Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

PubliCola No-Brainer Endorsement #30: Joe Fitzgibbon

Last week, we published 27 “No-Brainer” endorsements for the November 2 election. We realized, though, before we study up and make the rest of our endorsements, there are still a few obvious picks on the ballot. About five more to be exact.

(Yesterday we added “Yes” on R-52 to our No-Brainer list, and on Tuesday we added “Yes” on King County Prop. 1 to the list.)

Here’s the the 3rd addition to the No-Brainer list.

State Rep., 34th District, Position 2: PubliCola picks Joe Fitzgibbon

In the last few months, 34th district House candidate Joe Fitzgibbon has gotten a lot of support from local progressive bastions like the Sierra Club, Fuse, the Washington Bus, and Progressive Majority. He even got several shoutouts this morning, in fact, at the Washington Conservation Voters breakfast fundraiser, where just about every Seattle progressive was on hand.

Progressives adore Fitzgibbon because of his super-informed opinions on progressive issues, which he picked up during his time as a legislative aide to progressive coalition leader state Rep. Sharon Nelson (D-34) (who got the WCV Legislator of the Year at this morning’s breakfast, by the way, and name-checked Fitzgibbon during her acceptance speech as one of two important men in her life.)

Fitzgibbon has pledged to reintroduce the vulnerable users bill, imposing harsher sentences on drivers who strike pedestrians or cyclists; push a bill taxing companies that pollute waterways with hazardous substances; and he says he’ll try to pass a bill forcing “limited-service pregnancy centers” to disclose the exact services they provide (for example, anti-choice rhetoric, instead of abortions).

His supporters are also excited by the Fitzgibbon paradox of youth and experience—at the age of 24, Fitzgibbon already chairs the planning commission in Burien, arguing for shoreline protection against irritable residents, and worked with Nelson to limit the predatory practices of payday lenders like Moneytree—overdue legislation in Olympia.

We, too, like Fitzgibbon’s policy-paper brains and 21st century agenda. (Here’s our primary endorsement.) But what we really like about his candidacy is this: He’s created an identifiable constituency of activists, environmentalists, and progressives who want action. Constituencies hold politicians accountable. Too often, sleepy legislators are sent to Olympia from Seattle’s 100 percent blasé Democratic base. Yes, we’re confident they’ll vote the right way on choice or whatever, but we hardly give them a defined mandate, or any backup.

We think a strong progressive constituency will empower Fitzgibbon to get right to work on his to-do list (which also includes support for tax reform a la a state income tax and a value-added tax.)

In our endorsement interview, Fitzgibbon said the most valuable lesson he learned while working under Rep. Nelson was to gather like-minded legislators under a shared idea. “Persuasion is less of the equation,” Fitzgibbon says. “You have to mobilize allies and stakeholders.”

Consider us mobilized, Joe. But also consider us stakeholders. You’ve revved us up. Now you’re accountable.

We don’t have much to complain about with regard to Fitzgibbon’s opponent, Mike Heavey, an aide to County Council Member Jan Drago. In fact, Heavey lines up with PubliCola on one of our big editorial issues—education reform. Heavey’s been outspoken, arguing for holding teachers more accountable. Here, Heavey departs most starkly from Fitzgibbon, who’s in lockstep with the Democratic/teachers’ union establishment. We applaud Heavey for siding with ed reformers on these tough issues. As Heavey said in our endorsement interview, “It comes down to the teachers union, and they’re really uncomfortable with using students’ growth data.”

That said, this one is another PubliCola “No-Brainer.” Fitzgibbon’s given voters a real opportunity to up the ante in Olympia: Seattle liberals, all in.




  • Ty

    If this were a “no brainer” you would not have felt compelled to write such a lengthy, and one sided explanation. This choice does not in any way fall into what someone might surmise as being a “no-brainer”. A “no-brainer” to most on this blog is more like anything put forth by the Eyman enterprise. Or another “no-brainer” would be Murray over Rossi.

