Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Feds, State at Impasse Over Tunnel Under Downtown Federal Building

The federal General Services Administration—the agency that oversees federal buildings like the Federal Office Building in downtown Seattle—has made it clear to the Washington State Department of Transportation that the deep-bore tunnel can’t go under the building, where WSDOT plans to build it, until the state agency resolves a number of major issues.

The state has to get permission from the federal government to bore its tunnel beneath the federal building.

In a series of increasingly terse letters beginning last April, GSA officials have made it clear to WSDOT that the federal agency won’t allow the tunnel to go beneath its building until the state addresses serious concerns about the tunnel, which would run directly beneath or in the middle of the piers holding up the building, putting “this historic building and its occupants in permanent jeopardy,” according to the GSA’s most recent letter, dated December 13.

A tunnel underneath the building, the December letter continues, would make it impossible for the government to replace the timber piles holding up the building in the future, and could make building renovations impossible.

Additionally, the land under the building is expected to settle during and after construction, potentially damaging the fragile historic structure. “A historic masonry structure like the Federal Office Building could experience cracking of brittle finishes and even cracking through the mortar joints due [to] this settlement.”

Finally, the letter notes that methane has built up beneath the building as organic material piled up to create land for building construction in the early 1900s has decayed. “What is the proposed method for monitoring and mitigating any methane gas build-up within the tunnel and specifically around the Federal Office Building?”

The GSA raised many of the same concerns back in April, when acting regional GSA administrator Robin Graf expressed hope that WSDOT and the feds could clear up the GSA’s questions at a meeting later that month. Clearly, that didn’t happen, and in a subsequent letter in November, Graf noted that the GSA has not given WSDOT the right to drill its tunnel under the building, and that “consequently, we will not be granting any further access to the federal property by the project team, their contractors, or potential bidders.”

We’ll have an update tomorrow when WSDOT and GSA officials are back in their offices after the MLK holiday.


  • http://www.twitter.com/joeszi Joe Szilagyi

    Let’s see Conlin sign his way out of a middle finger from the Federal government.

  • Anonymous

    As much at it may hurt people to admit. It’s looking more and more like Mayor McGinn is on the right side of this tunnel issue. There is a lot wisdom in the crowd who elected this mayor largely on this issue. The cognitive dissonance of those who back this tunnel does not allow them to see it.

  • http://www.twitter.com/joeszi Joe Szilagyi

    I’m assuming McGinn and O’brian had no idea about this, or else they would have been banging this to high heaven rightfully for months. Who covered this up?

    Do you guys have any letters or communications from WSDOT back to the GSA? This is priceless.

    Nice freaking scoop!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BOQRTLVNUYUYCI6EO4JGVOHGV4 Zef

    This has been one of my biggest concerns about the tunnel. It is going underneath some of the most historically significant and fragile buildings we have. This idea of tunneling through infill seems ludicrous. We need to just try the surface/transit option and see if it works before we embark on an expensive and foolhardy tunnel.

  • TMN

    Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!1! :-D :-D :-D ^_^ ^_^ ^_^

  • Anonymous

    Doesn’t the City of Seattle have to cede right-of-way underneath its own property to the State as well? I believe the State is assuming the Seattle will do this, and for free.

  • Guest

    The state would have to compensate the city for any direct property losses but a city does not have the right to block a state highway project. Even if Seattle denied the state permits, the state would just get a court order and then move forward without the permits.

  • alexjon

    Citation required. :)

  • alexjon

    Citation required. :)

  • Seismic+transit

    I had heard several folks discussing the Federal Building last summer and the potential issues, so it’s not new. But these letters definitely indicate an escalating issue. I wonder how many other terse letter exchanges are happening with other building owners (who don’t happen to be the federal government). I really do wonder how many blind eyes it’s going to take before the tunnel crowd starts waking up. I’m a supporter of the surface+transit, but would even be open to a seismic upgrade and then 10-15 more years to get our transit shit together. I’m not entirely convinced the seismic upgrade was vetted as well as it should have been.

  • fount

    Cary Moon mentioned it in an editorial either here or on Slog about a month ago…sorry I can’t find it.

  • fount

    Cary Moon mentioned it in an editorial either here or on Slog about a month ago…sorry I can’t find it.

  • Alexjon

    How does WSDOT stonewall the federal government, an entity they are required to work with? This isn’t how a progressive city works.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    We will have to check the timestamp to see who had the “nice freaking scoop”.

