Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

A Combo of Smart Growth and Affordable Housing

1. Morning metaphor: Highlighting an unusual alliance between greens and social justice advocates, environmental lobbyist April Putney from Futurewise subbed in for social justice advocate Nick Federici at yesterday’s hearing in Olympia to testify in favor of a bill that would allow local governments to use Tax Increment Financing, or TIFs.

TIFs are a controversial development tool that aren’t currently kosher with the Washington State constitution (the bill comes with a constitutional amendment) because they essentially allow local governments to lend money directly to private developers. (In the TIF equation, developers—typically tasked with infill and redevelopment projects—pay the money back with increased property taxes generated from the redevelopment.)

Old school liberals and progressives are against TIFs because they see them as giveaways to developers for gentrification. But at yesterday’s hearing, a coalition of liberals—greens and low-income housing advocates specifically—joined together to support the idea because they see TIF as a tool to promote a combo of smart growth and affordable housing.

Indeed, after a parade of developers testified 100 percent support for the bill, they were followed by low-income housing advocates and greens. The coalition of lefties, like Ken Katahira from the International District’s Inter*Im Community Development Association, said they were willing to support TIF with some slight amendments, such as making sure the definitions of “public improvements” included affordable housing.

Greens like Putney joined Katahira. “The coalition largely supports the concept,” Putney told the committee, because TIF can generally support goals around growth management, environmental protection, and, sounding like working class lefty Federici now, “social equity.” She added, “If we use TIF improperly, it can also counter each of those goals”—noting that single use, large scale commercial development in the exurbs, “far away from population centers, [will do] harm.”

She said the bill’s general TIF mandate should be amended to specify “good applications of TIF” so that it can only be used for mixed-use development (employment and residential) and that portions of the money raised go directly back to the community for public benefits like open space and affordable housing.

2. The West Seattle Blog reports that West Seattle resident Michael Taylor-Judd will be joining the giant cast of characters running against City Council member Jean Godden. Taylor-Judd, who first told us he was running for city council about month ago, is now the fourth candidate to target the two-term incumbent.

3. The Washington Environmental Council is protesting a bill that would water down I-937, the renewable energy measure approved by voters in 2006. (This is the third year in a row the senate has taken a run at changing I-937.) The bill, sponsored by state Sen. Brian Hatfield (D-19, South Bend, Kelso, Raymond) would broaden the definition of “biomass energy facilities” so that more energy facilities qualify as “renewable energy sources.”

“Proposed Senate Bill 5575 would change I-937 to include existing 30-year old biomass resources to count toward the renewable energy standard,” says Keri Cecovich, Outreach Director for WEC.  “The effect would be a reduction in the amount of new renewable resources, like wind and solar, developed in our state.”

Proponents, including Weyerhaeuser, Cowlitz PUD, and the Association of Washington Businesses, argue that the bill will save jobs by allowing plants like the Kettle Falls biomass plant and the Longview fiber liquor pulping plant to keep operating during these rough economic times.

4. Some controversial bills are getting hearings in Olympia today: State Rep. Marko Liias’ (D-21, Edmonds) bill to phase out coal at TransAlta’s controversial Centralia plant is up in the house enviornment committee and Rep. Eric Pettigrew’s (D-37, S. Seattle) bill to base pending teacher layoffs (thanks budget) on teacher evaluations rather than seniority is up in the house education committee.


  • Greenwasheddevelopers

    Yes as long as the TIF law REQUIRES that any TIF be used for good purposes we can count on the local political process to ensure that’s always the case.

  • Godwin

    Question “growth”. All of it.

  • Mikos

    I believe that’s “smarth growt”.

  • Michaelp

    With respect to Rep. Pettigrew’s bill –

    Does it specify who does the evaluations, and what they would take into consideration? I’m sure I’ll earn the ire of Ivan, but performance should be a factor in determining layoffs, and personally, I believe the WEA would be better served policing their own than just fighting against any proposal to get rid of teachers who have been around for a long time, yet are past their prime.

    I suppose I liken it to the Med-Mal arguments from the various physicians’ groups, or SPOG – they refuse to police their own members, and get rid of the shitty ones, with their focus seeming to be only to protect their members, regardless of skill.

    The difference – teachers are, in theory, educating our future generations, not cutting off the wrong leg or using excessive force.

  • Jakers

    We need to also layoff any administrators that are too lazy and incompetent to be able to go through the steps and hassle to get rid of bad teachers. We should try to get rid of the bad teachers all the time, not only in the bad times when there are layoffs. Surely the teachers union doesn’t want bad teachers either, they just want the administrators to go through the proper process to get rid of them.

