Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Mayor’s Budget Slashes Jobs, Closes Pools and Community Centers, Raises Commercial Parking Tax and Meter Parking Rates

I’m at the packed, stuffy, un-airconditioned Rainier Beach Community Center, where Mayor Mike McGinn, frequently wiping sweat from his forehead with a handkerchief, is delivering his bummer of a budget speech.

“This proposed budget contains a balanced set of changes that does not rely on any general tax increases,” McGinn said. “Rather, the budget is balanced first and foremost on internal savings and efficiencies … a modest set of rate increases … and difficult reductions.”

Here’s a high-level view of the mayor’s budget proposal:

In addition to eliminating 294 positions (214 of those currently filled), McGinn’s four-year budget would:

• Forgo hiring 62 additional police officers to implement the city’s neighborhood policing plan; previously, McGinn had only proposed not hiring 21 of those officers next year;

• Require all discretionary (non-union) employees to forgo cost-of-living pay increases next year and require union employees to agree to a 0 percent “floor” for pay increases;

• Reduce funding for the police department 1.2 percent and the fire department 1.5 percent;

• Reduce funding for human services 5 percent, slashing funding for programs that provide support to neighborhood crime prevention councils and eliminating funding for the Indoor Air Quality program and a drop-in day center for seniors;

• Close seven wading pools permanently and another 10 partially;

• Close down the Rainier Beach Community Center (another community center will be completed in two years) and reducing hours and access at six community centers;

• Reduce staff at boating centers at Green Lake and Mount Baker;

• Reduce funding for public programs at environmental learning centers, which include nature walks and bird programs;

• Cut 8.5 percent from the library system, reducing services at eight of the system’s smallest branches, cutting the budget for collections, raising fines, and closing the entire system for one week each summer; and

• Close down six neighborhood service centers.

McGinn’s budget would also raise some existing fees and create some new ones.

• The hourly parking rate downtown would go up $1.50; in other parts of the city, it would increase by 50 cents.

• Parking would no longer be free on Sundays.

• The city would go after parking-fine scofflaws more aggressively to collect some of the $15 million in parking fines that is now outstanding;

• The fee for cat licenses would go up from from $15 to $20 for neutered cats and from $20 to $30 for non-neutered cats.

• The city would begin charging $50 for dual King County/Seattle taxi licenses;

• Library fines would go up and children under 13 would be subject to collections for unpaid fines;

• The police department would increase the fee for false alarms, which currently make up 97 percent of all alarms requiring a police response;

• Fire permits would go up 10 to  15 percent;

• Municipal court fees would increase substantially;

• and various fees to use parks department services like pools, gymnasiums, and picnic space, would also go up.

That’s the general fund. Other departments that aren’t funded by the general fund will take even more substantial hits.

• The Seattle Department of Transportation would lose $3.3 million in non-general fund money, on top of $5.8 million from the general fund. Those cuts mean longer pothole response times; increases to the fees for residential parking zone permits and on-street parking; a five-percent increase in the commercial parking tax (on top of the 2.5 percent increase proposed by the council to pay for early work on the seawall); and a $20 vehicle license fee.

• The city’s department of Planning and Development will lose 42 positions (in addition to 11 general-funded positions), in addition to the 155 positions DPD has lost since 2007.

• Seattle City Light rates will go p 4.2 percent next year and 4.2 percent in 2012.

• In addition to eliminating 37 positions, Seattle Public Utilities’ would increase wastewater rates 7.5 percent next year; drainage rates 12.8 percent; and water rates 3.5 percent.




  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    I hate to think of all those kids in Soberg not getting libraries and pools.

    Too bad Chris Gregoire can’t divert that 3 Billion dollar tunnel earmark to very needed city services.

  • Guest

    Your headline is misleading regarding pools. The wading pools will have the same service levels as they did in 2010. Rainier Beach is being closed for construction and will be the best pool in the city when it re-opens. None of the year-round indoor pools are being closed, nor are the two outdoor pools.

  • tpn

    In Europe they call this “austerity”, a cause championed by the right wing. Hard to see this through the green-coloured glasses, I suppose.

  • gloomy gus

    tpn, national leaders sometimes choose the political challenges of “austerity” over the political challenges of indebtedness, but we must remember: our city doesn’t have the option of indebtedness. It’s not a partisan thing here.

