Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Coalition Unveils Scaled-Back Alt-Transportation Agenda

The Transportation Choices Coalition, which advocates for alternatives to driving alone, unveiled a modest state legislative agenda at a lunchtime forum this afternoon that reflects the sour economic forecast for the state next year. TCC director Rob Johnson launched a lunchtime meeting today by saying, “It’s going to be a really terrible session next year,” a preface to the news that the group will focus its efforts on local transportation funding rather than funding from the state.

In addition to lobbying to preserve language in state law that encourages people to drive less (I wrote about efforts to repeal that legislation here), TCC is seeking, among other things, emergency short-term funding for transit (without which transit agencies like King County Metro face cuts of up to 40 percent); tolling policies that allow tolls to pay for transit, not just road expansion and improvements; a requirement that tolls in high-occupancy transit lanes apply to all cars with fewer than three occupants; new local tax options to pay for transit; and state investments in transit “where appropriate.”

Additionally, TCC’s agenda calls for several proposals that are probably years in the future, including pay-as-you-drive insurance, mandated health-impact assessments on big transportation projects; financial incentives for transit-oriented communities (a tiny nod to the TOC bill that went down in flames last year) and a statewide Complete Streets policy (requiring local jurisdictions to consider all road users, not just drivers, when making road improvements).

The group also discussed the implications of I-1053, the Tim Eyman initiative that requires a two-thirds vote of the state legislature to raise any taxes, including transportation taxes. TCC field director Andrew Austin said 1053 could have a silver lining, because—by making it essentially impossible to raise transportation taxes in the legislature—the measure will force all such taxes to a vote of the people. “The voters want transit, and the voters want safe streets,” Austin said. “We feel that in order to pass a [transportation] revenue package in Washington, the voters in central Puget Sound have to pass it and the voters in central Puget Sound tend to listen to us and our allies on transportation.”

TCC members also discussed the possibility of passing a $50 to $60 vehicle license fee in King County to help keep Metro operating at current levels. Of that total, King County could pass $20 without voter approval; the rest would have to go on a countywide ballot.


  • Grover

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/toronto/rob-ford-takes-aim-at-torontos-light-rail-transit-plan-on-day-1/article1820116/

    Toronto’s newly-elected Mayor took office Wednesday. Some of his first comments:

    “I just wanted to make it quite clear that he understood that Transit City’s over. The war on the car is over.”

    At least one city is beginning to return to the real world. The war on the car is over in Toronto.

  • voter

    So Toronto’s mayor has reinstated the war on transit, pedestrians, and bicycles? If that’s the case, sign me up! I love cities with unidemensional transport systems that force residents to spend thousands of dollars per year to get around while simultaneously making it dangerous or untenable for all other users to move around equitably. Sounds like urban paradise to me!

  • voter

    So Toronto’s mayor has reinstated the war on transit, pedestrians, and bicycles? If that’s the case, sign me up! I love cities with unidemensional transport systems that force residents to spend thousands of dollars per year to get around while simultaneously making it dangerous or untenable for all other users to move around equitably. Sounds like urban paradise to me!

  • voter

    So Toronto’s mayor has reinstated the war on transit, pedestrians, and bicycles? If that’s the case, sign me up! I love cities with unidemensional transport systems that force residents to spend thousands of dollars per year to get around while simultaneously making it dangerous or untenable for all other users to move around equitably. Sounds like urban paradise to me!

  • gloomy gus

    I admire TCC very much, and respect their “holy shit, let’s see what we can actually do” approach.

    And Toronto’s mayor likes to yell, but that doesn’t mean he’ll be able to stop the city’s light rail plan in favor of his subways. Likewise, our mayor sounds off a lot in the press, but that doesn’t mean his plan to stop the tunnel and divert viaduct traffic to our city streets is likely to win the day.Here’s the Globe and Mail’s editorial summary:http://www.theglobeandmail.com…/

  • Barleywine

    I don’t know much about Toronto (but I did live in Sault Sainte Marie for awhile). Isn’t Toronto basically a suburb of Detroit?

