Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Parsing Sound Transit’s Latest Rider Stats

Sound Transit recently released station-by-station and time-of-day ridership numbers from earlier this year. Seattle Transit Blog finds some interesting trends.

First, more than half of all (one-way) trips begin or end between Rainier Beach and Beacon Hill, which “illustrates some of the limitations of simply bypassing that segment to go straight to the airport.” It also suggests that cutting the Graham, Boeing Access Road, and S. 144th St. stations may have been short-sighted, if most riders are indeed coming to or from the South End.

About 11 percent of all trips happen entirely within the downtown transit tunnel, which surprises me, since riding the bus downtown is free (light rail costs $1.75 per trip within downtown). Are more people loading monthly passes on their ORCA cards or continuing their trips on buses elsewhere? Sound Transit’s data doesn’t say.

Ridership is much higher during the southbound afternoon peak period (3 to 6 pm) than the northbound morning peak period (6 to 9 am), while midday northbound ridership is stronger than midday southbound ridership. That, STB says, indicates that “Link’s AM peak is too early.”

More interesting stuff: A lot more people ride north out of the airport than south into it. That could be a reflection of perceived reliability (you’re less likely to be rushing when leaving the airport than when arriving), the fact that the train stops right at the airport, making it appear more convenient; or something else.

Overall, ridership on Saturdays (total number of boardings and alightings) is only about 24 percent lower than on weekdays, suggesting that cutting trains in half on the weekends (to save around $400,000 a year) might result in cramped single-car trains. (Sunday ridership was down about 57 percent).


  • Random Engineer

    It’d be interesting to know what portion of the tunnel only traffic is actually paying for the ride. Enforcement is still pretty occasional.

  • Barleywine

    “illustrates some of the limitations of simply bypassing that segment to go straight to the airport.”

    What were they talking about here?

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    Bottom line…transit is mostly something people are forced to use, by virtue of being one of the unlucky ones whose employers force them to leave their cars behind. Most people want to drive to work, and have free parking.

  • Anonymous

    There’s a critique of Central Link that it should have run straight to the airport via Georgetown to reduce travel time. That would have been disastrous for ridership and jeopardized federal funding.

  • anonymous

    First off, the title of the article should refer to LINK rider stats not Sound Transit rider stats which includes buses and Sounder Train.

    Secondly I assume that this only accounts for people who actually pay for their trip, since this is probably where they are getting their data

    third, i am assuming that those riding in the tunnel have monthly passes so they aren’t having the $1.75 deducted from their ORCA card, they have an unlimited monthly pass or annual pass.

    Lastly, people do not ride transit out of need alone, the fact that 11% of trips are within the downtown core prove this. It is more convenient to ride rail underneath the city to get from point A to point B than it is to drive.

  • Anonymous

    There are automated counters.

    We”ve paid for Link in the tunnel because we could bring a stroller on board without folding it up and carrying it up the stairs of a bus. We were on our way to dim sum and while it’s not impossible to walk the train seemed worth the $1.75 (via ORCA).

  • Anonymous

    No surprise that riding NB from the airport is stronger than SB. Enough riders are apparently aware of the ~29% chance of a breakdown of some kind (car/train, person/train, mechanical), primarily in the surface segments of the route, which was predictable (it being high due to being on the surface). What would be interesting comparisons to me, in addition to the fare evasion issue, would be the breakout of breakdowns by type and, when it’s open, a comparison of reliability of Central Link to tunnel-only U Link. I agree that a lot of folks downtown use the tunnel to go from one end of downtown to the other, as it’s way faster. “Whatever comes first,” which now includes Link, is what applies.

  • Anonymous

    No one is forced to take transit by their employers. That’s absurd. Yes, some employers may be more willing to subsidize bus passes than pay a lot more for “free” parking, but no one is taking transit at the point of a gun. Not to mention the fact that this data (ie., more than half of trips between Rainier Beach and Beacon Hill, 11% within downtown tunnel, share that are airport trips) indicates that most light rail trips are non-work trips.

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    City, Regional and State policies including tax breaks and earmarks, give priority to inner city development.

    This feeds the need for “transit”.

    It’s a debilitating cycle of addition.

  • meh

    nah, people can’t ride it if it’s not built, so going directly to the airport would have boosted ridership of those going to the airport also would have boosted future ridership to federal way etc. St chose Rainier Valley, one of the least densely populated areas of Seattle, because they were weakest politically and a surface alignment could be imposed on them allowing St to build its first segment and get it in the ground more easily. A line that hit the boeing field then the airport makes much more sense as a regional train line linking tacoma everett and seattle which is what link was supposed to be. many northenders don’t ride it to the airport because it’s not fast enough. btw the “ridership” in Se Seattle is “former bus riders” so while the federal formula is played this way, in reality it’s not that much of an increase in transit share.

  • right thinking

    yes, the addiction of people to central cities with rail transit is shown all over the world by the utter failure of cities like london rome moscow paris delhi rio madrid mexico city, all wastelands being depopulated as people all over the world move out in the exodus to podunsky, Russia, peauxdunque France Podunk UK etc. etc. etc. the death of cities all over the world is so clear, why do we have to even debate it?