  • ivan

    Suits me. We can rebuild the Viaduct, then.

  • Alexjon

    How long will traffic be diverted from the rebuild to city streets? I think that pretty much sums up the chances of the rebuild getting completed.

  • Guest

    RCW 36.70A.200. Also see Hunter v. Pittsburgh, 207 U.S. 161 (1907)

  • ivan

    If we do your f—–g surface option, the answer will be “forever.”

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr Baker

    Forever is a long f-ing time.

    It’s under or over, that was the threat from the governor before the tunnel was chosen. The project was going to roll up the southern mile and if Seattle could not get its shit together then it would be elevated all the way up. I expect that is still the case.

  • http://www.twitter.com/joeszi Joe Szilagyi

    No one else has still reported on it tonight. I think she got this one.

  • http://www.twitter.com/joeszi Joe Szilagyi

    Can the Feds similarly shut down the state without a lawsuit?

  • sarah

    Well, that should do it. No need to blather about the overruns, etc. anymore.

  • ceryous

    Doubtful. This seems like more of a headache for the state than a deal killer. WADOT might be able to shift their alignment or buy the building and move the tenants to another building at worst case. It hardly seems like an insurmountable obstacle.

  • Selma

    Not sure why, but it could also be a ploy for mitigation funding.

    I’d also like to see this reported elsewhere.

  • http://www.twitter.com/joeszi Joe Szilagyi

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but if they shift the tunnel plan, don’t all the environmental impact studies have to start over for the new plan?

  • sarah

    Why would the feds let the State buy an “historic” building, even assuming the State had the money to pay what the feds wanted? If these issues were raised in April and WSDOT still hasn’t resolved them even though the project’s initial steps are being taken, maybe they can’t be resolved. Which makes WSDOT look really stupid and/or criminal.

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    Yee-Haw.

    Now the fight is little more fair.

    Richard Conlin, the Seattle City Council, Chris Gregoire and the WA State hierarchy versus Mike McGinn and the Govenrment of the United States!

  • rtm

    Just to be clear, the City doesn’t control WSDOT. It’s the state that’s the issue. And perhaps WSDOT isn’t responding promptly because it knows the feds won’t like the answer . . .

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    Yeah, and all you Seattle Schmucks will be bilked for “cost overruns” before one ounce of concrete is poured! Serves you all right!

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    The Viaduct that withstood the two largest earthquakes in the last 60 years ?

  • Anonymous

    hmm, I like them odds.

  • alexjon

    Now extend that further a bit for us here and tell us if the federal government has a right to block a state road project. :)

  • Alexjon

    Right, because if we don’t build the DBT or Elevated, nothing will be built EVER.

  • Grousefinder

    This article is why I read PubliCola; it goes beneath the surface news down deep into the bowels of the issues. And…the methane angle…wow…nuf said.

  • Anonymous

    I can’t imagine why not. If it’s the fed’s property, and there’s no way the state has the power to just take it. Try and picture a new highway constructed through an Army base without the Army’s permission.

  • um… huh?

    As El Jefe Conlin would say: “This is not how budgets, I mean tunnels, are made! Rrrrrrraaaaaarrrrrrr!!!!”

  • Mr. X

    Probably not – the realignment of Link demanded by the U of W didn’t require a new EIS.

  • Cocktails42

    In this age of terrorist fears, I can see another reason why the feds might not want a public thoroughfare running beneath one of their buildings. Assuming that the feds hold firm and that the tunnel needs to be either shifted over by a block or make a special swerve to avoid the fed building’s footprint, then all the implications for such changes will have to be addressed, and the ones raised here by previous posters may only be the tip of the iceberg. (Could the new set of buildings and structures being affected include another deal-breaker like the federal building, and could the soil conditions of the new route carry a new set of cost-inflating challenges?) To this tunnel opponent, it looks like a lovely can of worms.

  • Jakers

    Anyone know who at the GSA? Would like to know names so we can see if there is a connection back to McGinn or some other anti-tunnel local player. My guess is that this will all go away soon as the real power players in the federal government tell this local person to shut up and sit down.

  • Jakers

    This easy: terror threat. Done. Shut down.

  • Jakers

    You nailed it on the head with “60 years”

  • Jakers

    Kent could easily fall into “Seattle Area” when it comes to property owners.

