none from Pierce. The rest of us were from King County and Seattle, even though some of us were representing statewide organizations.

  • Michaelp

    I confess I’ve been out of SnoCo for some time, but back when I was involved up there (up to the mid 2000′s), both bargaining units weren’t against a merger, so long as it was their contract that was used. There are apparently enough significant differences between the two…plus the clusterfuck of seniority…that while each ATU may say they don’t oppose a merger, they are an impediment.

    That said, I would imagine that times such as these, when we are seeing so many cuts to transit, things would move in that direction, but if the post-695 cuts (which cut weekends for a while) are any indication, that won’t be the case.

    Just to be clear – I recognize other obstacles, most on the City of Everett’s end. Specifically, the belief that if CT took over ET, there would be a loss of local control, even though it is all but common knowledge there would be more service in Everett. And, the sales tax portion (if memory serves, sales taxes are lower in Everett than the rest of the county because they don’t pay CT sales taxes).

    So, there are plenty of obstacles, to be sure, but, looking at MMH’s statement – Metro took steps to cut costs, so they get more money – would hopefully kick our neighbors to the north’s asses into gear.

  • Jakers

    Everett is at 0.6% for transit, CT is at the maximum 0.9%; which speaks to the fact that Everett has been able to provide good service without maxing out its taxing capacity. I don’t think right now the City of Everett wants to give control of anything to Snohomish County. The City is very well run and rather quiet on the political front, which can’t be said of the county.

  • Michaelp

    Have you ever actually relied on transit in Everett? Everett Transit is terrible. Not much in the way of routes, not much in the way of frequency, and terrible connections with ST and CT.

    Everett’s service is simple – continue to focus on having a car-centric city without good transit options. Combining the two would give more people reason and ability to use different methods of getting around in a reliable and convenient fashion.

    Then again, I probably won’t be happy until ST is fully regional, and replaces Metro, CT, ET and Pierce Transit.

  • guest

    CT is finally having a performance audit done (by Moss Adams), they are in the middle of it now.

  • Jakers

    I have used Everett Transit to get home from work a couple days a week during the summer. Everett is very different from Seattle in density and so it doesn’t have the critical mass needed to take it to the next level of service. I really don’t think that they have a goal of maintaining a car-centric city. ST combining/taking over CT makes more sense in the near future than CT combing with/taking over ET.