    Instead I would have appreciated a more in depth crosswalk of both candidates on the issues. With the new top two primary, we now have two very good candidates. I think you are all capable of doing some in depth analysis which would be more helpful than a one sided promotion.

  • Trevor

    I’m not a Heavey supporter. But there are lots of young people who flirt with lefty politics for a nanosecond and then become career corporate liberals. The fact is that incumbents are basically in office for life in liberal districts like the 34th. I wish Joe the best and would vote for him this year if I could. But it is a very rare individual who is able to be a visionary politician without having had substantial social movement experience. And being promoted by a group of liberal-left insiders is not the same thing as being elected by a group of social movement leaders. If you haven’t seen politicians betray you after you helped elect them, you’re not likely to be able to recognize the turning points in your own career when you are encouraged to think that your own interests in getting reelected trump the interests of the people you claim to represent.

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    According to the Copenhagen Post, Danes are getting fat.

    This is due to the tunnel they just built.

    The Science is settled: Tunnels make you fat, just like Danes.

    Danes’ girth growing
    http://www.cphpost.dk/news/politics/50127.html?task=view

  • Ty

    fair enough, but that stuff is from way back in May.

    I am currently undecided, and in previous years, I may have had a “no brainer” choice since there would have been a Republican and a Democrat and I will usually vote D. The new top two primary has produced, and will continue to produce more interesting and nuanced choices for voters. This is a refreshing change in my opinion, and makes this choice a “brainer”.

  • MVH

    A good point. There has been a real dearth of political reporting across the board in the media since the primary election (not including the many Dino-Patty horserace stories). I guess reporters just figure folks have already made up their minds.

  • kurisu

    I agree with everything you say except how it in any way it applies to Joe Fitzgibbon. He gets how Olympia works.

  • wk9

    If you look at the money, it is the same as a Dem v. GOP race. Heavy gets $$$ from the BIAW, Fitzgibbon gets it from labor, enviros and choice groups. Dont get confused by the party labels.

  • Anonymous

    If you follow the money, its clear that there is only one true Democrat. Heavy gets his money from the BIAW and other business interests. Fitzgibbon gets his from labor, enviros, pro-choice ppl, etc. Not that nuanced when you dig a little deeper then party label.

  • ivan

    For once I agree with kurisu. Competence in building relationships, knowledge of policy issues and the legislative process, and a strong commitment to putting working families first are rare enough in Olympia that we can celebrate and support them without also requiring that our legislators be “visionary,” whatever the hell that means and whoever is to decide.

    Joe Fitzgibbon meets all these requirements — especially putting working families first. Plus, at age 24, he has a terrific upside, and his constuents, who hardly can be said to be asleep at the switch, will hold him to high standards. Yes, Ty, this one IS a no-brainer.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    When weren’t you endorsing Joe?

    Did you scores 100% on Sinderman’s list?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    Exactly my point yesterday, point of use friction heat generation (rubbing your hands together) both makes Calories and burns calories.

    Risking complete callapse of their city (literally and physically) with the earth pressure balancing deep bore tunneling nonsense should not encourage use of unproven technology here.

  • MVH

    Is that like Schindler’s List?

  • i’mjustsaying

    Once again, no mention of Claudia Kauffman in the 47th? I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again:
    It’s the ultimate no brainer, Sen. Kauffman progressive where it matters, but works and plays well with both sides of the aisle. She is also up against the Republican’s annointed golden boy, Joe Fain, who won’t say where he stands on any issue (other than that he won’t raise taxes, of course, and wants smaller government). Joe Fain also just moved to the 47th and bought a $450,000 house -apparently, his King Co. staffer job pays pretty well and that whole smaller government thing doesn’t apply to him.

