Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

McGinn to Council: I Won’t Help You Cut My Budget

In response to pointed questions from city council president Richard Conlin last week about the mayor’s budget priorities, Mayor Mike McGinn sent a letter to the entire city council this morning reiterating what his budget director, Beth Goldberg, told Conlin last week: Every item in the mayor’s transportation budget, which would use a five-percent increase in the commercial parking tax and higher parking meter rates to fund sidewalks, bike paths, and the South Park Bridge, is a priority.

During last week’s budget committee meeting, Conlin pressed Goldberg to tell him what the mayor’s top priorities are if (as is likely) the city council doesn’t adopt some of McGinn’s proposed new fees and taxes. If the council has to make cuts, Conlin wanted to know, what were the mayor’s top priorities? Goldberg dodged the question, saying only that “a budget is a way of articulating priorities.”

Today’s four-page letter, replete with bolds, italics, and 22 instances of the word “priority,” lays out the mayor’s budget process at great length, noting repeatedly that McGinn’s budget “preserved high priority services” but still required additional revenues—an increase to the commercial parking tax and parking-meter rates—to fund everything the mayor considered high-priority.

By asking the council to raise those revenues, the letter says, “my budget makes a clear priority statement – that additional reductions to SDOT’s budget would degrade services at a rate that is unacceptable to me, and that it is critical that we find funding to support our most important future funding obligations.”

Cute language aside, what McGinn’s telling the council is this: It isn’t his job to help them come up with cuts to his budget. If they want to make cuts, they’ll have to decide what to cut themselves. By doing so, McGinn is putting the council on the hook for whatever they end up cutting (contrary to the story McGinn and some transit proponents are pushing, the council can cut from anywhere in SDOT’s budget; they don’t have to cut the projects that would be funded by the parking tax and fee increases) and sidestepping responsibility when they fail to pass his proposed tax and fee increases.

Once the council passes its budget without McGinn’s proposals in November, watch for the mayor to issue a disappointed statement blaming the council and its “different priorities” for cutting funds for popular programs like the bike master plan, sidewalks, and the South Park Bridge.




  • alexjon

    Conlin is trying to dismantle increases to parking rates by making it appear that they can just magically move money to the “top” priorities. This is silly, petty, and more pandering to his hysterical anti-progressive base.

    Why can’t we increase parking costs? One’s a percentage and is literal pennies per person per park and the other is an increase that is still FAR BELOW the average off-street parking rate, according to studies from PSRC and cited by the “you can’t raise parking rates” DSA on their own website: http://www.downtownseattle.com/content/businesses/Parking.cfm

  • tpn

    The Council should just cut all of McGinn’s funding proposals across the board, since they are equal priority, and in doing so, perhaps restore some of the proposed cuts his office offers in aushc a slipshod matter. That would teach him to be unspecific about priorities.

  • tpn

    world’s worst typo, that one there.

  • Jenny

    I disagree that the mayor is “sidestepping responsibility”.

    As a co-equal branch of government, the legislative branch should assert its priorities if it doesn’t want to approve revenue increases.

  • http://www.joeszilagyi.com/ Joe Szilagyi

    If the Council doesn’t like this budget they can cut it. That’s how it works.Are they afraid to have the negatives of cuts attached to their names? Tough shit. You signed up for the job, both the good and the bad. Are you worried that the tough decisions may impact your chances of re-election? Tough shit. You signed up for the job, both the good and the bad. You’re not entitled to be on the Council (or Mayor’s office) indefinitely or even more than one term. You’re only there as long as feel like you’re a value to us. Right now, thanks to the economy, this is how it is. Do your job.

  • http://www.joeszilagyi.com/ Joe Szilagyi

    If the Council doesn’t like this budget they can cut it. That’s how it works.Are they afraid to have the negatives of cuts attached to their names? Tough shit. You signed up for the job, both the good and the bad. Are you worried that the tough decisions may impact your chances of re-election? Tough shit. You signed up for the job, both the good and the bad. You’re not entitled to be on the Council (or Mayor’s office) indefinitely or even more than one term. You’re only there as long as feel like you’re a value to us. Right now, thanks to the economy, this is how it is. Do your job.

  • jonathan

    Yeah, it sounds like the council just wants to give out good news to their downtown pals and let McGinn give out the corresponding bad news.

    No way Mr. Conlin, if you cut revenues you have to say where the spending cuts should be.

  • Anonymous

    I can’t wait to see what the press releases would look like if such a policy put the South Park Bridge a few million short.

  • KCW

    The reverse holds true for the Mayor … if everything is equal priority then the Council can cut Walk Bike & Ride at the expense of the South Park Bridge. McGinn can’t complain because everything is supposedly an equal priority, so they can claim the moral high ground by citing social justice concerns or whatever explanation they like over bikes.

    Every day, another schooling for a Mayor in way over his head and too stubborn or stupid to realize it.

  • sarah

    He did his job, just as every Mayor before him has done, by sending the Council his budget. Now they have to do theirs.

  • Anonymous

    It’s pretty simple: the mayor’s budget items ARE his priorities. Does the council think he was just sort of musing out loud or writing a list for Santa Claus when the budget staff worked for weeks to get this done? Come on.

