Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Democratic Demiglace

As we’ve noted a couple of times now, the Democratic majority in the state house of representatives has shrunk. It used to be 61-37 and now, after last month’s election and a few recounts, it’s 56-42.

The spin from Democrats—liberal Democrats, anyway—is this: The delegation is no longer watered down with folks who have a “D” by their name, but aren’t really liberal or progressive. So, instead of having to compromise the progressive agenda in their own caucus, the Democrats can now come out strong with a unified, progressive agenda. Think of it as a Democratic demiglace—like when you boil beef stock down to its essence.

This is the spin I heard at the Washington Bus holiday party last Thursday night on Capitol Hill, anyway. “It was a fluke that we had some of those seats anyway,” one lefty activist told me as the shots of tequila were being passed around, referring to the conservative districts that Democrats managed to pick up in the blue waves of 2006 and 2008.

It’s true that a number of conservative-y districts changed hands from Democratic to Republican—moderate Democrats Dawn Morrell (D-25), John Driscoll (D-6), and Kelli Linville (D-42) all lost to Republicans.

So, while that means three more Republicans in the house, it does pump up the theory that there are fewer conservatives in the majority caucus.

Specifically, it equals three fewer conservative votes in the Democratic caucus.

Another seat from a red-ish district that went to Republican was Geoff Simpson’s (D-47) seat. However, Simpson may have been the most progressive member of the caucus, so that actually works against the theory that the caucus is now more progressive.

Net, two fewer conservative votes.

Meanwhile, conservative Democrat Deb Wallace (D-17) retired and was replaced by a Republican.

So, that’s back to three fewer conservative votes in the Democratic caucus.

Meanwhile, four  other moderate-to-conservative Democrats who all retired—Dave Quall (D-40), Lynn Kessler (D-24), Al O’Brien (D-1), and Mark Ericks (D-1) were replaced by more liberal-leaning Democrats Kristine Lytton, Steve Tharinger, Derek Stanford, and Luis Moscoso, respectively.

Net, four more left-leaning votes.

Finally, outspoken liberal Brendan Williams (D-22) retired in disgust. He was replaced by Democrat Chris Reykdal. Still, chalk this one up as a loss for the progressive cause.

Net, three more left leaning votes.

There were also three liberal reps who moved to the senate: Sharon Nelson (D-34), Scott White (D-46), and Maralyn Chase (D-32). They were all replaced by solid Democrats, progressives Joe Fitzgibbon and David Frockt, and Dem Cindy Ryu. I will say, Chase was left-of-the-dial, out there with Simpson and Williams as the caucus’ Bernie Sanders brigade.

So, I’d say, net loss of one left-leaning vote.

If my cursory equation is right, there’s a net of three fewer conservative votes in the Democratic house caucus and two more progressive votes, with five seats changing hands to Republicans.




  • righteous

    Those really liberal members were not influential, and each of those freshmen is beyond powerless. And the voters have given this Democratic legislature a very Republican fiscal policy framework. That’s what matters for this session.

  • righteous

    Those really liberal members were not influential, and each of those freshmen is beyond powerless. And the voters have given this Democratic legislature a very Republican fiscal policy framework. That’s what matters for this session.

  • Canard a l’orange?

    wow, losing equals winning again. two points:

    1. the dems shoulda been able to outvote those conservative dems inside their caucus anyway. so having a few conservatives when you’re way over 50% shouldn’t matter. you saying Tim Sheldon can stare down Frank Chopp?

    2. allusions to demi glace, ooh lah lah. Brilliant commuication metaphor.
    Obviously the intent is to give lie to the canard that democrats are elitsts who can’t communicate to regular folks.

    That sure will help.

    2.

  • Anonymous

    Tharinger is a real piece of work. He is chair of about 4 community groups, a member of about 8 more, and retains his paid position as Clallam County Commissioner, and now thinks he can be a legislator too.

    The state recently bought Tharinger’s 2200 square foot, 5 acre property, for $530,000 so as to do some river widening. Good if you can get it, the price came to about $180/foot sq. And with the proceeds was able to buy a house twice the size, and pocket about $100,000 difference. What makes this stink? Tharinger was Chair of the Board that determined the house purchasing requirement, and there is no written agenda or minutes that mention his recusal. He was connected with the groups that determined the need, provides the funding, and receives the funding.