Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Breaking: Cascade Bicycle Club Director Asked to Leave

This post has been updated to include comments from former Cascade Bicycle Director Chuck Ayers.

The board of the Cascade Bicycle Club has asked the group’s longtime executive director, Chuck Ayers to resign, effective immediately. He will be replaced at least temporarily by Peter Morgan, a Cascade board member who is stepping down from the board to serve as interim executive director until a permanent director can be found.

Contacted by phone, Ayers said that he and the board “have been having disagreements on how best to grow the Club and the direction of our advocacy work for quite a while. They wanted to go a different direction. I disagreed with that.” He said his personal organizing style, along with advocacy director David Hiller’s, was “more along the lines of grassroots, on the ground style organizing, and I think that the board believes that we’ve matured to a point where that kind of advocacy doesn’t make sense.”

Ayers has been head of Cascade since 1997.

In a statement, Cascade board chair Chris Weiss said, “While we are grateful for these and other accomplishments during his tenure, the Board has made the decision that Chuck is no longer the right person to lead Cascade into its next phase of growth and opportunity.”

“A revitalized leadership will bring fresh perspectives and ideas that enable us to remain committed to focusing on the grassroots power and passion of cyclists to improve their lives and the life of their communities.”

Weiss did not shed any light on why Ayers was asked to leave. There has long been tension within Cascade about whether the 13,000-member group should be primarily a bicycling club, organizing rides and promoting recreational cycling, or an advocacy group, pushing for changes to state law and additional spending on bike infrastructure.

According to board member Tim Hennings, Ayers’ departure does not signal a change in policy by the group. “We’re 100 percent committed to [Cascade's] existing policy positions, including the lawsuit [against the Puget Sound Regional Council, over its Transportation 2040 plan], the completion of the Burke-Gilman Trail, and candidate endorsements,” Hennings said.

He said that as the Club expands, the board decided it needed “strong organizational leadership, and that’s where we feel we need a new executive.”

“This is a very, very big deal in the cycling community,” Hennings said. “We understand that. This was not a decision that was made lightly at all.”

Cascade advocacy director David Hiller said he couldn’t comment on the decision.




  • http://www.derekmyoung.com Derek Young

    I’m guessing he got caught parking a Hummer downtown in a bike lane.

  • Paul R

    It seems to me that Cascade is at the height of its successes– and to leave its executive director by the side of the road right now seems to be a stunningly poor choice by the board. I’d love to know their story. How connected are they to Cascade or are they just a bunch of old, white men who think they have the pulse of the cycling community?

  • another ED bites the dust

    hmm, two local environmental advocacy groups are now without EDs. Maybe there’s a deeper story here.

  • Steve M

    If CBC wants the continued strong support of its thousands of members they will come clean with the real story here. To not do so risks the loyalty and enthusiasm of its members. Really sorry to see Chuck go, unless there’s a darn good reason we don’t know of yet . . .

  • I. Ponder

    I hope Publicola can get to the bottom of this story. Usually they say “he’s leaving to spend more time with his family”.

  • Michael M.

    Viagra?

  • Johns

    Chuck is a great human being and I, too, look forward to hearing the Board’s explanation for asking him to depart. He’s served the organization very, very well.

  • Johns

    Chuck is a great human being and I, too, look forward to hearing the Board’s explanation for asking him to depart. He’s served the organization very, very well.

  • Tim

    Maybe he was resisting turning the club into Critical mAssholes?

  • Barleywine

    I sounds like Chuck is pre-announcing Hiller’s future, too.

  • DL

    Having worked on State, Regional, and City transportation policy for the past decade, I consider it a privilege to get to know Chuck. He has a level head, listens more than he speaks, and has a rare combination of vision and patience. These traits and his glowing successes as a leader mean that he will be a difficult act to follow. The cocky and ungracious statement I received from their board saddens me and seems a poor omen for CBC’s future.

    The board should have been falling over backward with superlatives and appreciation in this announcement. I hope they will apply the balance of my dues toward a respectable sabbatical for him.

  • threatened much?

    Wow. What is this board afraid of, the grass roots approach might take it from 13,000 up to 25,000 in the next five years as folks become more and more into cycling? That’s a bad thing? WTflying F?

    I’d be interested to know. Do the members elect the board or is it a board appointed board ?

  • gloomy gus

    No kidding, DL. How does this help CBC find the best replacement, either? “Come lead us and work with our board, and know that in the end they’ll kick you to the curb with a damningly praise-free PR release! “

  • NightHawks

    Chuck and David were effective, smart people; we all lose with their departure.

  • Barleywine

    I know sometimes the union leadership isn’t on the same page as the union membership, and maybe it’s the same here.

    http://bikeintelligencer.com/2009/08/behind-cascade-bicycle-clubs-snub-of-bikin-mike/

  • Anonymous

    I withdrew from the CBC because I was uncomfortable with its aggressive advocacy. I didn’t like the idea of a cycling club taking political positions. I particularly resented the ‘list of candidates to support’ sent out every political season. I hope this change signals a move back to a club of people who just enjoy riding their bikes.