  • Jeffuppy

    Trevor, you’re exactly right about what happens to young idealistic lefty politicians once they find themselves with a tiny smidge of power. Most of the time. This is exactly why when I look for candidates to support I don’t look much at policy positions etc. Instead I spend a lot of time trying to get a read on the character of the candidate and the foundation and firmness of their beliefs. And it’s why I get excited about very few Dem candidates.

    I believe Joe has a much much better shot than average of not drinking the coolaid. I’ve spent many many hours with Joe over the last few years and I believe he is indeed the real deal. I agree with what you say about social movement experience (unlike Ivan, whom I suspect has no idea what you mean). But I truly believe that Joe IS in fact that rare exception you speak of. And I’m a damn hard sell. For whatever it’s worth.

  • Chris Kissel

    Ty, we’ve done a ton of news reporting on this race, including lengthy features on both candidates, back when their campaigns were just getting started (not to mention our coverage of all the 34th endorsement meetings and plenty on what the candidates have been up to around the district).

    http://www.publicola.net/2010/05/12/mike-heavey-county-aide-political-heir-seeks-open-house-seat/
    http://www.publicola.net/2010/05/07/joe-fitzgibbon-young-technocrat-has-eyes-on-olympia/

  • ivan

    Don’t ASSume what I know or don’t know about social movements. I thought you knew better than that.

  • Anonymous

    I just like giving you shit.

  • Lollyco

    Joe F. doen’t believe in transparency nor in listening to the citizens. When he was on the Burien Planning Committee he refused to say his name nor where he lived. In a public meeting to discuss Shoreline Management Joe told me, a citizen, to be quiet and sit down, that we the citizens had no right to know where he lived, nor even his name. He yelled at me saying he didn’t have to tell any of this information to the citizens at this public meeting. At a later meeting, another committe member told me Joe wasn’t the only member who didn’t live in Burien – she didn’t either. This is clearly against the Burien Council rules. All attempts to get any information on the committee members or proof of living in Burien have failed. Try to find an address on Mr. Fitzgibbons. He wanted to be on the Burien committee to further his own personal references and unrealistic enviornmental agenda – like removing all bulkheads in Burien. Not a good plan if you like the roads that boarder the Sound. But science doesn’t count in planning if you’re Mr. Fitzgibbons. Where exactly is he registered to vote? What address is on his driver’s license? I’m betting it’s not a Burien address. However, Mr. Fitzgibbon doesn’t believe intransparency – because he knows what’s right for all of us. Mr. Fitzgibbon told us at the meetings for public comment that he didn’t need to listen to public comment. This ISN’T who I want representing me in Olympia. He only wants to represent Joe’s personal agenda. Voters beware!

  • Lollyco

    Joe F. doen’t believe in transparency nor in listening to the citizens. When he was on the Burien Planning Committee he refused to say his name nor where he lived. In a public meeting to discuss Shoreline Management Joe told me, a citizen, to be quiet and sit down, that we the citizens had no right to know where he lived, nor even his name. He yelled at me saying he didn’t have to tell any of this information to the citizens at this public meeting. At a later meeting, another committe member told me Joe wasn’t the only member who didn’t live in Burien – she didn’t either. This is clearly against the Burien Council rules. All attempts to get any information on the committee members or proof of living in Burien have failed. Try to find an address on Mr. Fitzgibbons. He wanted to be on the Burien committee to further his own personal references and unrealistic enviornmental agenda – like removing all bulkheads in Burien. Not a good plan if you like the roads that boarder the Sound. But science doesn’t count in planning if you’re Mr. Fitzgibbons. Where exactly is he registered to vote? What address is on his driver’s license? I’m betting it’s not a Burien address. However, Mr. Fitzgibbon doesn’t believe intransparency – because he knows what’s right for all of us. Mr. Fitzgibbon told us at the meetings for public comment that he didn’t need to listen to public comment. This ISN’T who I want representing me in Olympia. He only wants to represent Joe’s personal agenda. Voters beware!