  • Jakers

    Right, because if an issue can’t be resolved in 9 or 10 months, it will never get resolved.

  • Jakers

    Or agaisnt some local that happens to work for the federal government. I want to know who is the person at the GSA behind all of this. Gregoire doesn’t get talked about as a potential solicitor general without having some clout with the power players that will tell this GSA facilities person to shut up and sit down.

  • Jakers

    Or agaisnt some local that happens to work for the federal government. I want to know who is the person at the GSA behind all of this. Gregoire doesn’t get talked about as a potential solicitor general without having some clout with the power players that will tell this GSA facilities person to shut up and sit down.

  • http://www.twitter.com/joeszi Joe Szilagyi

    Uh, each letter is signed:

    Carrie L. Mosher, Director of Portfolio Management
    Robin G. Graf, Regional Administrator, CC to Division Admin in DC

    If this was some trumped up nonsense, don’t you think WSDOT would have pressed deeper into the Federal level, rather than apparently ignoring the Fed like someone deep in the debt hole avoids the debt collectors calling? If it was nothing, why did the Federal government BAR the WSDOT engineers and staff from gaining access to the Federal building any longer as detailed in the letters?

    What makes you think this is part of some McGinn conspiracy? Is he some Lex Luthor supervillain? I swear, if this stupid fight went all the way to SCOTUS and they decided 9-0 against the tunnel, people would be screaming it was a McGinn conspiracy.

  • http://www.twitter.com/joeszi Joe Szilagyi

    Uh, each letter is signed:

    Carrie L. Mosher, Director of Portfolio Management
    Robin G. Graf, Regional Administrator, CC to Division Admin in DC

    If this was some trumped up nonsense, don’t you think WSDOT would have pressed deeper into the Federal level, rather than apparently ignoring the Fed like someone deep in the debt hole avoids the debt collectors calling? If it was nothing, why did the Federal government BAR the WSDOT engineers and staff from gaining access to the Federal building any longer as detailed in the letters?

    What makes you think this is part of some McGinn conspiracy? Is he some Lex Luthor supervillain? I swear, if this stupid fight went all the way to SCOTUS and they decided 9-0 against the tunnel, people would be screaming it was a McGinn conspiracy.

  • http://www.twitter.com/joeszi Joe Szilagyi

    Uh, each letter is signed:

    Carrie L. Mosher, Director of Portfolio Management
    Robin G. Graf, Regional Administrator, CC to Division Admin in DC

    If this was some trumped up nonsense, don’t you think WSDOT would have pressed deeper into the Federal level, rather than apparently ignoring the Fed like someone deep in the debt hole avoids the debt collectors calling? If it was nothing, why did the Federal government BAR the WSDOT engineers and staff from gaining access to the Federal building any longer as detailed in the letters?

    What makes you think this is part of some McGinn conspiracy? Is he some Lex Luthor supervillain? I swear, if this stupid fight went all the way to SCOTUS and they decided 9-0 against the tunnel, people would be screaming it was a McGinn conspiracy.

  • http://www.twitter.com/joeszi Joe Szilagyi

    Uh, each letter is signed:

    Carrie L. Mosher, Director of Portfolio Management
    Robin G. Graf, Regional Administrator, CC to Division Admin in DC

    If this was some trumped up nonsense, don’t you think WSDOT would have pressed deeper into the Federal level, rather than apparently ignoring the Fed like someone deep in the debt hole avoids the debt collectors calling? If it was nothing, why did the Federal government BAR the WSDOT engineers and staff from gaining access to the Federal building any longer as detailed in the letters?

    What makes you think this is part of some McGinn conspiracy? Is he some Lex Luthor supervillain? I swear, if this stupid fight went all the way to SCOTUS and they decided 9-0 against the tunnel, people would be screaming it was a McGinn conspiracy.

  • http://www.twitter.com/joeszi Joe Szilagyi

    Uh, each letter is signed:

    Carrie L. Mosher, Director of Portfolio Management
    Robin G. Graf, Regional Administrator, CC to Division Admin in DC

    If this was some trumped up nonsense, don’t you think WSDOT would have pressed deeper into the Federal level, rather than apparently ignoring the Fed like someone deep in the debt hole avoids the debt collectors calling? If it was nothing, why did the Federal government BAR the WSDOT engineers and staff from gaining access to the Federal building any longer as detailed in the letters?

