Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Burgess, at Parking Forum: Rates Likely To Go Down

At a parking forum this afternoon, city council and Seattle Department of Transportation officials confirmed what PubliCola was first to report this morning: The city is considering reductions to proposed parking rates in response to complaints from business owners that the rates the city set earlier this month are too high in areas like Pioneer Square. The city initially planned to increase rates to as high as $4 an hour.

“In collaboration with the mayor’s office and the city council, SDOT is taking a second look at its policy direction for setting street parking rates, with a goal of one to two open spaces per block,” Burgess said. “We want to take a hard look to ensure that the rates actually achieve that goal. … Any specific about changes to the parking rates will be shared later this week.”

Earlier this month, the city released the results of an SDOT study of the number of parking spaces that were being used per block throughout the city. The department used the results of its study to come up with parking rates in each neighborhood that, the department said, would result in an average of one to two free spaces per block.

Burgess explained that that study was aimed at from a “revenue-based” approach—one where the city adjusts parking rates upward whenever it needs more money—to one based on data, with the goal of one to two free spaces per block. That approach, he said, has three benefits: It clears up spaces so people can get to retail businesses, it reduces congestion (research, he said, shows that between 28 and 45 percent of people driving around are looking for parking), and it reduces carbon emissions (because people drive less when they can find a spot to park).

All five members of the panel cited Donald Shoup, author of The High Price of Free Parking, as the inspiration for their policy proposals (one even referred to Shoup’s book, which argues that “free parking isn’t free,” as “The Bible.”) The panel members had a number of suggestions—from regulating garage parking to charging property owners per parking stall (as opposed to charging drivers for parking by the hour) and changing parking rates by time of day.

But the most interesting (and tensest) part of the panel was the Q&A session, when audience members in the front row—several of whom worked at or owned businesses in Pioneer Square—challenged Burgess and SDOT parking manager Mike Estey over their recent decision to raise meter rates to $4 in the neighborhood.

“[Pioneer Square]‘s going to look a lot like Pike Place Market did during the Carter Administration where the market was boarded up. We can’t make our bills. If you increase the parking [rates], we’re going to lose 30 percent of our business,” one business owner told Burgess. “It’s just insanity.”

Burgess’ response: “I think very soon we’ll see some modifications of what’s been proposed, and I think you’ll be pleased. … If we maintain fidelity to the policy that we have and the research, rates will go down in many neighborhoods.”


  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr Baker

    Chicken

  • Brian H.

    The city likes quoting Shoup about rate policies, but conveniently leaves out the part about the local revenue reinvestment.

    And why is Sunday a sacred free parking day?

  • Roues

    “It clears up spaces so people can get to retail businesses, it reduces congestion (research, he said, shows that between 28 and 45 percent of people driving around are looking for parking), and it reduces carbon emissions (because people drive less when they can find a spot to park).”

    If these are truly the city’s goals, then the city should build a parking garage on every block, and make the parking free. Then nobody would ever have to drive around looking for a parking spot.

  • Grover

    If you want to read a well-written article on this subject, as opposed to Erica’s piece, go here:

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2014048979_parking27m.html

  • Grover

    From the Times’ piece:

    “Rick Williams, a Portland-based traffic consultant, agreed that there might be problems with the Seattle parking study. The city set as a goal of one to two open spaces every block, or a 15 percent availability.

    “Williams also said most cities set parking rates based on the cost of private parking garages and surface lots. In Seattle, where private parking averages about $25 a day, a typical on-street rate would be $2.50 an hour, he said.”

  • Roues

    So, according to the traffic consultant, the market rate for onstreet parking in downtown Seattle is $2.50 per hour. Isn’t that what the rate already is?

    Who to believe? A traffic consultant from Portland? Or a few bike-riding little kids who are trying to eliminate autos from Seattle?

  • Roues

    So, according to the traffic consultant, the market rate for onstreet parking in downtown Seattle is $2.50 per hour. Isn’t that what the rate already is?

    Who to believe? A traffic consultant from Portland? Or a few bike-riding little kids who are trying to eliminate autos from Seattle?

  • Morgan

    An appealing thought but exactly backward to what actually happens. Increased supply of parking simply leads to more people decided to drive into town and park for long periods of time. In no time at all, all the spots will be taken, again. We also can’t fill our downtown with ugly, otherwise useless structures that just displace businesses and other uses for limited space.

  • Roues

    Simple-minded pap. Why does this hot happen at shopping centers with lots of free parking, like Northgate?

  • Roues

    typo: should be, “why does this NOT happen…”

  • Godwin

    Because “free market” is a myth– like unicorns, and because people believe in unicorns, prices are not based on real use-vaules. They are based on arbitrary notions counched in bullshit concepts like “efficient markets” and “rational expectations”. Literally, they make up the models out of thin air, and plug in the numbers into the bullshit models, and call the result truth. E.g. 2+x=4, if x=3

  • Roues

    Wow. That is deep!

  • Mickymse

    Nice write-up, Erica…

  • Mickymse

    Nice write-up, Erica…

  • Mickymse

    Nice write-up, Erica…