    How does Toronto’s newly-elected mayor relate to Seattle?

    I mean, some good music has come out of that town. But good music always comes out of depressed towns. I don’t think cutting-edge environmental policy tends to come out of those towns.

    But maybe the new mayor has beats.

  • gloomy gus

    It’s another city executive belittling another city council.

  • Verd1n

    I believe the initials you stated, “TCC”, are really “TTC”.

    But a great post. Especially the description, “Toronto’s current streetcars are small, overcrowded and tend to block traffic.”

    Now, with that phrase in mind, what’s this nonsense about a Ballard to West Seattle streetcar?

    Just asking.

    Verd1n

  • Mr. X

    Toronto is by far the biggest city in Canada and is an economic powerhouse – it’s hardly some depressed backwater suburb of Detroit.

  • gloomy gus

    The TCC I admire above is Transportation Choices Coalition, referring to the Publicola post topic. Sorry to confuse.

  • Gomez

    Sure, if Vancouver’s a suburb of Seattle.

    Not really.

    Not really.

    And not really.

  • Obamaian

    “”holy shit, let’s see what we can actually do” approach. ” Yeah, just like Obama and the GOP. Give in in advance, then fail to message what you really believe, then lose a midterm, then give in some more.

    Nice NYT op ed today sayin’ all: he is a victim of the Stockholm syndrome. So sure, TCC, go after crumbs from the power elite’s table, a few minor changes here or there. Be realistic. Do NOT make a big deal about opposing the auto lovin’ wasteful DBT, or the train-free 520. Do NOT take strong stands that would lead to folks knowing it’s worthwhile to join your group because you FIGHT. Do NOT do what Ayers and that other guy at the bike group did …you know, stand for something leading to geometric growth in the membership of the group, its budget, and its political throwweight. But DO speak softly and carry no stick at all, and the governor, Chopp, Murray, and city council will like you, let you have a seat at the table and maybe one day we’ll get a smal slice of additional transit stuff as we spend bazillions on the DBT and a non transit oriented 520. Ah yes, the Rasmussen transit plan, billions on DBT then create an additional district to have an extra tax or license fee on cars to bolster tranist. A little bit. Because that’s what the power elite will let you have.

  • Anonymous

    The streets and highways are an ecosystem and as long as we have lanes 12 feet wide and 18-20 foot overhead clearances, you will continue to see giantism in vehicles and completely insufficient thruput of people and materials. Mass transit also has no prospects of anywhere near meeting our requirements, for anything except concentrating people into downtowns, during high-traffic times. We need to divide one lane of every street into two lanes, and install steel goalposts 5 foot wide and 5 feet wide. Nothing larger would be permitted. In due course of time you would have fabulous improvement in thruput, safety, and obviously, speed and fuel efficiency.

  • Barleywine

    I didn’t mean to offend.
    But it’s always seemed to me that the cities along the border mirror those in the US, like Vancouver does Seattle. Not copicats or anything, but topography tends to be similar & culture does, too.

    It might have been Montréal in ’67 where I got my mental picture, so it has yellowed & faded over time. If Toronto’s mayor says the war on cars is over, so be it. I’ll follow.

  • Chris

    I am so frustrated the the (rightly-placed) fiscal conservatism of the new Toronto mayor isn’t being paired with an appreciation of transit and THE best way to prudently spend transportation dollars and reduce total – public and private – expenditures on transportation. Same with Chris Christie in NJ. I agree with his fiscal prudence generally, but on the ARC tunnel he was dead wrong. The new transit investments, paired with conservation (ie carpools, tele-commuting, human-powered transit) have to be contextualized as the least cost alternatives in this environment. If TCC is throwing in the towel on that one at the state level, that’s too bad.