    What makes you think this is part of some McGinn conspiracy? Is he some Lex Luthor supervillain? I swear, if this stupid fight went all the way to SCOTUS and they decided 9-0 against the tunnel, people would be screaming it was a McGinn conspiracy.

  • http://www.twitter.com/joeszi Joe Szilagyi

    Uh, each letter is signed:

    Carrie L. Mosher, Director of Portfolio Management
    Robin G. Graf, Regional Administrator, CC to Division Admin in DC

    If this was some trumped up nonsense, don’t you think WSDOT would have pressed deeper into the Federal level, rather than apparently ignoring the Fed like someone deep in the debt hole avoids the debt collectors calling? If it was nothing, why did the Federal government BAR the WSDOT engineers and staff from gaining access to the Federal building any longer as detailed in the letters?

    What makes you think this is part of some McGinn conspiracy? Is he some Lex Luthor supervillain? I swear, if this stupid fight went all the way to SCOTUS and they decided 9-0 against the tunnel, people would be screaming it was a McGinn conspiracy.

  • Jakers

    Yes, this makes for very strange bedfellows, Seattle Liberals and the Patriot Act.

  • squid

    This is good news for the tunnel! Since the tunnel will have no cost overruns, each new problem reduces the number of problems to be faced in the future. (This also applies to any increase in urgency of known unsolved problems.) As soon as the entire contingency budget is used up, it will be smooth sailing.

  • Anonymous

    You can watch right now: the Special Committee on the AWV, with a WSDOT briefing. Watch live:
    http://www.seattle.gov/councillive/
    Maybe this will come up?

  • Anonymous

    You can watch right now: the Special Committee on the AWV, with a WSDOT briefing. Watch live:
    http://www.seattle.gov/councillive/
    Maybe this will come up?

  • Anonymous

    The PI just followed up, and includes the name of the GSA person. Looks like the mayor’s office wasn’t aware of the correspondence.
    http://www.seattlepi.com/local/433617_viaduct18.html

  • Jakers

    I didn’t see the second page until later. It’s a facilities person (a high level one) that is tired of the hassle or is anti-tunnel and doesn’t want to let the engineers have access to a building. There is a big difference between this and the Federal Government as a policy shutting the tunnel down.

  • http://www.twitter.com/joeszi Joe Szilagyi

    As the clear authority on how the Federal government’s rules, laws, policies, and practices of how management of historic Federal facilities work, I bow to “Jakers of Disqus”.

  • Gomez

    Even if this snafu (and yeah, WSDOT screwed up by pushing ahead without resolving this dispute) somehow kills the tunnel, it will more likely lead to a waterfront rebuild than it will lead to a surface/transit abandonment of the highway.

  • Scott in Hillman City

    whatever. mosher just wants attention for the federal building. she is not trying to stop the tunnel. the issue will get resolved. big deal. Liar McGinn will not triumph, he is a lame duck mayor waiting to serve out his one term. his lunatic fanatics can beat their wings all they want, this issue is a nonstarter, otherwise Liar McGinn would have been hammering away at this one as well as his disingenuous cost concern.

  • Scott in Hillman City

    whatever. mosher just wants attention for the federal building. she is not trying to stop the tunnel. the issue will get resolved. big deal. Liar McGinn will not triumph, he is a lame duck mayor waiting to serve out his one term. his lunatic fanatics can beat their wings all they want, this issue is a nonstarter, otherwise Liar McGinn would have been hammering away at this one as well as his disingenuous cost concern.

  • http://www.twitter.com/joeszi Joe Szilagyi

    McGinn already confirmed his people had no idea that WSDOT was fighting the Feds: http://twitter.com/mayormcginn/status/27419437200056320

  • Scott in Hillman City

    at joeszi…seriously? kept secret from you? lmao! conspiracy theorist leftest fringe. “@mayormcginn assuming you saw the tunnel news — Did your team know about this before? Or kept secret from you? — joeszi” tunnel will be built, get over it. even though Liar McGinn gives you hope it won’t, he is powerless. nice dr. who avatar above. silly silly silly.

  • Anonymous

    Just mentioned that the Federal building is coming up for discussion during the Council briefing in the next few minutes.

  • http://www.twitter.com/joeszi Joe Szilagyi

    Did it come up?

