Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Enviros’ New Transit Strategy: Get Ahead of the Game in Olympia

Viet Shelton, a spokesman for the new Transportation for Washington campaign that launched this morning and campaign director for Transportation Choices Coalition, says the group’s strategy in rolling out the campaign so early is to get ahead of legislators and business groups who are likely to propose a roads-heavy state revenue package next year.

The campaign is aimed at getting a revenue package that focuses on road maintenance and expanded transit over building new roads that “cause more sprawl, pollution and increased costs to taxpayers.”

“We said, instead of playing by [road supporters'] timeline all the time or throwing out our list of demands at the end, let’s try to shape the public conversation right away,” Shelton says.

Senate transportation committee chair Mary Margaret Haugen, historically no friend to transit supporters, is expected to roll out a statewide revenue package that emphasizes roads over transit next year. Meanwhile, state Rep. Marko Liias has introduced legislation that would allow voters to fund transit at the local level.

Shelton says he doesn’t expect to see any transit package on the ballot until next year, when Obama will be up for reelection. “Presidential years are particularly good years, with the right electorate, to support large transit measures,” Shelton says, noting that the last time voters passed a major light-rail package was in 2008, when Obama was elected.


  • Mr. President

    Too late, the ‘war on cars’ has become a wonderful effective meme no matter how hard you vainly try to hijack it back.

  • Anc

    For some reason they won’t/can’t explain Josh and Erica ‘like’ the ‘War on Cars’ meme. *shrug*

  • Anc

    Sounds like a good idea. Honestly, considering how much a joke ‘Tunnels and Transit’ turned out to be, I’d rather Enviros/Transit Enthusiasts just sit out Roads and Transit II for the time being. I’ve read that Haugen will be retireing in 2012, once that happens and the economy starts to come back I think we’ll have a much better situation in Olympia.

  • Marc E

    Yes, presidential years are great years for transit packages. Those are the years that voters who are barely engaged most of the time actually bother to show up. It may be reality, but it’s certainly not something to be proud of.

  • Anc

    I don’t get this. Either we are Republic, where we elect representatives who are wiser, smarter, more informed (a Platonic/Hamiltonian Natural Aristocracy) than us to make decisions, or we a Democracy where the people, the ignorant, emotional, short sighted people, are the decision makers.

    If like Eyman, you believe that the people should make the decisions, why would you not want the maximum amount of people to show up to make them?

  • Marc E

    Maybe I think poorly of the elites and the rabble.

  • Anc

    So in otherwords, only those who think like you should make decisions?

    Can’t say I can disagree. I feel the same way about my own stances. :D

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WZCRCELF2YUAWT5MZHSTMRQICE peter

    $5 per gallon gas in 2012 should help any public transit packages up for a vote by then.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WZCRCELF2YUAWT5MZHSTMRQICE peter

    Bush’s re-election in 2004, even though it was aided by electoral fraud, was enabled by many ignorant and intellectually lazy voters who should have known what the hell they were getting after an unjustified war and being sold out in favor of the plutocrats. Yep, it’s hard to think well of them.

  • smug defined

    yes, dman those voters. If we had smarter voters like they have in Sweden and Germany, than we progressives would be able to enact our policy goals.

  • Verd1n

    Well, not sure why anyone is against “roads” when in fact, that is what buses run on. Unless you are thinking of light rail, e.g. the South Lake Union tram that has a $26.00 subsidy per rider. Slow, lumbering, nearly empty all the time and – what is it supposed to do that a bus can’t, and on the same road at that?

    jhay

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    The cars just landed at Normandy.

    Transit made the mistake of opening up two fronts.

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    Democracy in the mid east could mean clinton era ppb

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    Thank you, Hosni.

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    Vichy Bellevue is falling…as US cars roll in to liberate the roads from the Transit Axis powers.

  • Anc

    “A pure democracy can admit no cure for the mischiefs of faction. A common passion or interest will be felt by a majority, and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party. Hence it is, that democracies have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have, in general, been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths.”

    “Does the advantage consist in the substitution of representatives whose enlightened views and virtuous sentiments render them superior to local prejudices and schemes of injustice? It will not be denied that the representation of the Union will be most likely to possess these requisite endowments. Does it consist in the greater security afforded by a greater variety of parties, against the event of any one party being able to outnumber and oppress the rest? In an equal degree does the increased variety of parties comprised within the Union, increase this security. Does it, in fine, consist in the greater obstacles opposed to the concert and accomplishment of the secret wishes of an unjust and interested majority.”
    -Plubius (James Madison, in Federalist Paper No. 10, using a pen name based on Roman Senator Plubius Valerius PUBLICOLA ;) )