  • Austerity is not fun

    Will anyone be left at DPD? Seriously, how many employees will remain after these cuts?

  • Dorothy

    Will you be providing the same coverage of the Executive’s speech? Some of us care about that, too

  • Still here at DPD (for now)

    Seriously sad days here at DPD. We had something like 500 employees department wide a few years ago and are now at something like 300? The General Fund is a very small bit of DPD budget but pays for the important functions like City Planning & Housing and Zoning Inspections. Those areas have been cut by at least 1/3 over the last couple years. I am still sad we could not take 26 furlough days department wide in 2011 and save more jobs.

    All in all I would say that although the message was not going to be goos anyway you slice it, I think he did a good job articulating the decisions that needed to be made and why.

    I am pretty favorable to all of the increases in fees and taxes (except maybe bill collection for 13 year olds with library fines). The meter increases, parking fees on sunday, increase in parking taxes and rate hikes for utilities are all things I can live with.

  • Jakers

    We do have the option of debt, that is how we built the stuff we need to close cause we can’t pay for its operation. We spent a bunch of money to build luxurious libraries and pools that we can now barely afford to operate. If we weren’t using tax money to pay off these debts, we might be able to use it to maintain key services.

    http://www.seattle.gov/financedepartment/03-04budget/DebtService.pdf

  • Jakers

    BTW, I understand that you can’t use to debt for operations.

  • tpn

    Huh. Then I guess Seattle’s municipal bond market is just fiction.

  • tpn

    Is there any statistical graphs available that chart permitting at DPD ? Permits have been very thin lately, mostly administratiove rule changes and sidewalk cafe applications. It’s not like the good old days– use variances, subdivisions, and proposals for land use, by the dozens every week.

  • Guest

    goodbye race and social justice

  • JK

    Frankly, some of these fees seem logical. Why should kids under 13 be exempt from library fines? Their parents are ultimately the ones responsible anyway.

    I’d be willing to pay more for the pool, libraries, etc….we have been demanding far too much from government without realizing the true cost of these services. It’s pay-as-you-go from now on.

    And no, I’m not a Tea Partier!

  • Tim

    Thanks for the laugh.

  • Anonymous

    Is there some reason I did not see a bicycle tax, now that the city can go after 13 ear old delinquent library loaners?

    At $30 per bike the city could be in clover – well, SDOT!

  • Anonymous

    “luxurious”? Operations costs would have been hit just as hard in this recession without the Libraries for All renovations and expansions; perhaps it would be even worse considering the renovations led to better energy efficiency.

  • Still here at DPD (for now)

    There is a difference between fines (which I believe they already get fined) for late books and sending a late or unpaid fine to a collection agency. I would just hate to see a 13 year old start out their credit history with a collection on their record. That could impact their ability to get student loans and go to college.

  • gloomy gus

    I hoped you’d get around to it…!

  • Anonymous

    Then they (or their parents) should pay the fines. I imagine you have to be fairly delinquent before the collection agency is brought on board.

  • Anonymous

    Do explain…

  • Anonymous

    Actually, it’s not just the right wing that supports austerity measures. In Greece, it is the Socialist government that is in power and is pushing austerity measures. In Germany, generally a left of center country, there is broad rejection of the high deficit spending on stimulus in countries like the US, and support for austerity. It’s called reality, and learning to live within your means.

    The liberal democrats in Britain are also supporting austerity programs. Unlike here, where the Republicans endlessly proclaim their concern about debt and deficits but “Pledge to America” to add $4 trillion in new debt to pay for extending the Bush tax cuts while making no substantial cuts to the military, social security, or medicare.

  • Anonymous

    $30 bike tabs in Seattle, eh? What do car owners pay to the city per car?

  • gloomy gus
  • Anonymous

    This is interesting. It seems to show that the German government prefers to stimulate the economy by spending money directly rather than on tax cuts. If the investments are wise, such as on important infrastructure, or in hiring people to work instead of be on the dole, I would agree that this is preferable to tax cuts for the rich.

