Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Business Community: No New Fees or Taxes, But We Still Want the Tunnel

Representatives of Seattle’s business community gathered in a noisy warehouse in SoDo this morning to decry a proposal by Mayor Mike McGinn to close a $67 million city budget gap, in part, by raising utility taxes and parking rates and to extend paid-parking hours. However, pressed repeatedly to suggest revenue sources they would support, the business representatives fell back on sound bites about excessive city spending on “unaffordable luxuries” and the need for revenues that don’t disproportionately impact the business community.

“Seattle has a spending problem,” said Joe Quintana, head of the Seattle Business Coalition. “Seattle’s got to get out of denial and stop spending so much” instead of raising utility rates, Quintana said. Pressed to identify potential savings, Quintana said the city should hire private contractors for things like street signs and utility call centers; during his campaign, McGinn pledged to reduce the number of outside contractors hired by the city.

Asked (by persistent Seattle P-I reporter Chris Grygiel) whether Seattle’s business community might eventually see the tunnel, which is funded in part by the very utility taxes the business owners were criticizing, as an “unaffordable luxury,” Chamber spokesman George Allen said, “The number one prioirity [of the business community] is public safety: police, fire, and construction of the tunnel and seawall. … We feel that the tunnel is a public safety project [and that] the city government’s resources should be focused in that direction first.”

Tango restaurant owner Travis Rosenthal, meanwhile, objected primarily to higher parking meter rates and longer meter hours, which he said would be devastating to the restaurant industry and would send restaurantgoers fleeing to places like Bellevue, where parking is cheap or free. McGinn has proposed raising parking rates from $2 to $3.50 per hour downtown and from $2 to $2.50 in other parts of the city.

“It seems our mayor has a strong disgust for cars and a strong love for bikes. And I respect that, but unfortunately, cars bring my restaurant its guests,” Rosenthal said. “When I look at Seattle city streets, I do not see thousands of bikes on the road right now. I do not see light rail or monorail or streetcar on my commute.”

Similarly, Fremont Chamber of Commerce director Jessica Vets said that although Fremont does have more than 500 free parking spaces, “everyone who comes to Fremont will have to pay more in parking” for the 72 spaces that aren’t free.




  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    Seattle’s idea of a diet:

    Put a half a teaspoon less powdered sugar onto the Blueberry Waffles with Syrup and Butter (tunnel fund waiting to be spent on real stuff: 3 Billion)

  • You

    If these business leaders were really serious about public safety, they would close the Viaduct down now (or at least in 2012 when Gregoire “promised” to do so). Instead, they’re happy keeping this hazard to the public up until 2016 when it is replaced by the tunnel. Huh.

  • elenchos

    The irony is that privately owned parking lots will tow you if you park there for hours on end. Those private spaces are there for short-term parking only by paying customers and camping there all day is not tolerated.

    But retailers and restaurateurs think letting people leave their cars long-term at no charge in the spaces in front of their businesses somehow helps them? Is that what they would do if those parking spaces were the property of their business? Not on your life.

  • Mikeg

    yes, all diners will waste time, gas and tolls fleeing seattle to dine in bellevue, because of a 50 cent parking meter increase…

    considering tango is in one of the most walkable neighborhood of seattle… i am guessing rosenthal doesn’t know his clientele very well… why is this town full of so many idiots?

  • gloomy gus

    Business owners aren’t this dumb as a rule – it’s the groups some of them organize that are. They can take perfectly acceptable points and annoy you into opposing them with their pomp and haughtiness.

  • megadutch

    Typical business response.

    Can’t get something for nothing, guys.

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    I totally agree. They should at the very least put signs up “ride at the risk of you and your passengers being crushed in an earthquake”Then suggest the alternative of the current surface street, Alaskan Way.That, more than anything, would demonstrate the viability of the surface street option.

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    What kind of business owner exactly supports:

    1) Wasting 3 billion in taxes

    2) Tearing up the entire city for years and destroying retail, parking, etc

    3) Incapacitating traffic on two major thoroughfares for little or no improvement

  • tpn

    There is a breaking point in the relationship between rasing the price of something and demand for it decreasing to the degree that it impacts total revenue. I’m not convinced that the increase in parking fees is going to reach that threashold and make or break downtown business by cutting into the amount of people showing up.

    There are larger macroeconomic factors at work, and the business community is being disingenuous by not recongnizing that; they want to blame the homeless, or the riff raff, or liberal spenders, or some other such nonesense, when the answer lies in the end results of their own ideological and economic pursuits.

    If someone isn’t going shopping it is not because it cost an extra 2 bucks to park on the street. Might be because they are part of the 16% real unemployed, or part of the vast majority of people that are choosing to pay off debt rather then incur it through discretionary spending. Doesn’t make for exciting press release copy, though.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    I an not overly concerned about the tax raising proposals.
    I will have to look into what a given tax will be paying for, and if that thing is a need or a want.
    The cuts to direct human services at all levels if government disturbing.

