Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Michael Moore, on Rachel Maddow Show: Assange Rape Accusers “Have to Be Treated Seriously”

Thank you, Rachel Maddow, and thank you, Michael Moore. Maddow: For saying what needed to be said, in a national forum watched by millions of people. Moore: For admitting he was wrong.

The back story: Two women accused Wikileaks founder Julian Assange of rape. Not of “sex by surprise,” not of “a broken condom,” of rape. Sweden sought extradition from the UK for Assange’s arrest. Assange’s lawyers fought extradition, accusing Sweden’s pursuit of him as politically motivated (which it probably was—sadly, the vast majority of rape allegations don’t result in charges, much less an international manhunt) and the women as liars (which only a court can decide). They then lied to the press about what Assange was accused of doing, first saying it was an obscure Swedish offense called “sex by surprise,” then saying he was guilty, at most, of a broken condom.

Both of these claims about the charges were false. But they got picked up and repeated by prominent people, people with national platforms like Keith Olbermann and Michael Moore, who both dismissed the charges, effectively declaring Assange innocent of all charges without a trial.

And then something else happened: The actual documents—the rape charges, in which one woman said Assange ripped her clothes and pushed her  down physically before having sex with her against her wishes, and the other said he initiated sex while she was asleep, after which she asked him repeatedly to stop—got leaked. (Oops.) And Julian Assange—champion of free information, leaker of countless documents—was furious about the leaks. Because once the charges themselves were leaked, no one could credibly claim that they should simply be ignored.

That’s where #mooreandme came in. NYC blogger Sady Doyle, furious that two “progressive” TV personalities, people she admired, were dismissing the women’s charges simply because they admired the man who was being accused, started a Twitter campaign asking Moore to apologize for dismissing, and acknowledge that it’s possible for a man to be a hero for free speech and simultaneously believe he could capable of doing a bad thing. Most rapists aren’t the Green River Killer. In fact many rapists are respected members of their communities—husbands, fathers, churchgoers, and neighbors.

For a full week, Moore didn’t respond. (Olbermann, meanwhile, responded by blocking people’s Twitter accounts and asserting that he was the real victim here.) Last night, on the Rachel Maddow show, he finally did.

Here’s how Maddow—prompted by thousands of tweets asking her to address Moore’s dismissal of the Assange rape allegations—led off her segment with Moore:

The timing could not be more suspicious. The man accused says he’s being pursued for political reasons. But even if you’re suspicious about the timing, there are two women who went to the police with what are essentially date-rape charges against this guy.

This doesn’t fit on a bumper sticker.

Can your suspicion about the forces arrayed against Julian Assange and Wikileaks — your suspicion about the timing and pursuit of these charges — coexist with respect for the women making these accusations against him and with a commitment to take rape allegations seriously, even when the person accused is someone that for other reasons you like?

And then Michael Moore said this:

Every woman who claims to have been sexually assaulted or raped has to be, must be, taken seriously. Those charges have to be investigated to the fullest extent possible. For too long, and too many women have been abused in our society, because they were not listened to, and they just got shoved aside. The older people here remember how it used to be. It’s not that much better now, it got a little better, because of the women’s movement made that happen. I think these two alleged victims have to be treated very seriously and Mr. Assange has to answer the questions.

See what he did there? He saw that he was wrong, and he admitted it. He successfully held two thoughts in his mind at once: That one can be a staunch defender of Wikileaks, and also believe that rape allegations should be taken seriously as a matter of course. And for that, I, and the hundreds of others who’ve been tweeting #mooreandme for the past week, are grateful.

He also responded directly to Sady, thanking her for the campaign. Read Sady’s response here.


  • http://pstransitoperators.wordpress.com/ Jeff Welch

    Erica,

    Get over it. Assange’s accusers aren’t the ones who abused YOU, and Assange isn’t your abuser. Get help.

  • http://pstransitoperators.wordpress.com/ Jeff Welch

    Erica,

    Get over it. Assange’s accusers aren’t the ones who abused YOU, and Assange isn’t your abuser. Get help.

  • Offended

    Jeff,

    You are an idiot.

    Have you ever been raped? Do you know what these women must be going through? I personally do not but I do not doubt for one second that it is anything short of the worst pain in the world.

    Julian Assange is absolutely innocent before proven guilty but to dismiss these charges as bogus is obscene. This is why what Michael Moore did is vitally important and needs to be reported.

    Get over yourself.

  • http://pstransitoperators.wordpress.com/ Jeff Welch

    RE: being an idiot – guilty as charged (from time to time).

    If you follow ECB’s Twitter account, then you know that her focus on this Assange thing has risen to heights not matched elsewhere.

    Have I been sexually assaulted? Yes.

    Do I know what those women must be going through? No, as it’s unclear whether their claims are in fact valid or politically motivated.

    I haven’t dismissed anything – merely called out ECB for her harping on the subject.

    Get over your own self.

  • http://pstransitoperators.wordpress.com/ Jeff Welch

    RE: being an idiot – guilty as charged (from time to time).

    If you follow ECB’s Twitter account, then you know that her focus on this Assange thing has risen to heights not matched elsewhere.

    Have I been sexually assaulted? Yes.

    Do I know what those women must be going through? No, as it’s unclear whether their claims are in fact valid or politically motivated.

    I haven’t dismissed anything – merely called out ECB for her harping on the subject.

    Get over your own self.

  • http://www.twitter.com/joeszi Joe Szilagyi

    So, I’ve been as tough as anyone on Erica’s more out there posts on this, but the responses to even the level ones are absurd, as is your claim that she her Twitter focus on this “has risen to heights not matched elsewhere”. I just looked and counted about 25 tweets and replies in about a week and change, of which more than half are retweets and the bulk of which came in one quick burst of retweets. In the realm of Twitter, calling that unmatched heights is like saying Erica is up there with Ashton Kutcher in number of followers. There are people who have farted more volume about this situation on Twitter in a few hours, let alone her fairly spread out little cluster. You make it sound like she’s been on some crazed Feminist Assault Force rampage on Twitter or something. She hasn’t.

  • Anonymous

    God, you are a disgusting waste of a human being.

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    In fact many rapists are respected members of their communities—husbands, fathers, churchgoers, and neighbors.

    Welcome to Publicola Court…Justice Barnett presiding…were all Men are guilty until they give up all their worldly possessions to fund light rail.

  • http://pstransitoperators.wordpress.com/ Jeff Welch

    Well, that seems a bit extreme. Are you outside my window right now? Should I be concerned?

  • http://pstransitoperators.wordpress.com/ Jeff Welch

    OK.

  • Anonymous

    LOL – the head leaker who promotes transparency is unhappy that someone has released the documents. And his supporters are calling it a conspiracy, which of course is hypocrisy and a double standard.

    The one who leaked it is a hero to everyone that believes in free speech and open government, which is what Assange keeps on proclaiming.

  • David Sucher

    Why is there even an issue?

    The publicity given to the rape charges is obviously being used by people who don’t like WikiLeaks. In fact it’s _possible_ that the charges are a total fabrication designed specifically to attack Assange.

    But so what?

    The rape charges may in fact be true. So law authorities must investigate. Period.

    Yes Sweden’s establishment is concerned about its own leaks and so they don’t like Assange. So what? If the women’s claim are sufficient for the police & prosecutors to investigate, then of course they have to. Best for Assange to get the whole thing on the table. (I am assuming some integrity of the Swedish legal system.)

    What is there to discuss?