  • 1234

    To clarify: the library will send you to collections really quickly. Like 2 months. But it shouldn’t go on credit report if it’s less than $50. (I get that idea from one of my parking tickets in collections)

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr Baker

    Too bad McGinn is diverting 13 million dollars to Walk/Bike/Ride, something the mayor controls and is proposing.

  • Anonymous

    “What do car owners pay to the city per car?”

    An interesting question. Typically, for downtown parking, a car owner will pay the city on average about $7.00 a day, depending on location and duration, unless it is in an overtime slot and he gets to pay a fine of, maybe, $50 or so. I always appeal mine and get them cut on the rare days it happens.

    Then, there is the annual street-use permit fee I have to pay to park my car on city owned right-of-way. That is $141.00 a year.

    As for car licensing fees, if that is what you are driving at, I still register my cars in Clark County so Seattle gets zip.

    Of course, none of this has anything to do with the budget and ways to enhance the revenue stream, something you don’t seem to worry about.

  • Anonymous

    Well, I guess your proposal would bring in lots of revenue for the City, unless everyone follows your advice and registers their bikes in Clark County!So, you expect those who own a 20 pound bike to pay $30 a year but you–the owner of a 2500-6000+ pound vehicle spewing carbon, unburned hydrocarbons, and leaking oil–pay nothing to the City in licensing fees…?

  • tpn

    It’s common in the US to say that “socialism” is a left wing monolith. In the rest of the world, it isn’t. “Socialist” as well as “Labor” parties prusue right wing fiscal policies all the time. Note in Greece that the unions and the left are in opposition to the socialist government, and that same government is closer fiscally to a guy like Sarkozy or even (R.I.P) Tony Blair. It isn’t about reality, but is about obfuscation of actual policy under meaningless political terms like “liberal” and “socliast”. US liberals are consider right of center by any meangful standard. Any economist, armchair or educated, knows that there is a big difference beyween “living within one’s means” on a personal level and in institutional one. Applying the standard accross the board would mean that no corporation would take any risk e.g. capital investment, and no government would build a single mile a road, track, bike path, or anthing else. In this narrow world view, everyone just buys gold and waits for the apocolapse.

  • Anonymous

    Hey, don’t tell me about obfuscating with political terms; you’re the one who said that austerity measures are “championed by the right wing.”I will agree that US elected representatives who are labeled “liberals” are right of those labeled liberal in most Western democracies, but not “by any standard.” If race or ethnic-based policies intended to remedy disparities are a liberal ideal, then US politicians are much more left-wing than French or many other European politicians. Freedom of speech and government separation from the establishment of a state religion are also ideals generally associated with liberals, and the US protects these ideals more vigorously than virtually any other country.Finally, with regard to fiscal policy, I would distinguish between borrowing to invest and borrowing to pull consumption from the future to the present. The former is responsible for both individuals and governments; the latter is often irresponsible. Government borrowing to build key infrastructure, education, etc. may increase future GDP enough to justify the borrowing. Borrowing to give tax cuts to rich people, to invade countries that don’t present a threat to your country, or other spending that will not bring future returns is not “living within in one’s means.”At the personal level, think about the difference between borrowing to get an engineering degree versus borrowing to buy flat screen TVs and a new pickup truck.

  • tpn

    Right. Librarians = flat screen TVs. Got it.

  • Anonymous

    Huh? No, I don’t think you understood my point. Going into debt to buy unnecessary consumer goods is an example of unsound personal fiscal policy. The equivalent for government would be tax cuts for the rich, wars of choice, etc.

    I’m not sure why you bring up librarians, because as far as I’m aware the city is not going into debt to pay for their salaries. And for the record, I think Seattle Public Libraries are great, the staff are great from my experience, and these are tax dollars well spent, in my opinion.

  • Anonymous

    No one is forcing you to park your car downtown. I suggest a bus if you find parking fees burdensome.

  • Library User

    I think it is unfortunate that the cuts to the library system are all focused on public service staff, rather than middle managers. Yes, several managerial positions are being eliminated as has been reported, but these were all branch managers who worked as librarians with the public in the branches, rather than middle or upper level managers working in the Central library. These upper management positions are actually growing in number, while services in the branches are being strongly curtailed, with eight branches not even having a single librarian in them.

  • Pat

    Lookdkkkkdkdkk