  • Patrick

    You don’t need a 13,000 member organization to go enjoy a ride – just go ride. The only point of banding together so many pro-cycling voices is to influence the inherently political process of setting transportaton policy and laws so that you can safely take that ride.

  • Barleywine

    “I hope this change signals a move back to a club of people who just enjoy riding their bikes.”

    It doesn’t sound like it, but it’s confusing. Do they want to double the membership AND get away from the agressive advocacy? Maybe you were the one that broke their back.

    From the Times:

    “There has been some tension between the board and Chuck about a variety of management issues over a period of time,” said Peter Morgan, a board member serving as interim director. Morgan said the board is grateful for Ayers’ work, but wants a new leader who can double its membership and deal with increased complexity.

    Ayers said Monday the board thinks bigger is better, and wants more of a business model, rather than a community-organization model.

    Political advocacy is a friction point as Cascade pushes with other groups to add bike lanes, trails and city funding for non-car projects, causing a backlash among some drivers. “I think they [the board] take a very PC approach and are afraid of people getting a little angry at us,” said Ayers.

  • DOUG.

    Funny. I didn’t renew my CBC membership because of their lack of aggressive advocacy (the endorsement of Nickels being the final straw).

  • Deeply Skeptical

    If the Board really believes they’ve “matured to a point where that kind of advocacy doesn’t make sense”, that’s usually code for ‘we’re hiring an Olympia lobbyist to do all our advocacy for us.’

    Which means goodbye advocacy on behalf of members (bikers), and hello advocacy on behalf of the organization (Board). Prepare for many more compromises and hard-to-defend positions…

  • Steve M

    Respectfully disagree, djbinoz and agree with Patrick below. If you want to enjoy a bike ride, get on your bike and go, or Facebook some friends and gather a group ride. If you want to change public policy regarding funding, infrastructure and laws favorable to bicycles, gather thousands of folks together as a advocacy group and in a civilized way let your voices be heard. The latter, in addition to organizing incredible group rides and educating newer riders, is what CBC has done under Chuck & David’s leadership.

  • http://www.charlesredell.com/blog Charles

    Yeah I gotta say, if this is the end of grassroots advocacy and a return to just being a bicycle club or a shift to Olympia-style advocacy with a lot of compromises to get very little done, I’m done with CBC and switching my membership to the Bicycle Alliance. But, I’ll wait to pass judgment till the real story comes out.

  • http://www.charlesredell.com/blog Charles

    Yeah I gotta say, if this is the end of grassroots advocacy and a return to just being a bicycle club or a shift to Olympia-style advocacy with a lot of compromises to get very little done, I’m done with CBC and switching my membership to the Bicycle Alliance. But, I’ll wait to pass judgment till the real story comes out.

  • Thebarry

    I think that it might be time to start coming up with names of our new grass-roots bicycle advocacy group. We’ll need a leader. I hear that Chuck Ayers is available!

  • sigh

    Since advocacy is and has been a part of Cascade’s mission as far back as I can recall (read that as early ’80s), I would expect them to be providing membership with lists of candidates that the club endorses. The organization acts on behalf of the membership, but doesn’t vote for them. Part of the job of any advocacy is group is to inform its members/supporters of the candidates who will support the organizational goals.

    Now if you’ve been uncomfortable with the shift to “aggressive advocacy” (not sure what you mean by that, or that they have been actually aggressive to begin with), did you make your voice heard to the board/membership when the advocacy goals and approaches were developed?

  • Solstare

    that’s what BAW does. They are the advocacy group getting things done in Olympia.

  • Solstare

    that’s what BAW does. They are the advocacy group getting things done in Olympia.

  • Off We Go

    I dropped my long term CBC membership for this exact reason. I told them in a survey why I dropped out. Then I corresponded with Chuck about this specific issue. I did not like their support of candidates at all, particularly on the Eastside where I live. I didn’t feel they knew the candidates positions on bicycle transportation but were becoming a shill for the demos.

  • Bike Girl

    David can be a rather challenging personality to get along with, but I always thought of Chuck as the good cop to David’s bad cop. There are many smart people out there who could step in and lead the organization to a new phase. It will be interesting to watch where they go next. A different “tone” might be a good thing.

  • point83 admin

    seize the day ben greening, seize the day!

  • None

    This question is key to the present and future situation.

    It used to be a member-elected board. Members could nominate people to the slate of candidates.

    A recent by-law change turned it into a board-appointed board. That is, only the board can nominate candidates. While there are still elections, it is purely a formality as there is no mechanism to reject the board nominees.

  • Guest

    “I hope this change signals a move back to a club of people who just enjoy riding their bikes.”

    No, I suspect it is exactly the opposite. It is a change away from a being a club (ie member driven) and becoming a board-driven organization.

  • tpn

    It’s not the same. Union members elect their leaders. CBC does not.

  • Mad Rad

    One can only hope.

  • Barleywine

    Union members may elect their leaders, but those leaders may go astray.

    I wrote something about the Cath-lic church, and Martin L-ther, and how maybe sometimes you have to reform the current thing, or split.

    That got nixed.

  • Sami Wistler

    Good news