  • Scott in Hillman City

    so what? so the mayor is again oblivious to reality and uninformed as to what is going on around him. so what? proves nothing favorable for the mayor. as for WSDOT fighting the fed? you make it sound so…wild westy! the feds want their building taken care of. thats all. sounds reasonable to me. WSDOT shouldnt ignore their concerns. doesnt mean the tunnel wont happen. you act as if the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT is against the tunnel. umm…they’re paying for the damn thing. hello?!?!

  • Scott in Hillman City

    so what? so the mayor is again oblivious to reality and uninformed as to what is going on around him. so what? proves nothing favorable for the mayor. as for WSDOT fighting the fed? you make it sound so…wild westy! the feds want their building taken care of. thats all. sounds reasonable to me. WSDOT shouldnt ignore their concerns. doesnt mean the tunnel wont happen. you act as if the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT is against the tunnel. umm…they’re paying for the damn thing. hello?!?!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=509524638 David Meinert

    The pro-tunnel folks have been reduced to calling names and trying to sidestep the issues brought up by the Feds. I don’t have a strong position on the tunnel. But if these are real issues for the federal building, wouldn’t the be real issues for other buildings downtown? Can any of you pro-tunnel folks rationally and directly answer these concerns?

  • Anonymous

    I’d take that.

  • Random Engineer

    Not necessary. Addressing these kinds of “concerns” is typical for an engineering project of this scope. Nothing remarkable at all about this.

  • Michael Taylor_Judd

    This is really not that different from needing federal approval to toll I-90 or negotiating with UW to run Link underneath the campus. There’s no reason to believe that this won’t get resolved in a satisfactory matter without threatening the tunnel project.

    The question this DOES raise, however, is why certain electeds keep talking about the tunnel as a “done deal” when there are clearly a number of problems remaining to be settled before this project can begin construction.

  • Michael Taylor_Judd

    To be clear, I’m asking tunnel supporters to spend a little more time explaining why the deep bore tunnel is the best alternative according to the EIS… and a little less time ridiculing the Mayor and others who raise legitimate concerns and receive no answers.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=509524638 David Meinert

    Seems at least one building owner thinks it’s necessary. I would think several others do as well, right? Seems at least on the surface to be a fairly serious issue – no unresolveable though (or at least the Feds sound like they think it could be addressed initiatially)

  • Jakers

    I always appreciate the ridicule. It really advance the discussion, that and calling me a troll. Surely it’s not that hard to understand the difference between career folks and politicians (that set policy).

  • Mikos

    That’s because the governor is no longer talking to McGinn and WashDOT works for her. This thing is thoroughly FUBAR.

  • Random Engineer

    You misunderstand. Of course WSDOT will repond to GSA on these concerns, such a response is typical for a project of this scope.

    It is not necessary for “pro-tunnel folks” to “answer these concerns” (presumably in some public forum). Why bother? There is a process in place that is moving along nicely.

  • Anonymous

    yes, the Fed Bldg was discussed very briefly, at 78:50
    http://www.seattlechannel.org/videos/video.asp?ID=2161105
    the story was also covered on KUOW, with a soundbite from the briefing, but I don’t see it archived yet on KUOW’s site.

  • Anonymous

    So why has WSDOT not responded to these concerns since April? Why were contracts let with this major concern unresolved? With the Federal Government no less! This points to some significant misfeasance within WSDOT and the Governor’s office.

  • Verd1n

    See Initiative 101 for that answer. That is what it is all about. For short, I-101 stops any city ROW from being ceded.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=509524638 David Meinert

    Because we’re dealing with politics. The pro-tunnel folks act like arrogant asses (see your response above) and leave us people who are undecided leaning towards the anti-tunnel position as a result. If you don’t think this will play out in the next city council election, you’re head is in the sand. My sense is most people in this City are leaning anti-tunnel right now, and so when anti-tunnel candidates run for council they will be elected. This could be good or bad depending which side you are on. I’d just like to hear some rational explanations for these questions. When I don’t hear them, I assume they don’t exist.

  • jazzerciser

    Hi all,

    Great work Erica

    jazzerciser

  • Inter R. Gator

    you want a rebuilt viaduct? really? with all the added bulk?

  • Anonymous

    No, I want surface/transit. But the viaduct is better than this fiasco.