  • Josh Feit

    Micahaelp,

    Follow the last link—it’ll take you to the story we did on Pettigrew’s bll.

  • Michaelp

    Exactly. Part of that, though, includes a positive working relationship at some level between the union (or their members) and administrators.

    Of course, we could also stand to get rid of a School Board member or two. Remember with Hiriam Martin-Morris proposed lowering the graduating standard in order to graduate more students?

  • Annoyed

    All four SPS school board members up for re-election need to go. That’s Harium Martin-Morris, Steve Sundquist, Peter Maier and Sherry Carr. On their watch the District has gotten 2 god-awful operations audit, and a damned by faint praise capital expenditures audit (And hey — Carr is supposed to be a whiz at financial mgmt at her Boeing job.) There was that pathetic D average graduation requirement from Martin-Morris, Maier and Sundquist’s consistent refusal to advocate for better programming and capacity management in schoolsin their areas of the city, instead capitulating to our Superintendent’s Centralized planning in vote after vote after vote. The final straw – last week Sundquist gave our district a grade of B at the Channel 26 televised Town Hall mtg. about SPS operations under this superintendent. LMAO. The crowd was in disbelief. SPS’ own tests show most kids are doing WORSE in the classroom over the last 3 years. Enough. Be gone. And take the superintendent with them. Get us some leadership and board members who are laser focused on supporting our best schools and prescribing the resources to kids who struggle. And if the new board members could be a tad more supportive and respectful of the teachers and parents working their butts off every day to help kids in the face of slashed budgets, ineffective top-down management and a generally unwelcoming attitude toward involvement in district policy making, well that would be a nice change. Rant over.

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    I note they have categories for low and medium density.

  • Sasha

    Godwin – two words for you; Eugene Oregon

  • ratcityreprobate

    Regarding the TIF proposal, I would suggest you check out the story that was in the news last week about how Federal Tax credits intended for low income communities have been hijacked by Wall Street financiers to renovate luxury properties.

    This Bloomberg article is but one of many you will find if you look for them; http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-02-08/rich-taking-from-poor-as-10-billion-u-s-subsidy-law-funds-luxury-hotels.html

    Too many times well intentioned proposals such as TIF end up subsidizing the unscrupulous at the expense of tax payers and the general public.

  • Diogenes

    Google returns ~5,500,000 hits for “environmental justice”, an indication that the alliance between environmental and social justice advocates is not as unusual as Fizz seems to believe.

  • greenwasheddevelopers

    what? That would never happen in Seattle. We can count on the local political process to ensure that if the law says it must be used for good, then it will be used for good purposes.

  • JimBeam

    Okay I give what exactly is “social justice”?

  • Baboeuf

    Les aristocrates a la lanterne.

  • Baboeuf

    Les aristocrates a la lanterne.

  • Anonymous

    Seattle cannot limit worldwide, nationwide, or even statewide population growth. What we can do is encourage more growth that we can’t control to be located in dense, walkable, urban areas rather than by paving over pristine natural areas with new auto-dependent subdivisions further and further on the outskirts of the metro area.

  • Anonymous

    Seattle cannot limit worldwide, nationwide, or even statewide population growth. What we can do is encourage more growth that we can’t control to be located in dense, walkable, urban areas rather than by paving over pristine natural areas with new auto-dependent subdivisions further and further on the outskirts of the metro area.

  • Anonymous

    Except that the unions often defend onerous and expensive procedures that make firing the worst teachers more trouble than its worth. Costs often soar into the six figures to fire a bad teacher, at least in the LA School district.

    http://articles.latimes.com/2009/may/03/local/me-teachers3

  • Anonymous

    Except that the unions often defend onerous and expensive procedures that make firing the worst teachers more trouble than its worth. Costs often soar into the six figures to fire a bad teacher, at least in the LA School district.

    http://articles.latimes.com/2009/may/03/local/me-teachers3

  • answeres

    it’s giving your son food so he doesn’t die, even though in a free market he has zero value and can’t compete. It’s social security. It’s buying some things collectively and some things in a market. It’s regulating out of control markets tht do harm. It’s taxing the better off to improve the less well off as this improves the lot of the better off too as any comparison with between Stockhom and NYC after dark would show you. Or any comparison between Paris, and Mogadishu.

  • JimBeam

    As I suspected no one here can really define it…

  • answer redux

    You ask, you got answered, you got no answer to the answer, so you bully.

    Typical conservative toofooll of the rich.