  • Stacy

    The Tunnel is not a public safety project.

  • Chris

    Forget the exact price increase of the meter rates – they should be set at market rates and not by government anyway, if at all possible. The City should look to the San Francisco test program re: variable rate meters. The price should fluctuate based on the time of day and day of the week. Left to setting a single rate, the price will almost always be inefficient, either above or below what the market rate is.

  • tpn

    Oh god, not efficient markets? That’s so 2007.

  • Anonymous

    I think you might have a bit of a mistaken impression of what business leaders have authority over. Unless you want the Chamber to lead a sit in campaign on it or something.

  • gloomy gus

    The kind you don’t know, I guess?

  • takes two

    Travis Rosenthal, remind me again why I should subsidize your lower than market rate parking with my property taxes? Perhaps we should outsource on-street parking. I think the going rate is about $7 per hour in private lots.

    Last time I went to Tango I walked. Key words there are ‘last time’.

  • gloomy gus

    Only if it actually started falling on me during the earthquake would I ever say that (and even then I might not be saying it long).

  • Jonah

    Billions of dollars for an underground freeway while human services get slashed; those are some awesome priorities right there, the “business community’s” parents would be very proud.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    What is the market rate for on street parking?

    Meh, 3.50, not a a big deal, what exactly that is for I still need to look at.

  • Eureka330

    Aren’t there laws mandating that the city’s utility rates are only supposed to fund the capital and operational costs of providing said utilities?

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    Hint: You won’t normally find them on SLOG or Publicola.

  • Jakers

    The problem is at some point we can’t just keep raising taxes. We increase taxes when things are good, and then need to increase them more when things get bad. When will the cycle stop? I don’t mind being taxed for most of our current services, but I see a never ending cycle of increased taxes.

  • Jakers

    The problem is at some point we can’t just keep raising taxes. We increase taxes when things are good, and then need to increase them more when things get bad. When will the cycle stop? I don’t mind being taxed for most of our current services, but I see a never ending cycle of increased taxes.

  • Jakers

    Market rate doesn’t need to get down to an instantaneous market rate. Stores rarely use time-of day pricing, and they are much more involved in the market than the city is for on-street parking. Two rates would do, daytime and evening/night/weekend. Keep it simple and lower cost to operate, no expense equipment to maintain.

  • Jakers

    Market rate doesn’t need to get down to an instantaneous market rate. Stores rarely use time-of day pricing, and they are much more involved in the market than the city is for on-street parking. Two rates would do, daytime and evening/night/weekend. Keep it simple and lower cost to operate, no expense equipment to maintain.

  • gloomy gus

    Neither of us sad bastards, then.

  • Jakers

    Why should he subsidize your life with a B&O tax, property tax, etc. etc.? Why should I subsidize your walking? This line of argument and questioning goes no where. We’d only truly know the market rate for on-street parking if it is ran like a private business with the cost of construction, risks and drive for profit that the private lots have. Not tickets for over staying, just tow them away.

  • Jakers
  • Tunnelfacts.com

    You can get the public to pay for it though… Socialize costs & privatize profits!

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    That is where I am at, too.

  • You

    Right. Those two years of budgeted alt transpo funding comes out to being 0.3% of the (rosily projected) cost of the tunnel. Damn you, McGinn, don’t spend that kind of money on sidewalks to schools!!!

  • kurisu

    “Stores rarely use time-of day pricing?” Ever heard of happy hour?

  • Barleywine

    You two are giving Eyman wood. And it’s not even morning.

  • Johns

    …a miniscule down payment at best on the pedestrian and bicycle master plans, not to mention the transit master plan.

  • Mikeg

    yep, you’ll find them repeating their rush talking points ad nauseum on soundpolishedshit

  • Mikeg

    restaurants pay a b&o tax? the 1100 pike building appears to be tax exempt…
    http://info.kingcounty.gov/Assessor/eRealProperty/Dashboard.aspx?ParcelNbr=0660001875

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    Damn you gas tax and state constitution.

  • eric

    All businesses pay B&O tax on gross revenue, regardless of whether they make a profit or not. Businesses with retail sales also pay sales tax on top of B&O tax, plus L&I tax, plus payroll taxes. And if the business is owned by an individual or couple, and not a corporation, then the owners pay both sides of the payroll tax (15%) on income they receive as well as income tax.

  • eric

    All businesses pay B&O tax on gross revenue, regardless of whether they make a profit or not. Businesses with retail sales also pay sales tax on top of B&O tax, plus L&I tax, plus payroll taxes. And if the business is owned by an individual or couple, and not a corporation, then the owners pay both sides of the payroll tax (15%) on income they receive as well as income tax.