    It’s likely to be a much smaller viaduct that you think. I argued this out over here:
    http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/11/30/editorial-viaduct-or-tunnel/

  • DBT shuffle and jive

    MTJ, UW is example of a entity blocking ST and holding it hostage; it got so much mitigation it’s ridiculous, even to the point it can shut down link when next generation of trains come in if they cause too much vibration. And the $8 m station is now $38m. Hard to negotiate with a govt. you can’t condemn? So yes, it’s similar to the feds. We can’t condemn the land, so they got it all over the State. WSDOT today is revealed to have a budget doublign on the measly little highway 18 project. Oopsie, overruns again! Oh wait, “there won’t be any overruns on DBT, and rich property owners will pay any overruns. Oh and this federal kerfuflle? This is normal for a project this size. Just move along folks, everything is just fine, we used up $200 million in the contingency prior to contract signing, too, that’s normal, just move along….”

  • greatest good, number…

    Ditch the DBT. Build the monorail.

    Cheaper, moves more people, but finance it.

  • Cocktails42

    The SCAT-sponsored “Stop the Tunnel” Initiative, I-101, now has topped the necessary number of signatures needed and is simply gathering excess signatures to provide a good ‘cushion’ before meeting its February 1st deadline. Since we know that the pro-tunnel City Council will not adopt it, the necessary outcome will be for an election to be scheduled sometime this year that will give Seattle’s voters the opportunity to either pass it or reject it. When will this election take place and what role, if any, might it play in the Council elections that will also occur in this election cycle? I wish Publicola would start working on this story rather than dismissively ignoring it as it’s done so far…

  • http://www.twitter.com/joeszi Joe Szilagyi

    Is there functionally any way the Council can stop I-101 from appearing on the ballot now?

  • girafrozzo

    as always WSDOT is giving us the ‘don’t worry, be happy’ explanation for the latest problem in the road of their mega-project wet-dream. i mean really, what is wrong with those whacky feds? why would they think that there could possibly be a problem with sending a massive tunnel boring machine not under, but through the wood piles that support an unreinforced masonry building? what could possibly go wrong? let me say this one more time “WE HAVE A SIGNED CONTRACT!! PROBLEM SOLVED, EVERYONE GO HOME AND SHUT UP.”

    having watched this project from the early days (the first design briefings to the city 7 or 8 years ago) i have gone from scratching my head in disbelief that they would propose digging a cut and cover tunnel through a swamp, to laughing in disbelief as they actually disclosed the surface solution (the only reasonable proposal to come out at any stage of the process) only top see the state declare that the bored tunnel had won the day after it had never been publically discussed or assessed. as the process continues we see the tunnel route getting closer and closer to that same swamp, buildings being demolished as they will likely crumble, the state requiring a billion dollar bond in case the boring machine grinds to a halt under a high rise building downtown, the winning bidder having at least one conviction for racketeering, the state refusing to change the wording that seattle taxpayers have to pay the cost overruns for a state designed and controlled project and at every turn every question is answered with ‘DON’T WORRY BE HAPPY’ or sometimes the more snippy ‘THE DECISION HAS ALREADY BEEN MADE’ this is now beyond a project going badly, we are headed full bore into a full blown catastrophe. anyone with their eyes open can see it. WSDOT and the city council are great great actors, even when there was an accidental stabbing on stage, the lead actor fell off the stage and broke his leg and the stage and the curtains are on fire, they are still on script, “THE FRIKKIN SHOW MUST GO ON”. make no mistake this is going to be a major catastrophe and while i hope that the feds manage to stop the project in its tracks, i also secretly hope that they don’t and that we see the whole massive disaster unfold. the hubris of the governor, WSDOT and the Seattle City Council is of epic proportions. this is going to make Boston’s Big Dig look like a rip roaring success. this is the material that Shakespeare would have loved.

  • Cocktails42

    Assuming that a valid number of signatures are tallied, then the answer would be: Yes, by adopting it.

  • http://www.twitter.com/joeszi Joe Szilagyi

    Well, yes, but that’s as likely as Conlin saying they’ll fight the DBT all the way to the Supreme Court.

  • http://www.twitter.com/joeszi Joe Szilagyi

    Well, yes, but that’s as likely as Conlin saying they’ll fight the DBT all the way to the Supreme Court.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WZCRCELF2YUAWT5MZHSTMRQICE peter

    A Surface/Transit option would be good provided there is a bus only lane to make transit really fast and efficient.