    McGinn is absolutely right to call out the council for trying to make him identify the cuts the council wants to make, instead of the council doing that difficult work themselves. The council needs to identify THEIR priorities. And budget accordingly. They can’t make McGinn look like the bad guy, much as they are going to try.

  • hmk

    So now the South Park Bridge is important to Mike McGinn?

    Let’s set the record straight: Seattle City Council committed funding to the South Park Bridge – not the Mayor. They made the commitment in full awareness of the budget crisis, and likely would not have done so if they didn’t have a funding mechanism already in place.

    Using South Park in this way is just wrong. Makes me sick how McGinn uses poorer communities in his political ploys.

  • Anonymous

    “Cute language aside, what McGinn’s telling the council is this: It isn’t his job to help them come up with cuts to his budget. If they want to make cuts, they’ll have to decide what to cut themselves.”

    Also called passing the buck.

    Whats funny is that while the mayor might win some hypothetical political points with the few hundred people who pay that much attention, he is losing the ability to actually make sure that what he cares about gets done. He is putting politics over governing, which is not at all surprising, but still disappointing.

    If I were the Council I would ignore his budget entirely and craft one they want, pass it by a veto proof majority, and move on. McGinn’s a joke at this point to all but his fanboys and nothing he is doing is looking to change that.

  • Anonymous

    Priorities come in levels. Food, water, and travel are all priorities to me, but guess which one I cut first when times are tough? Asking the mayor which things he cares most about is not out of line. In fact it seems like a pretty standard thing to ask.

  • Anonymous

    You’re both buying the political speak. The Council wants McGinn to stick his neck out further than it already is (which is pretty far, already cutting things that people love like community centers) to protect themselves politically, and McGinn is refusing to (which is his right). This is a non-issue.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr Baker

    They fund the bridge, and the $20 car fee pays for a broader set of transportation items.

    Do you people remember yesterday?

  • cosmopolis

    Umm, did everyone forget McGinn’s pitch to Council at the end of his budget proposal, barely a month ago:
    “I welcome vigorous discussion of the budget choices, even argument around the choices I made and the choices you will make [but] if you consider changes, talk to us,” McGinn said. “Our budget director, our staff, and our department heads will be available to you so that you can fully consider the pros and cons of the decisions I’ve made before determining a path.”
    http://www.publicola.net/2010/09/27/mcginn-to-council-talk-to-me-about-budget/

  • Selma

    Yeah, but you weren’t supposed to take that seriously. It’s only what McGinn says right now (….and right now! and now! …and now!) that’s real.

  • Grover

    “popular programs like the bike master plan”

    The bike master plan is popular with whom? The 3 percent of people who commute on bikes?

  • Selma

    It’s that durn Seattle blog echo chamber again. Just because Publicola carved out the bike lane beat for itself doesn’t actually mean that most of Seattle cares about it.

  • MVH

    Congratulations! I was wondering when somebody was going to remember that piece.

  • eric

    The fact that McGinn calls virtually everything in his budget a priority illustrates the fact that he doesn’t understand the meaning of the word priority. Fail.

  • eric

    The fact that McGinn calls virtually everything in his budget a priority illustrates the fact that he doesn’t understand the meaning of the word priority. Fail.

  • Jenny

    So to you, a “vigorous discussion of the budget choices” can simply be Conlin saying “No I don’t like it”?

  • MVH

    No, but that’s not what he said. He said: “If we decide against any one of the mayor’s multiple tax increase proposals, which projects would he like us to cut?”

    At which point, the mayor hid behind his budget staff and refused to participate in a vigorous discussion of the budget choices.

  • KaySue1

    I’m with you. Watching TV news I saw sports fans protesting as if they are the people who are making decisions at the cost margin. They normally car-pool, too, making the shared cost a pretty small price to pay to park–on or off the street.

    The City’s fee increases always lag behind the market and do not keep up with COLA each year; a fee increase requires a City ordinance–either separate legislation or via the budget process. So it’s always in “catch-up” mode. Compare this to the cost of off-street (i.e. private lot or garage) fees.

    In addition, increasing the price of parking is the most cost-effective way to increase use of public transportation and car-pooling–and I think that’s a goal we say we have.

  • KaySue1

    The Bike Master Plan is popular with the growing number of cyclists who commute and recreate. (And, I’m not one–for the record.) It’s an inexpensive benefit. May I suggest a bigger target–the State and the $30 million that we spend subsidizing Sounder riders each year? I like the Sounder. But isn’t it time those riders started to bear a larger share of the cost? Yes, it’s a different pot of money–but remember, each “pot” comes from the same pocket–yours and mine. And can you spell “South Lake Union Trolley,” how much was the public subsidy to benefit a very small piece of public transportation, compared to the amount put up by the local businesses (Vulcan, et al) who lobbied for it? Lots bigger things to pick on.

  • BSdetector

    Yes, It’s way more cost effective to increase transit use by making driving suck than it is to actually make using transit a desirable way to travel. God forbid we make transit safe and efficient so people actually want to take it.