  • Barleywine

    So I guess you’re not a believer in density? TOD?

    It would have been foolish NOT to but it right where it is, because the whole point of the train is to get things built around it. And the SE sorely needed the investment.

    You may be right about the former bus riders, though. Some of them, but not the ones that would make you uncomfortable. The #7 still rules.

    But not forever. You might need to think ahead a bit.

  • TMN

    “Most people want to drive to work, and have free parking.”

    That’s not actually true. I much prefer a good transit system, and so do a lot of people I know.

  • TMN

    You’re a goddamn idiot. Giving tax breaks to people who act to lessen the share of limited city resources that they use (in this case road capacity) is not a conspiracy to pretend that we need mass transit. We actually do NEED mass transit.

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    I think most people don’t know it’s not a RideFree option.

    I made a point of checking to be sure.

    And there are signs in the station stating that it costs money to go between tunnel stops.

    Still, it seems obvious to me that these riders are not paying the $1.75.

  • meh meh

    Nice ad hominems — if somone critiques anything ST does the reaction is to avoid the issue then call them names and the more passive the name calling the better. In your case, leaping to conclusion that am anti transit or anti SE Seattle bus riders (we know what kind of code you’re using there. wow. Very harsh. Slanderous in fact!) or anti TOD when in fact the opposite is true. Am so pro trains transit TOD and service for the transit dependent it’s sad seeing bad decisions supported for knee jerk reasons. Or none at all, really. The points made were that the choice of building first in SE Seattle was politically based not transit based; putting the first segment where there are more people (any quadrant byut SE Seatle) would in fact be better for TOd and transit; and that as it is to be a regional line connecting tacoma to everett meandering thru rainier valley isn’t so great an alignment. Seriously, you get on a train in Tacoma to go to Everett, you really want to stop all over Se Seattle and meander a mile east and back and have an additional billion dollar tunnel?
    You point to TOD but logic fail, tracks on the surface harm TOD as well as walkability. Can’t cross a street easily to go to the corner store if huge train tracks have signs saying “do not cross here, walk north or south.”

    Imagine Broadway on Capitol Hill with a surface regional rail from tacoma to everett on it….and signs saying “don’t cross here, walk three blocks north” to cross….not very good for TOD.

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    Amazingly, people normally pay for things they “need”…food, clothing and shelter…and cars. But mass transit, which you say they “need” is something for which the Sheriffs of Urbingham have to extract taxes from the populace.

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    Are you being slyly subversive? “Federal funding” boosted by phony ridership superceding all the supposed “need for mass transit”?

    Once again the whole mess becomes a recursive self-fulfilling disaster.

    Forced density “requiring” mass transit.

    Mass transit to avoid the density.

    Around and around it goes, with payoffs, ripoffs and scams draining the taxpayer on each turn of the screw.

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    I challenge the idea that it is faster. I’ve taken surface buses downtown and I think they are pretty much almost as fast (considering that the entire journey north to south in downtown is at most…what…3 miles?)

    Also, many of the avenues have less traffic on them these days than some of the more used neighborhood streets like 45th the U. District.

    I think people take the tunnel because there are a lot of signs that say “take the tunnel” so conceptually its easier. However, having waited in the tunnel for up to 10 minutes or more sometimes just to go one stop, and finding I can have less wait time on a surface stop…just questioning the accepted wisdom here.

  • Barleywine

    “Slanderous in fact!”

    Meh Meh vs. Barleywine:
    Case dismissed. Neither party showed.

    “The points made were that the choice of building first in SE Seattle was politically based not transit based; putting the first segment where there are more people (any quadrant byut SE Seatle) would in fact be better for TOd and transit”

    I disagree, kind of.
    Running a train from downtown to the airport, bypassing the SE, would be lovely for those people that want a cheap taxi alternative; but putting it through the SE was the biggest blessing this place has seen in many years. We might be week politically, but in this case it worked to our advantage. Maybe not yours, but who cares. Meh.

    “Seriously, you get on a train in Tacoma to go to Everett, you really want to stop all over Se Seattle and meander a mile east and back and have an additional billion dollar tunnel?”

    If the world began in Tacoma and ended in Everett, with nothing or nobody in between, I could see your point. But we’re here.
    Enjoy the ride.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/6SAQ6R2ZBGQQNNBXVJZG66K6KY Mickymse

    That doesn’t make any sense… I’m required to pay taxes to support roads, too, whether or not I actually use them.

  • Anonymous

    You could be right. Mine is not a scientific study, rather anecdotal from taking the bus from the tunnel from Pioneer Square to Convention Place. Since light rail was added to the tunnel and many buses moved to the surface, and with the concern about bus/rail accidents in the tunnel, vehicles are probably spaced further apart now than before, the latter being most of my observations/gut feel. The street patterns have also changed, e.g. Third Avenue, and stops have been consolidated and spaced further apart. Fourth Avenue routes are quite fast, now that you’ve mentioned it.