  • JimBeam

    That nonsense wasn’t an answer…

  • JimBeam

    That nonsense wasn’t an answer…

  • ivan

    Performance is a factor both in SB 6696 and in the newest SEA contract, so your supposition that it isn’t is, as usual, wrong.

    Moreover, apparently you are unaware that plenty of teachers get “counseled out” of the profession before they reach tenured status. Guess who contributes to this? Fellow teachers, through peer review.

    Finally, are you aware that teachers are dismissed for cause every year in every school district, all according to procedures spelled out in their contracts? I am told there were 24 in Seattle alone in the last academic year.

    Who suffers from bad teachers, besides their students? Their co-workers, that’s who. If a third-grade teacher sucks, who has to bear the brunt the following year? The fourth-grade teachers, that’s who. Other teachers have to suffer the consequences of having a bad teacher in their midst year after year. Why in Billy Blue Hill would you think other teachers would even want a bad teacher around, WHO MAKES THEM LOOK BAD? Are they all fucking masochists? Take your head out of your ass and think about it. You’re repeating the biggest lie in the whole subject of public education.

    You work in the legal profession, where decisions are based on evidence, yet you repeat the same tired old bullshit that Stand For Children, which got that poor fool Pettigrew to sponsor their bill, has been spreading for years. Look at the evidence for a change, and quit parroting their bullshit anecdotes.

  • Michaelp

    Took you long enough!

    What defines cause? Regardless, we seem to be closer than you think with respect to whether evaluations of teachers are an effective tool. I just believe that once a teacher is tenured, they should still be subject to the same scrutiny and standards as newer teachers. Regardless of years in the classroom, there is never any excuse for lousy teaching.

    It’s not just a matter of new teachers, but tenured teachers. It is incumbent upon the State and the Districts to have some mechanism in place to deal with all experience levels.

  • final answer

    You asked what is social justice and you got specific examples that illustrate both the broader principles and real world applications. At this point you’re arguing like a child, saying “is not!” I can give you examples of love, but no no one can “really define it.” I can give you examples of beauty but no no one can “really define it.” I can gie you examples of social justice but in your limited narrow minded view of things apparently if it can’t be defined like the formula for a molecule it doesn’t exist. You asked, you got real examples. You paying food for your kid is noneconomic nonmarket nonfreedom nonliberty conduct but it’s fucking justice idiot; so is the social security program; so is regulating wall street; so is a fair bit of redistributionism. Injustice? That’s you pretending to dialogue and debate when all you do is act like Cartman or Beavis. Your kid needs food. He can’t get it on his own. You’re the dad so you pay for it and feed him. This is just. If you can’t get that god help you.

  • Godwin

    Hiring and firing policies are _jointly negotiated_ between unions and employers…that being the case, why isn’t management taking 50% of the heat on these typical “f the WEA” screeds? Union do not unilaterally impose employment policy. They are jointly agreed upon.

  • A Narquist

    From each according to their ability, to each according to their need.

  • Jakers

    So do you have all the white space at the end of your comment because disqus sucks and you can’t read what you are writing without putting a bunch of returns in?

  • Jakers

    Social Justice is the assumption that every person was created equally and therefore is an equal shareholder in this great nation, but that the great capitalist economic engine of ours does not provide a fair distribution of dividends to the poor so the government should make sure that they receive their fair share of benefit from being an owner. It does not mean equal share, because they don’t put as much in, but by being part owner, they should get something out because without the court systems, military, and natural resources owned by all, the capital markets would not even come close to providing the wealth that we currently enjoy.

  • Doc Johnson

    Jakers! Flashing some skills with that answer. Nice work.

  • Sarajane Siegfriedt

    Josh, please do a follow-up on the TIF bill’s definition of “affordable housing.” It pushes it well past the foundational definition of the State Housing Trust Fund to 80% of area median income for rentals and 120% of AMI for condos, potentially over $100,000 in King County. Adding more of these makes the developer eligible for $1M in free taxpayer money. Our money.

  • Sarajane Siegfriedt

    Josh, please do a follow-up on the TIF bill’s definition of “affordable housing.” It pushes it well past the foundational definition of the State Housing Trust Fund to 80% of area median income for rentals and 120% of AMI for condos, potentially over $100,000 in King County. Adding more of these makes the developer eligible for $1M in free taxpayer money. Our money.

  • Sarajane Siegfriedt

    Josh, please do a follow-up on the TIF bill’s definition of “affordable housing.” It pushes it well past the foundational definition of the State Housing Trust Fund to 80% of area median income for rentals and 120% of AMI for condos, potentially over $100,000 in King County. Adding more of these makes the developer eligible for $1M in free taxpayer money. Our money.