Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

“Hi Mom!”

1. In a surprisingly crowded Wing Luke Museum auditorium last night, dozens of developers, housing advocates, and residents of the South Downtown and International District neighborhoods lined up to criticize portions of the city’s Department of Planning and Development proposal—which, as PubliCola’s Dan Bertolet wrote yesterday, would allow developers to build taller buildings in the neighborhoods south of downtown if they agree to provide incentives like affordable housing and open space.

In general, the concerns broke down into two categories. First, several residents and small business owners told city council members (seated at table up front) that reducing parking requirements and allowing taller buildings would hurt small businesses and increase apartment rents in the neighborhoods south of downtown. “One-hundred fifty feet—that’s really going to increase the price of real estate, and I really think it’s going to drive out some small business owners,” said Julie Pham, managing editor of Northwest Vietnamese News.

Second, a number of folks from the business community argued (along the lines of the point Bertolet made in his editorial) that the “incentives” the city is proposing as part of its incentive zoning proposal aren’t enough to prompt developers to build taller residential buildings in an untested part of town, and in a tough economic climate.

“Developers are not choosing this neighborhood to do new housing,” said Downtown Seattle Association president Kate Joncas, who, like many in the downtown development community, argued that the city should simply increase the “base” zoning height in the area rather than attaching height increases to incentives like low-income housing. “I don’t think there’s a confidence that there would be future development above the base height under this proposal.”

Others, like Pioneer Square developer Marty Goodman, noted that the rents the city’s proposal assumes developers will get for high-rise developments south of downtown are significantly higher than rents in places like downtown Seattle. “They’e assumed that in the south downtown neighborhood now, you can get $3 per square foot per month for an apartment unit,” Goodman said, whereas “currently, the rents are somewhere in the neighborhood of half that. Even if you look at projects in other areas of town, rents are in the neighborhood of $2 a foot.”

And Goodman pointed out another problem raised by the DSA in a letter to the city council yesterday: As long as potential apartment rents remain low, it will make more sense for property owners who own surface parking lots to keep them as parking lots rather than developing them. “The highest and best use for land in South Downtown is still surface parking, and that’s why you see so many surface parking lots,” Goodman said.

Commenters also raised concerns about the committee’s proposed changes to the city’s multi-family code, which they said would excessively constrain developers’ design options. The changes, which the council expects to adopt within the next two weeks, are a response to the rash of ugly townhouses that sprouted around Seattle in the late 2000s.

2. While waiting for the bus at Third and Union last night, PubliCola witnessed Seattle Police Department gang-unit officers confiscate a large silver handgun from a young man they’d apparently just yanked from a Metro bus and pin him to the front of a marked SPD car. (We arrived too late to catch the bus number). The man, who was wearing a black stocking cap and baggy jeans, yelled repeatedly, “I didn’t do anything wrong!” and “My arm hurts!” (the cops had pinned his arm behind his back), to which one of the officers responded, “You’re a convicted felon and you don’t have a license to have a gun.”

With last week’s startling SPD footage in mind, Fizz took out our cell phone and filmed the arrest. The officers evidently had the infamous video on their minds too: About 30 seconds in to the second video, the sergeant in charge looks at our camera and defiantly says, “Hi, Mom!”

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQ6l-0KaxaA[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfVynA0bumk[/youtube]

3. Speaking of police accountability. Be sure to read yesterday’s Afternoon Jolt. Seattle City Council member Nick Licata done good.

4. Sound Transit apparently ran double trains last night (as opposed to their usual nighttime one-car trains) in response to the bus-crippling snowstorm. And it’s a good thing they did: The train Fizz rode was filled to standing-room-only with happy passengers.

Smooth sailing. Thanks to Seattle Transit Blog for the tip on the video:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dmYduyLkjM[/youtube]




  • gloomy gus

    Publicola: we’ll cover any breaking news that occurs where we happen to be at the time, using the latest in how-does-my-phone-video-work-anyways technology.

  • Morgan

    The incentive zoning program is not going to slow development in South Downtown. Development will happen in South Downtown when the economy is right, and when people begin to invest in nicer streets and parks. Isn’t that what incentive zoning is supposed to do?

  • MVH

    I like my news photography sideways.

  • Perfect Voter

    Can’t believe that public meeting at Wing Luke wasn’t cancelled. I hope all the attendees lived within walking distance, otherwise I’m sure some didn’t get home until this morning.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    The story is slanted, the situation didn’t go sideways.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    Yes, people that knowingly buy homes without yards must be given public yards in order for people to buy the yardless home.

    I think that we are compensating developers for the restriction we place on them, then we lift the restrictions anyway.

  • http://twitter.com/fattailed fattailed

    Developers complain that every incentive proposal doesn’t provide enough incentive, because what they always want is incentives that give them free money for projects that would be profitable without any incentive.

  • Barb

    All hail light rail! Hooray for Sound Transit

  • http://www.joeszilagyi.com/ Joe Szilagyi

    And the role of government, of course, isn’t to help people better monetize their projects.

  • http://www.joeszilagyi.com/ Joe Szilagyi

    Makes you wonder what the attendance would have been had they rescheduled for the weather.

  • seandr

    This video gave me a kink in my neck, and Mr. Baker may have permanently injured my sense of humor. :-)

  • Jakers

    Here’s to all the people that complain about light rail shutting down when there is an accident/blockage on the line.

  • Jakers

    Here’s to all the people that complain about light rail shutting down when there is an accident/blockage on the line.

  • seandr

    “Hi Mom!” Love it. That should be an official part of SPD officer training.

  • seandr

    “Hi Mom!” Love it. That should be an official part of SPD officer training.

  • Anonymous

    The issue I have with the height increases is that they fail to address the underlying problem. Currently, demand for housing in the neighborhood is low, due to the perceived unattraciveness of the area. This means that market rents are low, making developer revenues low enough not to be profitable.

    Since much of developers costs are wrapped up in fixed costs, increasing heights essentially lowers the per-unit cost of development, making it more attractive for development.

    The underlying assumption is that this decrease in supply costs will somehow increase demand, and I don’t think this is true at all. To me Belltown is a perfect example of this.

    The incentive portion is supposed to add community benefits which increase demand, but ultimately this is an inefficient system. By definition the benefits to developers have to be more than the benefits to the community for them to still want to build.

    Personally, I think if Seattle really wants to help the neighborhood they should suck it up and invest some real money in the area. A development authority which could help finance projects that the city deems especially beneficial to the neighborhood (North Lot project anyone?) I think would go much further than an height incentive program.

  • ReDeveloper

    By that logic, providing no incentives at all would mean that we would have exactly the amount of development we currently have in exactly the same form. As a developer (albeit a minor one), from my perspective, a LOT of projects would never move forward if municipalities did not provide incentives. What is wrong with providing incentives if the municipality requires disincentives?